logo
Citizen Kane's iconic Rosebud sled sells at auction for more than $22 million

Citizen Kane's iconic Rosebud sled sells at auction for more than $22 million

Hollywood history has gone under the hammer, with the more than $22 million sale of Citizen Kane's famous Rosebud sled.
The once-thought-to-be-lost sled from Orson Welles's 1941 film was sold at a Texas auction on Thursday for $US 14,750,000 ($22.8 million) — becoming the second most-valuable piece of movie memorabilia ever sold.
The sled is one of only three known to survive and was miraculously saved from disposal by director Joe Dante in 1984 while filming on a Paramount set that was once a RKO lot.
The Gremlins director recognised the sled's importance, and preserved it for decades, even planting it as an Easter egg in four of his own films, including Gremlins 2: The New Batch.
Scientific testing confirmed the sled's period authenticity, and like the others, the sled bore the signs of production use, including original paint, wear, Heritage Auctions said in a statement.
"I've had the honor of protecting this piece of cinematic history for decades," Dante said.
"To see Rosebud find a new home — and make history in the process — is both surreal and deeply gratifying.
Only a few versions of the sled were produced for the 1941 production — with one being sold to producer-director Steven Spielberg in 1982, and an anonymous buyer in 1996.
Thursday's buyer is unknown.
Citizen Kane is frequently cited as the greatest film ever made, and the sled symbolises the film's theme of innocence lost.
In 2024, the sale of Dorothy's ruby red slippers from Wizard of Oz made history when they sold for $US 32.5 million ($50.3 million) at auction.
This week's auction also boasted a slew of other infamous film props including the inscribed tablets from Cecil B DeMille's epic The Ten Commandments, Indiana Jones's bull whip from The Last Crusade and Luke Skywalker's Red Five X-wing from The Empire Strikes Back.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The fallout from the Coldplay concert exposes just how ethically dubious the kiss cam has always been - ABC Religion & Ethics
The fallout from the Coldplay concert exposes just how ethically dubious the kiss cam has always been - ABC Religion & Ethics

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

The fallout from the Coldplay concert exposes just how ethically dubious the kiss cam has always been - ABC Religion & Ethics

It was meant to be just another moment of crowd-pleasing fluff. At a Coldplay concert in Massachusetts, the kiss cam roamed the stadium, panning over hopeful couples and performative pecks. Then it landed on two people who weren't so keen to play along: the chief executive officer of US tech company Astronomer, Andy Byron, and the company's chief people officer, Kristin Cabot. The reaction was immediate and instinctive — not just from them, but also from the internet. The couple ducked, recoiled and tried to disappear. Band front man Chris Martin, doing what musicians sometimes do when handed awkward audience moments, joked that they were either 'having an affair or just very shy'. That alone might've blown over, but this is 2025, and we are far too fluent in the language of viral shame. Within hours, their names were circulating online, the speculation was loud, the LinkedIn accounts were scrubbed, and Byron's wife reportedly wiped him and his surname from her socials. The internet did what it does best: escalate everything. A fan holds up a sign during a kiss cam segment in the game between the Philadelphia Phillies and the Los Angeles Angels at Citizens Bank Park on 18 July 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Isaiah Vazquez / Getty Images) At a time when headlines are saturated with wars in Europe and the Middle East, warnings of looming recession, AI platforms veering into fascist territory and renewed attention on the corrupt legacy of a high-profile paedophile, maybe this was exactly what the public was craving: something juicy, a little sleazy, and completely inconsequential. But was it really inconsequential — and for whom? Memes proliferated, jokes abounded and the Coldplay kiss cam became the internet's favourite short-form soap opera. The clip has now been viewed more than 100 million times across X, TikTok and other social media platforms. A history of discomfort This isn't the first time a kiss cam has betrayed its own script. For every dozen crowd-pleasing couples who play along, there's always someone who didn't ask to be spotlighted — whose discomfort becomes part of the punchline. And sometimes, that punchline lingers. Back in 2012, a woman at a Kansas University basketball game clearly wanted no part of the ritual. Her male companion walked off, the crowd booed and the internet wondered whether they'd just watched harassment dressed up as stadium banter. There are plenty of other examples too — some you probably don't want to relive, and others the people involved would prefer you didn't. Kiss cams in a different era There was a time when the kiss cam was just considered harmless filler — a novelty squeezed in between nacho runs and third-quarter lulls. It relied on a simple formula: pick two people in a crowd, hope they kiss, cue the applause. And if they didn't? Cue laughter. Either way, the spectacle delivered. But that formula doesn't land the same way anymore. What used to be a fleeting stadium gag now lives forever online: replayed, clipped, captioned, shared virally, memed and dissected for the pleasure of people who weren't even in the building. A moment of awkwardness isn't just witnessed by 20,000 people; it's processed by millions, judged, shared and sometimes used as a springboard to speculate about someone's marriage, career, or moral character. What might have once passed as 'just a bit of fun' now comes with real fallout. Because once the internet gets involved, the line between entertainment and exposure collapses entirely — and, often, irreversibly. US President Barack Obama laughs with first lady Michelle Obama as they appear on the kiss cam as the US Senior Men's National Team and Brazil play during a pre-Olympic exhibition basketball game at the Verizon Center on 16 July 2012 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Leslie E. Kossoff–Pool / Getty Images) Being in public is not consent There's a tired old argument that comes out every time someone gets caught in an awkward or compromising moment in public: 'Well, if they didn't want to be seen, they shouldn't have been there.' As if buying a concert ticket is the same as signing a waiver for public humiliation. Being in a crowd isn't the same as consenting to be broadcast, much less turned into viral content. That difference used to be obvious. Now it's blurred beyond recognition; replaced by an unspoken assumption that anyone visible is fair game, and that every candid moment is just a potential reel waiting to happen. The kiss cam, once a localised bit of stadium theatre, can now act as a content generator — a machine for mining human reactions and feeding them to an audience that didn't ask for context and wouldn't care for it anyway. The problem isn't just that it's unexpected. It's that it's non-consensual, performative and permanent. Should artists and venues rethink audience interaction? Chris Martin's off-the-cuff remark — 'They're either having an affair or just very shy' — got a laugh. Of course it did. But it also poured accelerant on a moment that was already slipping out of control. It's easy to forget that when you're standing on a stage above 50,000 people, your mic is not just for music; it can also be a moral amplifier. This isn't just about musicians. It's about the entire production machine: the camera operators, the event planners, the social media teams who know exactly what kind of moment might blow up. The kiss cam was never really harmless. It simply belonged to an era when the consequences of public awkwardness were fleeting, and the footage vanished with the final whistle. (simonkr / E+ / Getty Images) Audience interaction used to mean pulling a kid on stage to sing. Now it means turning a stranger's private moment into a viral subplot, preferably with a twist. It's worth asking: do performers and venues still believe surprise crowd-spotting is harmless? Or have they just calculated that the risk of embarrassment (someone else's, of course, not their own) is worth the entertainment value? A cultural relic worth retiring? In the case of the Coldplay concert, the couple weren't exactly low-profile — but they weren't high-profile enough that news of an affair, discovered by any other means, would have made headlines. Had it emerged through more conventional means, it might not have made even it to the back pages of a local tabloid. But caught on a kiss cam, in full stadium spectacle, it became perfect fodder for social media. Maybe it's time we admit it: the kiss cam was never really harmless. It simply belonged to an era when the consequences of public awkwardness were fleeting, and the footage vanished with the final whistle. That time has passed. Today, the kiss cam feels less like a feel-good tradition and more like a glitching holdover; a device wired for discomfort, embarrassment and just enough ambiguity to be 'memeable'. It demands performance from people who never auditioned, turning hesitation into comedy, and resistance into spectacle. But maybe the real problem isn't just the camera. Maybe it's the audience, too. Which is to say, us . An arena already flooded with spectacular light shows, dazzling production, decades of beloved and cherished music, and a legendary performer pouring his lungs out still isn't quite enough to satisfy. The audience needs more in order to be entertained — something unscripted, a little scandalous and preferably at someone else's expense. This isn't about cheering on affairs or defending their morality. It's about asking why, in a stadium already packed with euphoria, we still need little scandals and controversial moments to feel like we got our money's worth. In some parts of the world, it is now visibly harder to keep live audiences entertained. And the lengths artists and their production teams go to, sometimes at the expense of their own safety, say it all. Ask Beyoncé. Milad Haghani is an Associate Professor of Urban Mobility at the University of Melbourne.

Internet turns on Jamie Lee Curtis over ‘insane' red carpet outburst
Internet turns on Jamie Lee Curtis over ‘insane' red carpet outburst

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Internet turns on Jamie Lee Curtis over ‘insane' red carpet outburst

Hollywood actress Jamie Lee Curtis is copping a backlash online for her strange outburst on the red carpet at a recent awards show – seemingly unaware that she was dressing down her hosts for the evening. Curtis was a guest at the recent Las Culturistas Culture Awards at the Orpheum Theatre in Los Angeles. The tongue-in-cheek pop culture themed awards (some sample categories: the Woman of a Certain Age Award and Best Title for the Next Bridget Jones) are the brainchild of comedians and podcasters Bowen Yang and Matt Rogers. The pair were on the red carpet outside the Orpheum, answering some questions for media outlet Vulture, who'd asked them to recite some iconic movie lines into the camera. Saturday Night Live star Yang was giving it his best Julia Roberts as Erin Brokovich, delivering the line 'I'm not talkin' to you, b**ch!', when suddenly Curtis appeared beside them, interuppting the vox pop and looking agitated. 'We're quoting Julia Roberts,' Rogers explained, perhaps worried Curtis had thought that particular quote was directed at her. But the Freakier Friday star stood between the comedians and the camera, her arms outstretched, and gave them a firm direction: 'Bring the whole f**king thing down.' She seemed completely unaware that she was talking to the hosts and organisers of the event she was at – and was about to spend several hours watching them on stage. 'You're going to hate this show then,' Yang quipped. 'We're going to be pitching to the rafters.' Rogers gave Curtis some cheeky advice in return: 'Maybe you could bring it up?' Those who watched the moment on social media were shocked by Curtis' behaviour, with some asking if the actress was attempting a 'bit' or whether she was serious. 'The audacity to interrupt someone's interview at Their Own Award Show just to shush them is insane,' one person tweeted. Another said the moment 'repulsed' them – 'Doing this to [Rogers and Yang] at their own event?' One person under Vulture's post dubbed Curtis 'the ultimate Karen' – a tag that's followed her after a string of minor controversies in recent years. She publicly apologised in August last year after slamming Marvel at Comic-Con, and earlier in 2024 sparked a bizarre feud with Bella Ramsey over a joke the young actor made while presenting an award at the Critics Choice Awards. She copped further backlash in January of this year when she likened the wildfires that had decimated whole neighbourhoods in Los Angeles to the ongoing war in Gaza. The Last Showgirl.

Horrifying moment Katy Perry nearly falls off flying prop as it malfunctions mid-performance
Horrifying moment Katy Perry nearly falls off flying prop as it malfunctions mid-performance

News.com.au

time3 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Horrifying moment Katy Perry nearly falls off flying prop as it malfunctions mid-performance

Fans at a recent Katy Perry concert have been left gasping in shock when the singer nearly fell off a flying prop and into the crowd. The terrifying moment unfolded when she was performing Roar on Friday night in San Francisco while soaring above the audience on a giant butterfly machine, which abruptly malfunctioned, jerking her forward and nearly causing her to lose her grip. Gasps and screams could be heard around the venue, with Perry momentarily falling silent as she regained her composure, before quickly picking up the song again. The singer was able to poke fun at herself following the scary incident, taking to her Instagram Stories and posting a screenshot of herself, mouth hanging open, during the near-fall. 'Goodnight San Fran,' she captioned the picture. Perry's Lifetimes tour has already proven dramatic, with news of her split from Orlando Bloom confirmed during her run of shows earlier this month. The singer and Lord of the Rings star had been together on and off for almost a decade and share a four-year-old daughter, Daisy. Representatives for the famous pair confirmed months-long speculation that they had parted ways, insisting in a statement that their child would remain their 'focus'. 'They will continue to be seen together as a family, as their shared priority is – and always will be – raising their daughter with love, stability and mutual respect,' the joint statement read. Bloom and Perry were then spotted together in Italy last week, with the actor even posting a cosy family photo with his ex, their daughter, and the 14-year-old son, Flynn, whom he shares with Miranda Kerr.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store