SQA accused of 'slap in the face' to teachers
The course updates were announced in the SQA's regular newsletter on 15 May and include the removal of an entire question paper from Higher Drama, the introduction of a prescribed text list for another, and alterations to exam questions and marking schemes at National 5 and Advanced Higher levels. According to one senior teacher who approached The Herald, this was the 'first notification' to schools that significant changes would be introduced and made mandatory for the 2025/26 academic year.
Under a sub-heading of 'What you'll need to do differently', teachers were informed that they will have to select one of 15 prescribed texts for paper one of the exam. In addition, they were told: 'You'll also need to update your teaching notes and assessment materials to reflect the new marking instructions for both sections of the question paper.'
The post confirmed that the updated course specifications and exemplar exam papers would be made available four days later on Monday 19 May. This material was published as planned on the SQA website.
Most secondary schools in Scotland begin their new timetables in June once students have returned from exam leave, meaning that teachers have just a few weeks to reconstruct their courses to fit the new requirements. In cases where schools have not previously taught any of the new approved texts, class sets will have to be purchased and entirely new teaching materials developed.
The EIS has told its members not to carry out unplanned additional work in order to accommodate 'last minute changes from the SQA".
READ MORE:
A spokesperson for the SQA insisted that the changes have been 'shaped by the thoughtful feedback shared by teachers, and the timing reflects what was important to them.' They also said that 'a range of resources' will be made available 'in the new session' in order to 'help bring clarity and confidence to the classroom".
However, a senior teacher disputed these claims, telling The Herald that the SQA had carried out very limited engagement work and had not presented the proposed set text list to teacher to gather their opinions on the plays to be included. They added that the decision to impose the changes immediately creates an 'obvious workload issue' and financial challenges that the SQA should address.
In addition to the logistical concerns being raised by teachers, the new set text list has also been described as disappointing and uninspired, with some arguing that it will make it more difficult for teachers to engage young people in the subject.
The only women with work included as a set text are Shelagh Delaney (A Taste of Honey), Liz Lochhead (Dracula), Ena Lamont Stewart (Men Should Weep), Zinnie Harris (The Duchess (of Malfi)). An SQA spokesperson told The Herald that the selections on the new list are 'based on the most popular responses' in previous exams, and that the list will be 'reviewed regularly top ensure it remains relevant".
The new list of set texts for Higher Drama (Image: James McEnaney) Speaking to The Herald on condition of anonymity, one current drama teacher said that the SQA has 'failed to recognise the huge implications of introducing a set text list and new marking scheme just a few weeks before the change of timetable."
They continued: 'In a time where unions are voicing concerns for teachers health and wellbeing as well as workload it's a real slap in the face to those wanting to do the best for the young people in their class.
'I'm hugely concerned at the lack of diversity on the new list - it does not represent a contemporary Scotland. There are no BAME texts, very few females on the list. It's made up with a majority of white men.'
Commenting on changes to marking approaches, the teacher added that these have 'now been dumbed down' and expressed a fear that drama will 'now be looked down on by universities' when setting entry requirements.
Anne Keenan, Assistant General Secretary of the EIS, said: 'Clearly, where it is necessary to make changes to a course in any subject following what should be consultation with teachers through their representative bodies, it is essential that schools and teachers are provided with adequate information and time to prepare. The workload demands of changes to a course are substantial, and can add significantly to existing teacher workload if not managed correctly. In addition, changes to courses can bring with them resource requirements which place an even greater strain on already tight school budgets.
'In planning any changes to courses, the SQA must be fully cognisant to the impact on schools, teachers and students. It is also important that due consideration be given to the appropriateness of the required materials, including the equality impact of the selected texts.
'Proper consultation with teacher trade unions would have led to much stronger equality considerations at an early stage. The EIS continues to advise members that there can be no expectation that last-minute changes from the SQA will be accommodated over and above existing agreements in respect of teachers' working time.
'The SQA should think again.'
The Herald approached the SQA to ask why course changes were being pushed through for the coming school year and whether the exam board would consider a delay in response to concerns raised.
Their spokesperson said: 'Following feedback from stakeholders, and evidence gathered from past years' assessments whereby learners were not taking advantage of the full range of marks available to them in the Higher Drama exam, SQA took the decision to review the Higher Drama question paper and the accompanying marking instructions.
'This was done to consolidate the question paper and give learners the best opportunity to maximise their marks from the paper. Feedback received indicated that there was a desire among teachers to adopt the changes for the 2025-26 session.
'These changes were shaped by the thoughtful feedback shared by teachers, and the timing reflects what was important to them.
'To support teachers through this transition, a range of resources will be available in the new session. These will include an event, a webinar, and understanding standards material – such as exemplar answers and commentaries – to help bring clarity and confidence to the classroom.
'We're grateful to teachers for their input, which played a key role in shaping these developments.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
7 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
The additional support needs crisis risks lost generation of children
A few days ago, a group of leading care and education charities warned that Scotland risks creating a 'lost generation of vulnerable children'. This intervention came after School Leaders Scotland (SLS), which represents secondary school staff like headteachers and deputes, released a report suggesting that the system as it stands is 'not fit for purpose'. Members said that the amount of support available to schools has fallen while the level of need amongst pupils (and their families) has massively increased. At the same time, it has become harder and harder to access specialist provision for those who really need it. At the end of last year, The Herald ran a special series looking at the state of ASN in Scotland's schools. We heard many of the same concerns and some truly heartbreaking stories. Since then teachers have continued to ring the alarm bell, and parents have continued to talk about desperate battles to protect their children. Things are bad and getting worse – and vulnerable pupils are the ones ultimately paying the price in the shape of poorer (sometimes hellish) school experiences, education outcomes, post-school destinations, and life chances. To be clear, the numbers we're talking about are extraordinary. In 2007, 5.3 percent of the national school roll was identified as requiring additional support; by 2024, that figure had jumped to 40.5 percent. This is the overall number, however, and it's also possible to break it down further where we see that around a third of primary pupils, and nearly half of secondary pupils, have additional needs. So in a standard high school class of 30, for example, an average of 13 or 14 will need additional support. That number will be even higher – perhaps dramatically so – in the most deprived areas. Official data also lets us see the increases in specific reasons for additional support, some of which are astronomical. There has, for example, been a 100 percent increase in pupils with dyslexia since 2013, while the number of autistic pupils has risen by more than 200 percent. In most cases these increases are probably explained by better identification and diagnosis, or simply by more detailed interest on the part of the school system: the number of pupils recognised as being a young carer, for example, looks like it has risen exponentially, but in the past these children simply weren't seen or, worse, were ignored. Then again, the 600 percent increase in pupils needing support for mental health problems feels like it might be worth worrying about for different reasons. Either way, the situation is pretty clear: as the level of need has skyrocketed, the level of support has remained entirely terrestrial. Spending per head is down considerably, specialist teachers are becoming an endangered species, and support staff are constantly being cut back. Read more: 'Judge me on education': Sturgeon fails to be frank on education failures in new book The thing you need to remember is that the overwhelming majority of additional support is provided in class by teachers, sometimes (if they're lucky) with the support of extra staff. Very often this also involves a great deal of additional planning (referred to as differentiation) to try to ensure that learning and success are available to all. Oh, and don't forget that teachers in Scotland still have less preparation time than those in almost any other comparable country, something the SNP promised, and failed, to tackle. Long story short: we're asking the impossible. It doesn't matter how good or dedicated a teacher is – you can't 'get it right for every child' under these circumstances. The range and scale of needs are simply too complex; the time and support available are simply too limited. The numbers just don't add up, no matter what a government spin doctor tells you. Something we don't talk enough about is how corrosive all this is for teachers' own wellbeing. More and more, they're being made to feel like they are failing their students, and trust me when I tell you that this is a heavy burden to carry around the classroom. And it doesn't even end there, because the failure to meet the needs of young people is also a major driver behind the serious issues with violence and aggression in the classroom – a point made over and over again by teaching unions. All of which makes teaching harder and harder, which drives staff absences and shortages, which makes it harder to meet pupils' needs, which ramps up the pressure even more, and on and on and on it goes. As Audit Scotland correctly argued earlier this year, the Scottish Government 'failed to plan for the impacts' of the more inclusive approach to ASN introduced in 2004, and now we're facing the consequences of that failure. Teachers were asked to do much, much more, but were not given the time, support, or resources they needed – and the powers that be either didn't understand, or didn't care, that this would lead to disaster. The exact same mistake was made over the exact same period regarding Curriculum for Excellence. The consequences for all of this are very real – in fact, the stakes are about as high as they get. We're talking about the education – and by extension the life chances – of nearly 300,000 young people who need help. Those kids have done nothing wrong, but they're being made the victims of a broken system and leaders who cannot or will not accept reality. So far the SNP has offered a £29m ASN funding pot that won't even touch the sides, while the opposition parties have given us slogans. With an election around the corner, it's time for all of them to be put on the spot and asked how, exactly, they are going to address Scotland's ASN crisis.
Powys County Times
19 hours ago
- Powys County Times
What can pupils expect from this summer's GCSE results?
Pupils in England, Wales and Northern Ireland are receiving their GCSE and Level 2 vocational and technical qualification (VTQ) results to help them progress to sixth form, college or training. – How do GCSE grades differ across the UK? In England, GCSEs are graded using a numerical system from 9 to 1 rather than from A* to G – with 9 being the highest grade. A grade 7 and above is roughly equivalent to an A and above, while a grade 4 and above – which is considered a 'standard pass' – is roughly equivalent to a C and above. But Government performance data highlights the percentage of pupils who achieved a grade 5 or above in English and maths – which is roughly equivalent to a high grade C or low grade B. The rollout of the numerical grading system began in 2017 in England, and by 2020, all subjects were graded in numbers. In Northern Ireland, the Council for the Curriculum, Examinations & Assessment uses a nine-category grade scale A* – G – which includes a C*. In Wales, the traditional eight-category grade scale A* – G has been retained. Scotland has a different qualification system and pupils received their results for National 5 exams earlier this month. – Will GCSE pupils get their results on an app this year? Tens of thousands of GCSE students in England will get their grades in an app on Thursday as part of a Government pilot. The Government is trialling the Education Record app with more than 95,000 pupils in Greater Manchester and the West Midlands this summer, ahead of a national rollout. Students involved in the pilot will still be able to pick up their paper results in the normal way from their school or college from 8am on results day. Their results will also be made available on the app at 11am. It is hoped digital education records, which will bring pupils' exam results and certificates into one app, will help pupils when applying to further education, apprenticeships or employment. – Were pupils given extra support in their exams because of Covid-19? Most pupils who took their GCSE exams this summer were in Year 6 when schools closed after the national lockdown in 2020. Exam aids have been given to GCSE pupils in England in mathematics, physics and combined science since 2022 to limit the impact of Covid-19 on learning. In October, the Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson asked regulator Ofqual to continue providing formulae and equation sheets to GCSE pupils in these subjects in 2025, 2026 and 2027. – What can students do if they are not happy with their results? Pupils are advised to speak to their preferred school or college to see if they can be flexible on entry requirements if they have just missed the grades. In England, if a student is unhappy with their grade they can also ask their school or college to request that the exam board review the marking. If there are still concerns after the review, the student can ask their school or college to appeal against the result. Students can also choose to resit any GCSE exam in the summer of the following academic year if they are unhappy with their results. But students can retake English language and maths GCSEs from this autumn. In England, it is a requirement for students who do not secure at least a grade 4 in English language and/or maths GCSE to retake the subjects during post-16 education. Students are funded to retake maths and/or English until they achieve a GCSE grade 9 to 4. For students with a grade 2 or below, they can either study towards a pass in functional skills level 2 or towards a GCSE grade 9 to 4.
Glasgow Times
20 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
What can pupils expect from this summer's GCSE results?
– How do GCSE grades differ across the UK? In England, GCSEs are graded using a numerical system from 9 to 1 rather than from A* to G – with 9 being the highest grade. A grade 7 and above is roughly equivalent to an A and above, while a grade 4 and above – which is considered a 'standard pass' – is roughly equivalent to a C and above. But Government performance data highlights the percentage of pupils who achieved a grade 5 or above in English and maths – which is roughly equivalent to a high grade C or low grade B. The rollout of the numerical grading system began in 2017 in England, and by 2020, all subjects were graded in numbers. In Northern Ireland, the Council for the Curriculum, Examinations & Assessment uses a nine-category grade scale A* – G – which includes a C*. In Wales, the traditional eight-category grade scale A* – G has been retained. Scotland has a different qualification system and pupils received their results for National 5 exams earlier this month. Thousands of GCSE pupils will receive their exam results via an app as part of a pilot scheme (David Davies/PA) – Will GCSE pupils get their results on an app this year? Tens of thousands of GCSE students in England will get their grades in an app on Thursday as part of a Government pilot. The Government is trialling the Education Record app with more than 95,000 pupils in Greater Manchester and the West Midlands this summer, ahead of a national rollout. Students involved in the pilot will still be able to pick up their paper results in the normal way from their school or college from 8am on results day. Their results will also be made available on the app at 11am. It is hoped digital education records, which will bring pupils' exam results and certificates into one app, will help pupils when applying to further education, apprenticeships or employment. – Were pupils given extra support in their exams because of Covid-19? Most pupils who took their GCSE exams this summer were in Year 6 when schools closed after the national lockdown in 2020. Exam aids have been given to GCSE pupils in England in mathematics, physics and combined science since 2022 to limit the impact of Covid-19 on learning. In October, the Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson asked regulator Ofqual to continue providing formulae and equation sheets to GCSE pupils in these subjects in 2025, 2026 and 2027. – What can students do if they are not happy with their results? Pupils are advised to speak to their preferred school or college to see if they can be flexible on entry requirements if they have just missed the grades. In England, if a student is unhappy with their grade they can also ask their school or college to request that the exam board review the marking. If there are still concerns after the review, the student can ask their school or college to appeal against the result. Students can also choose to resit any GCSE exam in the summer of the following academic year if they are unhappy with their results. But students can retake English language and maths GCSEs from this autumn. In England, it is a requirement for students who do not secure at least a grade 4 in English language and/or maths GCSE to retake the subjects during post-16 education. Students are funded to retake maths and/or English until they achieve a GCSE grade 9 to 4. For students with a grade 2 or below, they can either study towards a pass in functional skills level 2 or towards a GCSE grade 9 to 4.
