Trump fired him over white supremacist links. Now he's leading the US Institute of Peace
Beattie, who will continue serving as U.S. Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy while leading the institute as acting president, has a history of inflammatory views.
The former academic has lauded eugenics-style population control and mass sterilization, praised the Chinese Communist party and dismissed its repressive campaign against the Uyghurs, claimed the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol was a conspiracy by federal agents, and wrote on social media last year that 'competent white men must be in charge if you want things to work.'
'We look forward to seeing him advance President Trump's America First agenda in this new role,' the State Department said in a statement on Friday.
The Trump administration has tried to exert control over the peace-keeping organization as part of the president's radical restructuring of federal agencies and diplomacy.
In February, the president signed an executive order slashing most of the group's staff, part of a wider effort to drastically change U.S. tools of foreign influence and diplomacy that also saw the administration gut the U.S. Agency for International Development.
The following month, Elon Musk's so-called DOGE initiative seized the peace institute's headquarters with the help of police and the FBI, ejecting staff from the building.
Staff members then sued over the takeover and mass firings, and a federal judge in May temporarily blocked the Trump administration from dismantling the institute.
The administration then appealed, and a federal appeals court in Washington last month returned control of the building to the administration as the legal process plays out.
In March, Democratic members of Congress wrote to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who sits on the board of the U.S. Institute for Peace, expressing alarm over Beattie's appointment in February to his diplomatic post.
'Darren Beattie's white nationalist loyalties and public glorification of our adversaries' authoritarian systems make him unqualified to serve as the top diplomat representing American values and culture to foreign audiences,' the members wrote.
The Independent has requested comment from the State Department and U.S. Institute for Peace for comment.
After his dismissal from the Trump administration in 2018, Beattie returned to the government two years later, with the White House appointing him to the Commission for the Preservation of American Heritage Abroad, a body that preserves historical sites, including those related to the Holocaust.
The Biden administration forced Beattie's resignation from the commission in 2022.
Beattie isn't the only Trump staffer welcomed back into the government after controversy over their views.
Marko Elez, a DOGE staffer who previously praised eugenics, declared himself 'racist before it was cool,' and said he wanted to 'normalize Indian hate,' according to reporting from The Wall Street Journal, resigned from the administration in February, but soon found a new position in the Social Security Administration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rep. Nancy Mace kicks off South Carolina GOP gubernatorial bid. She says she's 'Trump in high heels'
WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina is running for governor, entering a GOP primary in which competition for President Donald Trump's endorsement — and the backing of his base of supporters — is expected to be fierce. Mace, who last year won her third term representing South Carolina's 1st District, made her run official during a launch event Monday at The Citadel military college in Charleston. Mace told The Associated Press on Sunday she plans a multi-pronged platform aimed in part at shoring up the state's criminal justice system, ending South Carolina's income tax, protecting women and children, expanding school choice and vocational education and improving the state's energy options. Official filing for South Carolina's 2026 elections doesn't open until March, but several other Republicans have already entered the state's first truly open governor's race in 16 years, including Attorney General Alan Wilson, Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette and Rep. Ralph Norman. Both Wilson and Evette have touted their own connections to the Republican president, but Mace — calling herself 'Trump in high heels' — said she is best positioned to carry out his agenda in South Carolina, where he has remained popular since his 2016 state primary win helped cement his status as the GOP presidential nominee. Saying she plans to seek his support, Mace pointed to her defense of Trump in an interview that resulted in ABC News agreeing to pay $15 million toward his presidential library to settle a defamation lawsuit. She also noted that she called Donald Trump early this year as part of an effort to persuade GOP holdouts to support Rep. Mike Johnson to become House speaker. 'No one will work harder to get his attention and his endorsement,' she said. 'No one else in this race can say they've been there for the president like I have, as much as I have and worked as hard as I have to get the president his agenda delivered to him in the White House.' Mace has largely supported Trump, working for his 2016 campaign but levying criticism against him following the Jan. 6, 2021, violence at the U.S. Capitol, which spurred Trump to back a GOP challenger in her 2022 race. Mace defeated that opponent, won reelection and was endorsed by Trump in her 2024 campaign. A month after she told the AP in January that she was 'seriously considering' a run, Mace went what she called 'scorched earth," using a nearly hour-long speech on the U.S. House floor in February to accuse her ex-fiancé of physically abusing her, recording sex acts with her and others without their consent, and conspiring with business associates in acts of rape and sexual misconduct. Mace's ex-fiancé said he 'categorically' denied the accusations, and another man Mace mentioned has sued her for defamation, arguing the accusations were a 'dangerous mix of falsehoods and baseless accusations.' 'I want every South Carolinian to watch me as I fight for my rights as a victim," Mace said, asked if she worried about litigation related to the speech. "I want them to know I will fight just as hard for them as I am fighting for myself.' Mace, 47, was the first woman to graduate from The Citadel, the state's military college, where her father then served as commandant of cadets. After briefly serving in the state House, in 2020 she became the first Republican woman elected to represent South Carolina in Congress, flipping the 1st District after one term with a Democratic representative. "I'm going to draw the line, and I'm going to hold it for South Carolina, and I'm going to put her people first," Mace said. ___ Kinnard can be reached at
CNN
5 minutes ago
- CNN
Chief Justice John Roberts enabled Texas' gambit to gerrymander the state for the GOP
The brazen partisan redistricting underway in Texas, with Republicans attempting to entrench themselves in office and Democrats weighing a counter-offensive in blue states, was greenlit by the US Supreme Court six years ago. Chief Justice John Roberts, in an opinion for a 5-4 court, declared that federal judges could not review extreme partisan gerrymanders to determine if they violated constitutional rights. Roberts' opinion reversed cases that would have allowed such districts – drawn to advantage one political party over another irrespective of voters' interests – to be challenged as violations of the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech and association and the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection. The justices split among the familiar ideological lines, with the five conservatives ruling against partisan gerrymanders and the four liberals dissenting. 'Of all times to abandon the Court's duty to declare the law, this was not the one,' dissenting justices warned in 2019, 'The practices challenged in these cases imperil our system of government. Part of the Court's role in that system is to defend its foundations. None is more important than free and fair elections.' That decision in Rucho v. Common Cause has generated a new era of partisan rivalry with vast repercussions for American democracy. The decision resonates as profoundly as the Roberts Court's decision last year in Trump v. United States, which granted presidents substantial immunity from criminal prosecution (also delivered among partisan lines). Trump has taken the 2024 ruling as a blank check, tearing through democratic norms. The gerrymandering case also lifted a federal guardrail. Lawsuits challenging extreme partisan gerrymanders can still be brought before state court judges. But state laws vary widely in their protections for redistricting practices and state judges differ in their ability to police the thorny political process. Roberts may have failed to foresee the consequences in 2019 and then in 2024. Or, alternatively, perhaps he understood and simply believed the effects were not properly the concern of the federal judiciary. In his opinion, Roberts acknowledged the apparent unfairness of gerrymandered districts. 'Excessive partisanship in districting leads to results that reasonably seem unjust,' he wrote. But, he said, 'the fact that such gerrymandering is 'incompatible with democratic principles,' … does not mean that the solution lies with the federal judiciary.' The chief justice said no constitutional authority exists for judges to oversee the politics of redistricting, nor are there standards for their decisions, that is, to know when state lawmakers have gone too far in what is an inherently political process. Roberts wrote: ''How much is too much?' At what point does permissible partisanship become unconstitutional?' The current redistricting controversy arises from Trump's pressure on fellow Republicans to generate as many GOP-controlled districts as possible before the 2026 midterm elections for the US House of Representatives. Right now, the focus is on Texas where legislators broke from the usual cycle of post-census redistricting that happens every 10 years and suddenly proposed a new map intended to push several Democrats out of office and buttress the chances that Republicans keep their majority, now hanging by a thread, in Congress. The audacious Texas effort has prompted liberals to consider a counterattack in Democratic-controlled states such as California to create new maps that could boost their numbers. But politicians' effort to draw lines to their advantage have never been free of controversy. The paired cases before the justices six years ago involved extreme gerrymanders by Republicans in North Carolina and by Democrats in Maryland. Roberts was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, whose vote was crucial. A year earlier, Kavanaugh had succeeded Justice Anthony Kennedy, who had previously left the door open to federal court challenges to partisan gerrymanders. Justice Elena Kagan, taking the lead for dissenters, insisted workable standards existed and had been used by lower US court judges. 'For the first time ever, this Court refuses to remedy a constitutional violation because it thinks the task beyond judicial capabilities. And not just any constitutional violation,' she wrote, pointing up the stakes. 'The partisan gerrymanders in these cases deprived citizens of the most fundamental of their constitutional rights: the rights to participate equally in the political process, to join with others to advance political beliefs, and to choose their political representatives,' Kagan added. She was joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who remains on the bench, and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died in 2020, and Stephen Breyer, who retired in 2022. Echoing a line from redistricting precedent that appears apt as Texas legislators divide voters for predetermined results, Kagan wrote that a core principle of government is 'that the voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around.'
NBC News
7 minutes ago
- NBC News
Firebrand GOP Rep. Nancy Mace launches bid for South Carolina governor
Rep. Nancy Mace, who has at times broken with her own GOP leaders and often courted controversy, launched a long-expected bid for governor of South Carolina on Monday, shaking up a crowded primary race that already includes big names in the Palmetto State. "I didn't come to join the club. I came to hold the line. They said stay quiet; I spoke up. They said sit down; I stood up. They said play nice; I fought back," Mace will say in a speech in Charleston, where she made history 26 years ago as the first woman to graduate from the Citadel military college. "South Carolina is tired of politicians who smile for the cameras, lie to your face, then vanish when it's time to lead. I'm not one of them. ... "This isn't about playing defense. It's about going on offense — for your family, your freedom and your future," she will say. "Because I wasn't built to kiss the ring. I don't answer to the establishment. I don't owe those in the back room a single thing. I answer to the people — and the people are fed up." Donald Trump hasn't endorsed a candidate in the race, but her first campaign video includes a clip of the president saying: "Nancy Mace, she's a fighter. I know about that, she's a fighter." And her campaign platform calls for a "zero-tolerance approach to crime," cutting the state income tax to zero and stopping "the radical gender agenda" and "woke ideology" in South Carolina schools. The 2026 GOP primary will be a family affair within South Carolina's tiny congressional delegation. The son of GOP Rep. Joe Wilson, state Attorney General Alan Wilson, launched his campaign in June, while Rep. Ralph Norman, one of the leaders of the far-right Freedom Caucus and a thorn in leadership's side like Mace, jumped into the race just last week. Other Republican candidates include Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette and state Sen. Josh Kimbrell. The sitting Republican governor, Henry McMaster, cannot run for re-election due to term limits. Whoever wins the GOP primary is expected to succeed McMaster in the ruby-red state. Mace, 47, a former state lawmaker who is serving her third term in Congress, would be the most well-known candidate nationally. She has repeatedly voted against big spending bills and was one of eight House Republicans who voted to oust then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., in the middle of his term in 2023 — a move that sparked backlash from establishment Republicans. In a building full of attention seekers, Mace has managed to grab headlines through some of her unexpected positions and actions. Despite declaring during her first campaign she 'strongly support[s] LGBTQ rights and equality,' Mace has made being anti-transgender a big part of her political identity more recently. Last year, shortly before Democrat Sarah McBride of Delaware was set to become the first out transgender member of Congress, Mace rolled out a measure to ban transgender women from using female-designated bathrooms in the U.S. Capitol. She later said the bill was ' absolutely ' aimed at McBride, now a fellow congresswoman whom Mace has repeatedly misgendered. In December, Mace accused a man of assault for 'aggressively' shaking her hand at the U.S. Capitol, wearing a sling for days after the alleged incident. Federal prosecutors decided not to pursue an assault charge. And in February, Mace gave an unprecedented 50-minute floor speech where she accused four men — including her ex-fiancé — of rape, sex trafficking and other sex crimes against her and other female victims, which she called 'some of the most heinous crimes against women imaginable.' During her speech, Mace also accused Alan Wilson, her future rival for governor, of failing to prosecute the men after, according to Mace, she presented his office with evidence. All four men whom Mace accused of sex crimes have vehemently denied the allegations in statements to NBC News. In response to the February speech, Wilson's office called Mace's accusations that it had failed to act 'categorically false,' adding that the two politicians know each other well but that she had never discussed the alleged crimes with Wilson or his office before taking to the House floor. Mace has stood by her claims. A spokesperson for the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, known as SLED, said in a statement in February that it had opened an investigation into Mace's allegations of assault, harassment and voyeurism in December 2023 after being contacted by U.S. Capitol Police. Wilson's office said in February that it had not received any reports or requests for assistance from any law enforcement or prosecution agencies regarding these specific allegations. Asked for an update on Friday, Wilson spokesman Robert Kittle said: 'Our office has not received anything pertaining to her case. If SLED does turn over the case, it would be sent to the 9th Circuit Solicitor's Office.' Born at Fort Bragg, Mace hails from a military family. Her father, retired Brig. Gen. James Emory Mace, had served as commandant of cadets at the Citadel, the prestigious military college located in Charleston. In 1999, during his tenure there, Nancy Mace made history as the first woman to graduate from the Citadel Corps of Cadets. She briefly served in the South Carolina statehouse before defeating Democratic Rep. Joe Cunningham in the 2020 race for the coastal 1st Congressional District. Mace is hosting a series of town hall events across the state in August, calling it the 'Mother of ALL Town Halls.' The first will be in Myrtle Beach on Wednesday.
