CERN collider reveals major clue to universe's bias against antimatter
A key clue comes from something called CP violation — a difference in the behaviour of matter and antimatter.
While CP violation has been observed in certain types of particles called mesons, it has never been reported in baryons, which are the particles (like protons and neutrons) that make up most of the matter around us.
Based on new data, the LHCb collaboration in Europe has now reported the first-ever observation of CP violation in baryon decays, specifically in a particle called the Λb⁰ baryon (pronounced 'lambda bee-zero baryon').
Their findings were published in Nature on July 16.
'For the first time, we have clear evidence of CP violation in baryons,' Xueting Yang, the corresponding author of the study, a member of the LHCb team, and a PhD student at Peking University in Beijing, told The Hindu. 'The matter-antimatter asymmetry in the universe requires CP violation in baryons, such that the discovery is a key step forward.'
Looking for the signal
In CP, 'C' stands for charge conjugation, which means the action of swapping a particle with its antiparticle. 'P' stands for parity, which is the action of flipping the spatial coordinates, like looking in a mirror. CP symmetry stipulates that if you swap particles for antiparticles and look in a mirror, the laws of physics should be the same.
CP violation thus means this symmetry is broken and that the laws of physics are slightly different for matter and antimatter. This is important because CP violation is a necessary ingredient to explain why the universe is made mostly of matter.
The Λb⁰ baryon is made up of three smaller particles: an up quark, a down quark, and a bottom quark. The antiparticle of the Λb⁰ baryon is called the Λb⁰-bar.
The newly reported result focuses on a specific decay of the Λb⁰ baryon: into a proton, a negatively charged kaon, a positively charged pion, and a negatively charged pion. This is denoted: Λb⁰ → p K⁻ π⁺ π⁻.
The collaboration also studied the same decay for the antiparticle, Λb⁰-bar, but with all charges reversed.
The experiment used data from the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, specifically from the LHCb detector on the machine.
The LHCb team collected data between 2011 and 2018, corresponding to a very large number of collisions between beams of protons accelerated to nearly the speed of light.
In these collisions, Λb⁰ and Λb⁰-bar baryons are produced and then rapidly decay. The LHCb researchers looked for events where the decay products matched p K⁻ π⁺ π⁻.
To reduce background noise — in the form of random combinations of particles that mimic the signal — they used machine learning to distinguish real decays from fake ones. They also used particle identification tools on computers that could tell protons, kaons, and pions apart.
The main quantity they measured was the CP asymmetry. It compares the number of Λb⁰ decays to the number of Λb⁰-bar decays: if there is no CP violation, the value of CP asymmetry should be zero. In practice, they measured the yield asymmetry, which is the difference in the number of decays observed for Λb⁰ and Λb⁰-bar.
There are some effects that can mimic CP violation. For example, the proton-proton collisions may produce more Λb⁰ than Λb⁰-bar to begin with. For another, the LHCb detector on the Large Hadron Collider might have been slightly better at detecting one charge over another.
To correct for these possible biases, the researchers used a control channel — a similar decay where no CP violation is expected. Here, an Λb⁰ baryon decays to a positively charged Λc baryon, and a negatively charged pion: Λb⁰ → Λc⁺ π⁻.
Any asymmetry seen in this control channel was considered a nuisance and subtracted from the main measurement.
Mesons, then baryons
The researchers used statistical methods to determine how many real Λb⁰ baryon and Λb⁰-bar antiparticle decays the detector recorded. Then they checked their results for consistency across different data-taking periods, detector settings, and analysis methods.
Thus, the team found a significant difference in the decay rates: about 2.45%.
According to the paper, this result is 5.2 standard deviations away from zero, which is well above the statistical threshold required for physicists to claim a discovery in particle physics.
'It was expected that the LHCb group had enough data. They are reporting it now,' theoretical physicist, University of Hawai'i affiliate graduate faculty, and Chennai's Institute of Mathematical Sciences retired professor Rahul Sinha told The Hindu.
This is the first time CP violation has been observed in baryon decays. Previously, physicists had reported CP violation only in mesons, particles which are made of a quark and an antiquark, and not baryons, which are made of three quarks.
The result matches the predictions of the Standard Model, the main theory of particle physics, which says CP violation comes from the way quarks mix and decay.
However, the amount of CP violation in the Standard Model is not enough to explain the matter-antimatter imbalance in the universe.
'The observation of CP violation in baryons still doesn't settle the mystery of the universe's missing antimatter,' Prof. Sinha said. 'The Standard Model predicts a rate of disappearance of antimatter that doesn't match what we're seeing in the universe.'
The new announcement opens new ways to search for 'new physics', the name for hitherto unknown effects or particles beyond what the Model predicts, and which physicists believe will reveal the 'complete' theory of subatomic particles.
Mind the phase
According to Prof. Sinha, the new paper reports observing CP violation in baryons but doesn't say whether the amount of violation is higher or lower than that predicted by the Standard Model. Ascertaining that requires researchers to determine the complex phase.
In the context of CP violation, the complex phase is a combination of variables present in the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix, a mathematical tool physicists use to understand how the quarks in a baryon interact with each other.
If the complex phase has a non-zero value, it means the laws of physics are not identical for matter and antimatter, leading to observable differences in their behaviour.
The Standard Model predicts specific values for the amount of CP violation, which are determined by the magnitude and phase of the variables in the CKM matrix. By measuring the phase associated with CP violation in baryon decays, physicists can compare the observed amount of violation to the Standard Model's predictions.
In their paper, the LHCb researchers have reported that the complex phase information proved too difficult to extract from the data collected by the detector.
'Until we measure the phase, we can't say if the rate of antimatter's disappearance is too high or too low compared to the Model's prediction,' Prof. Sinha said.
The same technique to measure the phase for mesons can't be used for baryons. To this end, Prof. Sinha added that in 2022, he and his peers Shibasis Roy and N.G. Deshpande described a new way to measure the complex phase for baryons. It was published in Physical Review Letters.
Observing CP violation in baryons is important because the visible matter around us today is made of baryons. Some baryons like protons and neutrons are very stable and don't decay for a long time. Others, like Λb⁰, decay in around 1.5 picoseconds. The point is what is true for one baryon should be true for all baryons.
'To definitively resolve the asymmetry problem, both experimental and theoretical progress are needed,' Dr. Yang said.
'Experimentally, more precise and comprehensive measurements across different particle systems are required to build a coherent and consistent picture of CP violation. Theoretically, improved calculations and refined models are essential to connect these experimental observations with the fundamental physics driving the matter-antimatter asymmetry.'
The Sakharov conditions
How did matter gain an overwhelming upper hand over antimatter in the universe? CP violation in baryons is an important piece of this puzzle — but also only one piece.
In 1967, the Soviet physicist and later political dissident Andrei Sakharov said three conditions will have to be met for the universe to be made predominantly of only matter. They are:
(i) Baryon number violation: physical processes must exist that create an imbalance between the number of baryons and the number of antibaryons.
(ii) CP violation in baryons
(iii) Departure from thermal equilibrium: to prevent processes from balancing baryon and antibaryon production, interactions must occur out of equilibrium.
The observation of CP violation in baryon decays provides a 'source' that adds to CP violation among mesons. The complex phase of the mesons' violation has been measured whereas that of the baryons is pending. Once the latter is known physicists will be able to compare it to that predicted by the Standard Model.
If they match, it will mean the Standard Model is right — but at the same time leave a gap between the predicted matter-antimatter asymmetry and that observed in the universe.
If the values don't match, it could be a sign of 'new physics', which physicists will have to explain using new theories and experiments.
Overall, the newly reported observation is a milestone showing that the laws of physics treat matter and antimatter differently not just in mesons but also in baryons — the building blocks of the visible universe.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Where is the centre of the universe?
A:The universe has no top, bottom or middle and no centre either. Scientists know today that the universe is spreading out in all directions and in all places at the same time. This means galaxies that are 500 lightyears away, 5,000 lightyears away, and 5 million lightyears away are all moving away from the earth. The earth itself is moving away from another object somewhere else. On a more fundamental level, we often consider the Big Bang to be a central event in space, but this is not true. Our universe is not located inside some larger space (at least to the extent that we can study and prove). Right after the Big Bang, space grew, changed, and evolved everywhere at once. The human mind is accustomed to a three-dimensional surrounding where specific parts of space begin and end. It is more used to shapes with points and straight lines. Thus, for example, we can say a spherical soap bubble has a centre. But the universe bends space and time and has a shape that is not easily comprehensible by the mind. It has no edges or vertices and thus no centre either. As the German physicist Werner Heisenberg once said, 'Physics does not offer comfort; it offers reality.' (Shamim Haque Mondal is a researcher in the Physics Division, State Forensic Science Laboratory, Kolkata.)
Indian Express
17 hours ago
- Indian Express
Matter's elusive dark twin: Most expensive substance in the universe
In 1930, theoretical physicist Paul Dirac was trying to reconcile quantum mechanics with Einstein's theory of relativity when his equations hinted at something strange: the existence of a 'mirror' particle identical to the electron, but with opposite charge. Its implications made him uneasy — that every particle has an antiparticle, and that perhaps the whole of nature is constructed in this way. Dirac's calculation wasn't to be a mere mathematical quirk. Two years later, American particle physicist Carl Anderson found the positron, the electron's antimatter twin, in cosmic ray experiments. It was a moment of rare scientific poetry: a particle predicted by pure mathematics, then seen in nature. Antimatter sounds like something from science fiction. And indeed, it has captured the imagination of writers from Star Trek (where it powers warp drives) to Angels and Demons (where it threatens to obliterate Vatican City). But antimatter is very real, though vanishingly rare in our universe. Whenever a particle meets its antiparticle, they annihilate in a flash of energy — converting all their mass, as per Einstein's , into pure light. That property makes antimatter the most energy-dense substance imaginable. A single gram could, in theory, produce as much energy as a nuclear bomb. But if it's so powerful, why don't we use it? And why don't we see it everywhere? Here lies one of the deepest mysteries in cosmology. The Big Bang, as we understand it, should have created equal amounts of matter and antimatter. But for reasons not yet fully known, the early universe tipped the scales ever so slightly toward matter — by just one part in a billion. That tiny excess is what makes up everything we see: stars, galaxies, people, planets. The rest annihilated with its antimatter counterpart in the early universe. Physicists are still trying to understand why the universe has this imbalance. One possibility is that antimatter behaves slightly differently than matter — a tiny asymmetry in how particles decay, known as CP violation. Experiments at CERN and Fermilab are probing these effects, but so far, no definitive explanation has emerged. The reality of antimatter: not just theory Despite its elusiveness, antimatter isn't merely theoretical. We make it — routinely. In fact, hospitals around the world use positrons (antimatter electrons) every day in PET scans. The 'P' in PET stands for 'positron,' and the scan works by injecting a radioactive tracer that emits positrons. When these encounter electrons in the body, they annihilate and emit gamma rays, which are detected to create precise images of tissues. Physicists at CERN's Antimatter Factory even trap anti-hydrogen atoms, composed of an antiproton and a positron, in magnetic fields for a few milliseconds at a time, to study their properties. The dream is to answer a simple but profound question: does antimatter fall down like regular matter, or does it somehow respond differently to gravity? Early experiments suggest it falls the same way, but the precision isn't yet conclusive. Energy source or weapon? Harnessing antimatter sounds like a sci-fi superpower, and indeed, the energy from matter-antimatter annihilation could, in theory, power spacecraft far more efficiently than any rocket we've built. But there's a catch: antimatter is mind-bogglingly expensive. Producing a single gram would cost about $60 trillion using today's particle accelerators. Worse, storing it safely is a nightmare. Let it touch anything, and boom, it annihilates. That hasn't stopped the speculation. NASA has funded studies on antimatter propulsion, suggesting it could one day shorten interstellar travel. But for now, it remains out of reach, a gleaming prize at the edge of possibility. Antimatter in space Cosmic rays from deep space occasionally strike Earth's upper atmosphere, producing short-lived showers of antimatter particles. The International Space Station even carries an instrument called the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, scanning for signs of antimatter nuclei that could hint at entire regions of the universe made of antimatter — a speculative idea, but one not yet ruled out. Neutron stars and black hole jets may also generate antimatter in tiny amounts, adding to the cosmic fireworks. But overall, the universe appears matter-dominated. Why nature chose this option, why there's something instead of nothing, remains among the deepest riddles in physics. Final Reflections In Star Trek, antimatter is a tame servant of human ambition. In reality, it's a fleeting, elusive shadow of the particles we know. Dirac's equations suggested a universe with perfect symmetry, but nature, like a mischievous artist, left a flaw in the mirror. The story of antimatter reminds us that physics isn't just about numbers or formulas. It's about imagination, daring, and a relentless curiosity about the hidden sides of reality. Somewhere in the collision of matter and anti-matter lies a spark — of annihilation, yes, but also of wonder. Shravan Hanasoge is an astrophysicist at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 days ago
- First Post
Have scientists decoded why the universe exists? Cern study points to matter-antimatter asymmetry
The finding offers vital clues to the long-standing mystery of why the universe is composed predominantly of matter, rather than being annihilated by an equal amount of antimatter read more A new study has shed light on one of humankind's fundamental queries: Why does the universe exist? Image courtesy: Nasa A new study at CERN has provided critical insights into one of the most fundamental questions in physics: why does anything exist at all? Researchers working on the Large Hadron Collider beauty (LHCb) experiment have observed a rare form of symmetry violation in the decays of beauty baryons– particles containing a bottom quark. The finding offers vital clues to the long-standing mystery of why the universe is composed predominantly of matter, rather than being annihilated by an equal amount of antimatter. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The study, published in Nature, reports the observation of charge–parity (CP) violation in a baryonic decay process, marking a significant development in the quest to understand the imbalance between matter and antimatter in the early universe. What did the scientists observe? The experiment focused on a specific decay of the beauty baryon, into a proton, a kaon (K−), and two pions (π+ and π−). This decay can occur via two different quark-level pathways: one involving a bottom-to-up (b → u) transition and another involving a bottom-to-strange (b → s) transition. Crucially, the researchers found that these two processes do not behave symmetrically when matter is swapped for antimatter. This violation of CP symmetry is a direct indication that the laws of physics are not entirely the same for matter and antimatter– a foundational requirement for explaining why the universe didn't simply self-destruct in a flash of mutual annihilation shortly after the Big Bang. Why is CP violation so important? CP violation had previously been observed in the decays of mesons– particles made of a quark and an antiquark. However, baryons (made of three quarks) are less explored in this context. The new findings from the LHCb collaboration represent the first clear evidence of CP violation in baryon decays, expanding the frontier of known symmetry-breaking phenomena. This asymmetry is a necessary component in explaining the observed dominance of matter in the universe. Without it, the Standard Model predicts that equal amounts of matter and antimatter would have been produced in the early universe– leading to their mutual destruction.
