logo
#

Latest news with #G8

Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission
Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission

BreakingNews.ie

time22-07-2025

  • Politics
  • BreakingNews.ie

Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission

A furious Bob Geldof threatened to storm out of Tony Blair's Commission for Africa – warning it was in danger of becoming 'a laughable grotesque', according to newly-released government files. The Live Aid campaigner was instrumental in persuading Mr Blair to set up the commission to examine the problems of the continent ahead of a crucial summit of the G8 at Gleneagles in Scotland, which the UK was chairing. Advertisement But official papers released to the National Archives in Kew, west London, show he was outraged when – after just one meeting – the commissioners were sent a document setting its 'emerging conclusions'. In an angry letter to the commission's director of policy, the economist Sir Nick Stern, dated August 9 2004, he said it was impossible to have come to any conclusions it such a short period of time. The former rock star warned that he was not prepared to serve on a body which was simply there to push 'pre-determined government policy'. 'To be clear, policy must be determined by the commission independently sitting and independently deliberating and concluding of its own volition. This distinction is vital. If I have got this wrong please inform me so I may tender my resignation,' he wrote. Advertisement 'More broadly, the whole notion of emerging solutions is laughable. If the solution to the misery of Africa can be 'concluded' within a mere six week time span, it is a truly remarkable feat. 'How blind we must all have been these past years. The fact is that there are not and cannot as yet be any emerging conclusions. 'The commission will lose all credibility if it is not clearly seen to be an independent entity. If it seems to advance pre-determined government policy it will be correctly viewed as a laughable grotesque.' Bob Geldof with Bono and Tony Blair in Downing Street. Photo: PA. Geldof went on to complain that the involvement of some of the commissioners – including some of those from Africa – appeared to have been 'minimal'. Advertisement 'Is it not the secretariat's function, on behalf of the chair, to ensure that this is not the case? Or is this all some farcical political game played out at the expense of the wretchedly poor? If so, I ain't playing.' Sir Nicholas wrote back hurriedly to assure him the that the document was not an attempt pre-empt the commission's findings, and that the input from British politicians had been 'comparatively minor'. 'Far from being an attempt to rush conclusions the paper is intended to to be a tool to help promote discussion and ensure a real interchange between commissioners at the second meeting in October,' he wrote. 'I would be very keen to sit down and discuss these questions with you; perhaps we could meet for a drink as soon as we are both around?' Advertisement Geldof's reply is not recorded in the files, but he was sufficiently placated to carry on. After the Gleneagles summit the following year agreed to double aid to Africa and extend debt relief, he hailed it as 'mission accomplished'.

‘Is this a farcical political game played out at the expense of the wretchedly poor?' – Bob Geldof to Tony Blair over Africa Commission
‘Is this a farcical political game played out at the expense of the wretchedly poor?' – Bob Geldof to Tony Blair over Africa Commission

Irish Independent

time22-07-2025

  • Politics
  • Irish Independent

‘Is this a farcical political game played out at the expense of the wretchedly poor?' – Bob Geldof to Tony Blair over Africa Commission

The Live Aid campaigner was instrumental in persuading Mr Blair to set up the commission to examine the problems of the continent ahead of a crucial summit of the G8 at Gleneagles in Scotland, which the UK was chairing. But official papers released to the National Archives in Kew, west London, show he was outraged when – after just one meeting – the commissioners were sent a document setting its 'emerging conclusions'. In an angry letter to the commission's director of policy, the economist Sir Nick Stern, dated August 9 2004, he said it was impossible to have come to any conclusions it such a short period of time. Is this all some farcical political game played out at the expense of the wretchedly poor? If so, I ain't playing Bob Geldof The former rock star warned that he was not prepared to serve on a body which was simply there to push 'pre-determined government policy'. 'To be clear, policy must be determined by the commission independently sitting and independently deliberating and concluding of its own volition. This distinction is vital. If I have got this wrong please inform me so I may tender my resignation,' he wrote. 'More broadly, the whole notion of emerging solutions is laughable. If the solution to the misery of Africa can be 'concluded' within a mere six week time span, it is a truly remarkable feat. 'How blind we must all have been these past years. The fact is that there are not and cannot as yet be any emerging conclusions. 'The commission will lose all credibility if it is not clearly seen to be an independent entity. If it seems to advance pre-determined government policy it will be correctly viewed as a laughable grotesque.' Geldof went on to complain that the involvement of some of the commissioners – including some of those from Africa – appeared to have been 'minimal'. 'Is it not the secretariat's function, on behalf of the chair, to ensure that this is not the case? Or is this all some farcical political game played out at the expense of the wretchedly poor? If so, I ain't playing.' ADVERTISEMENT Sir Nicholas wrote back hurriedly to assure him the that the document was not an attempt pre-empt the commission's findings, and that the input from British politicians had been 'comparatively minor'. 'Far from being an attempt to rush conclusions the paper is intended to to be a tool to help promote discussion and ensure a real interchange between commissioners at the second meeting in October,' he wrote. 'I would be very keen to sit down and discuss these questions with you; perhaps we could meet for a drink as soon as we are both around?' Geldof's reply is not recorded in the files, but he was sufficiently placated to carry on. After the Gleneagles summit the following year agreed to double aid to Africa and extend debt relief, he hailed it as 'mission accomplished'.

Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission
Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission

Powys County Times

time22-07-2025

  • Politics
  • Powys County Times

Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission

The Live Aid campaigner was instrumental in persuading Mr Blair to set up the commission to examine the problems of the continent ahead of a crucial summit of the G8 at Gleneagles in Scotland, which the UK was chairing. But official papers released to the National Archives in Kew, west London, show he was outraged when – after just one meeting – the commissioners were sent a document setting its 'emerging conclusions'. In an angry letter to the commission's director of policy, the economist Sir Nick Stern, dated August 9 2004, he said it was impossible to have come to any conclusions it such a short period of time. The former rock star warned that he was not prepared to serve on a body which was simply there to push 'pre-determined government policy'. 'To be clear, policy must be determined by the commission independently sitting and independently deliberating and concluding of its own volition. This distinction is vital. If I have got this wrong please inform me so I may tender my resignation,' he wrote. 'More broadly, the whole notion of emerging solutions is laughable. If the solution to the misery of Africa can be 'concluded' within a mere six week time span, it is a truly remarkable feat. 'How blind we must all have been these past years. The fact is that there are not and cannot as yet be any emerging conclusions. 'The commission will lose all credibility if it is not clearly seen to be an independent entity. If it seems to advance pre-determined government policy it will be correctly viewed as a laughable grotesque.' Bob Geldof with Bono and Tony Blair in Downing Street (PA) Geldof went on to complain that the involvement of some of the commissioners – including some of those from Africa – appeared to have been 'minimal'. 'Is it not the secretariat's function, on behalf of the chair, to ensure that this is not the case? Or is this all some farcical political game played out at the expense of the wretchedly poor? If so, I ain't playing.' Sir Nicholas wrote back hurriedly to assure him the that the document was not an attempt pre-empt the commission's findings, and that the input from British politicians had been 'comparatively minor'. 'Far from being an attempt to rush conclusions the paper is intended to to be a tool to help promote discussion and ensure a real interchange between commissioners at the second meeting in October,' he wrote. 'I would be very keen to sit down and discuss these questions with you; perhaps we could meet for a drink as soon as we are both around?' Geldof's reply is not recorded in the files, but he was sufficiently placated to carry on. After the Gleneagles summit the following year agreed to double aid to Africa and extend debt relief, he hailed it as 'mission accomplished'.

Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission
Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission

South Wales Guardian

time22-07-2025

  • Politics
  • South Wales Guardian

Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission

The Live Aid campaigner was instrumental in persuading Mr Blair to set up the commission to examine the problems of the continent ahead of a crucial summit of the G8 at Gleneagles in Scotland, which the UK was chairing. But official papers released to the National Archives in Kew, west London, show he was outraged when – after just one meeting – the commissioners were sent a document setting its 'emerging conclusions'. In an angry letter to the commission's director of policy, the economist Sir Nick Stern, dated August 9 2004, he said it was impossible to have come to any conclusions it such a short period of time. The former rock star warned that he was not prepared to serve on a body which was simply there to push 'pre-determined government policy'. 'To be clear, policy must be determined by the commission independently sitting and independently deliberating and concluding of its own volition. This distinction is vital. If I have got this wrong please inform me so I may tender my resignation,' he wrote. 'More broadly, the whole notion of emerging solutions is laughable. If the solution to the misery of Africa can be 'concluded' within a mere six week time span, it is a truly remarkable feat. 'How blind we must all have been these past years. The fact is that there are not and cannot as yet be any emerging conclusions. 'The commission will lose all credibility if it is not clearly seen to be an independent entity. If it seems to advance pre-determined government policy it will be correctly viewed as a laughable grotesque.' Geldof went on to complain that the involvement of some of the commissioners – including some of those from Africa – appeared to have been 'minimal'. 'Is it not the secretariat's function, on behalf of the chair, to ensure that this is not the case? Or is this all some farcical political game played out at the expense of the wretchedly poor? If so, I ain't playing.' Sir Nicholas wrote back hurriedly to assure him the that the document was not an attempt pre-empt the commission's findings, and that the input from British politicians had been 'comparatively minor'. 'Far from being an attempt to rush conclusions the paper is intended to to be a tool to help promote discussion and ensure a real interchange between commissioners at the second meeting in October,' he wrote. 'I would be very keen to sit down and discuss these questions with you; perhaps we could meet for a drink as soon as we are both around?' Geldof's reply is not recorded in the files, but he was sufficiently placated to carry on. After the Gleneagles summit the following year agreed to double aid to Africa and extend debt relief, he hailed it as 'mission accomplished'.

Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission
Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission

Rhyl Journal

time22-07-2025

  • Politics
  • Rhyl Journal

Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission

The Live Aid campaigner was instrumental in persuading Mr Blair to set up the commission to examine the problems of the continent ahead of a crucial summit of the G8 at Gleneagles in Scotland, which the UK was chairing. But official papers released to the National Archives in Kew, west London, show he was outraged when – after just one meeting – the commissioners were sent a document setting its 'emerging conclusions'. In an angry letter to the commission's director of policy, the economist Sir Nick Stern, dated August 9 2004, he said it was impossible to have come to any conclusions it such a short period of time. The former rock star warned that he was not prepared to serve on a body which was simply there to push 'pre-determined government policy'. 'To be clear, policy must be determined by the commission independently sitting and independently deliberating and concluding of its own volition. This distinction is vital. If I have got this wrong please inform me so I may tender my resignation,' he wrote. 'More broadly, the whole notion of emerging solutions is laughable. If the solution to the misery of Africa can be 'concluded' within a mere six week time span, it is a truly remarkable feat. 'How blind we must all have been these past years. The fact is that there are not and cannot as yet be any emerging conclusions. 'The commission will lose all credibility if it is not clearly seen to be an independent entity. If it seems to advance pre-determined government policy it will be correctly viewed as a laughable grotesque.' Geldof went on to complain that the involvement of some of the commissioners – including some of those from Africa – appeared to have been 'minimal'. 'Is it not the secretariat's function, on behalf of the chair, to ensure that this is not the case? Or is this all some farcical political game played out at the expense of the wretchedly poor? If so, I ain't playing.' Sir Nicholas wrote back hurriedly to assure him the that the document was not an attempt pre-empt the commission's findings, and that the input from British politicians had been 'comparatively minor'. 'Far from being an attempt to rush conclusions the paper is intended to to be a tool to help promote discussion and ensure a real interchange between commissioners at the second meeting in October,' he wrote. 'I would be very keen to sit down and discuss these questions with you; perhaps we could meet for a drink as soon as we are both around?' Geldof's reply is not recorded in the files, but he was sufficiently placated to carry on. After the Gleneagles summit the following year agreed to double aid to Africa and extend debt relief, he hailed it as 'mission accomplished'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store