logo
‘They're on. They're off.' Court rulings add to whiplash for businesses on Trump's tariffs.

‘They're on. They're off.' Court rulings add to whiplash for businesses on Trump's tariffs.

Boston Globe5 days ago

'We've taken a position of remaining cool and seeing what happens,' said Dana Katz, owner of
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
He hasn't raised prices yet on his tailored men's suits, blazers, and other merchandise even though about 95 percent of it is imported from a variety of countries. But Katz said he's been in frequent communication with his wholesale suppliers and will have to raise prices if the tariffs remain in place.
Advertisement
Right now, that's a big if.
Trump has made tariffs a centerpiece of his economic policy. He has argued that increasing the levies the US government slaps on foreign imports from dozens of nations — as high as 145 percent at one point this year on goods from China — will lure more manufacturing back to the United States and provide leverage to negotiate more favorable trade deals.
Advertisement
But the higher tariffs have triggered trade wars with several foreign nations, including China and Canada, which raised their own levies on US goods in response. Trump has tried to mitigate the fallout, which included major financial market selloffs, by reducing or pausing some of the increases, including through
Trump's actions also spurred lawsuits from business owners and several Democratic-run states arguing that he had exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. Trump had said the federal trade deficit and the flow of fentanyl into the country constitute emergencies.
On Wednesday in Manhattan, a three judge panel of appointees by Presidents Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama, and Trump himself unanimously struck down most of the president's tariffs, saying the law did not give him 'unbounded authority.'
The court kept in place tariffs on steel, aluminum, and automobiles imposed under other laws. Then on Thursday, that ruling was temporarily halted by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Separately, US District Judge Rudolph Contreras, an Obama appointee, granted a preliminary injunction Thursday against the same set of tariffs in a case filed
in Washington, D.C.,
by two small businesses. He paused the injunction for 14 days to give the Trump administration time to appeal.
White House officials decried the rulings as the actions of 'rogue judges' and predicted Trump ultimately would prevail.
Advertisement
'As far as we're concerned, our trade agenda is moving forward . . . and we fully expect to win this case in court,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. Administration officials are continuing to negotiate trade deals with foreign leaders and Leavitt said Trump spoke to Japan's prime minister, Shigeru Ishiba, Thursday in a call she described as 'very good.'
But William Reinsch, a trade expert who served in the Clinton administration, predicted that foreign officials won't want to agree to any trade deals until the tariff court cases are fully resolved.
'It seems to me that no government in its right mind will agree to concessions given the possibility that the need to do that might go away,' said Reinsch, now a senior adviser at the bipartisan Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank.
The stalling of trade talks will just add to the uncertainty on tariffs that has frozen US businesses, he said.
'They're up. They're down. They're on. They're off. There are exceptions. There aren't exceptions. They're bigger. They're smaller. They're postponed. They're not postponed,' Reinsch said. 'I mean, who knows on any given day what's going to happen? And so nobody does anything because they're waiting for the dust to settle."
Senator Peter Welch, a Vermont Democrat, got a firsthand taste of the trouble
when he held a roundtable on tariffs in Manchester, Vt., on Wednesday with local businesses, including fishing gear manufacturer
Orvis and Back Roads Granola.
'We literally have situations . . . where if they're importing something, it'll be on a cargo ship from abroad, and just before it hits the port there will be a 50 percent tariff increase,' Welch told the Globe. 'They're complaining about the added price, but also the total uncertainty that makes it impossible to do their business, whether it's super-premium granola or super-premium fly casting rods.'
Advertisement
Trump's burst of tariffs in April raised the overall average US rate on foreign goods tenfold, to 25 percent from about
2.5 percent at the end of last year, said Gregory Daco, chief economist at global consulting firm EY-Parthenon. The temporary suspension of many of the tariffs on China earlier in May lowered that average tariff rate to 14 percent — still the highest since 1939, Daco said.
If this week's court rulings are upheld, the rate would drop to 4.6 percent, which while much lower is still nearly double what it was at the start of the year.
'When you raise tariffs in such an extreme manner to levels that, until recently, were inconceivable and then you lower them back down to levels that are still at historical highs, you're still implementing a significant increase in cost of doing trade and doing business,' Daco said.
The ongoing tariff rollercoaster has consumed business owners, said Greg Reibman, president of the Charles River Chamber, whose members are in Newton, Needham, Watertown, and Wellesley.
'It's a big issue for everybody that I hear from, the retailers and restaurants or anybody who's dealing with any kind of supply chain issue,' he said. 'If you're a business trying to decide when to place an order, it's like playing roulette right now.'
That's why Katz, of Miltons, which has stores in Braintree, Chestnut Hill, and Burlington, has been trying to remain calm.
'We certainly watch it and discuss it every day, and we have conversations with our suppliers every day,' he said. 'There's certainly a degree of uncertainty. I liken it to COVID 2.0.'
Advertisement
Jim Puzzanghera can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republican push for proof of citizenship to vote proves a tough sell in the states
Republican push for proof of citizenship to vote proves a tough sell in the states

Associated Press

time6 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Republican push for proof of citizenship to vote proves a tough sell in the states

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans have made it a priority this year to require people to prove citizenship before they can register to vote. Turning that aspiration into reality has proved difficult. Trump's executive order directing a documentary, proof-of-citizenship requirement for federal elections has been blocked by a judge, while federal legislation to accomplish it doesn't appear to have the votes to pass in the Senate. At the same time, state-level efforts have found little success, even in places where Republicans control the legislature and governor's office. The most recent state effort to falter is in Texas, where a Senate bill failed to gain full legislative approval before lawmakers adjourned on Monday. The Texas bill was one of the nation's most sweeping proof-of-citizenship proposals because it would have applied not only to new registrants but also to the state's roughly 18.6 million registered voters. 'The bill authors failed spectacularly to explain how this bill would be implemented and how it would be able to be implemented without inconveniencing a ton of voters,' said Anthony Gutierrez, director of the voting rights group Common Cause Texas. Voting by noncitizens is already illegal and punishable as a felony, potentially leading to deportation, but Trump and his allies have pressed for a proof-of-citizenship mandate by arguing it would improve public confidence in elections. Before his win last year, Trump falsely claimed noncitizens might vote in large enough numbers to sway the outcome. Although noncitizen voting does occur, research and reviews of state cases has shown it to be rare and more often a mistake. Voting rights groups say the various proposals seeking to require proof-of-citizenship are overly burdensome and threaten to disenfranchise millions of Americans. Many do not have easy access to their birth certificates, have not gotten a U.S. passport or have a name that no longer matches the one on their birth certificate — such as women who changed their last name when they married. The number of states considering bills related to proof of citizenship for voting tripled from 2023 to this year, said Liz Avore, senior policy adviser with the Voting Rights Lab, an advocacy group that tracks election legislation in the states. That hasn't resulted in many new laws, at least so far. Republicans in Wyoming passed their own proof-of-citizenship legislation, but similar measures have stalled or failed in multiple GOP-led states, including Florida, Missouri, Texas and Utah. A proposal remains active in Ohio, although Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, has said he doesn't want to sign any more bills that make it harder to vote. In Texas, the legislation swiftly passed the state Senate after it was introduced in March but never made it to a floor vote in the House. It was unclear why legislation that was such a priority for Senate Republicans – every one of them co-authored the bill -- ended up faltering. 'I just think people realized, as flawed as this playbook has been in other states, Texas didn't need to make this mistake,' said Rep. John Bucy, a Democrat who serves as vice chair of the House elections committee. Bucy pointed to specific concerns about married women who changed their last name. This surfaced in local elections earlier this year in New Hampshire, which passed a proof-of-citizenship requirement last year. Other states that previously sought to add such a requirement have faced lawsuits and complications when trying to implement it. In Arizona, a state audit found that problems with the way data was handled had affected the tracking and verification of residents' citizenship status. It came after officials had identified some 200,000 voters who were thought to have provided proof of their citizenship but had not. A proof-of-citizenship requirement was in effect for three years in Kansas before it was overturned by federal courts. The state's own expert estimated that almost all of the roughly 30,000 people who were prevented from registering to vote while it was in effect were U.S. citizens who otherwise had been eligible. In Missouri, legislation seeking to add a proof-of-citizenship requirement cleared a Senate committee but never came to a vote in the Republican-led chamber. Republican state Sen. Ben Brown had promoted the legislation as a follow-up to a constitutional amendment stating that only U.S. citizens can vote, which Missouri voters overwhelmingly approved last November. He said there were several factors that led to the bill not advancing this year. Due to the session's limited schedule, he chose to prioritize another elections bill banning foreign contributions in state ballot measure campaigns. 'Our legislative session ending mid-May means a lot of things die at the finish line because you simply run out of time,' Brown said, noting he also took time to research concerns raised by local election officials and plans to reintroduce the proof-of-citizenship bill next year. The Republican-controlled Legislature in Utah also prioritized other election changes, adding voter ID requirements and requiring people to opt in to receive their ballots in the mail. Before Gov. Spencer Cox signed the bill into law, Utah was the only Republican-controlled state that allowed all elections to be conducted by mail without a need to opt in. Under the Florida bill that has failed to advance, voter registration applications wouldn't be considered valid until state officials had verified citizenship, either by confirming a previous voting history, checking the applicant's status in state and federal databases, or verifying documents they provided. The bill would have required voters to prove their citizenship even when updating their registration to change their address or party affiliation. Its sponsor, Republican state Rep. Jenna Persons-Mulicka, said it was meant to follow through on Trump's executive order: 'This bill fully answers the president's call,' she said. ___ Cassidy reported from Atlanta. Associated Press writers Mead Gruver in Cheyenne, Wyoming; David A. Lieb in Jefferson City, Missouri; Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida; Hannah Schoenbaum in Salt Lake City; Julie Carr Smyth in Columbus, Ohio; and Isabella Volmert in Lansing, Michigan, contributed to this report.

Investors bet on Trump tariff concessions as retaliation threats rattle markets
Investors bet on Trump tariff concessions as retaliation threats rattle markets

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Investors bet on Trump tariff concessions as retaliation threats rattle markets

China shares rose while Europe and the U.S. slipped as investors bet—or at least hoped—that U.S. President Donald Trump would step back from his most recent aggressive tariff threats. S&P futures were off 0.4% while Hong Kong rose 1.5%. Are trade tensions rising or falling? Unable to answer that question, investors let markets slip in Europe and the U.S. on Tuesday morning, bumping China. U.S. President Donald Trump's recent doubling of steel and aluminum tariffs to 50% and the imposition of new limits on the sale of chip design software to China—as well as his claim that Beijing had 'totally violated' the terms of the U.S.-China tariff truce—did little to encourage investors. Nor did EU threats of retaliation against the metals tariffs, as well as China's veiled warning that it would 'continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' Still, investor sentiment that Trump's tariff threats are not as dire as they first appear and that his administration will end up backing off the toughest ones (aka the 'TACO' trade) seems to be cushioning the markets from further drops. 'Reports in Washington suggest US President Trump may talk directly with China's President Xi later this week (after several days of more heated rhetoric between the US and China over trade),' UBS chief economist Paul Donovan said in a Tuesday note. 'As Trump has been anxious for the call, and China has not, this may hint at more US retreats over trade taxes as a concession to bring China to the telephone.' European markets and U.S. futures were down slightly early Tuesday, with the Stoxx Euro 600 dropping 0.2% while S&P futures were off 0.4% before the opening bell. In Asia, markets in China rose: Shanghai rose 0.4% after Monday's holiday, while Hong Kong's Hang Seng jumped 1.5%. 'It's a difficult time to forecast right now given the relentless crossfire of trade headlines. But there's a growing sense that we're now on a turbulent but sustained path towards de-escalation,' wrote Deutsche Bank's global head of macro research Jim Reid. 'Even if the US administration remain hawkish on trade, we have already seen there are limits to that approach, particularly in the face of market turmoil and declining approval ratings for President Trump. Here's a snapshot of today's action prior to the opening bell in New York (6:15 a.m. ET): • The S&P 500 was up 0.4% Monday. The index is up 0.9% YTD.• S&P futures were trading down 0.5% this morning.• The Stoxx Europe 600 was down 0.2% in early trading.• Asia was mixed: Japan was off 0.1%. Hong Kong rose 1.5%. Shanghai was up 0.4%, and India's Nifty 50 was off 0.7%.• Bitcoin was sitting up at $105,300 this morning. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Democrats' generational tensions reach boiling point in House primaries
Democrats' generational tensions reach boiling point in House primaries

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats' generational tensions reach boiling point in House primaries

A growing number of young Democrats have launched primary bids against the party's old guard in recent months, underscoring generational tensions that burst into the open following former Vice President Kamala Harris's defeat in November. Former House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) last week drew a primary challenger 50 years his junior in Harry Jarin, who cast the incumbent as representative of 'a bygone era.' He follows a number of other young candidates who have launched primary bids against veteran Democratic lawmakers. The trend comes amid renewed anxiety within the party over the issue of age, spurred by new revelations about former President Biden and the recent deaths of several older House members. 'A lot of politicians in Washington, they stew in this environment in D.C., sometimes for decades at a time, and they lose touch with young people and working people and people outside the beltway,' Jarin told The Hill. 'I think that's the reason for the sudden surge of primary challengers: We've now spent our whole lives seeing the same Democratic leaders do the same unproductive things in Congress and not actually deliver results.' Jarin, a 35-year-old volunteer firefighter and former 'Jeopardy!' contestant, is vying for the seat in Maryland's 5th Congressional District that Hoyer, 85, has held since his election in 1981. Hoyer, who won in November by more than 30 points, hasn't announced whether he'll seek reelection to a 24th term in 2026. In California, 39-year-old tech millionaire Saikat Chakrabarti, a veteran of Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) 2016 campaign and former chief of staff to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), is challenging 85-year-old former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D), who hasn't formally announced plans but reportedly filed paperwork to run for her 21st term. Another California incumbent, Rep. Brad Sherman (D), who at 70 is seeking his 16th House term, drew a challenge from a former deputy press secretary, Jake Rakov, 37. In Illinois, social media influencer Kat Abughazaleh, 26, launched a bid in March for Rep. Jan Schakowsky's (D) seat, contending that 'the same old s— isn't working.' Schakowsky, 80, later decided against trying for a 15th term, saying 'it is now time for me to pass the baton.' The campaigns are cropping up as Democrats grapple with broader questions about generational disconnect. 'Frankly, I do think we need sharper, new, fresh perspectives to address the challenges of today,' said Everton Blair, a 33-year-old educator who's challenging 12-term incumbent Rep. David Scott (D), 79, in Georgia's 13th Congressional District. 'When I think about the logistical conversation about age, it's like, you want folks that can last through a couple cycles, get to the place where they're still sharp and still able to get something done, and then they can also be a key part of the conversation and moving us forward for the next generation, and then building a bench while we still have time to build a bench,' Blair told The Hill. The 2024 election also raised red flags for Democrats that young voters, especially young men, are shifting right. 'It's worth noting that Republicans in Congress have definitely had a lot more turnover in the last decade than Democrats have. And I don't know that you could draw a direct line to some of the gains or unexpected dynamics folks are seeing with young voters, but it's certainly the case,' said Kaivan Shroff, a Democratic strategist and veteran of the Generation Z group Dream for America. The conversations have taken on a new sense of urgency in recent weeks with the release of multiple books that have ramped up scrutiny on Biden's health. The public recriminations that have emerged following the release of the books have also played out as the party reels from the recent deaths of three Democrats in the House. 'Six members of Congress have died in the last 16 months, and all of them were Democrats over age 65. So, I mean, I don't see how you can look at the situation and not say, 'Hey, we have a serious problem,'' Jarin told The Hill. 'I'm not putting down any of these people or the work that they've done. But we have to be realistic.' Republicans have also grappled with their own age-related issues for years. But the questions have been felt more acutely by Democrats in recent months as they search for answers following former Harris's devastating loss to Trump in November. Cheyenne Hunt, executive director of Gen-Z for Change, said some may be hesitant to talk about age issues, especially as there are many older lawmakers who are 'clearly still kicking and getting the job done.' 'But at the same time, this is a fundamental threat to our ability to govern, and so it simply cannot continue to be this way,' said Hunt, who mounted a bid to become the first Gen Z woman in Congress last year. 'The unwillingness to make space for new voices, particularly new voices that in general, are further left [than the] party establishment, is going to be a very, very serious threat to the party, and they're moving further and further away from where young voters are.' Still, young candidates and activists alike stress age isn't enough to make a winning pitch for the House. 'To me, it's not really about generational change, because there are older members that are meeting the moment and that are very good at what they do,' said George Hornedo, 34, who's running for the seat held by nine-term Rep. André Carson (D-Ind.). 'There can be younger members of Congress that aren't particularly strong.' 'It's about efficacy and accountability and being results-oriented,' he added. 'It's not enough to just say, 'Hey, I'm young and I'm fresh.' It's about being serious. It's about being strategic. It's about being able to take on a broken system and win.' Leaders We Deserve, a group helmed by Democratic National Committee Vice Chair David Hogg, launched an initiative last month aimed at elevating a new generation of leaders by supporting primary challenges against House Democrats in safe seats. The plans drew pushback as some fret about the high stakes in 2026, but Hogg stressed that it's not 'all about age.' 'There are older people who are great; there are young people who suck,' Hogg told MSNBC. He also told The Washington Post that his initiative has ruled out supporting challenges to Hoyer and Pelosi, among others. As 2026 approaches, young Americans are 'looking for new conversations,' Shroff said. 'If this next wave of young candidates doesn't bring that, then it's the same old, same old.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store