
Bryce Dallas Howard Talks ‘Pets' And Filmmaking: ‘I Always Approached Storytelling Through More Of A Director's Lens'
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - APRIL 11: Bryce Dallas Howard is seen in Midtown on April 11, 2025 in New York ... More City. (Photo by Raymond Hall/GC Images)
'I'm always asking people 'So, do you have any pet?' It's one of the most fun ways to get to know a person, it's through their pets or by being introduced to their pets, because you're like 'I see who you are,'' actor and director Bryce Dallas Howard told me in an interview.
Pets, her new documentary about our relationship to our fur babies, is now streaming on Disney+ and if you are in need of a heartwarming, touching and funny watch, Pets is what you're looking for.
Some things in life can make you cry instantly and watching a compilation of viral videos of parents surprising their kids with a puppy or a cat is one of them. Howard knows it, and that's exactly how she decided to open Pets, which is not your regular, scientifically explained documentary. Pets is the incredibly charming result of kids explaining in front of a camera what their pets mean to them, but it's also stories from all over the world and people sharing their new lives as dog parents or explaining the importance of a raptor's sanctuary.
When talking about the emotional response we can have regarding our pets or even the way we talk to them, Howard said, 'I was always very good about not using the baby voice with my kids, but with my pets, I'm out of control, it's really obnoxious, it comes from a different place in my body.'
I asked Howard how she had pitched Pets in the first place, and particularly how she explained it to the young kids being interviewed. She said, 'Oh gosh I actually have an answer to that and it's gonna make everybody in the world cringe, but I'll tell you. So in general, I love watching things with talking heads, with people who are experts. But for me, as a storyteller, I'm really interested in feelings and in revealing human behavior we can relate to, instead of being like 'Oh that's an interesting fact.''
'Pets' directed by Bryce Dallas Howard
She added: 'I've been directing short documentaries for 15 years maybe, and I've always done this thing like it has to be in full size, and I'm asking them questions about things that may not even be relevant because it's just sharing their humanity. So when I was first pitching Pets, people were like 'Oh and we can learn about the history of pets' and I was like 'Not this one, it's a celebration'. But something I said to the kids when I was trying to explain that I was making a documentary, that word doesn't necessarily trigger anything. So at one point I was like 'I'm going to interview you, you know, like in reality television!' And the producers were like 'No! This is not reality TV!' But it is giving us all contextualization for the medium.'
As a director, Howard has been incredibly busy these past few years, especially with the making of Dads, her 2019 documentary, but also with her official entry into the Star Wars universe. Her love for Star Wars needs no introduction and shines through her work as the director of some of the best episodes of The Mandalorian, Skeleton Crew or The Book of Boba Fett.
When talking about her editing process (Pets is also incredibly funny thanks to some great editing), I asked her if she had the same approach and the same techniques whether she was editing a documentary or a TV episode.
She said, 'It's very interesting because there are stages where it's all very similar, narrative, fiction, documentary, and other stages where it's very different. What I would say is when I'm shooting something whether it's a commercial, a short film, or an episode of Star Wars, there is a goal, a picture in mind that I have. What I always say is 'We want to achieve this or something better.' It can always be something better, but we don't want something less.'
Bryce Dallas Howard on the set of 'The Mandalorian'
She added: 'So there's definitely a mission, that's through pre-production, in production, and then you edit in post- prod, you have to take a moment, relook at all your footage without that main goal in mind, and see what you got. Because you might have gotten something that you didn't know you needed but it's like the secret ingredient. So that phase of narrative filmmaking is very much so like making a documentary, because you know that something is happening, you know that there is a story there, but you're trying to see it, you're trying to experience it, you're not projecting it onto a situation.'
She then explained that in order to make a documentary, she needs to know the elements she wants to include. She said, 'I wanna have someone adopting a new pet, I wanna see someone who understands what it is to experience pet loss, I wanna be interviewing kids, I want there to be viral videos. So I know what the elements are but I don't necessarily know what the final result is going to be. So to essentially have this beginner's mind and think about what is really there, instead of what I wanted. That applies to both documentary and filmmaking narrative to a certain point.'
Growing up and learning from her father, Ron Howard, the actress and director realized that she wanted to surround herself with filmmakers she wanted to learn from. She explained how that really shaped how she views both directing and acting. Howard said, 'I always approached storytelling through more of a director's lens.'
I asked Howard what she had learned about herself as an artist, whether it was in her acting career or by becoming a very talented filmmaker herself.
She said, 'Thank you! That's how I grew up and what I was privy to. I already had that perspective. So when I was acting, I was trying to act almost outside in. And with directing, I've learned so much by being an actor and seeing what works for other actors or what works for me, or what doesn't work for me.'
'Pets' directed by Bryce Dallas Howard
She added: 'What I kind of learned is you want to do no harm when you actually get to direct a scene. You wanna let the actors do their thing. I try to have them do their scenes a few times before I say anything. I want there to be that discovery, space and room for not something I just want to achieve, but for something greater than that. So both have certainly impacted the other.'
Recently, Howard shared her strong desire to direct a Star Wars movie, and gave some hopeful news about the reboot of Flight of the Navigator. When I asked what the triggering factor was that made her want to direct a documentary when she is involved in so many narrative projects, or the other way around, to go back to fiction after a documentary, she said, 'That's such a great question! At any given moment, I have probably 4 or 5 documentaries, that if I was given the budget, I would do them right now. And I have definitely maybe 4 narrative projects, that if I was given the budget, I would do it now.'
She added: 'So it's never really 'Oh it's time to do this!' You're always sort of hustling, like I'm sure for you as a writer, you're pitching multiple story ideas, and see which one does your editor respond to. Then you're like 'Great, that's the one I'll go with right now'. And then something happens in the news, and it's like 'Remember that thing you passed on a couple of months ago, it's relevant right now, we can do it now!' So you're sort of always developing a few things, and then you're waiting for there to be opportunities for others to basically be like 'Oh yeah, we'll pay for that'. So that's kind of how it is.'
Pets is now streaming on Disney+.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
I've Been A Big Hater Of Disney's Live Action Remakes, But After Snow White, I Feel Like There's An Easy Way To Fix It
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. So Disney is taking a break from live-action remakes, and I have to say I'm not too surprised. I'm the kind of girl who grew up watching Disney as if it were the air I needed to breathe. Switching on Disney Channel was like switching on my own personal oxygen tank. I'm pretty sure my parents, at some point, knew all the theme songs by heart of every single show, or all the Disney soundtracks as well, and not willingly. But when these Disney live-action remakes started to happen, I had a feeling that they were either going to go terribly wrong or they would do really well. And…so far it's been a pretty big mixed bag where I'd say about 60% of the time you get something that's not too great. And I've regularly talked about this pretty consistently on this website. However, I actually have something I need to say about this change Disney is making—one that I think a lot of people will agree with. If they were to continue, there's an easy way to fix these Disney live-action movies, so let's get into it. So, before I give you my reasoning, my truth must speak first – I've been a hater of these live-action movies in the past. In fact, I literally just wrote an article about how I'm sick of them, and while I think Lilo and Stitch might be the outlier, most don't entertain me anymore. When the first movies began to release years ago, there was a lot to love, mainly because they were new and exciting. Oh, Disney is releasing its best animated movies, but they're going to be live-action now with pretty stars and beautiful visuals and everything? That sounds exciting! But at the end of the day, most ended up becoming half-baked remakes that tried to be something new when the blueprint is right there. I used to love them. Truly, I did. But over time, they just diminished in quality to the point where we ended up getting Snow White…and while I do believe Rachel Zegler is still the perfect Snow White because she has the voice of an angel, the rest of the movie was just…not that great. However, I've been thinking a lot about this, and I know what to do with these live-action films if Disney were to keep making them. The solution is simple, really. Literally. It's. That. Easy. Just go to the source material. Do you want to know why so many of the original live-action films did so well? They didn't try to reinvent the wheel. They stuck to the material that most everyone and their mother knew because it's Disney. These are the stories that we have grown up with, the tales that our parents told us to fall asleep to, and then took us to the theatre to see. Why would we want to see them changed? Honestly, I'm not even talking entirely about the Disney versions. I'm talking about the actual story that the movies are based on. I feel that with so many of these adaptations, they've been trying to work in different aspects of pop culture and modern-day political stances, and so much more, that it's lost the magic that these tales once had. Are there certain things that need to be changed? Of course. These are older stories, and some things haven't aged well. But most are still fine. The source material is fantastic and well-loved for a reason. Why change it? This is the biggest thing, though—if you're going to recreate the movie, recreate what you know the fans already love. Recreate the scenery, the dresses, and the themes that we all understand because the last thing we want is some new message shoved down our throats that wasn't already there in the first place. Sure, this begs the question of why these live-action films even need to be made, but honestly, I don't find it terribly unethical to remake the movie. I actually think it's pretty par for the course because animation is such a fantastic medium of film that it makes sense people would want to create a live-action version of certain films to test the powers of technology and all that. And if Disney is going to move in that direction, then why not stick with the same story that we all know? If you want to change a few aspects, that's fine, which is precisely what Cinderella did. The 2015 film from Disney isn't an exact adaptation of the original film – it's actually considered another adaptation of the original story. Still, it hits the same story beats as the animated film. There are a few changes that really make the movie stand out, from how Cinderella and the prince first meet to what happens after the ball. These changes add depth and emotion to the story without taking away its key themes, which is how I feel many other Disney live-action remakes have done. Personally, I think Beauty and the Beast and The Little Mermaid are the only other two live-action remakes that have relatively kept the same theme and plot, and maybe that's because they're so beloved. But it feels like the other ones have tried to change too much – or, in The Lion King's case, not that much at all, and instead feed us the most lifeless 'live-action' CGI animals in history. Yeah, that film should have just stayed animated. I think my last major point would be that while it's okay to make slight changes to the story in order to fit more into it, you don't need to try so hard to make additions at all. They should really only be there if the story makes sense to have them there. For example, I actually like 'Evermore' from Beauty and the Beast. I think it adds a lot more depth to Beast's character and adds more humanity to the story overall. But notice how the movie itself is the same kind of story as the film. They didn't try to push new themes down your throat or anything else. It was just Beauty and the Beast with the addition of a new song. That is how it's supposed to be, and what other live-action Disney remakes need to take from this. I don't know, maybe I'm sticking up for Disney a little hard, but I feel like there is a secret pathway to success with these films. I think it really is just as easy as listening to the fans and creating movies that have the stories we all know and love. Every person nowadays is trying to sell something to you, whether it's physical, emotional, or whatever. Too many people have too much access to preaching their ideas over and over, and the last thing we want is to see that in a movie that we all know, something the original never had. If we're going to be watching a film that we all know and love, make the movie that we know and love. If you want to make changes, fine, make a few subtle changes. But if you're going to change the entire storyline, don't call it an adaptation of the movie, because that is where you will lose fans, time and time again. Okay, rant over. I think I need to rewatch some old Disney movies to calm down. It's time for a marathon.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lilo & Stitch Quietly Passed A Box Office Milestone That Previously Went To Sinners
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. We're slightly less than halfway through the 2025 movie schedule, and some wild times have already been had at the box office. A pair of Marvel movies failed to make their usual explosive debut, and instead, one of the biggest movies of the year has been Sinners, an original film not connected to any franchise. The film had previously been the second highest-grossing movie at the domestic box office, but Disney's Lilo & Stitch remake has now taken that honor. At over $267 million at the domestic box office, Sinners had been the number two movie of 2025. Lilo & Stitch now sits at nearly $285 million. It's going to take some doing for Disney's little blue troublemaker to become the highest-grossing movie of the year, however. A Minecraft Movie currently sits atop the box office at $423 million. With numerous major blockbusters set to come out over the next couple of months, it's quite likely that Sinners will continue to slide down the box office chart. Still, wherever it happens to end up, its achievement cannot be overstated. Franchise filmmaking had already been the focus of studios back when more people still went to theaters, and in an era where getting people to do that is becoming increasingly difficult, audiences aren't leaving the house to see anything other than familiar franchises. To be fair, the fact that it took Lilo & Stitch as long as it did to overtake Sinners at the box office is a testament to the film's popularity and staying power. Stitch had an opening weekend that was three times that of Sinners. Sinners, however, had virtually no drop in its box office take between its first two weekends, a nearly unheard of statistic. Lilo & Stitch saw a nearly 60% drop between its first two weekends, which is fairly standard for major tentpole releases. If Lilo & Stitch means anything in the broader box office landscape, it's that despite the overall failure of Snow White, live-action remakes of popular animated films are still popular with fans. Lilo & Stitch is in the upper tier of the box office results for those films, only behind movies that grossed a billion dollars worldwide, like Aladdin, Alice in Wonderland, and The Lion King. Lilo & Stitch seems unlikely to reach quite those heights; it's broken $600 million and the global box office, but with the movie having been released in all countries, save Japan, where it will open this weekend, it has certainly made most of the money it's going to make. The major thing that may stop the momentum of Lilo & Stitch may, ironically, be another family-friendly live-action remake of a popular animated film. How to Train Your Dragon is set to hit theaters next weekend.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
I Don't Mind Lilo And Stitch's Live-Action Changes, But There's One That Really Bothers Me
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Alright, we have to talk about Lilo & Stitch. The new movie specifically. Before I get into this, let's bring up Disney's live action remakes in general. These movies tend to lean towards changes that not everyone agrees with. I wrote an entire article about how live-action adaptations from Disney could succeed if they stick to the source material and then make changes that not only relate to the story but also preserve the themes of the movie. Most of the films have not done that. We either have movies like Snow White, which is excellent for families and children but is certainly not the same story that we all know, or we have films like The Lion King, which is essentially just a carbon copy of the original with no substance and no flavor. Now, we have Lilo & Stitch, a personal favorite of mine – a movie I was actually excited about before it came out. And I have to admit, there are specific changes in there that I didn't mind, but there's one I really can't get behind. So today, we're going to talk about it. The good news? Lilo & Stitch isn't a soulless cash-grab, and with any Disney live-action remake, that's an absolute win. Did it generate a substantial amount of money? You betcha. Lilo & Stitch has remained the box office king for weeks at this point. But the main reason is that the story is essentially the same. Lilo is a lonely and somewhat eccentric kid. She and her sister have lost their parents. Stitch is an alien who crashes on Earth and ends up becoming part of their family, even though he's crazy – the whole nine yards. Is it as good as the original? No, nothing can beat the original, but it still has a heart and it's still fun. At the end of the day, for something like this, that is one aspect I can get behind. There have been so many of these movies that I have watched in the past, and have just hated because they feel so boring, drab, and unentertaining. They'll make me want to turn it off and watch the original. But, Lilo & Stitch succeeds. Stitch is still enjoyable; the movie has funny moments. All in all, I think it's a good addition to the 2025 movie schedule. However, there is one change I don't like…and that has to do with Nani. There are plenty of changes in 2025's Lilo & Stitch. Cobra Bubbles not being a bigger part, is a major one. Another is not making Gantu not the main villain (and not even including him at all). Even adding in the neighbor, Tutu, for Lilo and Nani is one I don't mind. It's how Nani ultimately decides to care for Lilo that I don't enjoy. When I rewatched the animated classic for the first time in years, I felt a seriously special connection to Nani for many reasons. I think it's really because I'm a grown-up now (or at least trying to be), and I could really see where Nani was coming from by taking care of Lilo. It's not like Nani was all grown up at that point, either. Nani was still a young woman when her parents died, and then, all of a sudden, she was the sole responsible person taking care of Lilo. She had to get a job and give up her life to be the perfect person for Lilo when, obviously, she wasn't that, and throughout the film, we saw her grow with Lilo, not only as her sister but also as she learned to be accepting and rebuild their family from the ground up. She did everything in her power to not be separated from her sister. But now, Nani goes to the mainland? And leaves her sister with her neighbor as her guardian? I…I don't know about that. From my perspective, in this situation, I'm unsure how I would feel about leaving my little sister with my neighbor to take care of her. I understand that the school Nani goes to is her dream school, but throughout the film, we clearly see that she still wants to be there for Lilo. However, her decision to attend school in California to study marine biology is something that feels somewhat separate. If I were in her shoes, even if I had the portal gun that she gets at the end, I still would want to be as close as humanly possible just in case something happened. Another aspect of this is that Tutu essentially taking on guardianship of Lilo (and also taking care of Stitch) feels very unrealistic. Look, I'm sure there are plenty of great neighbors out there. I live in an apartment building, so it's hard for me to relate to that because I don't get to see my neighbors as often as I'd like. But I'm still trying to imagine a world where I would be totally okay letting my neighbor take care of my kid sister while I went to school hours away. Even then, I really don't think most neighbors would be that open to taking in a child, especially Tutu, who is literally in her seventies. That's essentially becoming a mother again that late in your life, and that's not a simple thing to do. It helps that Lilo is at least a little older than a toddler, but to give up your retired life for that? I can't see that happening. Look, I'm not saying Nani leaving ruins this movie. I think, by today's standards, her decision to pursue a degree is something I can agree with. But a part of me wishes that it had been somewhere in Hawaii instead of going to the mainland. To me, that would have made more sense. What made the first movie so special was watching Nani really become that parental figure for Lilo and seeing the special montage of them growing closer alongside Stitch, David, and everyone else, as well as literally and figuratively rebuilding their home together. We don't really see much of that at the end of the film because Nani has decided to go to college and leave her sister with Tutu. It's nice that she can still visit and see her as much as possible, but it also feels as if it takes away a substantial part of Nani's character development. She's still grown, but just not in the way that I'm used to…and it does make me feel disappointed. Either way, the family is still intact, which is all that matters. However, it just feels like another case where a Disney live-action adaptation is changing things up for the sake of change – and not always in a good way.