logo
The USA's Costume In This Men's Pageant Is Sooo Fitting

The USA's Costume In This Men's Pageant Is Sooo Fitting

Buzz Feed27-05-2025

I am overjoyed today to inform you that there is an annual(ish) "Mr. World" competition, in which handsome men from around the world compete in a pageant. Part of that pageant is a costume show, where the contestants dress in a costume that represents their country's culture and identity. For example, here's Bolivia's contestant from the 2024 pageant, in his costume inspired by Bolivian folk dance:
And here's Peru's national costume, inspired by Inca nobility:
And here's Venezuela's costume, inspired by the country's war for independence from Spain:
Even though these costumes were from the 2024 competition (which took place six months ago), the video has been making the rounds, because... well, here's the United States' costume:
Yeah, that's just a Captain America costume.
The contestant did a little flip and a superhero landing, though!
Now, I don't want to act like there weren't other countries that maybe phoned it in a little. Here's Canada, in head-to-toe denim, aka a "Canadian tuxedo":
People also felt that France's costume was perhaps a little too on the nose:
Americans on Reddit had a lot of thoughts about the USA's costume choice:
Now, let's not forget that it's a Captain America costume that they BEDAZZLED, so it's bespoke:
There were a lot of suggestions on what the USA could have done instead:
But hey, at least the Canadians seem happy:
Anyway, I'm really hoping there's a 2025 competition this year. Bye!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chris Hayes: GOP civil war erupts as Musk ratchets up attacks on Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Chris Hayes: GOP civil war erupts as Musk ratchets up attacks on Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Chris Hayes: GOP civil war erupts as Musk ratchets up attacks on Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'

This is an adapted excerpt from the June 4 episode of 'All In with Chris Hayes.' There's a civil war brewing in the Republican Party and it's threatening the centerpiece of Donald Trump's legislative agenda: his one big, beautiful, disgusting abomination of a bill, which the Congressional Budget Office says will add almost $2.5 trillion to the deficit, while depriving more than 11 million Americans of health care coverage in the next decade. That bill is now meeting new resistance from far-right members of Congress, thanks to the actions of Trump's one-time wingman, Elon Musk. Shortly after his DOGE days in the White House ended in embarrassing fashion, with a literal black eye and reports left and right about alleged drug use and other weird behavior, Musk started this week off by declaring war on Trump's legislation. (Musk has denied the reported drug use.) 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk posted on his social media platform, X, on Tuesday. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' To say this leaves the Republican caucus in disarray would be an understatement. Just days ago, House Speaker Mike Johnson, who is shepherding the spending bill through Congress, posted a photo of himself riding in style with Musk and Trump. But on Wednesday, he said he couldn't even get Musk on the phone. 'We've gotta get it done, and I think Elon understands the weight of that,' Johnson told reporters. 'I hope he comes around, and I'd love to talk to him this week, and I hope he calls me back today.' (As of Thursday morning, Johnsons told reporters they were still playing phone tag.) Hours after that Wednesday news conference, Musk posted a call to action against the Trump legislation on X: 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL.' (In case that was too subtle, eight minutes later, he also posted a movie poster for the film 'Kill Bill.') But this is more than just a food fight. Remember, Musk threatened to primary Republicans who won't toe the MAGA line. Now, the threat seems to be that he could primary Republicans who pass Trump's bill. And so some of those Republicans are tying themselves in knots to try to keep both Trump and Musk happy. When Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia was asked about Musk's criticism, she told reporters, 'Well, you know I have to agree with him on one hand. I always love it when Americans are angry at the federal government and express it … And so, do I like the price tag of the bill? No. But I want to get off the Biden and Democrat CR that this government is currently funding on.' At one level, this is a story of two people with enormous egos who were never going to be content as co-presidents. But the deeper story here calls into question the entire Trump enterprise and what Trump was using Musk for, which was to make really unpopular cuts across the government. Cuts that followed the Project 2025 playbook and appealed to the most hardcore anti-government extremists in the Republican base and far-right members of Congress, like the House Freedom Caucus, who want a government small enough to drown in a bathtub. But as a policy, that approach is substantively disastrous and politically unpopular. It is not even popular with Trump, who has no qualms about running up massive budget deficits. He told everyone he's not going to touch Social Security or Medicare. But he has to worry about pro-austerity Republicans, so he outsourced the austerity to Musk and DOGE. That way, Trump could say to the anti-government vanguard in Congress, 'Oh, don't worry about the deficit and the debt or spending, because I've got Musk going to town over there. He's just going to cut all the stuff you don't like, and no one in Congress is going to have to take hard votes.' But this was always a dubious play. First, because what DOGE was doing was illegal, as many courts have found. Second, Musk wasn't actually making a dent in federal spending. He decimated our international aid budget, but that was never where the big government spending was, contrary to all the lies and false conspiracy theories Musk spread. Most importantly, Musk's activities were so unpopular that the American people's outrage blew back on Trump and the Republicans. In town hall after town hall, it became clear that Trump's play for plausible deniability was a failure. That's why I believe the White House didn't keep Musk on and why he's freelancing now. Trump's special weapon against party division has always been his cult of personality. When it comes to voting for their own beliefs or voting for Trump, Republican lawmakers almost always vote for Trump. That was enough to get the bill through the House. But there are Republicans, particularly in the Senate, folks such as Sens. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who are being very vocal about wanting to scale back Trump's legislation drastically, to pull it apart or to kill it. And now, thanks to political cover from Musk, senators such as Tuberville, Paul and Johnson may be even more emboldened to resist Trump. This is the Frankenstein's monster that Trump helped create: A guy who has virtually unlimited funds to primary politicians he doesn't like. Musk is giving these Republicans cover to rail in the way that they are politically comfortable with — and he has a massive social media platform that he can use to supercharge the debate, just as he used it to spread totally ridiculous stories and false numbers about what DOGE has been up to. That points to a real danger here: Musk's propaganda machine now rivals Fox News in its ability to influence and target the right wing of the Republican Party. It seems Trump is discovering that his oligarchy would be great … if it weren't for the oligarchs. This article was originally published on

The Twilight of Evening News: Anchor Swaps, Trust Gaps and a Looming AI Threat
The Twilight of Evening News: Anchor Swaps, Trust Gaps and a Looming AI Threat

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The Twilight of Evening News: Anchor Swaps, Trust Gaps and a Looming AI Threat

On June 2, another new era of the decades-long evening news battles began at 6:30 p.m. NBC debuted the first episode of NBC Nightly News with its new anchor, Tom Llamas. He succeeded Lester Holt, who, after a decade behind the Nightly desk, is moving to a role at Dateline. Aside from the new face, little changed. The studio appeared largely the same, as was the format. That was almost certainly a deliberate choice. After all, when NBC launched its ad campaign for Llamas, it leaned on its history and heritage, and the fact that the anchor has been familiar to NBC News viewers for the past four years, while also referencing Holt's status as the most trusted news anchor by Americans. More from The Hollywood Reporter Would You Pay $400 Million for This Movie? 'Today' Co-Host Sheinelle Jones' Husband Uche Ojeh Dies at 45 of Brain Cancer With Cord Cut, Can Old TV Brands Take Off On Streaming? 'Legacy isn't handed down, it's carried forward. As the world changes, we look for what endures, we look for a constant,' the spot declared, featuring video and audio from Nightly anchors past, before segueing to Llamas. 'And from one era to the next, trust is the anchor.' Llamas ended his first Nightly as he does every show, with a thanks to the viewers, meant to underscore the role he hopes to play in their daily lives: 'My thanks to all of you as we start this new adventure together. Tonight, and always, we're here for you.' Of course, Llamas assumes the anchor chair of NBC Nightly News at a strange and uncertain moment for the format. The network evening newscasts are still considered the flagships of the broadcast news divisions, the anchor chairs where legends like Cronkite, Jennings, Brokaw, Walters and Rather informed the nation day in and day out, and reassured them in times of tumult and crisis. And they remain the primary news digests for tens of millions of Americans who turn on their TV sets at 6:30 p.m. most evenings, breaking down complex topics in a format that is easy to understand. 'I think the core need that evening news continues to serve is just going to become even more important, as we see this proliferation and explosion of AI generated slop out there, being human and being trusted and being real is the currency,' a senior news executive tells The Hollywood Reporter. 'And the value of that, I think, is going to be exponential as well, because we are fast approaching a time where it's going to be very hard to tell what is real, what is bullshit, what actually happened and what didn't happen.' But broadcast TV has not been immune to the squeeze impacting the larger TV business, and network news divisions have historically been more important to building brand equity than being profit centers of the business. The result has been cost cutting and consolidation across the network news divisions in recent years, with teams merged together and some talent cut loose. The morning shows like Today and Good Morning America have transformed into lifestyle brands that touch on health, food and fashion, while the Sunday public affairs shows now set the news agenda with newsmaking political interviews. The evening newscasts find themselves in an uncomfortable position: The millions of viewers who rely on them want a digest of the most important stories that happened that day, but the next generation of viewers is getting that news off of linear platforms. In private, news executives acknowledge that they are laser-focused on finding ways to reach those viewers, knowing that while they might not turn on the TV at 6:30 p.m. every night, the networks may still find some way to serve them a similar product. YouTube has emerged as a preferred landing pad. The Google-owned video platform is the most-watched streaming service, per Nielsen's Gauge, and all of the network evening newscasts now publish their episodes there, in some cases adding hundreds of thousands of incremental viewers. But there are other efforts in play, including NBC's approach with Llamas: As soon as he signs off on the network, he begins anchoring Top Story, the NBC News Now streaming show. NBC executives are quick to point out that the average viewer of the streaming show is decades younger than the typical evening news viewer. And in the meantime, despite the fears of what AI will do to the larger news environment, AI disruption is looming for the format that defines evening news broadcasts. Two sources tell THR that an AI-powered news digest is in development by at least one TV news operation, one that could deliver the news of the day in a more tailored format for digital consumers, combining human-reported segments with AI-powered personalization and voiceovers or anchors. It isn't science fiction: Last year NBC Olympics used an AI generated version of Al Michaels to deliver personalized recaps during the Paris Olympics, and last month ESPN chief Jimmy Pitaro told reporters that the sports media giant is actively developing an AI-powered SportsCenter that would deliver news only about the teams, sports and players that its users care about, perhaps delivered by AI versions of the anchors they already know. 'We are very much focused on on AI, and are working with some of our key talent right now, getting them on board with this idea of having the storytelling being driven by AI,' Pitaro said. As a veteran news producer lamented, while it may first take shape in the world of sports, an AI-powered evening news is 'inevitable,' though consumers would likely watch whenever and wherever they so choose, rather than on the TV set at 6:30 p.m. 'There will be, for sure, consumer products coming to market. I think the hard part for audiences is going to be figuring out 'how do I know I trust this and not that?' So if you're talking about like — name your AI product — go give me a summary of the top world headlines and read it back to me in the voice of Donald Duck, sure, that can be done today,' the senior news executive says. 'Or you know that I like stories about quirky crime trials; I want to know about all the cute cat and dog videos; I'm really a politics geek, and I want to know the stock price of Tesla at all times. Read that to me in the voice of Angelina Jolie every morning when I wake up at six. There will be lots of products like that. But when you get into like, a war has just broken out in X place. I don't think we're turning to AI at that point to say, what the hell is going on here? Or a plane has just exploded over the skies of Los Angeles. What just happened? That's where AI can't step in.' Whatever ends up happening, network executives have to grapple with the fact that shaking up the evening news is hard. Look no further than CBS, where a high-profile reimagining of the CBS Evening News is still evolving, with network executives tinkering with the format to keep loyal viewers while creating something that can appeal to a wider swath of the population. CBS made significant changes to the broadcast early this year, with Norah O'Donnell exiting for a new role at the network, and political correspondent John Dickerson and WCBS anchor Maurice Dubois taking the helm as co-anchors. 'We're making tweaks and changes as we go, looking at what works and what doesn't and making adjustments,' a source says. 'We always knew the broadcast would be different on Day 243 than it did on Day 1.' The co-anchor format is not new, of course, but CBS also moved the program from Washington D.C. back to New York, and named frequent correspondents who would appear in recurring segments. Bill Owens, who added oversight of the program in the revamp, told THR at the time that he wanted to bring some of the ethos from 60 Minutes to the daily newscast. Owens, of course, resigned last month amid larger tumult at Paramount Global, as did Wendy McMahon, the executive who spearheaded the changes. What their exits mean for the show in the medium and long term are not yet clear. ABC News, meanwhile, has exuded a quiet confidence at ABC World News, led by anchor David Muir. The network has tried to expand the newscast to streaming by leveraging the scale of Disney+ to make it a new platform for the newscast, a strategy that it hopes will stand out. Muir has also taken some segments from the show and expanded them into longform programs that stream on Hulu. Muir made his case directly to ABC advertisers at Disney's upfront May 13. 'We continue to have the largest audience every night with World News Tonight and often the most watched program on all of television,' Muir told those in attendance at a cavernous room at New York's Jacob Javits Center. 'Think about it this way, every month we reach as a newscast 40 million viewers. I'm proud to say that we're the number one newscast for the ninth consecutive year now. And there's never been a more vital time to be America's most trusted and most-watched newscast, and we thank all of you here in this room.' The fate of the evening newscasts also crosses over with larger questions about the fate of the star TV anchor. No one denies that today's star anchors can drive an audience (particularly the older audience that is still committed to linear TV). But in a media environment that is splintering, and a future where consumers may be able to get their news delivered by whomever they like (there's no reason the estate of Walter Cronkite couldn't sign a likeness deal with an AI company, for example), how should these companies think about that star power in the future? Agents aren't too concerned. Sure, there is a tightening of budgets across the industry for talent not firmly in the A-list, but in a world where trusting the source becomes all the more important, those A-listers should be ok, at least for a while. 'Stars are stars. Mega stars are always going to get paid in any business, whether it's news, movies, television, music,' UTA vice chairman Jay Sures noted in an interview with THR in April. 'Mega stars bring something that's unique, and I think they're always going to do well, and they bring something bigger than just ratings to the companies that they work for. Sometimes they're the face of the company, and that's hard to put a value on.' A version of this story appeared in the June 4 issue of The Hollywood Reporter magazine. Click here to subscribe. Best of The Hollywood Reporter How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023 Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire

Justin Bieber Continues Cryptic Post Streak Amid Divorce Rumors
Justin Bieber Continues Cryptic Post Streak Amid Divorce Rumors

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Justin Bieber Continues Cryptic Post Streak Amid Divorce Rumors

grabbed attention once again amid his ongoing divorce rumors with wife Hailey Bieber. The Canadian singer seemingly slammed haters through his latest Instagram posts for throwing shade at his and Hailey's relationship. In his cryptic post, he mentioned, ''LOYALTY' is manipulative language,' and advised his followers to choose 'LOVE' over it. Justin and Hailey Bieber have been dealing with divorce rumors for quite some time now. They have repeatedly dismissed the speculations and proven that all is well in their little paradise to their fans, but the hype seems to persist. In a recent post, the pop icon went on a rant on his Instagram handle, directing his response to haters. The singer stated, 'Loyalty is a duty, it's an obligation. THATS NOT FREE WILL. LOVE IS NOT A DUTY. LOVE IS A DELIGHT.' Furthermore, he slammed haters saying, 'PLEASE STOP USING LOYALTY TO KEEP PEOPLE AROUND YOU OUT OF YOUR OWN FEAR ITS HURTING US.' At the end of his post, he clarified that he would always choose 'LOVE OVER LOYALTY.' Aside from this, the musician shared another similar post, in which he questioned haters' 'audacity.' He expressed his disappointment and anger, asking, 'Who are you to tell someone what someone should or shouldn't have.' Bieber's rant didn't end with two posts on his Instagram. He shared another one with his picture flipping haters off with the caption, 'U DONT GET TO DECIDE WHOS WORTHY OR WHO DESERVES WHAT GOD DOES.' The singer and his wife, Hailey, have repeatedly debunked divorce rumors, but they seem to have not caught a break. Last month, the couple faced backlash due to Bieber's now-deleted post over the model's first-ever Vogue cover. In her interview with the magazine, she mentioned how hard she had tried to make people 'understand' her, but her efforts were in vain. Justin and Hailey Bieber have been married since 2018 and have a son named Jack Blues. Originally reported by Sushmita Sen on Reality Tea. The post Justin Bieber Continues Cryptic Post Streak Amid Divorce Rumors appeared first on Mandatory.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store