Court grants missing Pamela Ling leave to challenge arrest, travel ban
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court has granted leave for Datin Seri Pamela Ling Yueh to challenge her previous arrest and travel ban by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and the Immigration Department.
Justice Amarjeet Singh allowed Ling's application for leave to initiate judicial review after hearing submissions from parties in his chambers here on Monday (May 19).
The judge found that there were triable issues in the application.
ALSO READ: Cops talk to Pamela's kids
Senior Federal Counsel Mohd Faisal Md Noor did not object to the application.
Meanwhile, Ling's lawyer Surendra Ananth told The Star that the case management has been fixed on June 3.
Ling filed the leave application for judicial review on April 7, just two days before her highly publicised disappearance.
ALSO READ: Investigators interview Pamela Ling's children amid ongoing case
On April 9, the Sarawak-born was reported missing while on her way to the MACC headquarters in Putrajaya after getting in an e-hailing vehicle.
A police report on her disappearance was lodged at 3.02pm on the same day.
The MACC had earlier obtained an arrest warrant for Ling on Dec 2, last year, from a Putrajaya Magistrate's Court after she failed to comply with the order to attend an interview for the purpose of completing a money laundering investigation.
ALSO READ: Police detain Pamela's husband
On Jan 8, Ling was lawfully apprehended and brought back to Malaysia through a joint operation with the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) of Singapore.
Following her arrest, she was then brought to the Putrajaya Magistrate's Court where she was remanded from Jan 9 to 11 before being granted bail.
She was scheduled to be at the MACC headquarters on April 9.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
5 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Beng Hock's family not filing judicial review over NFA decision
Teoh Beng Hock's sister, Lee Lan, during a press conference in Kuala Lumpur today. KUALA LUMPUR : The family of Teoh Beng Hock has decided not to pursue a judicial review of the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) decision to once again classify his death as requiring no further action (NFA). His sister, Lee Lan, said the decision was made after consulting family members and their lawyer, Ramkarpal Singh. 'The judicial review will take three years to complete. Chances of winning the review are also slim as it would be the first judicial review brought in a criminal case,' she told a press conference at the KL & Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall here today. Last week, the AGC said it found insufficient evidence to bring charges following a fresh investigation by police, thus maintaining its NFA classification. The re-investigation had been ordered by the Kuala Lumpur High Court in November last year, which directed police to re-examine all aspects of the case. Lee Lan had expressed disappointment over the outcome and called for Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to honour his promise to deliver justice in her brother's case. Beng Hock was found dead on July 16, 2009 after falling from the fifth floor of Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam, Selangor, after being questioned for several hours by officers from the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). An inquest into his death initially returned an open verdict. However, in 2014, the Court of Appeal ruled that Beng Hock's death was caused by 'one or more unknown persons', including MACC officers. Meanwhile, Teoh Beng Hock Association for Democratic Advancement chairman Ng Yap Hwa raised concerns over the selective presentation of the Court of Appeal's judgment in AG Dusuki Mokhtar's letter. 'His letter stated that the Court of Appeal in 2014, ruled that an unknown person caused Beng Hock's death through unlawful means. 'However, the actual judgment is that one or more unknown persons, including MACC officers, caused his death through unlawful means,' he said at the same press conference. Ng called for Dusuki to clarify why the reference to MACC officers was not included in the official explanation. He also questioned whether this omission indicated that the AGC and police had excluded MACC personnel from the scope of their investigations. Lee Lan again appealed to Cabinet ministers, especially those from DAP, to help her family uncover the truth behind her brother's death. 'When the current ministers were in the opposition bloc, they told us they had no power to help the case. Now that they are in power, they are unable to keep their promises,' she added.
Free Malaysia Today
10 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
AG can still order police probe into Beng Hock's death, says lawyer
Teoh Beng Hock died on July 16, 2009 after being questioned for hours by MACC officers. PETALING JAYA : The attorney-general (AG) can still direct that the police investigate who was responsible for the death of former political aide Teoh Beng Hock under a more serious offence based on a Court of Appeal ruling issued 11 years ago, a lawyer said today. Salim Bashir said investigations could be conducted for culpable homicide not amounting to murder, causing death by negligence, or voluntarily causing grievous hurt. 'The Court of Appeal in 2014 found that Teoh's death was accelerated by the 'unlawful acts of persons unknown' and that the AG could direct the police to conduct further investigations,' he told FMT. He said there is no limitation period within which charges must be brought against a suspect. However, the prosecution must ensure that it is able to call the necessary witnesses and present the required evidence in court to support the charge, he added. Salim was speaking to FMT after two senior DAP leaders called for AG Dusuki Mokhtar to explain in detail why he thinks there is insufficient evidence to prosecute anyone for criminal offences which may have resulted in Teoh's death. Speaking on behalf of the party's central committee, its national chairman Gobind Singh Deo and secretary-general Loke Siew Fook called on the AG to review his decision and push ahead with charges against those responsible without further delay. FMT has contacted Dusuki, who is also the public prosecutor, for his response. Salim, a former Malaysian Bar president, said the AG under Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution and Section 376 of the Criminal Procedure Code had the discretion whether to prosecute a suspect, and which provision of the law to utilise. Last week, lawyer-activist M Visvanathan told a gathering in solidarity with Teoh's family that three doctors had during an inquiry said that the deceased had injuries to his neck, which occurred before he fell from the fifth floor of Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam. 'These injuries would have been capable of making Teoh immobile or unconscious,' he said when contacted, adding that a judge in the Court of Appeal bench stated that there was no necessity to 'engage Sherlock Holmes to investigate because the circumstances are so credible'. Visvanathan said it was absurd for police to confine their recent investigation to wrongful confinement under Section 342 of the Penal Code as Teoh had been detained by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) for lawful investigations. Lawyer Rafique Rashid Ali called for the AG to issue a press conference instead of a letter to Teoh's family explaining why he had classified the case as requiring no further action (NFA). 'As the guardian of public interest, the AG should be transparent and accountable as this is a high-profile public interest case, and there needs to be closure to the family's predicament,' he said. Rafique said that in October 1994, then AG Mohtar Abdullah announced through the media that he was not pressing charges against an influential political leader as he had no prima facie evidence to pursue a charge of raping an underaged girl. However, Mohtar said he was not exonerating the suspect of the alleged offence. He said another AG, Apandi Ali, had in January 2016 told the media that then prime minister Najib Razak had been cleared of any criminal wrongdoing in the RM2.6 billion channelled into Najib's bank accounts and finance ministry-owned firm SRC International Sdn Bhd. Apandi said there was 'insufficient evidence' to implicate Najib and ordered MACC to close its three investigation papers. However, in 2018, Najib was charged with corruption in the SRC International and 1MDB case. Teoh died on July 16, 2009 after being questioned for hours by MACC officers. An inquest was held and the coroner returned an open verdict. However, the Court of Appeal ruled that Teoh's death was caused by 'one or more persons unknown', including MACC officers. In 2019, police launched an investigation under Section 342 of the Penal Code for wrongful confinement. In November last year, the High Court ordered the police to complete its long-delayed investigations within six months. Before 2018, two special investigation teams were set up – one in 2011 and the other in 2015 – to look into Teoh's death. Both cases were classified as NFA by the public prosecutor.
The Sun
11 hours ago
- The Sun
High Court dismisses committal bid by former KL Tower operator
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here today dismissed the former operator of Kuala Lumpur Tower's leave application to commence committal proceedings against seven individuals and the government. The former operator, Menara Kuala Lumpur Sdn Bhd, and its parent, Hydroshoppe Sdn Bhd, are seeking contempt of court action against the eight for allegedly disrupting the administration of justice amid ongoing legal proceedings. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain, who rejected the application, ordered the two companies to pay RM25,000 to the respondents, including Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil. Six other officials were also named as respondents, including Dang Wangi district police chief ACP Sulizmie Affendy Sulaiman, Federal Land Commissioner Datuk Muhammad Azmi Mohd Zain and Communications Ministry Secretary-General Datuk Mohamad Fauzi Md Isa. In her judgment, Judge Roz Mawar ruled that the court was not satisfied there was a prima facie case to warrant the granting of leave for contempt proceedings. She further held that the court was not persuaded by Hydroshoppe's assertion of encroachment on its properties, regardless of the manner, given that its contract with the government had lapsed on March 31. The court also dismissed the inter partes injunction application by Hydroshoppe and Menara KL, ordering both companies to pay RM20,000 each in costs to the government, as well as to LSH Service Master Sdn Bhd, LSH Best Builders Sdn Bhd and Service Master (M) Sdn Bhd. The court then fixed July 14 to hear the striking-out applications filed by Fahmi and the three companies. Hydroshoppe and Menara KL filed a breach of contract suit against the respondents, alleging that LSH Capital and its subsidiaries induced a breach of an agreement purportedly reached with the government during a meeting in August 2022. The plaintiffs further claimed that the respondents engaged in dishonest assistance and are seeking a declaration that the award of the KL Tower concession to LSH Service Master is void and unlawful. In addition, they are claiming an estimated RM1 billion in damages and are seeking the concession of the iconic Kuala Lumpur landmark to be transferred back to them.
