Victoria's government not ruling out compensation to Indigenous Australians for 'genocide'
After a four-year truth-telling inquiry, The Yoorrook Justice Commission, delivered its final report to the Victoria state parliament on Tuesday.
The Australian-first Indigenous truth-telling body calls on the Victorian government to provide redress for injustices.
Among the proposals is a statewide redress scheme, including financial compensation for Indigenous Victorians.
The report also suggests recognising Indigenous groups as sovereign nations, exempting them from taxes and rates, and granting them access to revenue from natural resources and Crown land.
The report also called for the state government to offer a formal apology and to acknowledge its responsibility for the wrongs of its predecessors.
The apology would also see the state acknowledge that Aboriginal soldiers who served during the world wars were excluded from a scheme which gave veterans land when they returned home.
Some controversial recommendations included a significant overhaul of the education system, which would exclude Indigenous children from attendance requirements, suspension and expulsion, as well as avenues for more appropriate cultural training.
The Yoorrook Justice Commission submitted its final report to parliament, which included 100 recommendations aimed at making amends for the injustice that 'occurred during and as a result of the colonial invasion'
The report also pushed for the Treaty to be pursued and permanent funding streams to be instituted to help future generations of Indigenous people.
It also called for a permanent First Peoples' Assembly - a move which would create a Victorian version of the Voice.
During a press conference on Wednesday, Premier Jacinta Allan refused to rule out any of the recommendations.
'I'm just not going to rule things in or out through a press conference,' Allan said.
'I think we can understand the need... for government to take time to consider the recommendations.'
The report has given the Victorian government a two-year window to respond to its findings.
Yoorrook held 67 days of public hearings, gathering the testimony of Stolen Generations survivors, elders, historians, experts and non-Indigenous advocates.
It found there were at least 50 massacres across Victoria by the end of the 1860s, with eight colonists killed compared to 978 First Nations people.
The mass killings combined with disease, sexual violence, exclusion, eradication of language, cultural erasure, environmental degradation, child removal, absorption and assimilation brought about the 'near-complete physical destruction' of Aboriginal people in Victoria.
The 'decimation' of the population by 1901 was the result of 'a coordinated plan of different actions aimed at the destruction of the essential foundations of the life of national groups'.
'This was genocide,' one of the documents read.
Ms Allan said the findings made for 'tough reading' because they 'tell the truth' about how the state was colonised.
The recommendations will inform treaty talks between the state government and the First Peoples' Assembly of Victoria, with enabling legislation expected to be introduced later in 2025.
The report received a mixed response, with some critics labelling the extensive list of recommendations as a 'disaster'.
'[The list] read like demands that would send the state broke if they agreed to all of them,' one Indigenous critic told the Herald Sun.
'At a time when we are negotiating treaty and getting the Victorian people on board it's just a disaster.'
Others supported the report claiming it was time for the state to start 'making things right'.
Ms Allan encouraged Victorians to look at the report.
'I'm focused on getting better outcomes, because when you improve outcomes for Indigenous kids in schools, Indigenous kids in family settings, Indigenous men and women getting access to the health care that they need, that's better for all of us.'
First Peoples' Assembly member Nerita Waight warned Ms Allan not to let Yoorrook's work go ignored, as politicians have done with previous major Aboriginal-related inquiries.
'The truth has been told and now the government has an obligation to act,' the Victorian Aboriginal Legal Service chief executive said.
Yoorrook Justice Commission chairperson Professor Eleanor Bourke said the final report outlined recommendations that would be advanced through a treaty process while others needed to 'begin now' with urgent action and 'reforms.
'These recommendations take the voices, lived experience and evidence of First Peoples into the places where decisions are made and where change must happen,' Ms Bourke said.
'To Premier Allan and the Victorian Government, I urge you all to implement the Yoorrook for Transformation recommendations with courage and commitment.'
Independent Senator Lidia Thorpe called on the federal government to press on with national truth and treaty processes.
'Genocide has not just occurred in Victoria, but has been perpetrated against all First Peoples of this continent,' she said.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese promised to set up a 'Makarrata Commission to oversee a national process for treaty and truth-telling' in 2021.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
Australia fires first HIMARS long-range rocket in war game with US
ROCKHAMPTON, Australia, July 14 (Reuters) - Australia's army fired a truck-mounted long range rocket system that has become a priority for U.S. allies in the Indo-Pacific for the first time on Monday, alongside U.S. and Singapore forces firing the same system in joint war games. Armoured trucks with HIMARS - High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems that can reach 400 km (250 miles) - are in high demand in the Ukraine conflict and are also being acquired by U.S. allies in the Indo-Pacific, including Australia, which is reshaping its forces to respond to China's military build-up. On the first day of Australia's largest war games, "Talisman Sabre", the U.S., Australia, Japan, France, South Korea and Singapore held a live-fire exercise in northern Queensland involving U.S. F-35B fighter jets and land-based long-range strike rockets and missiles. Up to 40,000 troops from 19 nations are taking part in Talisman Sabre, across thousands of kilometres from Australia's Indian Ocean territory of Christmas Island to the Coral Sea on Australia's east coast. Australian Army Brigadier Nick Wilson, director general of the combined live-fire exercise, said it was the first time Australia, Singapore and the United States had fired HIMARS together, and the first firing by Australia on home soil. "HIMARS will be utilised in conjunction with a number of other weapon platforms ... to ensure we have a strategy of denial for security, peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific," he told reporters on Monday. The joint exercise at Shoalwater Bay in north Queensland was watched by Australian Governor General Sam Mostyn and Chief of Defence Admiral David Johnston. Australia has previously said army regiments with HIMARS can be transported to neighbouring island states with defence agreements to protect its northern approaches in a conflict. Lockheed Martin delivered the first two of 42 HIMARS launcher vehicles ordered by Australia in April. Australia has said it will spend A$74 billion ($49 billion) on missiles over the next decade, including a new domestic manufacturing capability. U.S. Army Lieutenant General Joel Vowell, deputy commanding general for the Pacific, said on Sunday the U.S. needed to work with partners in the Indo-Pacific, and that Talisman Sabre was "a deterrent mechanism because our ultimate goal is no war".
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Neoliberalism lite' is no solution to Australia's cost-of-living and productivity crises. We must curb wealth concentration
With a national productivity roundtable on the horizon, Anthony Albanese is seeking answers to flagging economic performance, cost-of-living pressures and growing economic anxiety. But productivity debates rarely confront the elephant in the room: four decades of rising wealth concentration has coincided with Australia's worst productivity performance in living memory. The treasurer, Jim Chalmers, signalled his intent to 'grasp the nettle' on tax reform – a bold invitation to reckon with a structural driver of slowing productivity. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The scale of the task is significant. The top 10% of households now control 44% of all wealth in Australia. The collective wealth of the richest 200 Australians has nearly tripled over two decades, mostly from property and resources – economic activities that extract value from existing assets rather than new productive capacities; what economists call 'rent-seeking'. The relationship between wealth concentration and productivity warrants examination. As economist Joseph Stiglitz argues, not all wealth represents productive capital. Rent-seeking concentrates wealth away from productivity-enhancing investments – in business innovation, public infrastructure, and worker wages. This leaves ordinary people paying ever-higher proportions of their income for necessities. French economist Thomas Piketty expanded Keynes' insight; without deliberate countermeasures, market economies naturally concentrate wealth as returns on assets outpace wages growth, making inequality an inherent feature of capitalism. This natural tendency can be accelerated by crises. The 2008 financial crisis and Covid-19 pandemic both triggered massive upward wealth transfers. While central banks' emergency measures prevented economic collapse, they disproportionately benefited those at the top. This marks a dramatic reversal from post-second world war prosperity, when countries like Australia, Canada, the UK and the US experienced broader wealth distribution. Institutional safeguards of the era, such as strong unions and progressive public policy, have steadily eroded, contributing to growing wealth concentration that now approaches pre-war levels. When middle and working-class families lose purchasing power, consumer demand falters. Since consumer spending drives 60-70% of economic activity in advanced economies, wealth concentration and income inequality trigger a demand spiral that weakens both business profitability and government revenues. Meanwhile, wealth inequality frays the social fabric. Financial hardship brings higher rates of anxiety, depression, suicide, addiction, family breakdown and domestic violence – placing further strain on public resources and healthcare systems. Despite growing awareness of wealth concentration's role in undermining economic performance and social health, political responses remain muted. Labor's re-election offers a revealing case. The party won not by proposing bold redistributive reform but by channelling voter anxiety around global uncertainty and cost-of-living pressure while keeping structural inequality off the table, as evidenced by Australian Labor's retreat on negative gearing reform. Despite commendable efforts to lift wages, wages of Australians have only returned to 2011 levels. This strategic ambiguity epitomises a modern centre-left paradox: parties can win elections on cost-of-living concerns only because they don't threaten the wealth concentration causing them. As seen in other advanced economies, failure to address underlying inequality eventually opens the door to movements that scapegoat minorities, immigrants and institutions while further slashing taxes for the rich – deepening the very discontent they exploit and threatening democracy. Chalmers has broken ranks with the usual political caution, stating that 'no sensible progress can be made on productivity, resilience or budget sustainability without proper consideration of more tax reform'. He has vowed to 'dial-up' Labor's ambition to change the tax system, signalling he is open to controversial ideas. However, newly surfaced Treasury advice suggests that while Chalmers signals political ambition, the institutional response remains conservative – tinkering at the edges while avoiding any serious confrontation with wealth concentration. Such a reset will require acknowledging a core contradiction at the heart of current policy: those who champion deregulation and resist redistribution undermine the very consumer base their prosperity depends on. The wealthy few cannot consume enough to replace the spending power of millions and the resulting demand weakness eventually undermines the economy. Unlike past technological revolutions, generative AI can perform non-routine cognitive tasks – affecting professionals across virtually every knowledge-based field . AI entrepreneur Ed Newton-Rex warned that tech elites are openly discussing their ambition to own the entire means of production through 'full automation of the economy'. As the adoption of generative AI accelerates, it threatens to decouple productivity from labour input – increasing unemployment and underemployment, pushing down wages and reducing disposable income. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Unless proactively managed, the transition to an AI-driven economy will see instability due to large-scale job displacement and unprecedented wealth capture. The current policy mix – 'neoliberalism lite' – will not solve these challenges. Australia needs a bold vision beyond tax reform that redirects economic returns toward broad-based prosperity. Norway's Government Pension Fund Global and Alaska's Permanent Fund show how sovereign wealth funds deliver public returns that can be reinvested for collective benefit. The entrepreneurial state model also ensures public investment yields public returns. Governments already underwrite innovation but rarely retain equity. Social production wages could pay those displaced by automation for charity work, caregiving, environmental restoration, informal mentoring and civic participation. Job guarantee schemes would ensure full employment through public service roles, underwritten by the returns of sovereign wealth funds. Whatever the approach, rather than framing public investment as wasteful spending, we should recognise it as essential. Central banks may be heralding their victory over inflation but ordinary Australians have little to celebrate. Slowing inflation merely reduces the pace of price increases – it doesn't reverse the cost-of-living surge. When wealth becomes too concentrated, it erodes not only economic dynamism but also the institutional foundations of productivity. Chalmers is right to say that reform is a 'test of the country'. The upcoming roundtable should acknowledge wealth concentration as a systemic risk and confront it directly. Now is the time for cross-sector leadership. Curbing wealth concentration may no longer be just a progressive preference. It may be capitalism's only lifeline. Associate Prof Jo-An Occhipinti is an NHMRC principal research fellow and co-director of the Mental Wealth Initiative at the University of Sydney's Brain and Mind Centre Dr Ante Prodan is a computer scientist and complex systems researcher with the school of computer, data and mathematical sciences at Western Sydney University Prof John Buchanan is a labour market researcher and co-director of the Mental Wealth Initiative employed in business information systems at the University of Sydney Business School
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Chalmers urges opposition not to treat productivity roundtable like ‘extension of question time'
Jim Chalmers has warned the opposition will have no credibility with voters or key economic decision makers if it plays politics at next month's productivity summit and has called on the Coalition to work with Labor to boost growth and prosperity. The treasurer said the summit would be organised around themes of resilience, productivity and sustainability, chosen to reflect the dramatic challenges facing Australia today, including the technological shift, the energy transition, geopolitical shocks and demography. Chalmers said the shadow treasurer, Ted O'Brien, and the opposition leader, Sussan Ley, faced a key test with the 19-21 August talks at Parliament House, which will consider tax reform and ways to lift living standards. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'If Ted O'Brien comes to the reform roundtable and treats it as an extension of question time, I think that will go down pretty badly in the room,' he said. 'I think a lot of the commentary, whether it's from Ted O'Brien or Sussan Ley, I don't think they are by their nature constructive, collaborative types.' The Reserve Bank governor, Michele Bullock, will address the first day of the talks, followed by productivity commissioner, Danielle Wood, and Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson. Already the government has invited trade unions, business groups and sought submissions from regulators and government departments. O'Brien will represent the opposition at the cabinet room table. The summit will guide Labor's second term agenda, which will include skills, the net zero energy transition, workforce pressures and the care economy. Chalmers said he believed regular economic volatility and uncertainty for governments and decision makers had replaced structural predictability to become business as usual. He made the comments in an interview for Guardian Australia's Australian Politics podcast, released on Tuesday. O'Brien told the podcast earlier this month a stronger economy was critical to helping households. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'Without a strong economy, Australia will become a poorer, weaker and more dependent nation,' he said. The treasurer will meet G20 finance ministers in Durban, South Africa, later this week, with US President Donald Trump's growing trade war and geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and Europe set to dominate talks. Chalmers is expected to hold one-on-one talks with counterparts from the UK, Canada, Japan, Germany and Indonesia while at the summit. 'The best defence against all of this uncertainty in the global economy, all this unpredictability and volatility which comes from either the trade tensions or conflict in the Middle East, conflict in eastern Europe, the best defence against all of that is more engagement, not less,' Chalmers said. 'More diverse markets, not less diverse markets, and also more resilience in our own economy.' 'Obviously trade will be a big part of the story, supply chains, critical minerals, how we get capital flowing more effectively in the global economy. These are the sorts of things that I expect to be talking with them about.'
