Man who baited birds of prey with rat poison in landowner feud sentenced
Clive Burgoyne, 38, of Forfar in Angus, left four pheasant carcasses gutted and filled with rat poison as part of an ongoing feud with a neighbouring landowner over shooting rights.
He hoped his actions would cause reputational damage to the Guynd estate near Arbroath, Angus, according to prosecutors.
At Forfar Sheriff Court on April 22, Burgoyne pleaded guilty to a breach of wildlife legislation between January and February 2023.
The court heard he left four pheasant carcasses coated in rodenticide which would cause haemorrhaging, in a bid to harm birds of prey.
On Thursday at the same court, he was given a community payback order and 135 hours of unpaid work to be completed within 12 months, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) said.
Prosecutors said he put birds of prey 'at risk of injury or death' using a known rat poison which can kill a bird of prey in a single feed.
Prosecutors told how witnesses saw Burgoyne in the front passenger seat of a car travelling towards, and later away, from the Guynd estate on the morning of February 3, 2023.
A short time later, an estate worker discovered a dead pheasant on a footpath within the estate, COPFS said.
The breast had been removed and the bird was covered in a quantity of grain and seed which was then coated in a bright blue liquid.
A further search of the area revealed three more dead pheasants nearby which had been similarly cut open and treated, according to COPFS.
Analysis carried out by officials at the Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture confirmed the blue grain was a known rodenticide formulation.
They believed the appearance of the pheasant carcasses suggested they had been prepared and set out with the intention of causing harm to birds.
After being arrested, a sample of Burgoyne's DNA was found on all four of the dead birds.
Iain Batho, who leads on wildlife and environmental crime at COPFS, said: 'It is highly important to preserve Scotland's natural heritage, including the wildlife that forms part of it.
'As such, wild birds are given strict protection by our law.
'Clive Burgoyne's reckless actions put various wildlife, particularly birds of prey, at risk of injury and death.
'COPFS takes offences under the Wildlife and Countryside Act seriously and will prosecute individuals where there is sufficient evidence of a crime and where it is in the public interest to do so.
'The result in this case is a testament to the collaborative working between COPFS, Police Scotland, and Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture, who in this case were able to provide vital forensic evidence.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
12 hours ago
- BBC News
Barmouth gull kicked to death after stealing fish from plate
A herring gull has died after it was kicked after stealing fish from someone's plate, the RSPCA has said. The incident happened at Marine Parade in Barmouth, Gwynedd, outside a fish and chip shop on 4 August at about 13:00 BST. Julia Dalgleish, RSPCA animal rescue officer, said: "Gulls and their nests are protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, it is illegal to do anything that causes suffering to gulls."The organisation is looking for first-hand witnesses to get in touch. Ms Dalgleish said: "Sadly, many people have an unfavourable opinion of gulls - but these are intelligent animals who form strong social bonds with."The RSPCA asked for help identifying someone of interest to the case, "he is about 5ft 10in (1.78m), has curly hair, is of medium build and was wearing a black jacket". Why do gulls steal food? Gull populations are in decline, with several species on the UK red list of conservation gulls are coming to live closer to people, adding human leftovers to their natural menu of fish, crabs, starfish and birds may be flocking to urban areas to find food to feed their chicks during the breeding season, switching back to a natural diet once their youngsters have gulls may be relying on human leftovers for much of the year as the natural food supply are in trouble in their natural spaces, and some species, such as herring gulls and lesser black-backed gulls, are seeking refuge in coastal is very little data on the number of urban gulls - but natural populations are regularly monitored, showing big declines.
South Wales Guardian
2 days ago
- South Wales Guardian
Abusive PE teacher who attacked boys over 27 years exploited trust, court finds
John Young, 91, was found to have targeted pupils while employed as a PE teacher at the independent Edinburgh Academy between 1966 and 1993 after an Examination of Facts hearing at Edinburgh Sheriff Court found 26 charges to be established, out of 44 charges alleged by prosecutors. Young was deemed medically unfit to face criminal trial or appear in court but evidence was heard from 24 former pupils, and a further three witnesses, with allegations spanning almost 30 years. Some of the victims told the court that Young would use violence as punishment, including hitting them with a cricket bat, megaphone or wooden wedge, or punching them, leading to issues with lifelong trauma for some. Prosecutors hailed the fact-finding exercise as a 'matter of public record' and said that Young 'had a duty of care to nurture and support these children but instead intentionally exploited his power to violate and humiliate them'. A sheriff ruled on 10 charges of assault, three charges of indecent assault, eight charges of lewd and libidinous behaviour, four charges of breaching the peace, and one charge of cruel and unnatural treatment, according to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS). However two victims told of their sorrow that it was not a full conviction, and their belief that 'hundreds' of pupils may have been attacked. A letter from July 1992 was published, where the parent of one boy complained about Young instructing pupils to remove their underwear before putting on their gym shorts, and complaining that this was not conventional practice at four other named schools. Prosecutor Fiona Kirkby said: 'John Young systematically abused young boys, over a period of 27 years, while holding a significant position of trust as their teacher at the Edinburgh Academy. 'He had a duty of care to nurture and support these children but instead intentionally exploited his power to violate and humiliate them. 'This Examination of Facts is a public airing of the facts and an acknowledgement that what happened to these children was criminal. 'It should never have occurred. It is now a matter of public record that Young committed offences including lewd and libidinous behaviour, indecent assault and cruel and unnatural treatment. 'The court's finding today also sends a clear message to abusers: no matter who you are, when the abuse happened or how long after the event it is reported, there will be a robust response from prosecutors.' Procurator Fiscal Fiona Kirkby added: 'Sexual abuse and the use of force upon children is a crime. 'To any victim of such offending, we urge you to report it when you feel ready and able to do so. Be assured you will be listened to and supported. We remain committed to investigating and pursuing those culpable to seek conclusions.' The first survivor, who was subjected to a barrage of blows during a classroom attack, said: 'Young was at the Academy for decades and taught PE to nearly every boy so it would not surprise me if hundreds more were affected. 'I think the school had lots of opportunities to prevent his abuse. I believe my complaint was taken to Young so the school could silence my complaint rather than address it. 'It's a shame that I and other survivors are denied the chance to get a conviction – I hope police and fiscals get the chance to act quickly against abusers in the future, so the chance for others to secure justice is not lost.' The second survivor added: 'For decades survivors like myself have been accused of lying, exaggerating or misremembering but now we have a black and white decision that finally acknowledges us. 'Although it's not a full conviction I think it's still better than what the school ever did. 'I find it unfair that I had to endure brutal cross-examinations while the person involved gets to sit at home. Ultimately, we secured the best possible outcome.'
Rhyl Journal
2 days ago
- Rhyl Journal
Abusive PE teacher who attacked boys over 27 years exploited trust, court finds
John Young, 91, was found to have targeted pupils while employed as a PE teacher at the independent Edinburgh Academy between 1966 and 1993 after an Examination of Facts hearing at Edinburgh Sheriff Court found 26 charges to be established, out of 44 charges alleged by prosecutors. Young was deemed medically unfit to face criminal trial or appear in court but evidence was heard from 24 former pupils, and a further three witnesses, with allegations spanning almost 30 years. Some of the victims told the court that Young would use violence as punishment, including hitting them with a cricket bat, megaphone or wooden wedge, or punching them, leading to issues with lifelong trauma for some. Prosecutors hailed the fact-finding exercise as a 'matter of public record' and said that Young 'had a duty of care to nurture and support these children but instead intentionally exploited his power to violate and humiliate them'. A sheriff ruled on 10 charges of assault, three charges of indecent assault, eight charges of lewd and libidinous behaviour, four charges of breaching the peace, and one charge of cruel and unnatural treatment, according to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS). However two victims told of their sorrow that it was not a full conviction, and their belief that 'hundreds' of pupils may have been attacked. A letter from July 1992 was published, where the parent of one boy complained about Young instructing pupils to remove their underwear before putting on their gym shorts, and complaining that this was not conventional practice at four other named schools. Prosecutor Fiona Kirkby said: 'John Young systematically abused young boys, over a period of 27 years, while holding a significant position of trust as their teacher at the Edinburgh Academy. 'He had a duty of care to nurture and support these children but instead intentionally exploited his power to violate and humiliate them. 'This Examination of Facts is a public airing of the facts and an acknowledgement that what happened to these children was criminal. 'It should never have occurred. It is now a matter of public record that Young committed offences including lewd and libidinous behaviour, indecent assault and cruel and unnatural treatment. 'The court's finding today also sends a clear message to abusers: no matter who you are, when the abuse happened or how long after the event it is reported, there will be a robust response from prosecutors.' Procurator Fiscal Fiona Kirkby added: 'Sexual abuse and the use of force upon children is a crime. 'To any victim of such offending, we urge you to report it when you feel ready and able to do so. Be assured you will be listened to and supported. We remain committed to investigating and pursuing those culpable to seek conclusions.' The first survivor, who was subjected to a barrage of blows during a classroom attack, said: 'Young was at the Academy for decades and taught PE to nearly every boy so it would not surprise me if hundreds more were affected. 'I think the school had lots of opportunities to prevent his abuse. I believe my complaint was taken to Young so the school could silence my complaint rather than address it. 'It's a shame that I and other survivors are denied the chance to get a conviction – I hope police and fiscals get the chance to act quickly against abusers in the future, so the chance for others to secure justice is not lost.' The second survivor added: 'For decades survivors like myself have been accused of lying, exaggerating or misremembering but now we have a black and white decision that finally acknowledges us. 'Although it's not a full conviction I think it's still better than what the school ever did. 'I find it unfair that I had to endure brutal cross-examinations while the person involved gets to sit at home. Ultimately, we secured the best possible outcome.'
