‘Unsightly' trees are not a nuisance, B.C. tribunal rules
The City of Vernon, B.C., is seen in this image from its website. (vernon.ca)
A seniors' home in B.C.'s Okanagan has lost its bid to compel its next door neighbour to pay for the cost of trimming trees that were encroaching onto its property.
B.C. Civil Resolution Tribunal member Mark Henderson agreed that the overhanging branches were 'unsightly,' but found that the Abbeyfield Houses of Vernon Society had not provided sufficient evidence to justify an order requiring neighbour James Budrow to pay for their removal.
According to Henderson's decision, which was published online Tuesday, there are 'several types of deciduous trees' growing along the property line on Budrow's side.
Photos provided by the society showed 'many branches' extending over the property line, in some cases 'overhanging the roof and touching the gutters of the two-storey house' on the society's side, the decision reads.
In March 2023, Abbeyfield began asking Budrow to come onto its property and trim the trees. The decision indicates he initially agreed to do so, but later refused.
After asking multiple times over the ensuing months, the society eventually hired a contractor to do the work in October 2023.
Abbeyfield applied to the CRT seeking an order for Budrow to reimburse it for the $1,470 it paid to have the trees trimmed.
'It is well-established that a property owner can trim overhanging branches back to the property line that are encroaching on their land,' Henderson's decision reads.
'So, the applicant was within its rights to hire the tree contractor to trim the branches. The respondent is only responsible for the trimming cost if the branches were a nuisance.'
As the applicant in the case, Abbeyfield bore the burden of proving, on the balance of probabilities, that the overhanging branches were a 'substantial, non-trivial, unreasonable interference' with the society's use and enjoyment of the property.
Physical damage caused by the branches would be 'a strong indication' that the interference was unreasonable, and therefore a nuisance, according to the decision.
While Abbeyfield provided photos and aerial video of the encroachment and alleged that it had damaged shingles on the building's roof, Henderson found none of the images were close enough for him to assess whether such damage existed.
The tribunal member also found that the society had provided insufficient evidence to support its assertion that 'leaves and debris from the trees were collecting in the applicant's roof valleys and gutters.'
'Although the photographs show that the overhanging branches are unsightly, I am not persuaded by the available evidence that they unreasonably interfered with the applicant's use and enjoyment of its property,' the decision concludes.
'So, I find that the encroaching trees were not a nuisance. For that reason, I dismiss the applicant's claim.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
26 minutes ago
- National Post
As separatist talk simmers in Alberta and Quebec, Canadians say breaking up will be hard to do: poll
Against a backdrop of fresh talk of Alberta separation and the constant spectre of Quebec's sovereignty movement, a new national opinion poll found that most Canadians say breaking up will be hard to do. Article content A large majority of respondents nationally said any secession by one province would require negotiation with all provinces and must be supported by a clear majority of voters in the province, and most said separation cannot be a unilateral decision, and it should require approval by the federal House of Commons. Article content Article content Article content A national opinion survey, conducted by Leger Marketing for the Association for Canadian Studies and provided to Postmedia, was designed to probe Canadians attitudes about the process for separation, rather than their views on separation itself, and what should follow a successful provincial leave referendum. Article content Article content 'The bottom line is that Canadians across the country envision the process as much more complex than a simple majority vote on a referendum question,' said Jack Jedwab, president of the Montreal-based Association for Canadian Studies. Article content Public discussion about Alberta separating from Canada drew more mainstream attention in May, after the federal election returned the Liberal Party to government and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith tabled provincial legislation to make it easier for Albertans to trigger a referendum on the province leaving the rest of Canada. Smith said she would hold such a referendum if a citizen petition called for it. Article content Article content Separatists in Quebec hope the renewed discourse on separation will boost their long-standing desire for independent statehood, which twice went to provincial referendum which failed to support sovereignty, in 1980 and 1995. The Parti Québécois plans another provincial sovereignty referendum in the years ahead. Article content That creates plenty of secessionist talk and debate, but it has been 30 years since Canada has seen an actual separation referendum. Article content 'Many Canadians of voting age and, of course, most immigrants didn't experience the last referendum 30 years ago, but there is a growing consensus that the rest of the country would want a say in the process and secession would not be simple,' said Jedwab. Article content The poll asked 1,537 people across Canada a series of questions on the mechanism of a possible separation. Article content Article content A majority of Canadians said any referendum question regarding provincial separation from Canada must be unambiguous, with 59 per cent of respondents agreeing with that, with only 11 per cent disagreeing, and 30 per cent saying they don't know or declined to answer.
CTV News
26 minutes ago
- CTV News
Lapu-Lapu memorial service held 40 days after festival attack, in Filipino tradition
A Lapu-Lapu memorial service was held June 5, 40 days after the attack on the Filipino festival. It has been 40 days of pain for Vancouver's Filipino community. Forty days of disbelief since a car rammed through a crowd at the Lapu-Lapu festival in April, leaving 11 people dead. On Thursday night in East Vancouver, a service was held to remember those who were lost. 'In Filipino Catholic tradition, the 40 days is very significant,' Crystal Laderas with Filipino BC told CTV News on Thursday. 'It's believed that within the 40 days, the souls of our loved ones are very close to us, and then on the 40th day, they transition to the afterlife and they find peace.' A touching memorial service was held at St. Andrew's Parish Church in East Vancouver, just blocks from where tragedy struck, marking a chance to honour those who died. It's the latest in a series of memorial events since the attack in April which made global headlines – in what has been described as one of Vancouver's darkest days. 'These 40 days recall the ancient story that when people lost their direction, lost their hope, somehow, like Jesus himself, showed himself alive and told them, despite what happened, we have hope,' Father Francis Galvan, who has Filipino heritage, told CTV News outside the church. After the service, those in attendance gathered at the site of the attack, lighting candles and saying prayers for those killed and injured. The days leading up to this event involved a debate over a City of Vancouver plan for a large scale benefit concert at Rogers Arena. That now appears as if it will go ahead, though no date has been set and there are conversations over specifics between the parties involved before any final decision. Filipino BC says Thursday's memorial service isn't closure, and that healing has no schedule. But at least this is a chance to remember – and honour – those who were lost.
CBC
31 minutes ago
- CBC
What is a duty to consult — and how will it affect Bill 5?
The Ontario government's controversial Bill 5 was passed with no consultation with First Nations, whose treaty lands are likely to be affected. Metro Morning spoke with an Anishinaabe scholar at the University of Toronto about the difference between a duty to consult and the "free, prior and informed consent" of First Nations leaders.
