Insurance agent, accused of fraud, perjury and forgery, is sanctioned
(Photo via Getty Images)
A former Iowa insurance agent accused of insurance fraud, perjury and forging financial records has been fined $3,000 by state regulators.
According to state unemployment records, Bryce Murphy, 33, of Dubuque County was working for the Naughton Insurance Agency in 2020 when the company discovered that three of Murphy's payroll checks had been altered to increase their value.
The company also discovered that a letter and pay stub Murphy provided to a credit union as evidence of his employment had been altered. Murphy was fired in November 2020 and an administrative law judge later determined his actions amounted to theft and forgery.
Three years later, in 2023, Murphy was criminally charged with identity theft, fraudulent practices in the first degree, forgery and two counts of insurance fraud.
The charges were tied to allegations that Murphy had amended his Farmer's Insurance homeowner's policy in 2019 to include two Rolex watches. A few months later, he reported to police his watches were stolen from a Minneapolis hotel room while he attended a Minnesota Vikings football game. He then filed an insurance claim for the reported theft, and Farmer's Insurance paid out $9,998 on the claim.
Three years later, while working for American Family Insurance, Murphy obtained an insurance policy from his employer for the same type of Rolex watches he had reported stolen in 2019.
I was so focused on making other people proud of me that I lost sight of my integrity and honesty.
– Bryce Murphy of Dubuque County
In September 2022, Murphy reported the two watches were stolen under similar circumstances as the 2019 incident: He alleged the watches disappeared from his luggage in a Minneapolis hotel as he attended another Vikings football game. He filed an insurance claim with American Family, which triggered an investigation that concluded the watches in question, assuming they were actually stolen, were most likely fake Rolexes.
Murphy later pleaded guilty to a charge of fraudulent practices and one count of insurance fraud, which resulted in 10-year and five-year prison sentences to run concurrently.
'I was so focused on making other people proud of me that I lost sight of my integrity and honesty,' Murphy informed the court prior to his sentencing.
In October 2024, the Iowa Insurance Division charged Murphy with four counts of regulatory violations. The charges were tied to the altered paychecks and letter from 2020, as well as newer claims related to allegedly fraudulent insurance claims and a failure to report his 2023 criminal prosecution.
At a hearing on the division's charges, Murphy testified he did, as originally claimed, have four Rolex watches that were stolen. He allegedly admitted the watches were fake Rolexes, but said he felt justified in insuring them for the value he personally assigned to them.
The administrative law judge who presided over the hearing recently concluded that while he was 'skeptical' Murphy had four watches stolen under such similar circumstances, the division had not proven the police reports and insurance claims were false.
Still, the judge noted, there was evidence Murphy overvalued the watches and falsified records, justifying the revocation of his license, which had already lapsed, and the imposition of a $3,000 civil penalty. Murphy has also been ordered to pay $3,460 for the division's prosecution of the case.
Murphy continues to face legal problems stemming from his 2023 arrest. Immediately after his sentencing in the criminal case, prosecutors reported finding inconsistencies in the financial affidavits Murphy had submitted to the court and informed the court Murphy was guilty of 'additional fraudulent activity' that was criminal in nature.
Since then, Murphy has been charged with three felony counts of perjury and entered a plea of not guilty. The case is still pending.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
White House staffer went on a revenge tour against Elon Musk, fanning flames with Trump — while bragging about Tesla stock drop
WASHINGTON — A top White House aide is taking the blame for helping trigger President Trump's fiery clash with Elon Musk — after speaking for months about giving the billionaire 'payback' and even gloating to colleagues when Tesla's stock price dropped, The Post has learned. Sergio Gor, Trump's director of presidential personnel, was instrumental in the president's decision late Saturday to yank the nomination of Musk's personal friend Jared Isaacman to be NASA administrator, turning a contained disagreement on legislation into a firestorm of insults, four sources inside or close to the White House tell The Post. 5 Sergio Gor, director of the White House presidential personnel office, during a Kennedy Center Board dinner with US President Donald Trump in Washington, DC, on Monday, May 19, 2025. Bloomberg via Getty Images Isaacman's donations to Democrats — including $100,000 in 2021 to a PAC linked to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) — would disqualify most nominees under Gor's standard vetting process. But Isaacman wasn't pulled by Trump until hours after Musk left his unpaid White House role, at Gor's urging. Musk was Trump's top financial backer in the 2024 election and this week's clash has put the president's legislative agenda at risk — and even threatens long-term political damage after Musk endorsed Trump's potential impeachment. Musk and Gor disliked each other since before Trump reclaimed power on Jan. 20 — with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO describing Gor as 'sleazy' during the transition and questioning his staffing picks. But the world's richest man had the president's ear and friendship through last week. 5 Donald Trump and Elon Musk watch the launch of the sixth test flight of the SpaceX Starship rocket on November 19, 2024 in Brownsville, Texas. Getty Images Simmering behind the scenes was a grudge nursed by Gor over a March 6 cabinet meeting, during which Musk 'humiliated' him by slamming the pace of staffing the administration, said the four sources, each of whom have interacted closely with Gor. 'He was bragging to other people that he was going to get one last shot at Elon out the door. He was going to get Elon back for making him look bad,' said one source. 'Elon was always telling the president 'Sergio's not moving fast enough to hire people. He's not the right guy for the job.' In front of the entire cabinet he said that. It's not just humiliating, but the president starts looking at him like, 'Why aren't you doing your f—ing job?'' Another said: 'Sergio was upset about Elon dressing him down at the meeting and said he was going to 'get him'. [Isaacman's nomination being pulled] was the modern-day equivalent of the assassination of Franz Ferdinand. Sure, Sergio got a scalp, but what did POTUS get?' Three sources say Gor's intensely personal dislike of Musk was illustrated by his periodic celebrations when Tesla's stock cratered. One source said that they were present when Gor laughed with satisfaction while showing off the dips in Musk's wealth. 'He'd go around showing Tesla stock prices going down and laugh about it, like he was responsible for taking the Tesla stock down,' one White House source revealed. The other said they heard from Gor repeatedly when Tesla stock tumbled. 5 White House Senior Advisor to the President and Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk departs the U.S. Capitol Building on March 5, 2025 in Washington, DC. Getty Images 5 President Donald Trump and Elon Musk attend a press conference in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 30, 2025 REUTERS Gor denied to The Post that he ever sought revenge against Musk and insisted that claims he openly rejoiced at Tesla stock falling were false. Steve Bannon, a Gor supporter, told The Post that he believes that the breakdown had nothing to do with the relatively obscure White House aide — citing months of disagreements, including Musk's dislike of Trump's tariffs, Trump's cancelation of a planned Pentagon briefing for Musk about China and the president not acting to extend Musk's 130-day tenure as a special government employee. 'It's the president and Elon. This has nothing to do with Sergio Gor. Sergio Gor is a staffer that the president has to do things,' Bannon argued. 'Did Elon have a problem with Sergio? Yes, the fact that we are not hiring enough — guess what? — liberal f–king progressive Democrats.' Bannon, who has pushing for Musk to be deported despite him being a naturalized American citizen since 2002, added claims that Gor was at the root of the clash were 'absolutely ludicrous' 'This is all about the behavior … the incompetence, the lack of performance, the drugs which President Trump is very upset about, all of it, of Elon Musk,' Bannon said. Although the White House was rife with tension for months with Musk and Gor 'hating each other,' the bad feeling never spiraled out of hand until Thursday, when Trump and Musk went at each other with personal attacks. Although Musk's criticisms of the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' gained significant attention, the president was chummy with the tech mogul on his last day in government May 30 — despite clips circulating for three days of the billionaire telling 'CBS Sunday Morning' that 'I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful but I don't know if it can be both.' As part of the send-off, Trump and Musk praised each other in the Oval Office, with the latter receiving an ornate key to the White House. Only after Isaacman's nomination was pulled Saturday night did the tit-for-tat build, with Musk calling the bill a 'disgusting abomination' Tuesday. The fight erupted further Thursday as Trump contended he would have won the election even without Musk's help and the businessman firing back that the Jeffrey Epstein files contain information on the president. 'The NASA guy was the straw that broke the camel's back,' one White House source said, arguing that Gor wanted 'to bury the knife in [Musk's] back.' 5 Elon Musk embraces Republican presidential nominee, former President Donald Trump during a campaign rally at the Butler Farm Show fairgrounds on October 05, 2024 in Butler, Pennsylvania. Getty Images Musk is not the only White House figure to cross Gor, according to this source, who added that the personnel boss helped far-right activist Laura Loomer gain a meeting with Trump in the Oval Office, after which six National Security Council officials were fired — while national security adviser Mike Waltz was moved out to become ambassador to the United Nations. 'There's just one staffer that's in the middle of every drama, leak and chaos that exists. It's been a detriment to the president and the organization,' they said. 'We've bounced basically two billionaires from the party and from the movement, because Sergio doesn't like them. And what does that do for anyone, or the cause?' White House Communications Director Steven Cheung called Gor 'a vital member of the team and he has helped President Trump put together an administration that is second to none.' But one source close to the White House said that illumination of the roots of the Trump-Musk feud could help prevent potentially devastating political consequences for Republicans. 'I think it will help,' the insider said. 'If Elon understands that this was not the president that was going after him and that the president was played by Sergio, I think Elon might look at it as an opportunity to say, 'Ok, let's put this s— to bed. And this guy thinks he's going to get me? I'm going to get him.''


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Huge pro-Israel summit in Texas canceled over threats
A massive pro-Israel conference in Texas has been canceled over 'threats from violent Jihadists' — even after changing venues over security concerns, organizers said. The Israel Summit, scheduled for next Monday through Wednesday in Dallas, switched locations due to 'indirect and direct threats made by American, pro-Hamas, Jihadist groups, who issued calls to 'target' the Israel Summit,' the organizers said in a statement. But anti-Israel activists outed the new venue and planned to protest the event, according to Luke Hilton from the Israel Guys, which was co-hosting the event. 'This is America in 2025,' former US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman, who was one of the slated speakers for the event, wrote on X. AFP via Getty Images 'Honestly, it feels like it's no longer safe for Jews and Christians who support Israel to publicly,' he said. He said law enforcement uncovered other threats on the dark web to 'target' the event — which was set to host some 1,000 attendees. 'After the two Israeli embassy staffers were murdered in Washington, DC, two weeks ago and then last week people were firebombed in Colorado, to me and to all the rest of us on our team, the word 'targeting' — that's a call to violence,' Hilton said. The three-day summit is run by pro-Israel Christian organizations and was expected to feature former US officials, members of the Israeli government and survivors of Hamas' Oct. 7 terror attack. Ten days before the Israel Summit was set to kick off, Dallas authorities said the threat level had been elevated, said Josiah Hilton, also of Israel Guys, according to Jewish New Syndicate. That forced the event's organizers to come up with 'a mandatory security plan with a substantial budget estimated in the hundreds of thousands of dollars,' leaving them to find a new location. They then found a 'new and significantly safer location just north of Dallas' with 'top-tier private security, with additional support from local law enforcement and coordination with the Texas governor's office.' But ultimately they had to cancel after the Palestinian Youth Movement Dallas outed the new spot as 'an isolated compound owned by staunch Israel ally evangelical televangelist Kenneth Copeland' under the campaign 'Texas un-welcomes the genocide summit.' 'This is America in 2025,' former US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman, who was one of the slated speakers for the event, wrote on X. He added: 'Law enforcement was completely cooperative but the threats were of a nature that required cancellation. When @POTUS says we need to take our country back, this is a good example of what he means!'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Musk-Trump Feud: 5 Things To Watch For
President Donald Trump, left, and Elon Musk. Credit - Alex Wroblewski and Allison Robbert—AFP via Getty Images This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME's politics newsletter. Sign up here to get stories like this sent to your inbox. Like so many pieces of President Donald Trump's self-created reality, the key he handed to fellow billionaire and government hater Elon Musk was oversized and appeared to be coated with gold coloration. That Potemkin moment was merely one week ago today. Indeed, last Friday, Trump held the unusual send-off party for an adviser tasked with helping him destroy the spine of the federal workforce and a patron to his rise to power. Fast forward a week, and Trump has all but declared war on his one-time ally, lobbing threats to cancel federal contracts for everything from clean-energy cars, shuttles into the heavens, and access to satellite orbits. In turn, Musk kept pushing Republicans on the Hill to reject Trump's ambitious domestic policy agenda while throwing open the doors to conspiracy theories. The back-and-forth brinksmanship captivated Washington as the week headed toward its end. Both parties seemed to understand their ownership of the news cycle, and it's entirely possible that most of this spat was as scripted as a professional-wrestling beef. 'One thing's for sure,' Musk posted on X, 'it ain't boring!' That doesn't make it any less reckless. Here are five things to watch as this story unfolds. As catty as this feud has been, it is ultimately a huge distraction from Trump's agenda. The more time spent on a personality clash between this pair of mercurial iconoclasts, the less time is being dedicated to getting Trump's pending domestic agenda across the finish line. This is, to be clear, a fight that could leave both men empty handed. Trump is heading to his country club in New Jersey for the weekend, away from the White House and the churn of that campus. That may give Trump time to cool to a simmer—or to boil over if he's left alone with his DVR, social media feeds, and cell phone that gives him a constant hum of agitation. Establishment Republicans fear the window for a once-an-administration legislative reach is closing fast. The White House set a Memorial Day deadline for House passage and just barely got there. Administration officials are now looking at a July 4 target for the Senate following suit. The sooner Trump can quiet his frustrations, the better the odds of snagging the brass ring. Once Musk suggested—without evidence—that Trump is somehow implicated in the sex-trafficking criminality tied to the late billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, there really was no telling where this goes next. The mega-rich like Musk don't exactly have a huge degree of self-awareness or self-control. Musk knows he is already under Trump's skin, and any plays to exploit Trump's insecurities don't exactly take terrible imagination. That's why this stands to go further sideways in a big way. Musk is not exactly known for keeping the savviest of political minds at his table. Unlike other deep-pocketed patrons, Musk does not have an army of consultants and so-called donor-advisers at the ready. But he does have the ear of some in Trump's inner circle, especially Donald Trump Jr. and Vice President J.D. Vance. If the White House is looking for an off-ramp, it might avail itself of those two lesser-appreciated insiders. At its core, this spat began over Musk's criticism of the deficit spending that would accompany the Trump-branded 'One Big Beautiful Bill' that preserves and expands Trump's first-term tax cuts, slices into clean-energy initiatives carried in Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, and boosts spending on border and immigration policing. It's poised to add trillions to the national debt. Musk, a newly converted deficit hawk, has said he sees the red ink as an existential threat. House Republicans powered their first leg of this marathon across the line with the barest of majorities and zero margin for error. Democrats were unified in their opposition, and remain even more so now that they've had time to unpack everything in a 1,000-plus-page bill that also would limit how much courts could rein in Trump and neuter the ability of states to regulate artificial intelligence. In the Senate, things were already iffy. The White House plans to use a procedural trick that allows Senate Republicans to sidestep the typical filibuster rules and pass the legislation with a simple majority. But that's going to require keeping the parameters narrow and keeping the crayons inside the line, especially when it comes to long-term spending obligations. But Senate Republicans also plan to edit the bill text. Add in there Musk's threats of consequences for rubber stamping the House version and it's even murkier where this one goes. As soon as Musk and Trump began bashing one another in earnest on Thursday, the GOP base immediately started agitating in three big directions. In one corner were those bucking up Trump's flank. Former White House strategist Steve Bannon went so far as to suggest the feds look at Musk's immigration status, hinting that the South African-born Musk could find himself on the losing side of a deportation skirmish. In another stood Musk's defenders, who said maybe the world's richest man was onto something when it came to the criticism that sparked the fallout: that the tax cuts in the bill would balloon the nation's already terrifying pile of IOUs. Musk's following remains huge, but he does not have a natural constituency the way other political leaders enjoy. That is why he is such a potent force in electoral efforts, especially among voters who feel no one in elected office has their interests at heart. Add in there the libertarian-minded Silicon Valley set, and it's an unusual coalition that few others could muster. Finally—and this is where so many Republican lawmakers are falling in line—is the corner where there's a last-ditch hope that Trump and Musk can move on, forgetting the pettiness of the last week. The Kiss-and-Make-Up Caucus, as it's been jokingly called among Hill aides, is one with long odds, to be sure. But it's a detente that might allow both billionaires to save face while sparing lawmakers from picking sides, a fraught choice given the passions running high with low-information voters. Johnson, speaking with reporters on Friday, tried to navigate a way out of this mess without any new tinder. 'It's not personal,' Johnson told CNBC on Friday. 'I don't tell my friend Elon how … to build rockets. I wish he wouldn't argue with me on how to craft legislation and pass it.' Since Musk started busting-up the federal government in January, Hill Democrats have been in a listless tilt in search of a strategy. A few fiery speeches have not stopped Musk's march through the federal workforce. Some of the actions have been reversed, either through quiet climbdown or court-ordered pivots. But by and large, Democrats have been left on the sidelines and powerless to query Musk and his deputies, let alone stop them. That may shift now. Musk is clearly no longer a loyalist to Trump, who could still avail himself of claims of executive privilege and block Musk's cooperation with the Hill Democrats. But with Musk openly encouraging Trump's impeachment—which would be a record third time!—there are chances that this escalates in truly history-making ways. Hill Republicans have so far stuck together to protect Trump and, by extension, Musk from any real scrutiny. While much of Trump's Cabinet has bristled over Musk's over-reach into their fiefdoms, they have still dutifully shielded Musk and Co from any real oversight. Through some clever administrative trickery, the White House ensured that Musk was never technically a real federal employee, and even claimed he was never in charge of the office he was actually running. Efforts to haul him in for oversight hit a brick wall. Hill Republicans kept their frustrations buttoned-up and limited to closed-door venting. Now that Musk is untethered, the game may have changed. If the White House wanted to, it could go so far as to encourage Congress to make use of its subpoena power. While that's an unlikely outcome, Musk can no longer be assured of the safe bunker in Washington he had when this second Trump term began. Make sense of what matters in Washington. Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter. Write to Philip Elliott at