Trump orders homeless out of DC, deploys federal agents and prepares National Guard
The announcement came after US media published images of FBI agents patrolling parts of the District of Columbia on Sunday evening. Separately, two US officials told Reuters on Sunday that the US military is preparing to deploy hundreds of National Guard troops in Washington.
On Sunday, Trump vowed to clear Washington of homeless people and jail criminals, despite the city's mayor, Muriel Bowser, asserting that there is currently no increase in crime rates.
'The homeless must leave immediately,' Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform. 'We will provide you with places to stay, but far from the capital. As for the criminals, you don't have to leave; we will put you in jail where you should be.'
Trump also posted images of tents and streets in the capital with some litter on them.
The White House declined to clarify the legal basis Trump would use to remove homeless people from Washington. The Republican president only has direct control over federal land and buildings within the city.
Trump threatens takeover
Trump's statements that crime in the capital is 'completely out of control' have reinforced his renewed threats of a federal takeover of the city and his orders to bolster federal law enforcement.
Although crime rates in Washington have recently decreased, arrests for non-violent crimes have risen under Trump's 'Safe and Beautiful DC' executive order, which established a task force aimed at eliminating crime and facilitating a 'stronger presence' of federal law enforcement, according to Axios.
Trump has pledged to make the US capital 'safer and more beautiful' than ever before. 'We will provide the homeless with places to stay, but they will be far from the capital,' the president said, adding that 'criminals will be imprisoned, and everything will happen very quickly.'
Last month, Trump signed an executive order that makes it easier for cities to clear homeless encampments and directs that people be placed in 'long-term' treatment facilities with the aim of 'restoring public order.' Human rights groups have criticised the order, saying it 'encourages the use of forced civil commitment,' a process of placing people with mental health issues in treatment facilities without their consent.
White House defends action
White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement on Sunday that Trump's actions had 'removed illegal weapons and drugs from the streets of Washington DC in just a few nights.'
'This does not take into account the many potential crimes that were deterred thanks to the heavy and visible presence of law enforcement officers,' she said. 'The Trump administration will continue to take necessary action to make Washington, DC, clean and safe.'
When asked to comment on reports that 120 FBI agents would be involved, Jackson said, 'There is an increase in the number of federal law enforcement officers in Washington, DC in response to violent crime, which has included the FBI.'
White House representatives did not immediately answer a subsequent question from Axios about the exact number of FBI agents involved, and the Bureau declined to comment on the matter.
Federal control of the capital
A full federal takeover of Washington would require Congress to revoke the city's home rule system, which allows residents to elect their own mayor and council members. Under the current arrangement, Congress retains oversight authority over the city's laws, and the president can temporarily assume command of the city's police force if he 'deems that special emergency conditions exist'.
Even without removing home rule, Trump could exert pressure on the city by deploying the DC National Guard, which is under his command, or by temporarily taking control of the city's police.
Appearing on MSNBC's 'The Weekend' on Sunday, DC Mayor Muriel Bowser emphasised that violent crime in the city had fallen for the second consecutive year. 'We are not seeing a spike in crime,' she said, adding that 'any comparison to a war-torn country is exaggerated and wrong.'
The latest escalation began last week after a former Justice Department employee was reportedly injured in a carjacking attempt. The president then floated the idea of imposing federal control if the mayor 'did not manage the capital better' and ordered a seven-day operation to enhance federal law enforcement, focusing on high-traffic tourist areas and other hotspots, according to multiple media outlets.
Trump's DC conference
On Sunday, Trump announced he would hold a press conference at 10 a.m. Eastern Time on Monday at the White House to unveil a 'comprehensive plan' to restore security, cleanliness, and renewal in Washington. He said the conference would address 'not only crime and murder' but also 'cleanliness and general physical renewal'.
The two US officials who spoke to Reuters on Sunday said that while the National Guard troops are ready to move as soon as the order is given, a final decision awaits the president's approval. One official added that the troops' duties could include protecting federal agents or performing administrative tasks to free up law enforcement for field duties.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mid East Info
3 hours ago
- Mid East Info
US Crude (WTI) hovers near key support as traders await US-Russia talks - Middle East Business News and Information
By Daniela Sabin Hathorn, senior market analyst at Oil markets have entered a cautious 'wait-and-see' mode ahead of the scheduled meeting between President Trump and President Putin in Alaska. Prices have stabilised after heavy losses since the start of August, with Brent crude holding firm around the $66 mark, while WTI (U.S. crude) hovers just above key support at $652 per barrel. This relative calm reflects investor hesitation to make big moves until the diplomatic outcome becomes clearer. US Crude (WTI) daily chart: Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The potential for a diplomatic breakthrough—such as relaxed sanctions on Russian oil—could increase global supply and weigh on prices. On the flip side, escalating tensions or new sanctions—especially targeting major buyers like India—could tighten the oil market and buoy prices. Recent penalties imposed on Indian imports for continuing Russian oil purchases underline this risk, which could drive oil prices up in the near term. Adding to the pressure on prices, the American Petroleum Institute (API) reported a notable 1.5 -million-barrel increase in U.S. crude inventories—suggesting demand may be weakening as the summer season wanes. Although the EIA's official figures are pending, this build is likely contributing to the market's muted reaction. Possible outcomes: Oil prices have always been very sensitive to geopolitical developments and the prospects of supply alterations. As a result, heightened volatility is expected over the next few days. If the U.S. and Russia reach a constructive agreement — such as partial sanctions relief on Russian oil exports, increased trade flexibility, or signals toward de-escalation — the market could price in rising global supply. This would likely be bearish for oil, especially if accompanied by weak demand signals like higher inventory levels. Meanwhile, risk assets would probably resume the upside. If the summit produces no substantial shift, whereby both sides reiterate their positions, with no new sanctions but no easing either, oil will likely remain range-bound, struggling for direction. This would likely see crude prices consolidate, and any price shift would likely reverse in the short term as traders await the next macro catalyst. Lastly, if talks collapse or escalate into new sanctions—like export limits, or additional penalties on countries trading with Russia (like India)— we could see a sharp rally in oil, whilst weighing on risk appetite.
Egypt Independent
5 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Is Trump forcing a marriage of convenience between India and China? Like most relationships, it's complicated
Their relationship is defined by a bloody border dispute, a vast power imbalance and a fierce contest for influence across Asia. Yet, President Donald Trump's latest trade war may be achieving the unthinkable: pushing India and China into a wary but tactical embrace. Trump's announcement of a new base tariff rate of 25 percent in India – later set to rise to a staggering 50 percent as additional punishment for purchasing Russian oil – in some ways mirrors the long pressure campaign he's waged against China and creates a shared interest between New Delhi and Beijing. While a thaw in India and China's fractious relationship was already underway, analysts say Trump's actions have added to this shift. New Delhi and Beijing now find themselves navigating a volatile and unpredictable Washington that treats strategic partners and geopolitical rivals with the same transactional disdain, be they in Europe or Asia. But in chastising India for not having a more open economy and its energy ties to Russia, the Trump administration is punishing the very nation the US has spent years cultivating as a democratic counterweight to China's power – creating an opening for Beijing. Chinese President Xi Jinping meets with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the sidelines of the 16th BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia on October 23, 2024. Xinhua/Sipa USA This tactical realignment is underscored by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's reported plans to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit later this month, which would be his first trip to China in seven years. When asked to confirm Indian media reports about Modi's attendance, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman said Beijing 'welcomes' Modi for the meeting. 'We believe that with the concerted effort of all parties, the Tianjin summit will be a gathering of solidarity, friendship and fruitful results,' said spokesperson Guo Jiakun. Yet, as the niceties play out in public, analysts say this is an alliance of convenience, not conviction. The deep-seated strategic distrust between Asia's two giants, born from their border conflict and struggle for regional dominance, remains firmly in place. For now, they are aligned partly not by a shared vision, but by a shared antagonist in the White House. 'We may see a greater thaw in India-China ties in face of a tough United States,' said Farwa Aamer, Director of South Asia Initiatives, Asia Society Policy Institute. But she warned that New Delhi must not lose sight of Washington and 'risk reversing the growth in relations it has long worked hard on to achieve.' Massive trust deficit India's relationship with the US has undergone a dramatic transformation, from Cold War estrangement to crucial partners in the 21st Century. Since Modi, a right-wing Hindu nationalist, swept to power in 2014, the relationship reached new heights, partly driven by the personal rapport he developed with Trump during his first term, during which the Indian leader cast aside staid diplomatic protocol to campaign for his counterpart's second term during a rally in Houston. New Delhi's growing alignment with Washington became even more critical as its own relationship with Beijing cratered after deadly border clashes in 2020 pushed the two Asian giants further apart than at any time in decades. The US' commitment to India deepened under the Biden administration, which identified New Delhi as a vital counterweight to Beijing's growing influence. President Joe Biden often lavished praise on Modi, while largely setting aside sharp criticism from rights groups over the Modi administration's alleged democratic backsliding at home. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump at NRG Stadium after a rally on September 22, 2019 in Houston, President Joe Biden and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi looking out towards the Washington Monument with India's flag flying behind them in Washington on June 22, 2023. Jonathan Ernst/Reuters But then came Trump's re-election, with a turbocharged 'America First' policy that looked far beyond confronting just China on trade. In a move that threatens to shatter this two-decade consensus, the US president publicly reprimanded New Delhi earlier this month over its Russian oil imports, calling the Indian economy 'dead' and singling out India for Washington's highest global tariff rate. With his new tariffs, Trump is punishing a country that currently imports 36% of its crude oil from Russia, much of it used to support its booming economy and growing 1.4 billion-strong population. But by treating New Delhi a transactional adversary to be punished, Washington risks shattering a cornerstone of its Indo-Pacific strategy, said Milan Vaishnav, director and senior fellow, South Asia Program at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Trump's latest actions, 'take us right back to that era of estrangement,' he said. 'The US-India relationship is robust enough that it won't be undone overnight, but these moves have created a massive trust deficit on the Indian side.' While many nations have rushed to strike trade deals with Trump to lower tariffs, India under Modi has been less willing to cave. India shot back, calling the tariffs 'unfair' and 'unjustified,' pointing out the hypocrisy of Trump's move and noting that the US and Europe still buy Russian fertilizers and chemicals. A farmer stands next to sacks filled with harvested potatoes in the northern state of Haryana, India, on February 1, 2025. Bhawika Chhabra/Reuters Trump has repeatedly called India a 'tariff king,' but a senior Indian official said the country is 'far from' it, noting that India imposes 'zero to low duties on many key US exports' including coal, pharmaceuticals, aircraft parts and machinery. India imposes some higher tariffs on the US than vice versa, particularly on agricultural imports that attract a simple average tariff of 39% compared to the US's 5%, according to a report from the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations. The 'mood (toward the US) is hardening in India, partly because of the way Mr. Trump has gone about and played his cards,' said Harsh V. Pant, vice president of foreign policy at the Delhi-based Observer Research Foundation think tank. 'The way he does diplomacy through public channels, and the way he seems intent on reducing the space for the Modi government to maneuver.' Modi, who was under pressure by opposition politicians to stand up to his long-term friend, defended his country at an event last week. India will never compromise on the interests of farmers, fishermen and dairy farmers,' he said. 'I know personally, I will have to pay a heavy price for it, but I am ready for it.' A common cause The unintended consequences of Trump's policies, analysts say, have the potential to push historic rivals New Delhi and Beijing into a strategic embrace. There has been a gradual normalization of ties between India and China after Modi met with Chinese leader Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the BRICS summit in Russia last October. India and China agreed to resume direct commercial flights, Beijing recently agreed to reopen two pilgrimage sites in western Tibet to Indians for the first time in five years, and both started re-issuing tourist visas for each other's citizens. 'For its own economic reasons, namely a slowdown in growth and a slump in foreign direct investment, India has signaled a greater willingness to entertain warmer trade and investment linkages with China,' said Vaishnav, from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. But this convergence remains limited by the deep-seated mistrust between them, rooted in their deadly border clashes in the Himalayas and China's strategic entrenchment in Pakistan. Indian army vehicles carrying supply and reinforcement are seen near China border in Ladakh, India, on August 29, predicted the future would be one of duality: 'I expect we will see increasing economic cooperation coupled with strategic rivalry,' he said of the relationship between India and China. Washington's willingness to antagonize a key partner like India has also baffled observers. One view is that the Trump administration lacks a clear, overarching strategy, diminishing India's crucial role as a democratic counterweight to China. 'There is no coherent China policy in this administration,' said Vaishnav. 'Which means India's role as a bulwark against China is under-emphasized.' He added that as Trump's mood on Russia soured, 'India's Russian oil imports became an easy target.' A more personal motivation may also be at play. Analysts suggest Trump's hostility could have been triggered by a bruised ego after India downplayed his alleged role in defusing a major crisis with Pakistan. Trump announced he had brokered a ceasefire following a military escalation between the nuclear-armed neighbors in May. While Islamabad publicly praised the claim and even nominated Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize, Indian officials refused to credit Washington's apparent intervention. 'After that, things went belly up,' Pant said. 'The (trade) deal which at one point seemed very doable, kept on going. And the more frustrated Mr. Trump has become, the more voluble he has become in terms of his public threats to India.' Critics say Trump's policies could be leading to the very outcome some US strategists have long sought to avoid. 'It could be the worst outcome for the United States,' Trump's former National Security Adviser John Bolton told CNN's Kaitlan Collins. 'The irony here is that while the secondary tariffs against India are intended to hurt Russia, it could push India back closer to Russia and, ironically, closer to China, perhaps negotiating together against the US tariff efforts.'
Al-Ahram Weekly
11 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Trump says may allow lawsuit against Fed chair over renovations - Economy
President Donald Trump said Tuesday he might allow "a major lawsuit against" the US central bank chief to proceed, as he complained again about renovations to the Federal Reserve headquarters and renewed pressure to lower interest rates. "The damage he has done by always being Too Late is incalculable," Trump wrote of Fed Chair Jerome Powell on his Truth Social platform. He added that he is thinking of allowing a lawsuit taking aim at Powell's oversight on the renovations in Washington, but did not offer more details. Trump has repeatedly lashed out at Powell this year over the Fed's decisions to keep interest rates steady since its last cut in December. Policymakers have been cautiously monitoring the effects of Trump's wide-ranging tariffs on the world's biggest economy, as they mulled the right time to lower rates further. This is because it takes time for levies to filter through to consumer prices. The jury is still out on whether Trump's latest tariffs will have a one-off or longer-term impact on inflation, but the president has regularly pointed to benign data to urge for rate reductions to boost the economy. Shortly after government data was released Tuesday, showing that consumer inflation stayed unchanged at 2.7 percent in July, Trump wrote on social media that Powell "must now lower the rate." He also called the Fed's leadership "complacent." Trump has openly floated the idea of ousting Powell over cost overruns for the renovation. While the US leader says the price of the makeover was $3.1 billion, reiterating this figure in his social media post on Tuesday, Powell has been quick to correct Trump in the past. The cost has been put at $2.5 billion, but Trump's higher number includes work on another building that Powell maintains was completed previously. On Tuesday, Trump said Powell was doing a "horrible" job in managing the Fed's revamp. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
