New statue of Daniel O'Connell for Leinster House to mark 250 years since birth
It is to be donated by Bank of Ireland, with the unveiling expected in September.
O'Connell, who was born on August 6th, 1775, was the foremost Irish nationalist leader of the 19th century.
The anniversary will also be marked by a special State-led commemorative event, which will form the central part of the commemorations. It is to be held at O'Connell's home in Derrynane House, Co Kerry.
READ MORE
Speakers from Ireland, the United Kingdom and United States will attend the annual Daniel O'Connell summer school at the end of August in Cahersiveen and Derrynane.
Minister for Culture Patrick O'Donovan will update the Cabinet on Tuesday about the programme of events.
Trinity College Dublin will hold a symposium this month on liberty, democracy and rights, while RTÉ is making a one-hour documentary on O'Connell in partnership with UCC and the University of Notre Dame, which will be distributed to schools and libraries.
[
Daniel O'Connell, the greatest of all politicians
Opens in new window
]
The Central Bank of Ireland will issue commemorative coins in gold and silver to mark the anniversary, while An Post will also issue commemorative stamps at the end of July.
The Irish Georgian Society will hold a study day consisting of a special event of lectures at City Assembly House in South William Street in Dublin, where O'Connell once led a three day debate on repealing the Act of Union.
Meanwhile, the Department of Foreign Affairs will be organising events across the State's Embassy network, including in London.
The Irish Embassy will host an event in September at London's Reform Club, where O'Connell was once a member.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on X's court defeat: the conflict will continue
The High Court's rejection of X's challenge to Ireland's new online safety code may come to be seen as a milestone in the enforcement of Europe's digital rulebook. It is also a reminder that the battle over online content regulation is not simply a matter of legal interpretation or child protection policy. It sits squarely in the middle of a transatlantic struggle over who sets the rules for the digital economy. Ireland's Online Safety Code, enforced by Coimisiún na Meán, requires platforms to shield children from harmful video content, introduce age checks and parental controls, and prevent the sharing of material that promotes self-harm, eating disorders or bullying. The court ruled these measures fall within the EU's Audiovisual Media Services Directive and complement the Digital Services Act, dismissing X's claims of overreach. That finding may seem straightforward from a European perspective. The EU has long sought to assert that technology companies must respect European standards if they wish to operate here. But the US views such measures through a different lens, shaped by its dominance in the tech sector and a political culture that prizes free expression in almost absolute terms. The commercial stakes are immense. The global tech services market is overwhelmingly dominated by American firms: Meta, Google, Apple and Amazon. EU regulation is therefore not just a neutral exercise in public protection but, inevitably, a rebalancing of power between the jurisdictions where these companies are based and the markets in which they operate. That tension is heightened by the fact that Ireland is home to the European headquarters of many of these firms, making it the front line in this conflict. READ MORE In Washington, the issues are often couched in the language of principle. Conservative figures such as JD Vance have been vocal in their defence of unfettered online speech, casting regulation as censorship. Such arguments, while grounded in America's First Amendment tradition, also align neatly with the commercial interests of the companies whose revenues depend on maximising user engagement. The defence of principle and the defence of profit are intertwined. The ruling against X will not end these disputes. The tech industry's legal resources are vast, and its political allies influential. But it confirms that Ireland, acting within the EU framework, has the authority to challenge the ethos of the platforms it hosts. That will not be welcomed in boardrooms in California or on Capitol Hill. As the digital economy becomes a key arena of US-EU competition, Ireland's decisions will be read not only as regulatory acts but as statements about where power lies in the online world. Tuesday's judgment suggests that, at least for now, that power may be shifting.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the Government VAT row: tensions ahead
With many Government ministers now scattered to the beaches and byways, attention to matters in Leinster House has turned briefly quiet. But the reverberations from a row over VAT on hospitality still linger, offering a taste of fractious budgetary debates to come in September. The flare-up, pitting Fianna Fáil against Fine Gael, may seem familiar. It echoes the tensions seen earlier this summer over third-level college fees and once again highlights the uneasy balance at the heart of the Coalition. The proposal to reduce the hospitality VAT rate to 9 per cent was a Fine Gael manifesto pledge that found its way, with caveats, into the Programme for Government. But enthusiasm for the measure is not universally shared. Simon Harris, eager to demonstrate economic support for small business and the regions, has championed the move. However, his party colleague, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe, was notably blunt in the Summer Economic Statement. The cut, he noted, would consume nearly two-thirds of the pot set aside for tax measures. READ MORE That alone was enough to raise eyebrows. More pointedly, Fianna Fáil's Minister of State Niall Collins described the proposal as an unnecessary concession to a 'price-gouging' industry. Fine Gael countered that hospitality is a major regional employer under pressure from rising costs. Both sides later sought to play down the public spat. Coalition tensions are nothing new, but the nature of this disagreement suggests tougher debates to come. While calling the 2026 budget a 'hairshirt' one would be absurd, it is clear nonetheless that the era of fiscal generosity is drawing to a close. Trade-offs are inevitable. One such compromise may involve delaying the reduction until mid-2026. That might provide enough breathing room for competing demands, though no one will be entirely satisfied. In the end, the episode may be remembered as a sideshow to more serious economic challenges. Still, it has cast a light on the limits of coalition unity in an era of fiscal tightening.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
High Court refuses Gript's application for stay on publication of Press Council decision
The High Court has refused to stay an obligation on conservative news website Gript to publish a Press Council of Ireland decision upholding a complaint against the outlet. Lawyers for Gript Media Ltd, which operates the Gript site, on Wednesday sought the stay as part of judicial review proceedings it wants to bring against the Press Council. Gript wants to quash a recent decision of the Press Council, which upheld a Press Ombudsman finding that the outlet breached the council's code of practice in publishing two articles in October 2024. The articles relate to a diploma course run for secondary school teachers by Dublin City University (DCU) on Social, Personal and Health Education (SPHE) and Relationships and Sexuality Education (RSE). The articles reported on the purported material contained on the course, according to Gript's court documents. READ MORE DCU subsequently filed a complaint with the Press Ombudsman over the articles. The Press Ombudsman, in a May 1st decision, held that Gript, in publishing the articles, breached the Press Council's code of practice in three respects – truth and accuracy, fair procedures and honesty, and privacy. Gript is a member of the Press Council, and is obliged to abide by the council's code of practice. Gript unsuccessfully appealed the Press Ombudsman's decision to the Press Council. In a June 18th decision, the council upheld the finding of the ombudsman. Arising from this, Gript is obliged to publish the Press Council's decision on DCU's complaint on its website, and annotate the offending articles with a reference to the decision. In the High Court on Wednesday, Conor Rock, barrister for Gript, sought a stay on this obligation, pending the outcome of his client's judicial review proceedings against the Press Council. Mr Rock made the application on an ex-parte basis, with only Gript represented in court. Mr Rock noted that the Press Council had published its decision, and the stay application was a question of whether or not his client should be sanctioned – that is, through publication of the decision on the Gript website – pending the outcome of the proceeding. Mr Rock said his client took issue with having to include a specific reference in the articles in question, 'effectively saying' that the reports weren't truthful or accurate, breached privacy, and weren't honest. He said this could result in a breakdown in trust between Gript and its readers. Even in the event his client is successful in quashing the Press Council decision, this trust cannot be easily quantified in damage, Mr Rock said. 'It's that independent trust with the readership that's at stake here,' he said. Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty refused the application for a stay. She noted that Gript agreed that the decision is already available publicly, and in those circumstances, she said she did not believe it was prejudicial to Gript to have to publish it. She said the matter could be addressed in terms of damages. The case returns in October.
