New images of Argyle Street revamp released as part of £120m project
Glasgow City Council is working on the Argyle Street East Avenue project, which will see the revamp of a stretch from Glasgow Cross to Central Station.
Under the scheme, pavements will be widened, new green areas developed and a new west-to-east bus route created. Work is set to begin in early 2026.
It is part of the wider £120m-plus Avenues programme under way across the city centre, which is funded by the Scottish and UK Governments through the Glasgow City Region City Deal.
Cllr Angus Millar, SNP, the council's convener for city centre recovery and transport, said: 'The Argyle Street East Avenue is about readying these famous streets for the century ahead.
'Recent decades have been tough for this part of town but we're seeing new turnaround developments on Trongate, major retail offerings on Argyle Street and global employers investing in new headquarters just further west. That's real confidence in our city centre.
'The Argyle Street East Avenue is about creating the conditions for more of that. But also, giving Glaswegians a greener, more attractive city centre with an international look and feel they can be proud of.' LDRS A pedestrian-friendly zone is planned on Ingram Street. Image from Glasgow City Council
The council has published a prior information notice to gauge interests from firms who may wish to bid for the project contract.
This project will link in with ongoing work at the western end of Argyle Street, and when completed will 'help transform the look and feel of the street from the M8 to the Gallowgate', the council has said.
Stuart Patrick, chief executive of the Glasgow Chamber of Commerce, said: 'The move to significantly enhance both the functionality and appeal of a key part of Glasgow city centre is a welcomed development.
'Creating a more attractive environment for businesses, residents and visitors, while improving connectivity between our transport hubs, is essential to Glasgow's long-term economic recovery.
'Although the Avenues programme is complex, using a combination of lessons learned from previous phases alongside continued engagement with business, it is hoped there will be limited impact on the trading environment.' LDRS A pedestrian-friendly zone is planned on Ingram Street. Image from Glasgow City Council
The project is set to include a new bus route through the pedestrianised section of the street, which the council has said will create much shorter journey times and better public transport connections.
It will also 'create the conditions to accelerate work to create more pedestrian-priority spaces and reduce traffic' around Queen Street, Ingram Street and Candeleriggs. Engagement with the local community around these streets is planned in the coming weeks.
The council's plans have been welcomed by some transport operators and passenger groups.
Dr George Hazel OBE, chair of the Glasgow City Region Bus Partnership, said they would deliver faster, more reliable journey times.
He added: 'This makes public transport a more attractive and convenient option, encouraging people to make fewer car journeys which reduces congestion and contributes towards a more equitable and sustainable transportation system for all.
'It also supports the economy of the city centre improving access for workers and the retail and leisure sectors.'
Greig Mackay, director for Scotland at Bus Users UK, a charity dedicated to promoting accessible public transport, said: 'A new west-to-east bus route in the city centre will help reduce journey times and increase service reliability which is good news for those who rely on public transport, and for the wider environment.
'Interventions which make journeying by bus a more viable and appealing option can attract new bus passengers and encourage existing users to travel more frequently.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Energy giants have questions to answer over zonal pricing
For the Highlands, the proposal ticked boxes. In a region with a colder climate, in which an estimated 33% of households in Highland experience fuel poverty, and have higher costs of living and lower incomes, the possibility of lower energy bills was attractive. Especially given that costs for those in the Highlands and Islands are higher, because of greater dependence on electricity and heating oil than mains gas. Even the unstinting efforts of Changeworks, Home Energy Scotland, the Energy Saving Trust and other advice services can only partially mitigate the difficulties faced by many. But now Energy and Climate Change Minister Ed Miliband has rejected Zonal Pricing, asserting that 'a fair, secure, affordable and efficient electricity system' can only be achieved through a reformed pricing system. Read more: The way to escape from dependence on 'fossil fuel markets controlled by dictators' is through a single national (UK) wholesale price. The dreaded 'Postcode Lottery' had to be avoided. And there was no guarantee Zonal Pricing would bring lower bills for anyone. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray praised the decision, citing a 'predictable climate for investment'. Consumers will, he insisted, 'feel the benefit of Labour's clean energy mission.' Bigger energy players agreed: Centrica have called it 'common-sense' and SSE's Martin Pibworth has said zonal pricing would have slowed the clean power transition, 'making energy bills more expensive.' The Inverness Courier responded with alacrity and condemnation: 'Labour's Ed Miliband has ruled out zonal pricing that could have cut Scotland's soaring energy bills because it would be 'unfair' to areas like the Midlands and South of England that consume the most power … the move could have a significant impact on next year's Holyrood election … over-charging Highland residents for electricity that is generated in the region.' Ed Miliband has come under fire over the decision. (Image: Newsquest) It's also worth noting that the SNP has carefully avoided backing zonal pricing – Kate Forbes and John Swinney, while predictably critical of Miliband, have steered clear, after the mess they made of Scotwind leases for offshore wind rights, underselling by, some say, £60 billion. While co-operation between UK and Scottish Governments is essential, criticism of Ed Miliband's statement is hypocrisy. All the same, UK Labour will need a good wind in its sails if it wishes to persuade voters with its reformed national pricing regime, changes to transmission charging and more planned infrastructure development. For starters, it must reassure the thousands already unconvinced by the bitter contrast between talk of a 'just transition' and the 150-metre-plus wind turbines marching implacably through their glen, trailing substations behind. Except these are not Labour Government developments. Among Mrs Thatcher's many gifts to us was a Wild West Energy marketplace, and the very corpulent corporations currently invading rural Scotland are not bringing power to the glens for the nation, like Tom Johnston, but seeking profit with a greenwashed prospectus. And the UK Government is not the major player here, its partnership with Big Energy looking a bit uneven. Ed Miliband's department is promising eligible households within 500 metres of electricity transmission infrastructure discounts on their bills, with further compensation to come. Read more: Will this be enough? I want to see UK Labour deliver its proposals for 'a transformative Community Energy programme' – community-led renewables and a 20% community share of large-scale projects. I want an end to Constraint payments adding to consumers' bills, when the Grid infrastructure isn't up to the job and turbine sails move uselessly around like Tories canvassing at elections. The challenges of rural living remain, and must be addressed. One of the most authoritative studies is the 2023 report by the Royal Society of Edinburgh, The cost of living: impact on rural communities in Scotland. And the Scottish Human Rights Commission's 2024 report on life in the Highlands and Islands stands in stark judgement on all levels of government. Energy costs loom large in these important documents. But the biggest questions should be asked of those corporate giants of Scottish energy, whose lobbying is ever on behalf of shareholders and profits. Their campaigning and threatening have worked so far, but their cynicism, seeing communities as anonymous cattle to be milked, must now be lessened by more realistic community shares. Zonal pricing, Big Energy claimed, risked hindering investment, diverting time and resources, bringing volatility, market instability and probably plagues of frogs. Well, SSEN (profits £2.4bn.) E-ON (£3bn) EDF (£8.5bn) and Scottish Power (£1.2bn) now have to walk the walk, and deliver on their promises to help consumers and build an age of clean power. Michael Gregson is a Labour councillor for Inverness Central
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
When will Miliband make up his mind on Mingyang?
Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband is preparing to be grilled by the Energy Security and Net Zero Committee this afternoon – and Mr S has a question for the lefty Cabinet minister too. While the veteran politician has expended a lot of his own energy on taking a pop at net-zero sceptics for 'talking their country down', he appears to be neglecting some rather important decision-making. As parliament prepares to rise for recess, Mr S would like to know whether Miliband has finished dithering over a dilemma regarding China's influence over Britain's infrastructure: specifically, the curious case of Mingyang Smart Energy. Miliband appears to be dragging his heels in considering what exactly to do about a windfarm project in Scotland that could see British reliance on Chinese-made turbines. Mingyang Smart Energy is a private Chinese company with close ties to the Chinese Communist Party. The organisation is hoping to sign a contract with Green Volt North Sea – jointly owned by Flotation Energy, a Scottish company, and Vårgrønn, a Norwegian one – which is constructing the first commercial-scale floating offshore wind farm in Europe. The project aims to deliver electricity to oil and gas platforms (in place of power generated via gas and diesel turbines) and power the UK grid. Green Volt has been waiting on approval from the government to go ahead using Mingyang-made blades for months – but with no response as yet, the company remains in limbo. The contract would involve Mingyang establishing a turbine factory in Scotland – a move the Trump administration has directly warned the government against over security concerns. So much for a just transition, eh? The decision to allow Mingyang machinery has left ministers divided amidst an 'ongoing discussion' on the role of China in Britain's critical infrastructure. Concerns centre around national security, as well as the possible use of forced labour in supply chains – such as from the repressed Uyghur population in Xinjiang province. Mingyang's CEO and chair Zhang Chuanwei has links to the CCP and is regarded as a longtime party loyalist. As noted in a 2021 profile of the company boss by Gavekal Fathom China, Zhang joined the People's Liberation Army as a clerk in 1978, aged just 16, before applying to join the party at 18. Zhang even served as a CCP representative in the 12th and 13th National People's Congress from 2013-2023. How very interesting… Ministers are of course able to block any investment into the UK under the 2021 National Security and Investment Act of 2021 and the government has stopped Chinese investment in the past over 'national security risks'. In 2022, the government halted the takeover of the UK's largest producer of semi-conductors by Nexperia, a Chinese-owned manufacturer. And Miliband's dilemma comes just months after Chinese company Jingye came under fire over its steel production plant in Scunthorpe in April, when it threatened to turn off the blast furnaces. While Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds suggested 'neglect' could have been the issue, reports at the time saw government officials pushing the theory that there had been a 'plot to sabotage' the British Steel plant. Tensions heightened when China snubbed a major 60-country UK summit on energy security the following week. So why is Miliband taking so long to make up his mind? Well, the Energy Secretary has remarked before that the foreign power is integral for global climate action. 'It is simply an act of negligence…not to engage China on how it can play its part in taking action on climate,' Miliband said in March following his trip to Beijing for the UK's first formal climate talks with China since 2017. During his visit, Miliband met the Chinese vice premier Ding Xuexiang as well as the head of the country's National Energy Administration, Wang Hongzhi, and is said to have pointed to 'mutually beneficial results' of cooperation, including in the offshore wind sector. But all that considered, there remain rather concerning questions of national security. For their part, a government spokesperson told Steerpike: 'We would never let anything get in the way of our national security, and while we would not comment on individual cases, investment in the energy sector is subject to the highest levels of national security scrutiny.' Whatever – and whenever – will Miliband decide? The clock is ticking…
Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
SNP accused of 'stifling economic growth' after £9m annual retail rates surcharge revealed
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Commercial premises in Scotland have paid out almost £600 million more in business rates than counterparts south of the Border due to a surcharge, with the set up costing retailers around £9m extra each year. SNP ministers have been accused of 'stifling growth' after it emerged that commercial premises in Scotland liable for the 'higher property rate' have cumulatively paid an extra £580 million more in business rates than their equivalent-sized counterparts in England over the past ten years. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Buchanan Street in Glasgow's city centre. Picture: John Linton/PA Wire Any business that uses, or has the right to use, a property with a rateable value of more than £100,000 will pay an extra 7p on top of the rate poundage, which is set by the Scottish Government each year. This means that those business will pay 56.8p in 2025-2026 for every £1 of rateable value - known as the higher property rate. Analysis of Scottish Government figures shows that the retail industry's share of the divergence from England amounts to £93m over the 10-year period, excluding the pandemic when businesses received 100 per cent business rates waiver - around £9m each year. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Offices have paid out an extra £73m compared to English counterparts, while manufacturing sites have been charged £91.7m and hotels have faced £20.3m from the surcharge. There are 11,360 business premises in Scotland that are subject to the 'higher property rate', of which 2,380 are shops. Retail bosses have warned against the 'slab tax' which means the higher rate applies to each and every pound of a property's rateable value, rather than a progressive scale. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Divergence with England began in the spring of 2016, when the higher property rate, then called the large business supplement, was doubled. The Scottish Government-commissioned Barclay Rates Review in 2017, described the surcharge as 'damaging perceptions' of Scotland's competitiveness, which called for parity with England to be restored by Spring 2020, now five years ago. David Lonsdale, director of the Scottish Retail Consortium, said: 'It's a challenging enough time for Scotland's shops and retail destinations with retail sales and footfall at best flatlining while statutory costs shoot up. David Lonsdale, director of the Scottish Retail Consortium 'Over and above this almost 2,500 Scottish stores are having to stump up more in business rates than their counterparts in England, to the tune of £9 million a year. This Scotland-only surcharge makes it even more expensive to operate a store on our high streets and to trade profitably. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We're flummoxed as to why the Scottish Government thinks thousands of stores and other businesses operating here in Scotland are better placed to fork out more in business rates than similar sized premises down south. 'It's not in the interest of Scotland's economy for shop owners to be incentivised to invest in Berwick-upon-Tweed over Balloch, Bathgate or Brechin. We need a firm commitment from ministers to reduce business rates and ensure that Scots retailers are never again charged more than their counterparts down south.' First Minister John Swinney has claimed that under his leadership, the SNP and the Scottish Government has fostered a better relationship with the business community than his predecessors. First Minister John Swinney (Picture: Jane Barlow - Pool/Getty Images) Mr Swinney's four key priorities in government include growing the economy, while many business leaders were unimpressed with the SNP's co-operation agreement with the Scottish Greens who do not recognise economic growth or GDP as a measure of positivity - an arrangement Mr Swinney has not revisited, while he has actively opposed Green policies. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In his first programme for government last year, the First Minister stressed that 'small and medium-sized businesses are the backbone of our economy', as he pledged to 'deliver the commitments set out in the New Deal for Business' - a strategy initially established in 2023. In January, the First Minister warned that he was 'left with the sense that Scotland's economy is not performing as well as it should'. READ MORE: Scottish high street suffers sales blow as households go holidaying and gigging He added: 'Scotland's unfulfilled economic performance – compared to both peers and pure potential – is not a recent development. It has been our national reality for decades.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But political opponents have criticised the SNP for the party of government's attitude to business and hit out at the divergence in business rates with traders south of the Border. Scottish Conservative shadow business secretary Murdo Fraser MSP said: 'It's frankly shameful that the SNP have made Scottish businesses fork out over £500 million more than their counterparts down South. Scottish Tory MSP Murdo Fraser | Contributed 'The SNP are anti-business and anti-growth. They just don't get how hard local business owners are working to make ends meet. 'Only the Scottish Conservatives have a plan to support entrepreneurs by passing on 40 per cent business rates relief to Scottish retail, hospitality and leisure businesses.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scottish Labour's business spokesperson, Daniel Johnson, warned that policies brought forward by SNP ministers were acting as a barrier to economic growth. He said: 'This is yet another example of SNP economic incompetence hammering businesses and stifling growth. Daniel Johnson 'It is simply wrong that businesses are being penalised by this government. 'Scottish businesses are fed up with paying more and getting less in return.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government is working closely with businesses to drive economic growth and prosperity in our towns, cities and communities and provide support through a competitive non-domestic rates relief package worth an estimated £733 million this year. This includes the most generous small business rates relief in the UK. 'However, we are doing all of this without the full economic powers needed to fully address the issues facing Scotland's economy. We need decisive action from the UK Government, including a reversal of its damaging decision to increase employers' national insurance contributions which is severely hampering business confidence, investment, growth and jobs.' Meanwhile, a separate report has revealed profit alerts among UK retailers more than doubled in the second quarter as consumers reined in their spending and firms faced soaring wage costs. The latest report from EY-Parthenon also showed that overall profit warnings among UK-listed firms jumped by a fifth year-on-year in the second quarter – with a record proportion citing policy changes and geopolitical uncertainty as the leading factor. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The data showed that seven UK-listed retailers, including supermarkets, cut profit guidance between April and June. Britain's retail sector has come under significant pressure since last autumn's Budget move to hike National Insurance Contributions (NICs) and the minimum wage, both taking effect in April. But EY said the high street was also facing tough consumer spending challenges, with shoppers cutting back and focusing on value. EY partner Silvia Rindone said the spike in retail warnings 'highlights both softening consumer demand and the deeper structural headwinds facing the sector'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Retailers we speak to tell us that falling sales are currently indicative of a longer-term shift, with consumers becoming more value-focused and less brand-local, which leaves cost-pressured retailers in a bind,' she said. Tariff woes sparked by US President Donald Trump waging a trade war also featured heavily in the report, contributing to a rise in the number of alerts more widely across corporate plc. The report found that the number of profit warnings issued by UK-listed companies rose by 20 per cent to 59 in the second quarter compared with 49 a year ago.
