MP who first blew whistle on child rape gangs was smeared as a racist, says son
Labour peer Lord Cryer said those who were complicit at the time and knew of the child abuse by a group of older men from the Pakistani community, but chose to cover it up, should face prosecution.
He was speaking after a nationwide inquiry was announced by the Prime Minister into grooming gangs following a major review by Baroness Casey.
Baroness Casey (House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA)
Her report, published on Monday, found the ethnicity of perpetrators had been 'shied away from', with data not recorded for two-thirds of offenders.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper claimed officials had dodged the issue of ethnicity among the groups of sex offenders for fear of being called racist, even though available data showed suspects were disproportionately likely to be Asian men.
The Government has accepted all 12 recommendations made by Lady Casey, including the establishment of a national inquiry.
Mrs Cryer was MP for Keighley when she was alerted to the problem in her constituency by a group of concerned mothers, who said their young daughters were being sexually exploited by a group of older Asian men and the police and social services were refusing to act.
After going public she faced accusations that she was a racist and also received threatening notes and phone calls, leading police to install a panic alarm in her house.
She stood down as an MP in 2010.
In the years since, a series of high-profile grooming scandals have been exposed, including in Rotherham and Rochdale.
All followed a similar pattern with the large-scale exploitation of mainly white girls by groups of men of predominantly Pakistani heritage, which the authorities failed to tackle.
Responding to a ministerial statement on the Casey review, Lord Cryer said: 'I rise to speak principally because the first person who raised the issue of the rape gangs, in other words the first whistleblower, happens to be my mum, Ann Cryer MP, who started raising this in 2003.
'She was then smeared and attacked, particularly by Labour figures, I've got to say, for being a racist.
'I'm not talking about ministers in the then government, many of whom actually supported her, and in the case of David Blunkett, as then home secretary, went out of his way to make sure that prosecutions happened, which they did.
'I'm talking about councillors, councils and other institutions who went on the attack and lied and smeared about the rape gangs.'
He added: 'I think some of them were complicit. Some of them knew it was going on, and they decided to cover up.
'And in those cases, if there is evidence to that fact, then they should be brought before the courts and prosecuted.'
In reply, Home Office minister Lord Hanson of Flint said: 'Can I pay tribute to his mother. I served in Parliament with Ann and I know she raised these matters and faced extreme difficulties locally as result, and took a very brave stand at that time.'
Stressing the need to address the issue, he added: 'My party hasn't been in government for 14 years, but we have been in control of some of the councils.
'My party wasn't in control of government when a lot of these issues happened, but I have still got a responsibility to look at making sure we deal with these in an effective way.'
Earlier, he told peers other recommendations made by Lady Casey would be implemented 'in very short order'.
These included making it mandatory to collect ethnicity and nationality data of all suspects in child sexual abuse cases, a change in the law so all adult sex with under-16s would be considered rape, and a review of the criminal records of exploitation victims.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Pro-Palestine thugs are becoming a threat to democracy
If you want to understand the mentality of 21st-century Leftists, you need to read a writer who died decades before they were born. Aldous Huxley is best known as the author of the dystopian novel Brave New World. But, in my view, his most chillingly brilliant lines are to be found in a foreword he supplied for an edition of Samuel Butler's Erewhon, in 1933. 'The surest way to work up a crusade in favour of some good cause,' wrote Huxley, 'is to promise people that they will have a chance of maltreating someone… To be able to destroy with a good conscience, to be able to behave badly and call your bad behaviour 'righteous indignation' – this is the height of psychological luxury, the most delicious of moral treats.' I remember those words every time I read about the gleeful cruelty of modern progressive 'activists'. Such as the anti-Israel protesters who have taken to targeting Luke Charters, the Labour MP for York Outer. Last week, Mr Charters has revealed, a group of masked thugs flung a tin of baked beans at him in the street, while chanting, 'Labour, Labour, genocide.' Then, on Saturday, around 20 of them tried to block the entrance to his constituency surgery, while bellowing, 'Luke Charters, you can't hide, we charge you with genocide.' As a result, he says, several constituents were too scared to attend meetings they'd arranged with him. What on earth could possess someone to think it's acceptable to hurl a tin at an MP (or, indeed, anyone?). Huxley knew. These foaming narcissists clearly believe that their cause is so unimpeachably righteous, they're entitled to bully anyone who doesn't share their fanaticism. And they do it with the most jubilant relish. Of course, Mr Charters isn't the only MP to be plagued by such people. One night in February last year, a mob of anti-Israel protesters angrily demonstrated outside the family home of the then Tory MP Tobias Ellwood. And last July, the Labour MP Rushanara Ali said that during the election campaign she'd 'spent as much time talking to the police and responding to threats and hostilities as I did talking to voters'. Certain groups, she said, had been 'weaponising' what she called 'legitimate anger about what's happening' in Gaza. Such behaviour goes far beyond 'peaceful protest'. If frenzied mobs are not only intimidating MPs, but deterring their constituents from visiting them, there can be only one conclusion. Pro-Palestinian thugs are becoming a threat to democracy. Still, I don't suppose they care. These moral treats are so delicious, they couldn't possibly give them up.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
DWP reveals what will happen to disability benefit claimants after cuts
Labour has published its landmark welfare bill, laying bare the full extent of the plans to cut welfare for millions of disabled benefit claimants ahead of a crunch vote next month. Titled the 'Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill,' the legislation lays out exactly what will happen to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claimants who lose their entitlement under the new measures. Currently claimed by 3.7 million people, PIP is designed to help with extra costs incurred by living with an illness or disability. The changes, first announced by DWP secretary Liz Kendall in March, will see the 'daily living' element of the benefit effectively become harder to claim as the eligibility criteria is tightened. As before, assessors will decide if an applicant has limited ability to carry out daily living activities. They do this by asking applicants to carry out a range of activities, awarding them points based on how limited their ability is. The applicant will be awarded points based on how limited their ability is for each, needing eight overall to secure this element of the benefit at the basic rate, and twelve for the higher. But from November 2026, they will need to score at least four points in a single daily living activity to be awarded this element of the benefit. The eight required points can no longer be spread across activities. Around 1.5 million people who currently claim the benefit would no longer be eligible under this criteria, analysis by the Office for Budget Responsibility shows. The watchdog adds that the 'behavioural response' could reduce this to around 800,000 people, but acknowledges that this is a 'highly uncertain judgement'. The changes have received strong backlash from charities and campaign groups, as over 100 Labour MPs are understood to be considering voting against the government on the plans. What happens if I lose my PIP entitlement? Crucially, anyone already claiming PIP will not see their entitlement reduced without attending a reassessment. These happen every three years on average. Once invited for a reassessment – for which attendance is compulsory – applicants will be assessed as before. However, the new points-scoring system will now apply. If the reassessment results in someone losing their entitlement to the daily living element of PIP as a direct result of Labour's changes, it will not stop being paid at that rate immediately. Instead, payments will continue at that level for 13 weeks as a 'transitional cover.' This will cease to be paid if the recipient moves abroad or is reassessed and becomes entitled again. After these 13 weeks, payments for the daily living part of the benefit will cease. This protection will include those who lose their eligibility for Carers Allowance and the carer's element of Universal Credit. The DWP said: 'The 13-week additional protection will give people who will be affected by the changes time to adapt, access new, tailored employment support, and plan for their future once they are reassessed and their entitlement ends. A release from the department adds that this protection is 'one of the most generous ever.'
ITV News
3 hours ago
- ITV News
Warm home discount to be extended to 2.7 million more households
Energy bill discounts of £150 will be extended to another 2.7 million households to help with fuel costs next winter. This brings the number of households eligible for the warm home discount up to just over 6 million, the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) has confirmed after a consultation. The changes remove some restrictions on eligibility and mean every bill payer on means-tested benefits will qualify. Some 900,000 families with children and 1.8 million homes in fuel poverty are set to benefit from the payment. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said: 'I know families are still struggling with the cost of living, and I know the fear that comes with not being able to afford your next bill. 'Providing security and peace of mind for working people is deeply personal to me as Prime Minister and foundational for the Plan for Change. 'I have no doubt that, like rolling out free school meals, breakfast clubs and childcare support, extending this £150 energy bills support to millions more families will make a real difference.' Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said: 'Millions of families will get vital support with the cost of living this coming winter, demonstrating this government's commitment to put money in people's pockets through our Plan for Change. The Conservatives criticised the move, saying energy prices are expected to keep climbing overall. Andrew Bowie, the acting shadow energy secretary, said: 'Labour promised to cut everyone's energy bills by £300 but they have increased by £280 and are forecast to keep going up. 'Energy bills need to come down but this announcement will cut bills for just a quarter of households whilst increasing them for everyone else. 'Kemi Badenoch and I have been clear that net zero by 2050 is impossible without bankrupting Britain and making hard-working families worse off.'
