logo
How will Indian cricket boycott post-Pahalgam attack affect Pakistan and Bangladesh? Here's what numbers suggest

How will Indian cricket boycott post-Pahalgam attack affect Pakistan and Bangladesh? Here's what numbers suggest

First Post06-05-2025

While the BCCI has been advised to completely boycott Pakistan following the deadly terror attack in Pahalgam, Bangladesh could be facing India's wrath as well in the coming days following a retired army officer's threat against New Delhi. Here's how an Indian boycott will affect Pakistan and Bangladesh's cricket boards. read more
The cricket boards of Pakistan and Bangladesh face the prospect of a major financial loss if India decides to boycott them due to ongoing political tensions after the Pahalgam attack. Reuters/AP
It's been more than a decade since India and Pakistan last met in a bilateral series, with the arch-rivals' meetings limited to ICC events and the Asia Cup. And after the deadly terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam that left 26 civilians dead, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has been encouraged to completely boycott the Pakistan Cricket Board, meaning India might not be playing any form of with Pakistan including in global and continental events.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Given how diplomatic ties between the two nations have undergone a complete breakdown in the last two weeks, the boycott could be extended to women's and youth cricket as well.
Bangladesh, too, could be facing BCCI's wrath in the coming days after a retired army officer's threat against New Delhi in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack.
The Indian government's relations with Dhaka have nosedived ever since the Sheikh Hasina-led government was toppled in August last year following weeks of political unrest. Attacks on the Hindu minority community following the agitation further deteriorated relations between the two South Asian neighbours.
And after India responded to the killings in Pahalgam with a series of non-military measures against Islamabad, whom they have blamed for the attack, Major General ALM Fazlur Rahman (retired) stirred controversy by suggesting Bangladesh should capture the north-eastern part of India if the Narendra Modi-led government attacked Pakistan.
How a Indian boycott will affect cricket in Pakistan and Bangladesh
Despite the Muhammad Yunus-led Bangladeshi interim government distancing itself from Fazlur Rahman's provocative comment, India certainly is viewing Bangladesh – a nation they had shared cordial relations with before Sheikh Hasina's resignation – with suspicion.
And with the Asia Cup set to take place later this year in the T20 format, the BCCI might end up taking action against Bangladesh in addition to Pakistan. India are scheduled to tour Bangladesh for three ODIs and as many T20Is before the Asia Cup, which might get called off due to the current political climate in the Indian subcontinent as well as potential security concerns in Bangladesh.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It is safe to suggest both Pakistan and Bangladesh face a massive financial loss upon an Indian boycott. India after all, is a global superpower in the sport thanks to its massive growth in the last two decades, spearheaded by the unprecedented boom of the Indian Premier League.
The BCCI alone accounts for 80 per cent of the ICC's total revenue – which incidentally is what boards such as PCB and Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) primary rely on to keep their operations afloat.
According to a report on Times Now, PCB and BCB stand to lose INR 220 crore and INR 130 crore respectively if the BCCI decides against playing these two nations in the future, starting with the upcoming tour of Bangladesh and the Asia Cup.
The Bangladesh board had earned between Rs 70-80 crore when the Indian team had visited the country in December 2022, in which they had played three ODIs and two Tests. And it would be safe to assume the BCB will lose just as much, if not more, if the Men in Blue don't show up this August.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The report adds that the two nations might stand to lose approximately Rs 20-30 crore in shared broadcast revenue per cycle if BCCI asks the ICC to put Pakistan and Bangladesh in a separate group.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Turkey threatening India's friend, not Armenia, Modi govt may hit back at Erdogan by...
Turkey threatening India's friend, not Armenia, Modi govt may hit back at Erdogan by...

India.com

time34 minutes ago

  • India.com

Turkey threatening India's friend, not Armenia, Modi govt may hit back at Erdogan by...

(File) Ankara: Bankrupt Pakistan is not refraining from spreading propaganda despite facing a humiliating loss to India. However, this terror state is getting the full support of its allies. Countries like China and Turkey are openly amplifying Pakistan's propaganda. Turkey, in particular, has now started threatening India's allies. Pakistan claims to have shot down Indian fighter jets. While India has acknowledged the loss of its aircraft, it has not disclosed how the jets were downed or how many were lost. Turkey is now threatening Greece—India's close ally. Turkish media is using Pakistan's statements to intimidate Greece. Greece, like India, has also purchased 24 Rafale fighter jets from France. Turkish conservative media platform TR Haber has launched new propaganda, claiming that Greece is uncertain about the capabilities of the French fighter jets it recently acquired. The main objective of TR Haber's report is to portray that if Pakistan can target Indian aircraft using China-made JF-17 jets and PL-15 missiles, then Greece's reliance on Rafale fighter jets could be dangerous for it. Tensions between Turkey and Greece have existed for decades, and it is evident from Turkish media reports that Turkey is trying to intimidate Greece. In essence, Turkey wants to use the India-Pakistan conflict to serve its own agenda. Meanwhile, Turkish media conveniently omits reports about how India destroyed Turkish drones as easily as slicing vegetables.

Netanyahu is frustrated as Israel faces massive shortage of 10000 soldiers, reason is…
Netanyahu is frustrated as Israel faces massive shortage of 10000 soldiers, reason is…

India.com

time34 minutes ago

  • India.com

Netanyahu is frustrated as Israel faces massive shortage of 10000 soldiers, reason is…

Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu (File) Gaza-Israel conflict: In a significant development amid the Gaza-Israel conflict, a massive bad news has hit Benjamin Netanyahu led Israel. As per the recent update, Israel is facing a massive shortage of over 10,000 soldiers due to huge number of deaths of the soldiers in Gaza. For those unversed, Israel and Gaza have been engaged in a conflict for over an year. Here are all the details you need to know about the recent issue Israel is facing. Media reports have it that Israel is facing a shortage of over 10,000 soldiers, including 6,000 combat troops, prompting calls for urgent recruitment, including from ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities. The statement came as the army spokesperson was asked a question about the recruitment of ultra-Orthodox (ultra-Orthodox Jewish) youth. Also, readers should note that more that 429 Israeli soldiers have been reportedly killed since the start of the ground operation in Gaza. Israel says it killed Palestinian Mujahideen Brigades chief in Gaza The Israeli military said that its forces had killed at least two senior members of the Palestinian Mujahideen Movement in strikes in Gaza City, including a commander accused of involvement in the deadly October 7 attack on Israel. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Shin Bet security agency said in a joint statement that As'ad Abu Sharaiya, head of the Mujahideen Brigades — the armed wing of the Palestinian Mujahideen Movement — was killed in a joint operation. They accused Abu Sharaiya of playing 'a key role' in the Hamas-led assault in 2023 and being 'directly involved in the abduction, detention, and killing of Israeli hostages.' US vetoes UN Security Council draft resolution demanding immediate Gaza ceasefire In another significant development, the United States vetoed a Security Council draft resolution that would have demanded an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the immediate lifting of all restrictions on humanitarian aid. The draft resolution, tabled by the 10 elected members of the Security Council on Wednesday, won the support of 14 out of the 15 members of the council. The United States, which holds veto power, voted against it. (With inputs from agencies)

This deal can trigger a new India-China power play
This deal can trigger a new India-China power play

Economic Times

time36 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

This deal can trigger a new India-China power play

Chagos and the colonial legacy India's stakes in Mauritius Live Events China's expanding footprint Chagos, India's strategic leverage? (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The recent agreement between the UK and Mauritius , where the UK has agreed in principle to cede sovereignty of the Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius, marks a watershed moment in post-colonial geopolitics. While India has officially hailed the move as the completion of Mauritius's decolonisation process, the implications go far beyond historical justice or moral diplomacy. For India, this development opens new possibilities in its ongoing strategic contest with China for influence across the Indian Ocean region. On this wider maritime chessboard, the Chagos Islands may prove to be a crucial Chagos Archipelago, a group of over 60 small islands in the central Indian Ocean, has been under British control since the 1960s, when it was separated from Mauritius prior to the latter's independence. The United Kingdom then leased the largest island, Diego Garcia, to the United States, which turned it into a major military base. For decades, the Chagos issue remained a sticking point in Mauritius's decolonisation narrative, and its legal claim was supported by international courts and the United has consistently backed Mauritius's claims, both out of principle and geopolitical calculation. The transfer of sovereignty to Mauritius — albeit with the U.S. base likely to continue operating under existing arrangements — allows New Delhi a more open and potentially influential role in shaping the future security architecture of the central Indian stakes in Mauritius are not new. The two countries enjoy strong diplomatic, economic, and cultural ties, underpinned by a shared history and a large Indo-Mauritian population. Nearly 70% of Mauritians are of Indian origin. Under a unique tradition, only Indian citizens, often top officials of Indian security and defence services, are appointed Mauritius' national security adviser and the head of the coast is among the top trading partners and investors in Mauritius, and it has strategically extended lines of credit, development assistance, and infrastructure investment to maintain its influence. India is building a Metro in Mauritius and also built its new Supreme Court building. Recently, the Indian government asked Indian airlines to bail out loss-hit Air 2015, India built a new airstrip and other military infrastructure on Agalega Island, another Mauritian territory. While officially described as supporting civilian use and improving connectivity, the facility is widely understood to have strategic value, potentially allowing India to monitor key maritime chokepoints and naval activity in the region. This development complements India's broader Indian Ocean strategy, which includes military agreements with Seychelles, Madagascar, and Oman, and a growing naval presence in the however, is not standing still. China's presence in the Indian Ocean has been growing rapidly through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), naval deployments, port development, and strategic partnerships. In 2019, China signed a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Mauritius — its first FTA with an African country — giving it a crucial economic and legal foothold in the island addition, China has funded infrastructure projects in Mauritius, including smart city projects and port modernization. While these developments are framed in economic terms, they potentially serve dual-use purposes, a hallmark of Chinese strategic investments. This expanding influence has naturally caused unease in New Delhi, which views China's Indian Ocean ambitions with deep the Chagos Islands possibly coming under the sovereignty of a friendly and closely aligned Mauritius, India gains several advantages in its strategic calculus. Control over the Chagos archipelago by Mauritius — a pro-India partner — alters the balance of influence in the central Indian Ocean. India could gain access or leverage over these islands to enhance its maritime domain awareness and patrol Diego Garcia will remain under US military use, Mauritius's sovereignty introduces a third actor into strategic dialogues. India, which shares robust defense ties with the US, could benefit from this triangle, facilitating intelligence sharing and operational Beijing establishing port access and naval agreements across the Indian Ocean — including Gwadar in Pakistan, Hambantota in Sri Lanka, and Djibouti — India needs strategic outposts of its own. The Chagos Islands, along with Agalega and other island partnerships, can serve as a counterweight. India has positioned itself as a net security provider in the IOR. Having influence over Chagos enhances its ability to counter piracy, trafficking, and other non-traditional threats, while also projecting hard power if strategic opportunity presented by the Chagos handover is significant, but it is not without challenges. First, the degree of India's access to or use of Chagos territory will depend on the terms Mauritius establishes, particularly in the context of the existing US lease of Diego Garcia. Second, India must be cautious not to provoke unnecessary tension with China, especially in a region where both nations are vying for influence through economic as well as military means. Moreover, the local sensitivities, especially surrounding the displaced Chagossian population and ongoing human rights concerns, mean that any Indian role must be diplomatically nuanced and development-oriented.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store