logo
In birthright citizenship case, US Supreme Court gets two controversies in one

In birthright citizenship case, US Supreme Court gets two controversies in one

Yahoo13-05-2025

By Andrew Chung
(Reuters) -One of President Donald Trump's most contentious policies - his attempt to restrict automatic birthright citizenship - arrives at the U.S. Supreme Court this week with an unusual twist: The justices may focus on something else entirely.
Federal judges in Washington state, Massachusetts and Maryland issued orders blocking Trump's January executive order nationwide, finding the directive likely violated language in the U.S. Constitution concerning citizenship for babies born in the United States.
But through an emergency filing, Trump's administration has focused the Supreme Court's attention not on the legality of the action by the Republican president but rather on the permissibility of the actions by the three judges - whether federal judges should have the power to issue broad orders that block challenged polices on a nationwide, or "universal," basis.
The administration asked the court to narrow the injunctions to let the government enforce Trump's directive - part of his hardline approach to immigration - to the greatest extent possible while the legal fight over the policy plays out.
The court may do so "without considering the underlying merits" of Trump's action, the administration asserted.
That approach would set up the possibility of the court, which has as a 6-3 conservative majority, allowing broad enforcement of the policy without assessing whether or not it is legal.
The matter came to the court on a compressed timeline and with minimal written briefing.
The way the court is considering the case "seems quite strange," said Alan Trammell, a professor at Washington and Lee University School of Law in Virginia, because "even though the substantive question of birthright citizenship technically isn't before the court, it still looms large."
"It concerns one of the most important provisions of the Constitution and implicates a raging political debate," Trammell said.
Trump's order, signed on his first day back in office, directed federal agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of U.S.-born children who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident.
Trump's order was challenged by Democratic attorneys general from 22 states as well as individual pregnant immigrants and advocacy groups. The plaintiffs have said the directive violates a right enshrined in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 and long has been understood to confer citizenship to virtually anyone born in the United States.
Trammell noted that the administration has not contested whether the injunctions should have been issued, asking the justices only to scale back their nationwide effect to protect just the plaintiffs in the cases.
"The situation would be very odd indeed if the court concluded that the plaintiffs' view of the merits is correct, yet gave only the individual plaintiffs the benefit of that ruling," Trammell said.
'BIRTH TOURISM'
The 14th Amendment states that all "persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
The administration contends that the 14th Amendment does not extend to immigrants who are in the country illegally or even to immigrants whose presence is lawful but temporary, such as university students or those on work visas.
Automatic birthright citizenship does not reflect the best reading of the 14th Amendment and it encourages "birth tourism" by expectant mothers traveling the United States to give birth and secure citizenship for their children, the administration argued in court filings.
At the Supreme Court, the administration has targeted only the universal scope of the injunctions, content to leave them in place to protect only the people who sued as well as the residents of the 22 states, assuming the Supreme Court finds that these states have the necessary legal standing to bring their cases. That outcome would let Trump's order go into effect in the 28 states that did not sue, aside from any plaintiffs from those states.
The Justice Department said the issuance of broad judicial injunctions has bedeviled administrations of both parties, Republican and Democratic, and must be urgently rectified by the Supreme Court. Trump himself on March 20 called the situation "toxic" and urged the Supreme Court to act.
Since Trump returned to office, many of his numerous executive orders and other initiatives have been impeded by judges, including through universal injunctions.
"The need for this court's intervention has become urgent as universal injunctions have reached tsunami levels," the Justice Department said in a written filing.
If the justices agree to scale back the judicial blocks, it could lead to a nation geographically fractured between places where babies are born with automatic citizenship and places where they are not, the plaintiffs said.
"An infant would be a United States citizen and full member of society if born in New Jersey, but a deportable noncitizen if born in Tennessee," the plaintiffs in the Maryland case told the justices.
IDAHO TRANSGENDER CASE
The Justice Department has cited the Supreme Court's action in a case last year to back up its request to narrow the injunctions. In that case, called Labrador v. Poe, Idaho asked the justices to let the state enforce a Republican-backed ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors after a federal judge blocked it as unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court, over the dissent of its three liberal members, granted Idaho's request that the statewide injunction be pared back to cover only the transgender plaintiffs who actually sued.
The scope of an injunction is significant, the Justice Department told the Supreme Court, and ensuring that lower courts do not act beyond their limited judicial power "is just as critical as merits review," meaning an assessment of an action's legality.
A Justice Department spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.
Some legal experts said the cases differ for numerous reasons. For instance, they said, the Idaho case involved one state, not a presidential executive order applying nationally.
Even though the administration has made the dispute primarily about universal injunctions, some court observers have said the justices could decide to rule on the legality of Trump's order anyway.
It is unusual for the court "to be considering an emergency application in this context," University of Chicago law professor William Baude said.
"Because of that, we won't know what the court is going to focus on until the oral arguments start," Baude added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel attacks Yemeni port city, Houthi rebels say
Israel attacks Yemeni port city, Houthi rebels say

Hamilton Spectator

time25 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Israel attacks Yemeni port city, Houthi rebels say

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Israel attacked docks in Yemen's port city of Hodeida on Tuesday, the Houthi rebels said, likely damaging facilities that are key to aid shipments to the hungry, war-wracked nation. Israel did not immediately acknowledge the attack and the Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press. However, Tuesday's claimed attack comes as the Houthis have repeatedly launched missiles and drones targeting Israel during its war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The Houthis announced the attack via their al-Masirah satellite news channel. They said the attack targeted docks there, without elaborating. The Houthis have been launching persistent missile and drone attacks against commercial and military ships in the region in what the group's leadership has described as an effort to end Israel's offensive in Gaza. From November 2023 until January 2025, the Houthis targeted more than 100 merchant vessels with missiles and drones, sinking two of them and killing four sailors . That has greatly reduced the flow of trade through the Red Sea corridor, which typically sees $1 trillion of goods move through it annually. The Houthis paused attacks in a self-imposed ceasefire until the U.S. launched a broad assault against the rebels in mid-March. Trump paused those attacks just before his trip to the Mideast, saying the rebels had 'capitulated' to American demands. Early Tuesday, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth wrote on the social platform X that U.S. Navy ships had traveled through the Red Sea and its Bab el-Mandeb Strait 'multiple times in recent days' without facing Houthi attacks. 'These transits occurred without challenge and demonstrate the success of both Operation ROUGH RIDER and the President's Peace Through Strength agenda,' Hegseth wrote ahead of facing Congress for the first time since sharing sensitive military details of America's military campaign against the Houthis in a Signal chat. Meanwhile, a wider, decadelong war in Yemen between the Houthis and the country's exiled government, backed by a Saudi-led coalition, remains in a stalemate. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Naturalization ceremony at Clinton Presidential Library, 39 new citizens welcomed by former President Bill Clinton
Naturalization ceremony at Clinton Presidential Library, 39 new citizens welcomed by former President Bill Clinton

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Naturalization ceremony at Clinton Presidential Library, 39 new citizens welcomed by former President Bill Clinton

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — Thirty-nine individuals from 18 different countries and nationalities were officially sworn in as United States citizens Monday afternoon during a naturalization ceremony held at the Clinton Presidential Library. The event was made even more special by the presence of former President Bill Clinton, who addressed the new Americans with words of encouragement, gratitude and hope for their futures. The ceremony celebrated the journeys of men and women who, after navigating the immigration process and demonstrating knowledge of U.S. history, government and civic values, took their oaths of allegiance to become full participants in the American democratic system. Former President Bill Clinton welcomes new U.S. citizens at naturalization ceremony in Little Rock One of those new citizens, Selen Strickland, originally from Turkey, reflected on her six-year journey to citizenship. 'It's a very big accomplishment,' she said. 'I came to the U.S. six years ago to pursue my master's degree. After my studies, I decided to stay, moved to Little Rock five years ago, met my husband, and now we have a one-year-old daughter. I feel very proud—this is a big achievement and a major milestone in my life.' Former President Clinton, the 42nd President of the United States, welcomed the group with heartfelt remarks, commending their resilience and the diversity they bring to the nation. 'Thank you for bringing your talents, perseverance, and your dreams to the United States,' Clinton said. 'There is nothing more important than what people decide to do with their lives, their minds and their hearts every new day.' Clinton urged the newly naturalized citizens to embrace education, civic participation and the responsibilities of their new status. 'You now hold the cards to forge a new future for yourselves and your families,' he said. 'As a country, we welcome the heritage you bring. Together, we continue to form a more perfect union.' Many attendees had the chance to meet and shake hands with the former president, who emphasized that being American is not about background but about shared values and commitment to the community. 'Whatever your nationality, as long as you follow the law, show up, work hard, pay your taxes and do all the things that are burdens of citizenship—we're glad you're here,' Clinton concluded. Immigrants from 22 countries become U.S. citizens in Little Rock As the event came to a close, emotions ran high among the new citizens who now call the United States their home. For many, including Strickland, the moment marked the culmination of years of perseverance and the start of a new chapter in the American story. 'After all the sacrifices and everything, I think this is the reward that I'm getting today, becoming an American citizen,' she said through tears. The ceremony served not only as a celebration of individual achievement but also as a powerful reminder of the enduring promise of the American dream. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Israel attacks Yemeni port city, Houthi rebels say
Israel attacks Yemeni port city, Houthi rebels say

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Israel attacks Yemeni port city, Houthi rebels say

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Israel attacked docks in Yemen's port city of Hodeida on Tuesday, the Houthi rebels said, likely damaging facilities that are key to aid shipments to the hungry, war-wracked nation. Israel did not immediately acknowledge the attack and the Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press. However, Tuesday's claimed attack comes as the Houthis have repeatedly launched missiles and drones targeting Israel during its war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The Houthis announced the attack via their al-Masirah satellite news channel. They said the attack targeted docks there, without elaborating. The Houthis have been launching persistent missile and drone attacks against commercial and military ships in the region in what the group's leadership has described as an effort to end Israel's offensive in Gaza. From November 2023 until January 2025, the Houthis targeted more than 100 merchant vessels with missiles and drones, sinking two of them and killing four sailors. That has greatly reduced the flow of trade through the Red Sea corridor, which typically sees $1 trillion of goods move through it annually. The Houthis paused attacks in a self-imposed ceasefire until the U.S. launched a broad assault against the rebels in mid-March. Trump paused those attacks just before his trip to the Mideast, saying the rebels had 'capitulated' to American demands. Early Tuesday, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth wrote on the social platform X that U.S. Navy ships had traveled through the Red Sea and its Bab el-Mandeb Strait 'multiple times in recent days' without facing Houthi attacks. 'These transits occurred without challenge and demonstrate the success of both Operation ROUGH RIDER and the President's Peace Through Strength agenda,' Hegseth wrote ahead of facing Congress for the first time since sharing sensitive military details of America's military campaign against the Houthis in a Signal chat. Meanwhile, a wider, decadelong war in Yemen between the Houthis and the country's exiled government, backed by a Saudi-led coalition, remains in a stalemate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store