Google killed this feature so the Pixel 10 could have Qi2 wireless charging
Since the Pixel 5, Google's handsets have had a reverse wireless charging feature called Battery Share. This functionality allowed you to wirelessly charge other devices by placing them on the back of your Pixel phone. While Battery Share made it onto the Pixel 9 series, Google did not include this feature on the Pixel 10 series.
The absence of this feature was noticed by the folks over at Droidreader (via 9to5Google) while looking at the technical specifications list on Google's website. After asking about the missing feature, Google sent the outlet the following statement:
The Pixel 10 series features Qi2 magnetic wireless charging for more efficient and reliable wireless charging (…) The array of magnets creates a strong connection with the charger but presents a physical limitation for reverse wireless charging. While this means Battery Share is not currently available on the Pixel 10, we are constantly exploring future innovations to improve the Pixel experience.
Google states that there were 'physical limitations for reverse wireless charging' after the Qi2 magnets were added. As a result, the tech giant did away with Battery Share on the Pixel 10. However, that doesn't mean that Battery Share is gone for good. The company adds that it is 'exploring future innovations.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration not eyeing equity in companies that are increasing US investment, WSJ reports
(Reuters) -The Trump administration is considering taking equity stakes in companies receiving funds from the 2022 CHIPS Act but has no plans to seek shares in bigger semiconductor firms that are increasing their U.S. investments, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, citing a government official. The development follows comments made by U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who on Tuesday said the government is continuing to work on the possibility of taking a 10% stake in troubled chipmaker Intel. However, the administration does not intend to take equity stakes in companies like TSMC, which are ramping up investment, the official told the Journal. Businesses not increasing their commitments may need to offer equity to the government in exchange for subsidies. "The Commerce Department is not looking to take equity from TSMC and Micron," the official told WSJ. TSMC executives have already had discussions about giving back their subsidies if the administration asks to become a shareholder, according to the report. The White House and TSMC did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. TSMC, which counts Nvidia and Apple as key clients, announced plans for a $100 billion investment in the United States during an event with President Donald Trump at the White House in March. This investment is in addition to $65 billion committed for three manufacturing facilities in the state of Arizona. The U.S. Commerce Department, which oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act, formally known as the CHIPS and Science Act, late last year finalized subsidies of $6.6 billion for TSMC to produce semiconductors in the United States. Besides Intel, Micron, TSMC and Samsung were among the biggest recipients of CHIPS Act funding. In the past, the U.S. government has taken stakes in companies during periods of economic uncertainty to provide financial support and restore confidence. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI CEO joins chorus of industry experts warning about "AI bubble"
Tech giants have made clear that they'll spare no expense in their efforts to win out in the AI rat race. So much so, that tech giants like Meta () , Microsoft () , Amazon () , and Google () planned to spend up to $320 billion on AI tech in 2025. So when Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, who augured the great LLM-ification of AI and became a major investor in ChatGPT creator OpenAI in 2019, warned about "overbuild" of data centers after being part of the cohort signaling their spending ambitions, some analysts and industry experts seemed to perk up. Even more so when Alibaba co-founder Joe Tsai echoed Nadella's concerns, calling the buildout in AI datacenters a "bubble." Microsoft, meanwhile, went on to deny additional capacity from hyperscaler CoreWeave () , which was in the process of IPOing (that capacity was bought by OpenAI instead.) Only, nobody really cared. On Wall Street, valuations in AI-fueled trades were taking off. The only real segway was April's tariff tiff. Then, it was back to all-time highs for U.S. equities. The attitude was: "don't fight the tape." In some techno-optimist circles, the advent of superintelligent AI was seen just around the corner. Their attitude: "Why sell now?" Investors might be more wary now, thanks to a recent MIT study warning that businesses are not seeing returns from AI investments. And making matters worse, more industry experts are warning that investors got ahead of themselves. MIT drops AI spending bombshell MIT researchers studied 300 businesses and how they were using AI and found that, despite claims that the businesses had invested $30 to $40 billion into generative AI, only 5% of companies had seen any return thus far. Where industry anecdotes fell on deaf ears, the MIT study cut through the noise. Immediately after the report dropped, so too did tech stocks. And dogpiling on, even more industry leaders are joining the chorus, explicitly calling out what they see as an AI bubble. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns of bubble Among them are OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who said in plain terms that, "investors as a whole are overexcited about AI." While emphasizing its long-term important, Altman cautioned that investors could get "burnt" by the 'dot com-like' dynamic in the market. Unfortunately, it won't just be the people betting on high-flying names like Palantir () . Many Americans' 401(K)s, IRAs, and brokerage accounts are tied up in indexes which are heavily exposed to the AI trade. In fact, these tech giants represent over a third of the S&P 500's weight. Altman remains an optimist over the long run, casting issues with his firm's latest frontier AI model as a "misfire" and promising an even more fantastic sequel in GPT-6. But that's what many AI optimists were hoping for GPT-5. And waiting even longer for "the future" to arrive might mean expending their optimism. That's not to say that AI models (including at competitors) are not progressing, but what investors' willingness to allow firms to become capital intensive businesses might not last much longer if they don't see light at the end of the tunnel. While they've learned to love the stratospheric growth coming from AI chipmaker Nvidia () and the double-digit strides in cloud services from Microsoft, Amazon, and Google, wariness about payoff might prompt a pullback. Mark's spend-a-thon comes to a close There's some evidence that it's already come — or maybe, somehow, AI is already replacing jobs — at Meta. CEO Mark Zuckerberg spent big to acquire AI talent and build out data centers. He's now almost fresh out of cash and looking to private credit to shore up his ambitions. Still, if you're confident there's a payoff, why pullback? Per WSJ, Meta is in the process of reorganizing its AI segment into different businesses prioritizing business endpoints. With it, exec departures, layoffs, and a hiring freeze. Is this a sign that Zuckerberg and management have looked around and collectively discovered that they're buying the top? Is this an unfortunate repeat of the company's failed metaverse ambitions? Or is this a wake-up call from within after squandering billions on comp packages for researchers and data centers? Too early to say, but after blowing through $31.8 billion in the last six months, you'd have to wonder if maybe, the industry gurus called it how it was. Now that Wall Street finally seems to be paying attention, what does that bode for the market? This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 21, 2025, where it first appeared in the Investing News, Analysis, and Tips section. Add TheStreet as a Preferred Source by clicking here.
Digital Trends
25 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
SpaceX takes big step toward next Starship rocket launch
SpaceX has taken a big step toward the 10th flight of the Starship rocket, moving the first-stage Super Heavy booster to the launchpad at the company's Starbase site in Boca Chica, Texas. The Elon Musk-led spaceflight company shared several images (below) of the Super Heavy booster — the most powerful ever to fly — on its X account on Thursday. One of them shows an aerial view of the Starbase site with the Super Heavy being moved toward the launchpad. Another is of the booster at the launchpad, while the third image shows a close-up of the rocket's 33 Raptor engines, which will generate around 17 million pounds of thrust at launch as it lifts off on Sunday. The upper-stage Starship spacecraft has yet to be placed atop the Super Heavy. Super Heavy booster moved to the launch pad at Starbase ahead of Starship's tenth flight test — SpaceX (@SpaceX) August 21, 2025 SpaceX is targeting Sunday, August 24, for the 10th test flight of the Starship. For full details on how to watch a livestream of the launch, Digital Trends has you covered. Recommended Videos Sunday's flight will be the first Starship launch since May 27. SpaceX had hoped to fly earlier than this weekend, but a sudden explosion at Starbase that wrecked one of the Starship spacecraft killed the plan. An investigation attributed the explosion to a technical flaw involving a damaged high-pressure nitrogen tank inside the spacecraft. Unlike some of the previous Starship flights, SpaceX will not be landing the 71-meter-tall booster back at Starbase, instead attempting a controlled landing in open water. Looking further ahead, NASA is planning to use a modified version of the Starship spacecraft for its first crewed moon landing since the final Apollo mission in 1972. The Artemis III mission is currently targeted for 2027, though depending on how SpaceX's Starship testing goes, among other factors, the highly anticipated mission could be shifted to a later date. Beyond that, NASA wants to use the Starship system to carry additional crews and cargo to the lunar surface, and even deploy it for the first crewed mission to Mars, which could take place in 2030s. Shortly before Sunday's flight, Musk is expected to give an update on the long-term plans for the Starship, which should include details about much of the above.
