&w=3840&q=100)
At G7 summit, Donald Trump backs return of Russia, hints at adding China
US President Donald Trump, at the Group of Seven (G7) summit on Monday, called for Russia's return to the group and even floated the idea of including China.
Speaking beside Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Trump criticised Russia's 2014 expulsion from the then-G8 following its annexation of Crimea, describing it as a 'very big mistake' that made international diplomacy 'more complicated'.
'If Russia were still in, I don't think you'd have a war right now,' Trump declared, adding, 'If Trump were president four years ago, there would be no war.' He suggested that Russian President Vladimir Putin was 'very insulted' by the G8 expulsion and has since refused to engage with other G7 leaders, with the exception of Trump himself.
Trump incorrectly blames Trudeau for Russia G8 expulsion
He went on to blame former US President Barack Obama and 'a person named Trudeau' for orchestrating Russia's removal. However, the decision had been made before Trudeau took office under his predecessor, then Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
The remarks came as Trump prepared to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Tuesday to discuss the ongoing war sparked by Russia's 2022 invasion.
No problem with China joining G7: Trump
When asked by reporters whether China should also join, Trump said he had no objections: 'It's not a bad idea… If somebody wants to see just China coming in, I don't mind that.'
His comments appeared to challenge the current structure of the G7, which is composed exclusively of liberal democracies: the US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and Canada, with the European Union also participating.
Carney attempted to smooth tensions by praising US leadership, calling the G7 'rudderless' without it. However, Trump dismissed several Canadian proposals, stating, 'They're good, but mine are better'.
On trade, Trump reaffirmed his hardline tariff stance, saying, 'I'm a tariff person… It's simple, easy, and precise.' His position contrasted with Carney's push for more collaborative trade measures, particularly as Canada remains burdened by steep US tariffs on its steel, aluminium, and automotive exports.
'Iran is not winning this war'
The US president also addressed tensions in West Asia, claiming that Iran 'is not winning this war' and urging the country to resume talks 'before it's too late.' He reaffirmed strong US support for Israel, despite escalating regional conflict.
Trump's comments stood in stark contrast to diplomatic efforts by G7 leaders to maintain cohesion amid global instability. The summit is unfolding amid urgent discussions on trade, tensions in West Asia, and Russia's aggression in Ukraine.
The White House on Monday (local time) confirmed Trump would cut short his visit due to the West Asia crisis. 'President Trump had a great day at the G7… but because of what's going on in the Middle East (West Asia), he will be leaving tonight after dinner with Heads of State,' said Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
PM Modi arrives at G7
The summit also marked a significant moment for India–Canada ties, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi arriving in Calgary as part of a three-nation tour that also includes Cyprus and Croatia. This is PM Modi's first visit to Canada in nearly a decade.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
28 minutes ago
- Business Standard
PM Modi's meet with Canadian PM Mark Carney: Key takeaways India-Canada relation
PM Modi and Canadian PM Mark Carney met on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Canada on June 17. This meeting comes after a period of strained ties between the two nations, following the killing of pro-Khalistani separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a case in which Canada had attempted to implicate India.
India.com
40 minutes ago
- India.com
A single phone call can stop Israel-Iran war, says Iranian FM...
(File) Israel-Iran war: A single phone call from US President Donald Trump can stop Israeli attacks on Iran and put an end to the Israel-Iran war, which has been raging for the last five days, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has said. In a post on X, the Iranian diplomat said that Trump must ask Israel to stop the assault if he was indeed sincere about diplomacy and ending the conflict. 'If President Trump is sincere about diplomacy and interested in preventing this war, the next steps will be consequential. Israel must stop its aggression and if military aggression against us continues, our responses will continue,' Araghchi wrote. He noted that all it would take for the war to stop and rein in someone like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is 'one phone call' from Washington. 'This could open the way for the return of diplomacy,' he added. Trump demands Iran's 'unconditional surrender' Meanwhile, Donald Trump has seemingly changed his stance on the Israel-Iran war situation, as the US President demanded an 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER' from Iran, and told reporters that Tehran cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons. 'Iran should have signed the 'agreement' I told them to sign. What a shame, and a waste of human life. Simply put, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. I have said this over and over again! Everyone must evacuate Tehran immediately!,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. Israel-Iran war On June 13, Friday, Israel launched its fiercest attack on Iran, unleashing a wave of pre-dawn air strikes on Iranian cities on Friday, including capital Tehran, under Operation Rising Lion, in which several top Iranian nuclear scientists and military commanders, including IRGC chief Hossein Salami, commander Ghulam-Ali Rashid, nuclear scientist Dr. Mohammad Tehranchi, nuclear scientist Dr. Fereydoon Abbasi and Iran's Armed Forces Chief of Staff Major General Mohammad Bagheri. Hours later, Iran responded with a barrage of missiles and drones on that struck several Israeli cities and major population centers, including Tel Aviv. Both sides have launched devastating strikes on each other, causing significant damage to infrastructure and loss of civilian lives, even as world powers and global agencies, including the United Nations, have urged the two bitter enemies to exercise utmost restraint. According to media reports, more than 230 people, including about top Iranian military officers and nuclear scientists, have been killed in Israeli airstrikes, while Iranian missile attacks have resulted in the deaths of more than 24 Israelis.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
A White House lunch date has everyone talking amid an unfolding geopolitical game involving US, Pak, Iran, India
On Wednesday in the White House, the kitchen will emit not just aroma of food but strategic signals too. Field Marshal Asim Munir , Pakistan's army chief and de facto ruler, will sit down for lunch with President Donald Trump . This unusual meeting between a US president and the military commander of a nation with a patchy democratic record signals more than just routine bilateral engagement. It is the latest episode in an unfolding geopolitical game involving Washington, Islamabad, Tehran and New Delhi. Strategic compulsions, realpolitik and historic grievances will be the flavours at the luncheon. At first glance, a lunch between a US president and a foreign army chief might seem like a diplomatic footnote. But in the fraught landscape of South Asian geopolitics, nothing is merely symbolic. Trump's embrace of Munir is a calculated move, driven by strategic necessity, regional calculations and a personal preference for dealing with strong men. Pakistan has long been a nation where the real locus of power lies not in the prime minister's office, but within the General Headquarters (GHQ) in Rawalpindi. The army has ruled directly for nearly half of Pakistan's post-independence history, and indirectly for much of the rest. Munir is no exception in this long tradition of military supremacy. After playing a pivotal role in the ousting of Imran Khan's elected government, Munir now presides over Pakistan's political, economic and security set-up with an iron grip. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Okuliare, ktoré sa stávajú populárnymi po celom svete onepower Viac info Undo For Washington, however, this democratic deficit has historically taken a back seat to strategic calculations. Whether it was fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan in the 1980s or engaging in counterterrorism operations post-9/11, Pakistan's military has been a necessary, if often treacherous, ally. General Michael Kurilla, the head of US CENTCOM, recently called Pakistan a 'phenomenal partner in the counter-terrorism world', reflecting a continuity of thought that values Pakistan's geography and military assets over its democratic failings. Given the resurgence of militant groups like ISIS-K in the region and ongoing instability in Afghanistan following the US withdrawal, Pakistan's geography and intelligence apparatus make it a useful ally. Pakistan offers critical overflight access, potential staging areas and intelligence cooperation that could help prevent another large-scale terror threat to US interests. AP Asim Munir, Pak army chief Iran in the background However, Indian concerns about Munir's visit to Washington, and especially the optics of a personal lunch with Trump, may actually be unfounded as Trump could be courting the Pakistani military for his goals in the Middle East. Amid Iran-Israel conflict, there are reports of a possible US military operation against Iran after Trump said he was not looking for a ceasefire. If the US were to engage militarily with Iran, Pakistan's strategic location would be indispensable. Its airspace, logistical networks and surveillance capabilities could serve as vital support nodes. Pakistan's ability to influence Taliban behavior in Afghanistan adds yet another dimension of utility for Washington, especially as the US continues to recalibrate its regional presence. Live Events As a large Muslim-majority country with nuclear capabilities and deep ties in the Islamic world, Pakistan's position during a US strike on Iran would matter immensely. Additionally, Pakistan shares a border with Iran through Balochistan, where anti-Iran insurgent groups operate with alleged tacit support from Pakistan. If the Israel-Iran conflict escalates, Pakistan could serve as a quiet front for logistical or intelligence operations for the US military planners. In this light, Munir's warm reception appears less a nod to his domestic credentials and a blind eye to his anti-India stance but more an acknowledgment of Pakistan's potential role in any future regional escalation against Iran. Trump's known disdain for multilateralism and penchant for transactional diplomacy makes such a strategic alignment all the more plausible. India's strategic snub But Washington's embrace of Munir comes at a price, particularly in its relations with India. For India, the optics of a US president wining and dining Pakistan's army chief, who is personally committed to spread terror in India, are deeply unsettling. Pakistan's military has long been accused by India of sponsoring cross-border terrorism, particularly in Kashmir. Munir himself is regarded in Indian intelligence circles as one of the principal architects of Pakistan's covert operations against Indian interests. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has made it unmistakably clear that India will not tolerate any attempt to resurrect the old Cold War hyphenation of 'India-Pakistan". Following the G7 Summit in Canada, Modi reportedly declined a face-to-face meeting with Trump on his return leg, citing a prior schedule. The symbolism becomes even more charged if reports are accurate that Trump had hoped to host both Modi and Munir in Washington concurrently, an overture that would have been perceived in New Delhi as equating a democratic partner with an authoritarian military chief and a spectacle that would have greatly diminished India's newly-acquired uncompromising stance on Pakistan's anti-India activities. Modi's refusal to play along underlines India's growing confidence on the world stage and its unwillingness to allow legacy US mindsets to dictate regional paradigms. Trump's affinity for strongmen is well-documented. From Vladimir Putin to Kim Jong-un, and now Asim Munir, his political instinct tends to favor personalities who project authority, regardless of their democratic credentials. In the case of Pakistan, this personal preference dovetails neatly with strategic exigencies. But the move risks alienating India at a time when New Delhi is being courted by the US as a counterweight to China in the Indo-Pacific. Joint military exercises, technology partnerships and shared concerns over Beijing have made India a cornerstone of Washington's Asia policy. A visible tilt toward Pakistan, especially its military, could jeopardize this fragile yet burgeoning partnership. Moreover, Pakistan's reliability as an ally remains under question. While CENTCOM may praise its cooperation in counterterrorism, on the ground Pakistan has often played both sides, sheltering militants with one hand while cracking down under US pressure with the other. Such duplicity can also undermine any potential military campaign involving Iran or elsewhere. Trump's embrace of Munir, if it's more than a brief transactional alliance due to the Iran angle, comes at the cost of alienating a more stable and democratic ally in India. Whether this is a temporary tactical maneuver or a deeper strategic recalibration remains to be seen. What is clear, though, is that this luncheon is not about food - it is a feast of interests, agendas and high-stakes diplomacy.
