Ex-Army major charged with wife's alleged murder reveals why they weren't wearing life jackets on kayaks
Graeme Davidson, a former Australian Army major, fronted the Brisbane Supreme Court on Thursday following the death of his wife Jacqueline Davidson.
Ms Davidson, 54, was unable to be revived after she drowned while kayaking with her husband, 55, on Lake Samsonvale, near Forgan Cove in Queensland 's Moreton Bay region, on November 27, 2020.
Mr Davidson moved to Thailand five months after his wife's death but was arrested earlier this year during a visit to Australia.
He was charged with murder, fraud and attempted fraud, relating to allegations he tried to claim more than $1million on Ms Davidson's life insurance.
During the bail application hearing on Thursday, defence barrister Craig Eberhardt KC claimed there was no evidence she had been 'violently assaulted'.
Her body did suffer minor bruising, which Mr Davidson's team said was consistent with his rescue and CPR attempts, Newswire reported.
The court also heard Mr Davidson's account of his wife's drowning.
He described them being 10metres apart on the water when he attempted to 'show off' by standing up on his kayak.
'Jacqueline became distressed about that and used the 'safe word' … designed to let him know that she was concerned about what he was doing,' Mr Eberhardt said.
Mr Davidson claimed moments later he saw Ms Davidson 'fall off the kayak'.
He recalled diving into the water to find her but struggled to see as it was 'murky' and full of grass weeds.
'He managed to find her after some period of time, and he dragged her out,' Mr Eberhardt said.
The lawyer said Mr Davidson then attempted to revive his wife and called to nearby bystanders for help. One of them called an ambulance.
The court heard the couple weren't wearing life jackets as they had been 'eaten by rats' at their home in Bondi, in Sydney's east, before they relocated to Queensland.
'There's evidence to that effect in a statement of (a woman)… she had been told prior to the death that the life jackets had been eaten by rats,' Mr Eberhardt said.
Police said they would allege in court that Mr Davidson murdered his wife after their relationship broke down.
Mr Eberhardt acknowledged the marriage had struggled after Ms Davidson discovered her husband had an affair with a woman in Papua New Guinea in 2019.
However, the lawyer claimed Mr Davidson was 'committed' to repairing their relationship.
There was no evidence of domestic violence between the pair.
Mr Davidson began a relationship with his second wife, Thai woman Pick Pattraporn, after he moved to the Thai resort of Hua Hin, 200km south of Bangkok, in April 2021.
The pair tied the knot in a traditional ceremony in December 2022.
Mr Davidson's adult son and two daughters did not appear in photos from the day.
He is also facing charges of fraud and attempted fraud, which relate to allegations he tried to claim more than $1million in life insurance after his wife's death.
In response to these allegations, Mr Eberhardt said both Mr Davidson and his wife had taken out claims in each other's favour in mid-2020.
'There is no evidence the setting up of the insurance policies was the applicant's idea,' the defence lawyer said.
Mr Eberhardt argued it would have been suspicious if Mr Davidson did not attempt to access her life insurance following her death.
The court also heard how Mr Davidson was recorded on CCTV burning 'a small number of documents' in his backyard, while one of his children was at home.
However, Mr Eberhardt dismissed the footage as 'not evidence of anything' since it was unclear what the documents contained.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
7 minutes ago
- BBC News
Crimestoppers reward for King's Lynn 'no body' murder information
Crimestoppers has offered a reward of up to £20,00 for information that could lead to those responsible in a "no body" murder investigation. Maris Ile, 54, was a seasonal worker from Latvia who had been living in the Highgate area of King's Lynn, Norfolk. He did not arrive at work in Ely, Cambridgeshire, after setting off from home on 20 November, and was reported missing three days Police said it believed the 54-year-old had come to harm and launched a murder investigation in March, despite not having found a body. On 11 March, four men and a woman were arrested at addresses in King's Lynn, Norwich and Peterborough on suspicion of murder in connection with the remain on bail until 11 September, police said. Last month Mr Ile's mother, Galina, described her son as "caring" and said he loved motorbikes as she appealed for information over his disappearance. In a translated appeal, she said: "This is very important to me."If he is no longer alive, then I want the police to find his body, so he would be cremated and brought back home to Latvia so he could rest on Latvian soil, so that he can be buried with his father in the cemetery." Crimestoppers has offered a reward of up to £20,000 for information that leads to an arrest or conviction, which will be available until 4 November. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Sall Grover begins federal court appeal against Roxanne Tickle's gender discrimination case win
Giggle for Girls and Sall Grover have begun their appeal to overturn a landmark court decision that found the women-only social media app and its CEO had unlawfully discriminated against Roxanne Tickle, a transgender woman. On Monday, the full court of the federal court heard that Grover's team believes the app – designed as a 'women-only safe space' – constituted a 'special measure' under the Sex Discrimination Act (SDA), which allows discrimination with the aim of redressing historical disadvantage between men and women. In an unexpected move, an application for a new amended notice of appeal with an entirely new ground of appeal was lodged by Giggle and Grover's team on Monday morning with only one hour's notice for Tickle's legal team. The application was refused. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Grover is challenging justice Robert Bromwich's milestone August decision in the first gender identity discrimination case to reach the federal court. Tickle, from regional New South Wales, sued the women-only social media app for gender discrimination, claiming she was unlawfully barred from using Giggle for Girls in September 2021 after the firm and Grover said she was a man. Tickle was initially allowed to join the app, which shut down in 2022, but was then later removed from the platform. She contacted Grover on multiple occasions seeking readmission. Tickle was awarded $10,000 plus costs after Bromwich found she had been indirectly discriminated against, in the decision that tested the meaning and scope of the SDA. The appeal is being heard over four days by justice Melissa Perry, justice Geoffrey Kennett and justice Wendy Abraham in Sydney. Giggle and Grover's legal team is being led by Noel Hutley SC. The team has dropped its constitutional challenge argument and is appealing against paying $10,000 damages, claiming Tickle was not discriminated against indirectly, on the basis Grover did not know Tickle was transgender when she barred her from the app. Grover previously said that the ruling erred in its interpretation of sex under the SDA, had not considered critical evidence and did not recognise that the app was a 'special measure' fostering substantive equality between women and men. Grover has persistently referred to Tickle as male and during last year's hearing, said she would not address her as 'Ms' Tickle. On Monday, Hutley said a woman was a 'natal' woman – or assigned female at birth. He told the court the SDA was a 'compromise' and that its special measures were 'ephemeral', claiming that 'just about any special measures targeted at a group' would, through the act's other legal carve-outs, probably involve discrimination of another group. He said special measures should be protective and enabling, not restrictive. Tickle's legal team is expected to argue that every special measure needs to work for all groups protected by the act simultaneously. Tickle's barrister, Georgina Costello KC told the court 'a real review of the evidence leads to the easily drawn conclusion that, for the purposes of the Sex Discrimination Act, Ms Tickle is a woman and she was a woman when the appellants excluded her from the Giggle app.' Costello said: 'She presented her gender identity to the world and to the Giggle app as a woman. Her identity is as a woman and as a transgender woman.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion She said Bromwich had made the correct conclusion 'that Ms Tickle was a woman' and that her sex as a woman was 'legally unimpeachable'. Tickle's team is expected to argue also that the judge did not fully consider all of the evidence and that Tickle's barring from the app and failure in her appeals to Grover to rejoin the app both amounted to direct, not indirect, discrimination. Tickle is seeking a total of $40,000: $30,000 in general damages, and $10,000 in aggravated damages. Her team will argue previously awarded damages of $10,000 are inappropriate and did not take into account Grover's conduct around the proceedings. During the three-day trial in April 2024, the court heard Tickle had lived as a woman since 2017, has a birth certificate stating her gender is female, had gender affirmation surgery and 'feels in her mind that psychologically she is a woman'. The respondents claimed that biological sex was immutable and that the app had been intended as an online refuge for women. The court has granted leave to the sex discrimination commissioner, Equality Australia and the Lesbian Action Group – which unsuccessfully attempted to exclude transgender and bisexual women from its public events – to intervene, or participate, in the appeal. Changes to the SDA in 2013 made it unlawful under federal law to discriminate against a person on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status. In April 2025, the UK supreme court issued a historic and definitive ruling that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the UK's Equality Act refer only to a biological woman and to biological sex.
Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Unseen photo shows killer nurse Lucy Letby partying at friend's wedding while on bail for murdering seven babies
New photos show Lucy Letby partying at her friend's wedding while she was on bail for the murder of seven babies. The photo was revealed by her friend Dawn, who did not want to use her surname, as part of a new TV documentary about Letby. Letby was convicted in 2023 of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others. Her friend Dawn said she was 'so glad she was there' at her wedding. She was so sure of her friend's innocence that she sought permission from the authorities to invite Letby to her wedding while she was on bail. In a clip for the documentary, Dawn was seen looking through pictures of herself and Letby. The pair met as teenagers and have been friends ever since. She said: 'There is definitely lots of holiday snaps, birthdays, holidays I forgot we even had. 'The wedding photos are definitely my favourite. There is Lucy at my wedding. I am just so glad she could be there because it was while she was on bail, she had to get special permission to be allowed to come from police. 'I watched it all unfold and at every step of the way I just couldn't believe it, it was just beyond belief that it could be happening.' She added: 'My assumption when all of this happened was that perhaps she had inadvertently forgotten bits of procedure or she has made some mistakes. 'There were those dark moments where I thought perhaps has she inadvertently caused harm because she was so newly qualified in such a high pressure environment and perhaps that's why she was being targeted for these accusations. 'Shortly after this she as held in custody, so I don't think she has seen these [photographs].' Dawn has stood by Letby despite her conviction and remains convinced of her innocence. She undermined claims that scribbled notes found in Letby's house were any sort of confession. She reveals that, at sixth form college together, both trained in peer-support counselling and learned of a common method to deal with anxieties – to write down your worst fears and feelings. 'If you're feeling overwhelmed, you write down everything that's going through your mind,' she said. And this is what Letby did when undergoing counselling arranged for her by the hospital. Dawn was at work when she heard the guilty verdicts and said she could not take them in. She said: 'I sat there dumbfounded for a while, not really knowing how to process what I was hearing. I didn't think it was real. I immediately switched to thinking what happens next? This can't be it, she can't just spend the rest of her life in prison. I'm living a life that Lucy should be living beside me. 'We should both be having families. We'd both bought our houses, and we were looking forward to the next chapter of our lives – and then all this happens. There's so much guilt that I'm living a life that Lucy should also be living.' The documentary also hears from Karen Rees, former head of urgent care nursing at the Countess of Chester Hospital where Letby worked. Sat in a car outside the hospital, Ms Rees said 'I loved working here'. 'We were all shocked, really shocked,' she added, 'when I look back to when it all started, I don't think any of us thought that this storyline would ride out the way it has.' Betweeen 2015 and 2016 nearly three times as many newborn babies had died than the normal numbers. Ms Rees said: I was made aware that the mortality rates appeared to be higher than they had been in the previous years. 'It was tough because everyone was trying, thinking please let us find a reason for this.' Letby was often accused of being cold and unfeeling during her trial for murder. But according to Ms Rees, she was in fact devastated by the accusations against her. The bitter, tearful scenes followed suggestions made by consultants at the hospital that Letby was doing harm. 'She was broken, cried regularly in my arms and in my office, and her mantra to me was, 'Why are they doing this to me? I've done nothing wrong',' said Ms Rees. Ms Rees, in her first TV interview, revealed she was given the task of breaking the bad news to Letby that she was being removed from the job she was trained for – the care of newborns – and confined to a humiliating desk job in a back office. Letby had to pretend to colleagues that this was her choice. Ms Rees said: 'I was told just to say that concerns had been raised, and that this was seen as a neutral act. 'She was not being accused of anything at this point. But it seemed safer to take her off clinical practice to protect herself as well as babies on that neonatal unit.' As she was led away from the unit where she had worked, Letby did not even question the decision. 'She was just looking at me,' added Ms Rees. 'I then had to walk her across the hospital grounds. I was the only one making conversation. She wasn't asking me why. She wasn't crying. She was just shocked.' But, said Ms Rees, she cried a lot later. Eventually, after police became involved, Letby was prescribed antidepressants which often suppress moods and emotions. She told her trial in May 2023 she was still taking them and that she had considered suicide at the time she was removed from her job. Ms Rees recalled how Letby once told her: 'You're the only person that hasn't asked me, 'Have I purposely harmed anybody?'.' She said: 'The reason why I never asked her is that I never thought she had. No. I didn't, I don't believe it.' Her revelations are one of several dramatic moments in the documentary Lucy Letby: Beyond Reasonable Doubt? to be shown on ITV this evening. Letby's new barrister Mark McDonald is shown in the documentary being questioned outside the CCRC offices in Birmingham by the Daily Mail's Liz Hull, who has covered the case from the beginning. Mr McDonald admits to camera that, despite the involvement of some of the most distinguished doctors in the world, who say no crime was committed, an appeal may yet be refused on a technicality – that the objections to the guilty verdict could have been raised at the original trial, so it was not the court's fault that things went wrong. He asks: 'If they dismiss this evidence, to say 'Well, it could have been called at trial... she's innocent but we are not going to take any notice of it because they could have done that, so we will let an innocent person stay in prison' – well, what is the logic of that?'
