Kim Kardashian calls for justice amid US immigration raids
Kim Kardashian has once again placed herself at the centre of a heated political storm. The reality star and business mogul spoke out against the latest wave of US immigration raids in Los Angeles.
Her words, echoed by a chorus of stars, have sparked fresh debate not only in America but the rest of the world, especially those who know the pain of family separation and the power of protest.
Kim Kardashian took to Instagram to denounce the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids. The raids have led to the arrest of over 100 people and ignited days of fierce protests in LA, according to News Nation Now.
'When we're told that ICE exists to keep our country safe and remove violent criminals—great.
But when we see authorities rip innocent, hardworking people from their families in inhumane ways, we have to speak up.
We have to do what's right… There HAS to be a BETTER way,' she wrote to her 356 million followers.
She added, 'Growing up in LA, I've seen how deeply immigrants are woven into the fabric of this city. They are our neighbours, friends, classmates, coworkers, and family.
No matter where you fall politically, it's clear that our communities thrive because of the contributions of immigrants.
We can't turn a blind eye when fear and injustice keep people from living their lives freely and safely'.
The raids, ordered by President Donald Trump, have seen the deployment of thousands of National Guard troops and 700 US Marines to Los Angeles. This is all without the state governor's approval.
California Governor Gavin Newsom slammed the move, calling it 'purposefully inflammatory' and warning that it 'inflamed a combustible situation'. The state is now challenging the deployment in court.
As the protests raged, Grammy-winning rapper Doechii used her BET Awards victory speech to call out the government's heavy-handed tactics.
'There are ruthless attacks that are creating fear and chaos in our communities in the name of law and order,' she said. Trump is using military forces to stop a protest.
Consider what kind of government it is when the military deploys against us every time we exercise our democratic right to protest. What type of government is that?'
Other celebrities have joined the fray. Mark Ruffalo warned, 'You are pointing your guns in the wrong direction…
The billionaire at the top is stealing from you blind, yet you worry about the poorest of the poor ruining your life.
Eva Longoria called the actions 'Un-American,' and singer Reneé Rapp declared, 'This is a disgrace'.
The protests and raids have not been limited to Los Angeles. They have spread to cities like Atlanta, Seattle, New York, and Chicago.
In scenes reminiscent of South Africa's own history of protest, demonstrators have faced rubber bullets, tear gas, and mass arrests.
Over 200 people have been detained in LA alone since the weekend.
For South Africans, the story is all too familiar. State power clashing with community resistance, families torn apart, and demanding justice.
Kardashian's words ring true on both sides of the Atlantic: 'There HAS to be a BETTER way'. As the world watches, one thing is clear: the fight for dignity, family, and justice is universal.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
39 minutes ago
- Mail & Guardian
Digital occupation: How surveillance technologies repress dissent from Gaza to Cape Town
Surveillance technology is increasingly being used to monitor civilians. From the skies above Gaza to the streets of Cape Town, surveillance technologies are no longer confined to military zones. Tools once developed for war and occupation are now being deployed to monitor, profile and suppress civilian populations — particularly those being used in solidarity with Palestine or challenging systems of injustice. One such tool is SocialNet, developed by US-based company ShadowDragon, a contractor for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a federal law enforcement agency. The software scrapes user data from more than 200 platforms — including Instagram, Facebook, OnlyFans and Bluesky — to construct detailed profiles of individuals' political views, associations and activities. Once used to hunt 'terror suspects' abroad, such software is now used domestically in the US to track activists, immigrants and students. According to Surveillance Watch, ShadowDragon and similar technologies have been deployed to monitor pro-Palestinian activists — especially after the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack and the escalation of war in Gaza. Peaceful protesters have faced online harassment, disciplinary action and immigration enforcement — all triggered by surveillance-generated intel. The net effect: digital repression masquerading as national security. South Africa is not immune. Amid pro-Palestinian solidarity actions — marches, boycotts, and teach-ins — activists report being photographed at protests, tracked on social media and warned by law enforcement. In some cases, private security firms with Israeli ties are alleged to have assisted in data collection and monitoring. The methods may differ, but the logic is the same: control space, suppress dissent and treat activism as a threat. Aerial surveillance systems such as Eye in the Sky reinforce this logic. Originally designed for military reconnaissance, these systems use high-resolution cameras mounted on planes or drones to survey entire neighbourhoods — recording protest routes, tracking crowds and compiling footage for analysis. Often deployed without public oversight or judicial authorisation, they turn urban centres into open-air observation zones. In Gaza, similar technologies are used by Israeli forces to monitor and target civilian movement. In Cape Town, they watch citizens exercising constitutional rights. The digital occupation framework reminds us that surveillance is not neutral. It is political. It is often racialised. And it is global. Facial recognition tool NesherAI, allegedly used by the right-wing Zionist group Betar, exemplifies this transnational repression. The software reportedly identified Palestinian student activist Mahmoud Ahmed Khalil on a US campus. A dossier about him was posted publicly and allegedly shared with ICE. The same technologies tested on Palestinians under occupation are now used to suppress solidarity abroad. South Africa's Constitution guarantees the right to privacy under section 14, while the Protection of Personal Information Act aims to regulate the collection and use of personal data. Internationally, Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights prohibits arbitrary interference with privacy. Yet these laws struggle to keep up with the speed and scale of militarised surveillance tools imported — legally or otherwise — into civilian life. Worse still, these tools do more than watch — they shape behaviour. Protesters begin to self-censor, students avoid organising and communities withdraw from public dissent. The psychological toll of being constantly observed is immense, particularly for racialised or marginalised groups. It mimics the tactics of occupation: isolate, intimidate, control. As South Africans, this moment demands clarity and political courage. The same state surveillance once used to crush anti-apartheid movements is being repackaged through private tech firms and foreign alliances. The rhetoric is new — 'smart cities', 'public safety', 'counter-extremism' — but the effect is old: silence dissent, maintain control, and fracture solidarity. From Gaza to Cape Town, from drones to data-mining, surveillance is not just a security tool, it is a system of domination. If we do not resist its expansion, we risk accepting a future in which privacy, protest, and political freedom become casualties of a permanent digital occupation. Sõzarn Barday is a writer and attorney based in South Africa and has a particular interest in human rights within the Middle East. Opinions shared represent her individual perspective.
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
DA demands tabling of forensic report into corruption at Endumeni Municipality
The resignation of Endumeni Municipal Manager Sithembiso Ntombela has intensified calls for transparency following a CoGTA report that revealed security tender corruption dating back to 2023. Ntombela stepped down amid a Section 106 forensic investigation. The probe reportedly found that FBL Security was appointed without following supply chain protocols; however, its findings have yet to be presented to the council. The report was finalised last year, but only presented to the Endumeni council in March of this year. The Courier has a copy of the report, and its findings were published last month. In it, the investigators recommend that two senior officials be charged, including Ntombela. DA caucus leader, Cllr Saleem Abdool, urged Speaker Andile Nsibande to present the report immediately and for councillors to act on its recommendations. 'Accountability must not be sacrificed for political expediency,' said a DA spokesperson. The party insists that due process be followed and that anyone implicated be held responsible. 'Throughout this term, the DA has pushed for clean governance and financial accountability. 'With public scrutiny at its peak, the party vows to continue advocating for a municipality that serves residents, not hidden agendas.' HAVE YOUR SAY: Like our Facebook page, follow us on Twitter and Instagram or email us at Add us on WhatsApp 071 277 1394. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Attacking Iran, Israel brazenly defies 'man of peace' Trump
WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump on Thursday implored Israel not to attack Iran and declared once again his goal was to be a peacemaker. Hours later, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, one of Trump's closest international allies, brazenly defied his advice by unleashing a major military campaign described as a "pre-emptive" strike against Iran's nuclear program. The attack marks only the latest setback for Trump's lofty goal set out at the start of his second term of being a "man of peace." Russian President Vladimir Putin, with whom Trump has also boasted a warm relationship, has rebuffed his overtures on a ceasefire with Ukraine. And Israel resumed another massive offensive in Gaza after talks bogged down on extending a ceasefire with Hamas reached with Trump's support at the end of his predecessor Joe Biden's term. Trump's friend and roving envoy Steve Witkoff - who has negotiated in all three crises - had been set to meet Iranian officials again Sunday in Oman. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a statement made clear the United States was not involved in attacking Iran and warned Tehran not to retaliate against US troops in the region. Rubio said that Israel advised that it attacked out of "self-defence," but conspicuously did not say if the United States agreed. Trump, hours before the strikes, doubled down with a social media post saying he remained "committed to a diplomatic resolution" on Iran. Netanyahu has described Iran's cleric-run government, which backs Hamas, as an existential threat and already last year ordered strikes that knocked out its air defences. "We've clearly seen a fork in the road in the American and Israeli approaches to this problem set," said Dana Stroul, a former senior Pentagon official who is a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. "These strikes are going to disrupt and delay and degrade Iran's nuclear program. The question, I think, is whether or not the United States and Israel in the future are going to work together on what to do to maximize the time that's put back on the clock," she said. INCREASINGLY AT ODDS Stroul noted that rifts had been building between Israel and Trump, who last month agreed to remove sanctions on Syria after former Islamist guerrilla Ahmed al-Sharaa swept into power. Trump embraced the new Syrian leader after appeals on a tour of Gulf Arab monarchies - which have also backed diplomacy on Iran. In Qatar last month, Trump said after meeting the emir that he believed a deal was in sight with Iran and that there would be no "nuclear dust" over the region. Despite growing disagreements, Israel enjoys robust support in Trump's right-wing base. The Trump administration in recent days has again taken lonely positions to back Israel, with the United States casting one of the only votes at the UN General Assembly against a Gaza ceasefire resolution and criticising top allies, including Britain, for imposing sanctions on far-right Israeli ministers. Justin Logan, director of defence and foreign policy at the libertarian Cato Institute, said the Israeli attack will "destroy US diplomatic efforts" on Iran and called for Trump to reject any US military role in protecting Israel from retaliation. "Israel has the right to choose its own foreign policy. At the same time, it has the responsibility to bear the costs of that policy," he said. But lawmakers in Trump's Republican Party quickly rallied behind Israel. Senator Tom Cotton said that the United States should "back Israel to the hilt, all the way," and topple Iran's Islamic Republic if it targets US troops. Trump's Democratic rivals, who mostly backed his diplomacy on Iran, were aghast at Israel's action on the eve of new US-Iran talks. "Israel's alarming decision to launch airstrikes on Iran is a reckless escalation that risks igniting regional violence," said Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Forces Committee.
