logo
Swarm Intelligence Is Reshaping How AI Gets Trained

Swarm Intelligence Is Reshaping How AI Gets Trained

Forbes5 days ago

A decentralized AI training swarm could be more cost effective, equitable and inclusive that current ... More closed AI training approaches.
It's no secret that current AI models are built behind closed doors in secrecy and seclusion. Only a handful of Big Tech companies hold the keys to those doors, the massive server centers, petabytes of data, training pipelines and protocols. The artificial intelligence models they produce are locked away behind their self-serving black boxes of seeming techno wizardry that the public can query but never really understand, influence or change. A ballsy decentralized AI start-up called Macrocosmos wants to change that.
With the relaunch of Subnet 9 on the Bittensor network — think of a subnet as a mobile phone app and Bittensor as an app store — Macrocosmos is taking the first meaningful step toward a more democratic future for artificial intelligence. The clue to how they've achieved this feat is captured in the subnet's new acronym, IOTA: Incentivized Orchestrated Training Architecture. This construct allows anyone with a graphic processing unit, no matter how modest, to help train cutting edge AI models.
Based on a novel 'swarm" approach, which is a theoretical pre training strategy for AI, Macrocosmos' breakthrough resolves key challenges around data and model compression, as explained in their white paper published on Friday. At its core is a vision that reimagines how intelligence is built and who gets to participate in that process.
'We are single-minded and obsessed in our pursuit of building competitive decentralized technologies that can compete with centralized labs,' wrote Macrocosmos CTO Steffen Cruz in a post on X.
Before we can understand swarm training, we need to understand the key differences between traditional AI and decentralized AI. At its simplest, decentralized AI means that the training of an AI model doesn't happen in one place or under the control of one company. Instead, it's spread out, distributed — across homes, labs, campuses and servers anywhere in the world. The same way that Bitcoin decentralized money away from centralized banks, Bittensor and Macrocosmos aim to democratize intelligence itself.
This matters because AI is infiltrating more and more of our lives. It's deciding what news we see, what products we are offered, how we shop, how we interact with each other, how we work and even how we're hired. Concentrating that power within a few cabalistic computing systems risks not just privacy or fairness, but the future of innovation itself. By opening those locked doors to public participation and direct engagement, decentralized AI offers a new kind of alignment — one where users are also co-creators.
'Not only is this a new research endeavor for Macrocosmos and Bittensor, but it's something bigger and more personal to us,' Cruz added. 'We are scientists, researchers and developers.'
Swarm training, as deployed by Macrocosmos through IOTA, takes cues from the natural world. Similar to how a swarm of bees, school of fish or a flock of birds can accomplish complex navigation without central control, this novel subnet enables thousands of independent machines to orchestrate and collaborate on training a single massive AI model.
Instead of forcing each network participant to download and run the full model — a costly and impractical ask — Macrocosmos uses a technique called model parallelism. Each subnet member — also called a miner since their actions 'mine' actual monetary incentives that benefit the entire network — trains just one slice of the model, typically a few layers of the neural network. As data flows through those individual layers, each miner processes their portion and passes the output forward. Then, a lightning fast reverse review grades how far off the model was and adjusts miner payouts accordingly.
This approach isn't just efficient than centralized methods — it's more inclusive. Rather than requiring top-tier hardware, the architecture allows both low- and high-compute participants to contribute meaningfully. This breaks down the barriers to entry that have long kept open-source communities at the margins of AI model training.
To understand the difference between how traditional AI models are trained and what Macrocosmos is doing, this graphic offers a useful side-by-side comparison:
This side-by-side comparison depicts the differences between centralized and decentralized AI ... More training.
In centralized training, one model is split into layers that are tightly linked across GPUs within a single data center. Everything is optimized for high-speed local connections. But this setup is expensive, exclusive and closed.
In contrast, the decentralized swarm training distributes different layers of the model across a global network of contributors or miners. Each of these individuals handles a piece of the workload and communicates their results with others. The swarm system regularly syncs up all the parts into a single, shared model. Instead of requiring giant compute clusters, it leverages a far flung spectrum of connected devices — ranging from a personal desktop GPU to larger industrial setups.
The outcome? Lower costs, more transparency and an AI model built by the many, not the few.
However, training models this way has its challenges. Internet bandwidth is a lot slower than the fiber optics inside a data center. And decentralized participants can drop out, try to cheat the incentive system or go offline at a moment's notice without warning.
While some of those issues are beyond Macrocosmos' control, they have developed an elegant solution for potential problems tied to miner incentives and rewards. The design of its new IOTA network overcomes three big challenges:
In this video clip, the firm's co-founders Cruz and Will Squires discuss why decentralized training matters, and how it can open a new era for AI.
This is more than a technical upgrade — it's a seismic philosophical shift. For years, decentralized AI projects have relied on centralized training behind the scenes. Macrocosmos is finally changing that.
'The time has come for us to move forward as a community and tackle new challenges in model training. This is an imperative for Bittensor. The competition are at our heels,' Cruz added.
'We beat nation states, we tirelessly benchmarked our progress and we shared our findings in our white paper. It was a fantastic experiment, and we pushed it far beyond its original design.'
This effort to distribute AI's compute and ownership to all comers through swarm training enables a future reality where AI isn't something reserved for elite power brokers while inferential dregs are grudgingly dripped to the masses. It's a collective thing we build together.
Macrocosmos is taking decentralized training out of Big Tech's locked, walled garden and into the wild. If they're successful, the next breakthrough frontier AI model might not come from OpenAI, Google or Meta — but rather from a swarm of us.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices
Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices

CBS News

time26 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices

Desire Godfrey said it was time for a vehicle upgrade. The Lancaster mother had her eye on a Lexus. "I had a baby, so I'm looking for something reliable for me and a baby," Godfrey said. She searched online and found what she thought was the right vehicle at The Reserve Auto Group in The Colony. She described the sales process in May 2024 as a positive experience. Warranty and GAP insurance issues But an unexpected oil change six months later changed everything. Godfrey, 33, said a Lexus dealership informed her the vehicle was not under warranty. She also discovered her GAP insurance policy didn't exist. "They (Reserve Auto Group) never paid the warranty company the money they were supposed to pay to activate this warranty and this GAP insurance," she said. Car loan charges continue Godfrey said the costs were included in her car note. She filed a report with The Colony Police Department — and she's not alone. Police said they received their first complaint on Jan. 31. According to a news release, police have been investigating multiple fraud claims connected to the dealership since 2023. The business shut down in December 2024, but complaints continue to come in. Alleged auto fraud pattern Investigators said customers were allegedly instructed to write separate checks for aftermarket warranties or GAP insurance policies. Those payments were supposed to go to third-party providers, but police said the dealership allegedly cashed the checks and never forwarded the money — leaving customers without coverage. Another victim comes forward A second alleged victim, who spoke to CBS News Texas anonymously, said she and her husband also bought a Lexus from the dealership. She provided a non-activation letter from DOWC Administrative Services LLC, a company that offers GAP insurance and warranties. The letter stated: "Please be advised that Reserve Auto has failed to remit payment to Us as the Administrator and Provider for your Contract. Consequently, the Contract was not activated in our system." Investigation still ongoing Police have not made any arrests or publicly identified anyone associated with the allegations. Officers said they are continuing to vet additional alleged victims. CBS News Texas is not naming the person listed as the dealership's owner, as police have indicated he did nothing wrong. He spoke briefly by phone, saying he wanted to schedule an appointment to discuss the claims further because he believed "we did not have all the facts." When asked for clarification, he said he didn't have time to explain. Legal team responds Two emails followed the call, and attorneys from Herrin Law introduced themselves. "We have no comment at this time. Thank you for your interest in our client's side of the story," attorney Benjamin Palatiere said. He requested that all future inquiries be directed to him. Buyer left without coverage Meanwhile, Godfrey said the vehicle itself has not had any issues. But she continues to pay for a warranty and insurance that don't exist. "So nobody wants to refinance the loan. Nobody wants to give me GAP insurance," she said. "It's just more so like I'm going to take it or leave it. If I wreck the car, then I would have to figure out a way to pay that car off." Godfrey said she hopes to recover the money one day.

Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel
Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel

CBS News

time36 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel

Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday halted lower court orders that required the White House's Department of Government Efficiency to turn over information to a government watchdog group as part of a lawsuit that tests whether President Trump's cost-cutting task force has to comply with federal public records law. The order from the high court clears DOGE for now from having to turn over records related to its work and personnel, and keeps Amy Gleason, identified as its acting administrator, from having to answer questions at a deposition. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. "The portions of the district court's April 15 discovery order that require the government to disclose the content of intra–executive branch USDS recommendations and whether those recommendations were followed are not appropriately tailored," the court said in its order. "Any inquiry into whether an entity is an agency for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act cannot turn on the entity's ability to persuade. Furthermore, separation of powers concerns counsel judicial deference and restraint in the context of discovery regarding internal executive branch communications." The Supreme Court sent the case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit for more proceedings. Chief Justice John Roberts temporarily paused the district court's order last month, which allowed the Supreme Court more time to consider the Trump administration's bid for emergency relief. A district judge had ordered DOGE to turn over documents to the group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, by June 3, and for Gleason's deposition to be completed by June 13. The underlying issue in the case involves whether DOGE is subject to the Freedom of Information Act. CREW argues that the cost-cutting task force wields "substantial independent authority," which makes it a de facto agency that must comply with federal public records law. The Justice Department, however, disagrees and instead claims that DOGE is a presidential advisory body housed within the Executive Office of the President that makes recommendations to the president and federal agencies on matters that are important to Mr. Trump's second-term agenda. DOGE's agency status was not before the Supreme Court, though the high court may be asked to settle that matter in the future. Instead, the Trump administration had asked the justices to temporarily halt a district court's order that allowed CREW to gather certain information from DOGE as part of its effort to determine whether the task force is an advisory panel that is outside FOIA's scope or is an agency that is subject to the records law. The judge overseeing the dispute, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, had ordered DOGE to turn over certain documents to the watchdog group by June 3 and to complete all depositions, including of Gleason, by June 13. Mr. Trump ordered the creation of DOGE on his first day back in the White House as part of his initiative to slash the size of the federal government. Since then, DOGE team members have fanned out to agencies across the executive branch and have been part of efforts to shrink the federal workforce and shutter entities like the U.S. Agency for International Development and the U.S. Institute of Peace. DOGE has also attempted to gain access to sensitive databases kept by the Internal Revenue Service, Social Security Administration and Office of Personnel Management, prompting legal battles. In an effort to learn more about DOGE's structure and operations, CREW submitted an expedited FOIA request to the task force. After it did not respond in a timely manner, CREW filed a lawsuit and sought a preliminary injunction to expedite processing of its records request. The organization argued that DOGE was exercising significant independent authority, which made it an agency subject to FOIA. Cooper granted CREW's request for a preliminary injunction in March and agreed that FOIA likely applies to DOGE because it is "likely exercising substantial independent authority much greater than other [Executive Office of the President] components held to be covered by FOIA." He then allowed CREW to conduct limited information-gathering, which the watchdog group said aimed to determine whether DOGE is exercising substantial authority that would bring it within FOIA's reach. A federal appeals court ultimately declined to pause that order, requiring DOGE to turn over the documents sought by CREW. In seeking the Supreme Court's intervention, Solicitor General D. John Sauer said CREW is conducting a "fishing expedition" into DOGE's activities. He warned that if Cooper's order remains in place, several components of the White House, such as the offices of the chief of staff and national security adviser, would be subject to FOIA. "That untenable result would compromise the provision of candid, confidential advice to the president and disrupt the inner workings of the Executive Branch," Sauer wrote. "Yet, in the decisions below, the court of appeals and district court treated a presidential advisory body as a potential 'agency' based on the persuasive force of its recommendations — threatening opening season for FOIA requests on the president's advisors." But lawyers for CREW told the Supreme Court in a filing that the Justice Department's position "would require courts to blindly yield to the Executive's characterization" of the authority and operations of a component of the Executive Office of the President. They said adopting the Trump administration's approach to DOGE would give the president "free reign" to create new entities within the Executive Office of the President that exercise substantial independent authority but are shielded from transparency laws. "Courts would be forced to blindly accept the government's representations about an EOP unit's realworld operations, unable to test those representations through even limited discovery," CREW's lawyers wrote. "It is that extreme position, not the discovery order, that would 'turn[] FOIA on its head.'"

Bill shielding Oregonians from utility rate increases by Big Tech heads to Kotek
Bill shielding Oregonians from utility rate increases by Big Tech heads to Kotek

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Bill shielding Oregonians from utility rate increases by Big Tech heads to Kotek

PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – A bill passed the Oregon legislature on Thursday, aiming to shield Oregonians from taking on increased utility rates from Big Tech facilities in the state. House Bill 3546, known as the Protecting Oregonians With Energy Responsibility (POWER) Act, would hold companies behind facilities such as data centers or cryptocurrency operations, responsible for their own utility bills, If signed into law, the bill would create a separate pricing system for energy users who demand more than 20 megawatts, or roughly the same usage as a small city, according to the Democratic Majority Office. Tillamook opens first owned-and-operated facility outside of Oregon 'Data centers play an important role in our growing technology needs in the United States, and they need to pay their fair share for infrastructure required to meet their energy needs, rather than passing the costs on to residential ratepayers,' said Senator Janeen Sollman (D – Hillsboro, Forest Grove & Rock Creek), a chief sponsor of the bill. 'Large energy users have the potential to place significant strain on the grid, especially in regions where energy capacity is already stretched thin.' 'The cost to serve certain large energy users is spilling on to other ratepayers,' added Rep. Pam Marsh (D – Southern Jackson County), a chief sponsor of the bill in the House of Representatives. 'This bill will help state regulators assign these high costs to the data centers and crypto mining entities that are consuming the energy.' The Democratic lawmakers note that industrial users currently pay about eight cents a kilowatt hour while households are charged more than double the rate at 19.6 cents per kilowatt hour. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now 'The bill helps protect everyday users, like families and small businesses, from paying the costs that big businesses are running up,' said Sen. Deb Patterson (D – Salem), who co-sponsored the POWER Act. 'Household budgets are stretched far enough as they are. They shouldn't be covering corporate costs, too.' The POWER Act passed the Senate in an 18-12 vote on Tuesday, with the Oregon House of Representatives concurring for the bill's final passage on June 5. The bill now heads to Oregon Governor Tina Kotek's desk for signature. When the bill was introduced in the House, Rep. David Brock Smith (R-Port Orford) raised concerns that the bill would discourage tech companies from growing their presence in Oregon. Drug trafficker sentenced to 15 years in prison after largest meth bust in Oregon history In his letter – which was supported by industry advocates such as the Data Center Coalition along with unions IBEW 48, IBEW 280 and UA 290 – Brock Smith said, 'data centers strengthen grid reliability through infrastructure investments and help stabilize residential electricity rates by providing consistent demand. The current proposed legislation, with its misaligned regulations, threatened these widespread community benefits and could discourage future development that supports our digital economy.' The bill comes as large technology companies are facing two growing demands to raise their energy supply for artificial intelligence and data centers, while meeting long-term goals of cutting greenhouse gas emissions, as reported by the Associated Press. AI uses 'vast amounts of energy,' said, noting a 2024 report from the United States Department of Energy estimated that the electricity needed for data centers in the U.S. tripled in the last decade and is anticipated to double or triple again in 2028, when tech companies could consumer 12% of the nation's energy. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store