‘We've got to get scary': Australia unready for war, warns expert panel on Sky News
In a special Sky News Australia program, The War Cabinet, hosted by award-winning journalist Chris Uhlmann in the historic Cabinet Room of Old Parliament House, the panel agreed on one stark conclusion – if conflict comes, Australia would not be ready.
Mr Uhlmann said the location served as a reminder of a time when leadership was tested under extreme pressure.
'Today, with China rising, America shifting, and the global order fragmenting, the threat of major conflict in our region looms once again,' he said.
Former defence minister Joel Fitzgibbon said the warning time for a potential threat was 'growing much shorter' and argued that keeping the United States engaged was critical.
'We cannot allow a hegemony … that's not democratic in our region,' he said.
'That means doing more of the heavy lifting … and building a force capable of deterring and denying a threat.
'That means, of course, spending more, spending smarter, and being more creative about the way we spend, and to spend far more efficiently.'
Alexander Downer, former foreign affairs minister, called the world's strategic situation 'difficult, if not dangerous', pointing to the growing links between China, North Korea, Iran and Russia.
Mr Downer said Australia's enduring security partnership with the United States was vital to sustaining stability in the region.
'If this alliance holds, it's properly cemented, if it's well led by the Americans and if we, as members of the alliance, are serious about making a practical contribution to defence throughout spending and our equipment, then we will maintain a balance of power in the world, and that will be a force for peace,' Mr Downer said.
'But if we fail … the risks are huge.'
Former Home Affairs secretary Michael Pezzullo warned that China's recent naval exercise off Australia's coast was 'likely a rehearsal for missile strikes'.
'We've got a very different China than the China that Hawke, Keating and Howard dealt with,' Mr Pezzullo said.
Cyber security specialist Catherine Mansted said the threat was already on home soil.
'We're certainly not at peace … Chinese military cyber spies are actively probing our civilian critical infrastructure looking for weaknesses … potentially for high-impact sabotage if relations deteriorate,' Ms Mansted said.
Strategic analyst Peter Jennings said Australia 'should be worried'.
'This is not a story about the 2030s … this is everything about China positioning to be the dominant strategic power in our part of the world, by military force, if necessary, and it is utterly false for our government to say that somehow they have stabilised the relationship with China,' Mr Jennings said.
The panel also warned a Chinese assault on Taiwan would quickly draw in Australia.
Mr Jennings predicted it would begin with a blockade to 'cutting of internet cables into Taiwan, stop air traffic and sea traffic into Taiwan' before missile strikes and leadership decapitation.
Former naval officer Jennifer Parker said China could also target Japanese and US forces, turning it into 'a regional conflict' where Australia's involvement would no longer be a choice.
Dr Ross Babbage said walking away from the US alliance would spark 'public outrage' and stressed Australians needed to understand the stakes.
'We've got to get informed. We've got to get strong. We've got to get scary … invest in things that cause the other guy to change their calculations,' Dr Babbage said.
Defence aviation expert Dr Oleksandra Molloy said that in 2014, 'no one expected anything would happen in Ukraine' but it was 'way too late to act'.
'We have time and resources … and we can develop and do it right now,' Dr Molloy said.
The panel agreed that, regardless of the scenario, Australia is currently ill-equipped to go to war.
'No one around this table wants war,' Mr Uhlmann said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Reserve Bank cuts cash rate to 3.6 per cent
The Reserve Bank has delivered its third interest rate cut of 2025, with a 0.25 percentage point reduction. Political editor Jacob Greber speaks to Sarah Ferguson.
SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Concerns expressed over Australia's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood
"The recognition itself is probably important from a symbolic point of view, but to be honest, it's not what we've been calling for in the last two years, or indeed for the last 57 years or or 77 years since 1948." That's Palestinian-Australian Mussa Hijazi. The Canberra-based lawyer was born in Australia and grew up in the Occupied West Bank. He's concerned the Albanese government's announcement that Australia would soon recognise a Palestinian state is a distraction from what's happening on the ground. "We haven't been marching for recognition. We have been marching and calling out for an end to the genocide that is taking place in Palestine." Protesters have been taking to the streets of Australia each week for the last 20 months, with the largest demonstration since the war escalated in 2023 being the tens of thousands of people who marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge earlier this month. Organisers claimed around 300,000 people participated in the protest, while New South Wales Police put the figure lower, at 90,000. "All this is doing in the meantime is creating a distraction from what is happening on the ground." In a 2024 interim ruling the International Court of Justice found it plausible that the Israeli offensive had violated the UN Genocide Convention, which the Israeli government strongly denies. It says it is fighting to defeat Hamas and to bring back Israeli hostages still held in Gaza. The decades-long conflict escalated in October 2023 when Hamas killed around 1,200 people in southern Israel and took 250 hostages. Israel's subsequent military campaign has since killed more than 61,000 people in Gaza. Mr Hijazi says there are practical actions the Australian government could take. "I think it's important to recognise that we do export F35 parts. We that we're at the stage now where our politicians, our Labor government, is telling us that they're non-lethal parts. Apparently, there are parts of the F35 jet that's been dropped that has been dropping 2,000-pound bombs on Palestinian civilians and destroying half city blocks at the time, apparently, some of the parts for that airplane that we manufacture here are apparently not, are not lethal." Australia has consistently denied sending weapons to Israel, but senior ministers have confirmed that parts of F35 fighter jets have been exported as part of a global supply chain program. Labor says any action on Australia's exports of component parts to Israel is unlikely to have an impact on the war in Gaza. People on the streets of Western Sydney have told SBS Arabic the move to recognise a Palestinian state is a step in the right direction. "I think that's great. And definitely I think, you know, the killings of innocent children, like anywhere in anything like it should be globally recognised, that this is just a wrong thing to do. And Inshallah, like all the eyes, like all eyes on Palestine now, so that it can, that we can stop this." "It should have happened a long time ago, there was too late now, after 50,000 people died, and I think the Palestinians should have their sovereignty. It's not up to the Australian government who cannot rule Gaza." "It's good step, you know? It's the right direction. And of course, because we have to follow England, England beat us first. So it's normal for especially the Labor Party, to support the state of Palestine. And it's very good step for all Aussies, especially when we had the big demonstration a couple of weeks ago, one of the biggest demonstrations on Harbor Bridge. So that it's a good wake-up call for all humanity, you know." The plan to recognise the state is based on assurances from the Palestinian Authority which governs the West Bank. It's conditional on Hamas, the Palestinian political-militant group and de facto government in Gaza that is proscribed as a terrorist organisation in Australia, playing no role in the future state's government. Adviser to the Palestinian Authority's Foreign Minister Ahmed al Deek has welcomed the move towards recognition. "We welcome the announcement made by Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese regarding Australia's decision to recognize the State of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly. We will build on this recognition to strengthen bilateral relations with Australia across all fields. Once again, we renew our call for all countries that have not yet recognised Palestine to take this step, as a means of safeguarding the two-state solution and contributing to resolving the conflict and achieving peace." But the move has been condemned by Israel's ambassador to Australia, Amir Maimon. He told the ABC it won't lead to lasting peace. "It's important to emphasize that we reject the recognition, unilateral recognition. It will not change anything on the ground, it will not bring a ceasefire. It would not bring about a release of the hostages, and it will not bring the two parties closer." President of the Zionist Federation of Australia, Jeremy Leibler, told SBS Hebrew he's disappointed by the government's move. "While Hamas is still in control of significant parts of Gaza, ultimately, it's going to send a message to those in the region, including Hamas, that here is a reward for terrorism and the most barbaric act of terrorism committed on Jews since the Holocaust. So we think it's extremely misguided. Ultimately, this is not going to help Palestinians on the ground." Executive Director of the New Israel Fund Australia, Kate Rosenberg, has told SBS Hebrew she supports the move. "While this move alone won't end the conflict, it affirms the Palestinian rights are not up for negotiation, and that equality must be the foundation for any lasting future."
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Court's stunning apology to South Australian MP over blackmail charges
A South Australian court has apologised for a system error which logged a guilty finding against an ex-MP who was accused of blackmailing Premier Peter Malinauskas. Annabel Digance is suing Mr Malinauskas for damages, claiming he orchestrated a 'malicious prosecution' against her to further his own political ambitions and crush a parliamentary inquiry into alleged bullying in the Labor Party. During a hearing in the South Australian Supreme Court in late July, Justice Graham Dart told the court that Ms Digance and her husband Greg had been found guilty of blackmailing Mr Malinauskas. The court was told their charges were later dropped, according to court records. Ms Digance and her husband Greg were charged with blackmailing Mr Malinauskas in 2021. The SA Courts Administration Authority (CAA) said in a statement on Tuesday that neither Ms or Mr Digance had been found guilty. The court said that in April 2023 a nolle prosequi order was made, meaning the prosecution was abandoned. 'There were no orders made which involved a finding of guilt against either of the defendants,' the court said in a statement. The court said that a document which stated that a finding of guilt had been made was 'generated in error and is incorrect'. 'The CAA unreservedly apologises to the parties for this error,' the court said in a statement. 'The CAA will review all court matters with orders made in the same circumstances to ensure that court records are accurate. 'The CAA will also commission an external assurance review into this matter.' In Ms Digance's statement of claim in her civil lawsuit, she argued that her arrest and prosecution caused 'injury, loss, damage and harm' and that Mr Malinauskas conspired with the SA Police to pursue her. She is suing both the premier and the State of South Australia and is seeking $2.3m in damages. The matter is scheduled to return to court in September.
