
Russia and China Give Iran Nuclear Deal Boost
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Russia and China are siding with Iran against European threats to reinstate sanctions against Tehran under a United Nations Security Council resolution—a step the U.K., Germany and France have warned that they may take if nuclear talks fail before an upcoming deadline.
Newsweek has reached out to the European Commission and the U.S. State Department for comment.
Why It Matters
The so-called "snapback" clause of U.N. Security Council resolution 2231 could once again place Iran under stringent sanctions for failing to comply with the nuclear enrichment levels dictated by the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the 2015 nuclear deal President Donald Trump quit in 2018.
If China and Russia refuse to recognize the mechanism, or move to block its enforcement, the West's ability to compel Iran via diplomacy would be greatly undermined.
The resulting lack of sanctions could further weakening Europe's leverage and influence, increase Tehran's dependence on Moscow and Beijing, and raise the possibility that the United States reaches for a military solution to the long-running disagreement—Iran has already signaled to America that it would consider illegitimate any attempt to reinstate sanctions through the snapback mechanism.
This handout photo made available by the Iranian Army Office on March 12, 2025 shows navy vessels taking part in a joint Iranian-Russian-Chinese military drill in the Gulf of Oman. The navies of Iran, Russia...
This handout photo made available by the Iranian Army Office on March 12, 2025 shows navy vessels taking part in a joint Iranian-Russian-Chinese military drill in the Gulf of Oman. The navies of Iran, Russia and China are holding military drills off the coast of Iran this week in a bid to boost cooperation, according to Iranian media. More
Iranian Army Office / AFP/Getty Images
What To Know
Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia's top envoy to the international organizations in Vienna, said the three European powers, sometimes known as the E3, were attempting to "blackmail" and "threaten" Iran into submission via their end of August deadline, according to a post on X.
Moscow's opposition to the E3's sanctions option echoed that of China on Friday, when Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said the snapback mechanism "does not help parties build trust and bridge differences and is not conducive to the diplomatic effort for the early resumption of talks."
The backing has given Iran further momentum to publicly push back against Western pressure ahead of the JCPOA agreement's expiration in mid-October. This week, Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said he had met with Chinese and Russian diplomats on Tuesday to discuss "joint measures to counter the destructive approach" of the E3.
After no progress was made at an Iran-E3 meeting in Istanbul in July, the three powers told the U.N. this month: "We have made clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution…or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism."
Iranian officials have said the country's economy could withstand further sanctions if talks fall through.
What People Are Saying
Russian Permanent Representative to International Organizations in Vienna Mikhail Ulyanov said Wednesday on X: "In other words, an attempt by #E3 to trigger #SnapBack despite their own non-compliance would contradict the fundamental principles of international law."
Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said Tuesday on X: "All three countries believe that Resolution 2231 should be terminated at its designated time, and these countries legally have no right to trigger the snapback mechanism and are opposed to reinstating Security Council resolutions."
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said Friday at a regular press briefing: "Any moves taken by the Security Council now should help reach new agreements in talks, instead of the opposite."
What Happens Next
The E3 have set the end of August as the deadline to trigger the U.N.'s snapback mechanism if nuclear talks with Iran do not proceed positively.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
22 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Visits Police, Military Patrolling DC
"Balance of Power: Late Edition" focuses on the intersection of politics and global business. On today's show, Former Vice President Mike Pence shares his thoughts on President Trump calling for Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to resign hoping these allegations are not part of a pressure campaign. Don Vultaggio, AriZona Beverage Company Co-Founder & Chairman, discusses how. President Trump's tariffs are threatening to increase the price tag of the company's iced teas. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago President Austan Goolsbee discusses the "mixed messages" being sent by recent US economic data. (Source: Bloomberg)


Chicago Tribune
24 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
California Gov. Newsom signs legislation calling for special election on redrawn congressional map
SACRAMENTO, Calif — California voters will decide in November whether to approve a redrawn congressional map designed to help Democrats win five more U.S. House seats next year, after Texas Republicans advanced their own redrawn map to pad their House majority by the same number of seats at President Donald Trump's urging. California lawmakers voted mostly along party lines Thursday to approve legislation calling for the special election. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has led the campaign in favor of the map, then quickly signed it — the latest step in a tit-for-tat gerrymandering battle. 'We don't want this fight and we didn't choose this fight, but with our democracy on the line, we will not run away from this fight,' Democratic Assemblyman Marc Berman said. Republicans, who have filed a lawsuit and called for a federal investigation into the plan, promised to keep fighting it. California Assemblyman James Gallagher, the Republican minority leader, said Trump was 'wrong' to push for new Republican seats elsewhere, contending the president was just responding to Democratic gerrymandering in other states. But he warned that Newsom's approach, which the governor has dubbed 'fight fire with fire,' was dangerous. 'You move forward fighting fire with fire and what happens?' Gallagher asked. 'You burn it all down.' In Texas, the Republican-controlled state Senate was scheduled to vote on a map Thursday night. After that, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's signature will be all that is needed to make the map official. It's part of Trump's effort to stave off an expected loss of the GOP's majority in the U.S. House in the 2026 midterm elections. What states are doing in the battle over congressional maps as Texas pursues plan President Donald Trump soughtOn a national level, the partisan makeup of existing districts puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. The incumbent president's party usually loses congressional seats in the midterms. The president has pushed other Republican-controlled states including Indiana and Missouri to also revise their maps to add more winnable GOP seats. Ohio Republicans were also already scheduled to revise their maps to make them more partisan. The U.S. Supreme Court has said the Constitution does not outlaw partisan gerrymandering, only using race to redraw district lines. Texas Republicans embraced that when their House of Representatives passed its revision Wednesday. 'The underlying goal of this plan is straight forward: improve Republican political performance,' state Rep. Todd Hunter, the Republican who wrote the bill revising Texas' maps, said. On Thursday, California Democrats noted Hunter's comments and said they had to take extreme steps to counter the Republican move. 'What do we do, just sit back and do nothing? Or do we fight back?' Democratic state Sen. Lena Gonzalez said. 'This is how we fight back and protect our democracy.' Republicans and some Democrats championed the 2008 ballot measure that established California's nonpartisan redistricting commission, along with the 2010 one that extended its role to drawing congressional maps. Democrats have sought a national commission that would draw lines for all states but have been unable to pass legislation creating that system. Trump's midterm redistricting ploy has shifted Democrats. That was clear in California, where Newsom was one of the members of his party who backed the initial redistricting commission ballot measures, and where Assemblyman Joshua Lowenthal, whose father, Rep. Alan Lowenthal, was another Democratic champion of a nonpartisan commission, presided over the state Assembly's passage of the redistricting package. Newsom on Thursday contended his state was still setting a model. 'We'll be the first state in U.S. history, in the most democratic way, to submit to the people of our state the ability to determine their own maps,' Newsom said before signing the legislation. Former President Barack Obama, who's also backed a nationwide nonpartisan approach, has also backed Newsom's bid to redraw the California map, saying it was a necessary step to stave off the GOP's Texas move. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach,' Obama said Tuesday during a fundraiser for the Democratic Party's main redistricting arm, noting that California voters will still have the final say on the map. Bipartisan group led by ex-Obama officials 'rolling the dice' on new remapping plan for Illinois legislatureThe California map would last only through 2030, after which the state's commission would draw up a new map for the normal, once-a-decade redistricting to adjust district lines after the decennial U.S. Census. Democrats are also mulling reopening Maryland's and New York's maps for mid-decade redraws. However, more Democratic-run states have commission systems like California's or other redistricting limits than Republican ones do, leaving the GOP with a freer hand to swiftly redraw maps. New York, for example, can't draw new maps until 2028, and even then, only with voter approval. In Texas, outnumbered Democrats turned to unusual steps to try to delay passage, leaving the state to delay a vote by 15 days. Upon their return, they were assigned round-the-clock police monitoring. California Republicans didn't take such dramatic steps but complained bitterly about Democrats muscling the package through the Statehouse and harming what GOP State Sen. Tony Strickland called the state's 'gold-standard' nonpartisan approach. 'What you're striving for is predetermined elections,' Strickland said. 'You're taking the voice away from Californians.'


Fox News
25 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump says he's ‘not playing games,' indicates crime crackdowns could be coming to more cities
Fox News senior White House correspondent Jacqui Heinrich reports on President Donald Trump's crackdown on crime that could be spreading to different parts of the country on 'Special Report.'