logo
‘They played us': Forever 21 vendors scorn retailer's bankruptcy

‘They played us': Forever 21 vendors scorn retailer's bankruptcy

Fashion Network23-04-2025
It's not the first time a Forever 21 bankruptcy has hurt vendors, some of whom have come to rely on the company for business. After its first filing, suppliers and others owed payments lost out on millions. Many vendors are also facing steeper financial pressure now thanks to President Donald Trump 's sweeping tariffs, which have forced many US businesses to consider reworking their supply chains.
A representative for Forever 21 declined to comment.
For retailers, taking shipments right up until bankruptcy can help load up inventory and boost proceeds from liquidation sales. But suppliers can be hurt in the process.
While vendors are entitled to a priority status on their claim for the value of goods received by a debtor within 20 days of its bankruptcy filing, senior lenders still come first. If a retailer's going-out-of-business sale doesn't raise enough money to repay them, the suppliers who helped stock the stores get nothing.
In Forever 21's case, secured creditors stand to recover just 3% of their claims, according to court documents.
'This is the oldest trick in the book,' said bankruptcy attorney Christopher Simon at law firm Cross and Simon. 'Borrowers build up their inventory, which is their lenders' collateral, and then that collateral is sold for the benefit of the secured lender first in every case.'
'They are fattening the cow before the slaughter,' he said. 'The folks who supply that feed sometimes don't get paid.'
Ahn has filed a roughly $10.2 million claim against the Forever 21 operator, according to court documents. The retailer still owes him payments for goods received in September, he said.
'They should have repaid the old debt first, which is customary in the industry. They must have known the day when they were going to file for bankruptcy while asking us to cut the deal,' Ahn said. 'We were loyal to them until the last moment. But they played us.'
Two China-based vendors interviewed by Bloomberg News, who asked not to be identified discussing private information, experienced a similar course of events to Ahn.
General creditors 'are set up to get absolutely smoked by this bankruptcy' and the unsecured creditor committee is 'going to do everything in its power' to test and improve the result, Justin Alberto, an attorney for the committee, said during a court hearing this month.
However, the Forever 21 operator's $1.6 billion in funded debt is making it unlikely vendors will see anything, the group of creditors has said.
In January, vendors got an email from Barbara Fevelo-Hoad, the chief sourcing officer for Forever 21 parent Sparc, announcing JCPenney was acquiring Sparc to create Catalyst Brands. She said the deal would allow for more investment in the brands.
'Please know that in the near term, we expect business to continue as usual,' Fevelo-Hoad wrote in the email, according to a copy seen by Bloomberg News.
The group of unsecured creditors said it's investigating the tie-up and has alleged the deal 'joined and obligated' Forever 21 and certain affiliates to pay JCPenney's existing debt.
Forever 21's board has determined it has no 'colorable or valuable claims' against Authentic Brands Group and Simon Property Group, which controlled Sparc along with fast-fashion powerhouse Shein, according to a March court filing. The retailer had tapped law firm Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor to review the JCPenney acquisition and other transactions involving Simon and Authentic, which owns the Forever 21 brand.
A representative for Authentic declined to comment. Representatives for Simon and Catalyst Brands didn't immediately provide a comment.
Many vendors who are owed money no longer have confidence in the large financial backers that rescued the Forever 21's US operator after its first bankruptcy. Since then, the company's funded debt has ballooned from $230 million to the $1.6 billion it had when it filed to reorganize in March, court documents show.
'We really believed in Forever 21's future when it was bought out by Sparc because we thought Simon and Authentic Brands were reputable companies that we could trust,' Ahn said. 'I still can't believe a large American company like Forever 21 just destroyed its own credibility overnight.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Satellite Photos Show "Shadow City Swallowing the Horizon" as China Constructs Unprecedented 1,000-Acre Stronghold With Alarming Speed
Satellite Photos Show "Shadow City Swallowing the Horizon" as China Constructs Unprecedented 1,000-Acre Stronghold With Alarming Speed

Sustainability Times

time2 hours ago

  • Sustainability Times

Satellite Photos Show "Shadow City Swallowing the Horizon" as China Constructs Unprecedented 1,000-Acre Stronghold With Alarming Speed

IN A NUTSHELL 🛰️ Satellite images reveal China's construction of a vast underground military command center near Beijing. near Beijing. China's project underscores its strategic ambitions to rival the United States and reshape global power dynamics. to rival the United States and reshape global power dynamics. The development has significant implications for global security , potentially altering military alliances worldwide. , potentially altering military alliances worldwide. Neighboring countries are reassessing their security strategies amid concerns over China's growing military influence. In recent times, the unveiling of China's ambitious military project has captured the global spotlight, raising questions about the future of international security dynamics. Satellite images have revealed the construction of a vast underground military command center near Beijing. This development underscores China's strategic aims to rival the United States and potentially reshape the global balance of power. As observers closely monitor these events, the implications for both regional and international security cannot be understated. Understanding China's motivations and the potential global ramifications is crucial as the geopolitical landscape continues to evolve. China's Ambitious Military Vision China's latest military endeavor reflects a grand vision reminiscent of Cold War-era strategies. Since the 1980s, China has been developing specialized teams focused on creating underground shelters designed to withstand significant threats. The origins of these efforts can be traced back to the Cold War, a period characterized by an arms race and the construction of bunkers by countries like the Soviet Union and Germany. Today, China is advancing this concept to unprecedented levels, aiming to build the largest underground military command center in history. The sheer scale of this project is a testament to China's desire to secure its military assets against potential threats. With rising geopolitical tensions, particularly in Asia, the development highlights China's commitment to strengthening its defense infrastructure. It also signals an evolution in military strategies, where technological advancements and strategic positioning are pivotal to national security. This project not only showcases China's military ambitions but also its long-term vision for maintaining a robust defense posture. '96% Quieter at 373 MPH': China Unveils Maglev Tunnel Boom Buffer That Could Replace Short-Haul Flights Without Extra Construction Costs Implications for Global Security The construction of China's underground military complex has far-reaching implications for global security. As China expands its military capabilities, neighboring countries and global powers are reassessing their security strategies. This development is not merely about military might; it represents a shift in the balance of power across Asia and beyond. The strategic significance of this project cannot be overstated, as it may reshape military alliances and defense strategies worldwide. China's actions are likely to provoke reactions from other major powers, potentially leading to an arms race reminiscent of the Cold War. The United States, in particular, may feel compelled to bolster its military presence in the region to counterbalance China's growing influence. This scenario raises critical questions about the future of international relations and the potential for conflict or collaboration in addressing shared security challenges. How nations respond to China's military ambitions will be pivotal in shaping the global security landscape. 'China Wants to Catch Ghosts Under the Sea': World's Largest Underwater Telescope Could Unlock the Most Dangerous Secrets of the Universe Technological Sophistication and Strategic Depth At the core of China's military project is a focus on technological sophistication and strategic depth. The underground command center is expected to integrate advanced technologies, ranging from state-of-the-art communication systems to innovative defense mechanisms. This technological prowess reflects China's broader ambitions to emerge as a leading military power, capable of rivaling the technological advancements of the United States and other global military giants. The strategic depth of this project also mirrors China's long-term vision for its defense strategy. By investing in subterranean infrastructure, China aims to ensure the resilience and sustainability of its military capabilities. This approach not only safeguards its assets from conventional threats but also positions China as a formidable force in future conflicts. This development represents a new chapter in China's military history, characterized by innovation and strategic foresight. It reflects a commitment to maintaining a robust defense posture in an ever-evolving global landscape. 'China Just Changed the Game' as Massive Zirconium Find Boosts Strategic Reserves 5-Fold and Sparks Pentagon Panic Over Hypersonic Race Regional Reactions and Future Prospects The revelation of China's underground military complex has prompted varied reactions across the region. Neighboring countries are closely monitoring the situation, with some voicing concerns over the potential impact on regional stability. Others are considering strategic partnerships and alliances to counterbalance China's growing military presence. This development has undoubtedly sparked a reevaluation of defense strategies across Asia, as nations seek to navigate the shifting geopolitical landscape. Looking ahead, the future prospects of this project depend on China's ability to manage its regional relationships and address the international community's concerns. The success of this undertaking could redefine China's role on the global stage, potentially paving the way for new alliances and diplomatic engagements. However, it also raises important questions about the potential for conflict and cooperation in a world defined by military prowess and strategic competition. As China's military ambitions unfold, the world watches with bated breath. The construction of this underground command center is a clear indicator of China's determination to assert its influence and secure its interests. In an era of rapid geopolitical changes, how will other nations respond to China's growing military might? Will this development lead to increased cooperation or heightened tensions among global powers? This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies. Did you like it? 4.6/5 (20)

Well-heeled shoppers shrug off price hikes for Birkenstocks and Bugaboo strollers for now
Well-heeled shoppers shrug off price hikes for Birkenstocks and Bugaboo strollers for now

Fashion Network

timea day ago

  • Fashion Network

Well-heeled shoppers shrug off price hikes for Birkenstocks and Bugaboo strollers for now

Well -heeled shoppers around the US seem - so far at least - willing to soak up price hikes for aspirational products from trendy Birkenstock sandals to Bugaboo prams, despite the impact of trade tariffs and belt-tightening elsewhere. German sandal and clog brand Birkenstock has enjoyed strong consumer demand with little pushback from US retailers since hiking prices at the start of July, its chief executive said on Thursday. As brands raise prices and cut costs to mitigate the impact of higher US tariffs on their imported products, a key question is the extent to which consumers will be put off and buy less, or simply walk away from purchases. Comments from Birkenstock, Bugaboo, Coach, Ralph Lauren and other brands at the premium end of the market suggest that, so far, affluent consumers are shrugging off price hikes. "We saw no pushback or cancellations following the July 1st price increases implemented in response to tariffs," Birkenstock CEO Oliver Reichert told analysts on a call, adding demand for the brand has been "tremendously strong." Bank of America, the largest consumer facing US bank, said this week that middle- and upper-income earners spent more on their credit cards in July than the same month last year. In contrast, spending among the lowest income bracket remained flat, the bank found. Overall US consumer spending may stay strong, Bank of America said, as long as higher-income individuals keep spending. Lower-income earners account for only 15% of all US consumer spending, according to Bank of America. However, Procter & Gamble, maker of Tide detergent, reported signs of spending cutbacks among higher-income consumers, indicating that shoppers may be becoming more selective with their purchases. Bugaboo, a Netherlands-based maker of expensive baby gear, also raised prices on its strollers, high chairs and play pens by $50-$300 in May because of US tariffs. Retailers were open and accepting. "In general we did not see any pushback. They are like us. They understand it is a fluid situation," Chief Commercial Officer for North America, Jeanelle Teves, said. Bugaboo manufactures in China and sells strollers for more than $1,000 at Target, Nordstrom, Bloomingdales and independent mom and pop stores. Coach handbags also remain in strong demand despite a gloomier economic outlook: the brand drew in more than 4.6 million new customers in North America this year, many of whom are Gen Z and millennials, Tapestry CEO Joanne Kuvoiserat said on Thursday. Coach, whose popular Tabby shoulder bags retail for $350, will maintain its operating profit margin despite the pressure of tariffs, Kuvoiserat said. Ralph Lauren, meanwhile, raised its annual revenue forecast as shoppers snapped up items like its $398 Polo Bear sweaters. But consumers' behaviour in the coming months remains hard to predict, CEO Patrice Louvet highlighted on a conference call with analysts. "The bigger unknown here today is the price sensitivity and how the consumer reacts to the broader pricing environment. So that's what we're watching very closely as we head into the second half."

Why Swatch is facing tough times
Why Swatch is facing tough times

Fashion Network

timea day ago

  • Fashion Network

Why Swatch is facing tough times

The Swatch brand is credited with having saved a Swiss watch industry that had been laid low by the so-called quartz revolution. Back in the 1970s and 1980s, these less expensive and more accurate watches from an ascendant Japan upended European mechanical watchmaking. Swatch's response? Tap into the '80s zeitgeist with colourful, low-priced designs—funky, artistic, eclectic and made for collectors along with a whole new demographic that saw them as fashion, not function. Swatch used its skyrocketing revenue to support its more staid, traditional brands while acquiring new ones. But fast forward to today, and the market's changed: phones and smartwatches have undercut low-cost watches, leaving luxury as the main engine for growth. And a new set of problems, from low sales in China to Donald Trump 's tariffs, have made matters even worse. The luxury spending slowdown in China has hurt all brands, but Swatch got hit more than most, given that 27% of its 2024 sales were attributable to the Asian nation. While the company said last month that sales data now show a possible turnaround, any recovery in China is expected to be slow. Meanwhile, Trump's radical imposition of a 39% tariff on imports from Switzerland puts high-end watch brands in a corner, since they can't raise prices much more in the current environment. Simultaneously, investors have been calling out Swatch, urging it to capitalise on the still-lucrative high-end segment. Steven Wood, founder and chief investment officer of New York-based GreenWood Investors, even mounted a campaign to win a seat on Swatch's board. He was defeated, but his intervention may underline the frustration among investors worried about the company's future. The Hayek family, which controls more than 40% of Swatch voting rights, has pushed back by saying it shouldn't just be making watches for the wealthy. To be sure, Swatch managed some mainstream success as recently as 2022, with the MoonSwatch. The quartz-driven timepiece leaned on the heritage and look of the Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch, an iconic watch worn on Apollo moon missions. Swatch sold more than a million of them that year, but it's struggled to generate the same sort of buzz across the rest of the group.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store