logo
Jewish, Israeli Harvard students felt shunned, silenced after 2023 attacks in Israel, report says

Jewish, Israeli Harvard students felt shunned, silenced after 2023 attacks in Israel, report says

Yahoo02-05-2025
The aftermath of the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks in Israel, Jewish and Israeli Harvard University students and faculty felt shunned and silenced, regardless of which side they supported, according to a report released this week.
Harvard's Presidential Task Force on Combating Antisemitism and Anti-Israeli Bias found that during the 2023-2024 school year, when protests and tension roiled the university campus, Jewish and Israeli members of the Harvard community kept quiet during discussions of current events, and some hid their identity entirely.
Those who didn't, lost friends and were kept out of social circles, sometimes explicitly because of their identity or beliefs, according to the report.
'I feel lucky I don't look Jewish,' one undergraduate student told the task force. 'I know if I do the 'wrong thing', I might get the antisemitism. So, put your headphones in, make sure you're not outwardly Jewish, and just walk to class.'
The report was released Tuesday, at the same time that the corresponding Task Force on Combating Anti-Muslim, Anti-Arab and Anti-Palestinian Bias published its findings.
Read more: Feds launch racial discrimination investigations targeting Harvard Law Review
A Harvard-wide survey of Jewish students found that 67% of those who responded were uncomfortable expressing their opinions, and 73% felt uncomfortable expressing their political opinions, according to the report.
Jewish students reported being told by peers and faculty that 'they were associated with something offensive, and, in some cases, that their very presence was an offense.' Others told the task force they were repeatedly asked if they were 'one of the good ones' who did not support Israel.
In some cases, students who spoke to the task force said they had avoided taking certain classes because the professor had expressed anti-Zionist views — opposition to a Jewish state. Or they dropped classes because they felt pressured or targeted during discussions about the conflict.
Read more: Harvard renames its DEI office, conceding on Trump demand
The report included multiple accounts from Jewish and Israeli students who were told that other students would not associate them, whether or not they had expressed support for Israel. Their non-Jewish, non-Israeli friends, too, reported being excluded simply because of their association.
In particular, Israeli students and those of Israeli descent felt that their nationality made them targets. Some students described having other students end conversations immediately upon learning of their connections to Israel.
Others said they were immediately labeled as Zionist, genocidal, murderers or as Israeli soldiers, due to the country's conscription requirement for all citizens.
Read more: Harvard changes admissions policy, offering foreign students a 'backup plan'
In one case, a few years before the Oct. 7 attacks, an Israeli student was assigned a partner for a group project, and their partner requested a new group due to their own political beliefs, according to the report. The task force was told that the professor granted the request.
'The social exclusion and shunning of Israeli students lies at the core of the Harvard experience for many,' one Israeli undergraduate student told the task force. 'From my first days on campus, I noticed students in pre-orientation avoiding conversation with me, simply out of fear of being associated with an Israeli ... Israeli students at Harvard are not merely subjected to implicit bias but instead face explicit, deliberate discrimination.'
For anti-Zionist Jewish students and staff, in addition to experiencing antisemitism, they described feeling ostracized from Jewish spaces for their beliefs. According to the report, in many Jewish student groups and organizations, 'support for Israel seemed assumed or even demanded.'
'The largest form of antisemitism I have experienced has been from other Jewish students who are interested in policing the bounds of Jewish identity one way or the other,' one student said.
The recommendations from the task force on antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias include:
Harvard should clarify its values through a statement that antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias — along with Islamophobia, anti-Arab bias, racism, misogyny, homophobia or transphobia — are forms of hatred that have no place within the Harvard community
Act against discrimination, bullying, harassment and hate
Improve disciplinary processes, such as striving for consistency in disciplinary cases and engaging in follow-up after complaints and consistency in disciplinary cases.
Implement education and training on antisemitism, including orientation for new students, student organization leaders, peer advising fellows and residential undergraduate supervisors.
Foster constructive dialogue on difficult subjects, including high-profile talks between people who disagree on controversial issues respectfully, and an award for a community member combating antisemitism.
Support Jewish life on campus, such as through kosher hot lunches, pork products being marked and staff providing reasonable accommodation for staff and students.
The task force emphasized that the opportunity for free speech was imperative for all members of the Harvard community to feel comfortable at the university.
'The State of Israel, like other nations, engages in behaviors that members of our community may find objectionable, even deplorable, and students and others have the right to say as much,' the task force wrote. 'However, 'criticism' does not justify intimidation, exclusion, bullying or harassment of members of our community.'
Mass. Rep. Auchincloss on how Harvard can 'Punch the bully in the nose' | John L. Micek
'My face was on the ... truck': Harvard report details climate of fear for pro-Palestine students
'Willing to capitulate': Cracks emerge in Harvard's resistance to Trump over DEI
Trump's cuts now getting personal | Paul Chiampa
Read the original article on MassLive.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chris Pratt talks hanging out with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: 'I love him'
Chris Pratt talks hanging out with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: 'I love him'

USA Today

time15 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Chris Pratt talks hanging out with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: 'I love him'

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has a fan in Chris Pratt. The "Guardians of the Galaxy" star, 46, spoke with Bill Maher on the "Club Random" podcast about his relationship with the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services. "I've spent a number of occasions hanging with him, just in a strictly family dinner kind of vibe, and I really got along with him well," Pratt said during the episode released on Aug. 18. "I think he's great. I think he's funny. I like him. I love him." Pratt's wife, Katherine Schwarzenegger, is a member of the Kennedy family. She is the granddaughter of Eunice Kennedy Shriver, a philanthropist and sibling of Robert F. Kennedy. Pratt also told Maher that politics is a "nasty business," and he has seen "how the person you are can be such a contrast to the person that people are being told that you are." Chris Pratt and Katherine Schwarzenegger welcome their first son together Kennedy, who endorsed Trump's 2024 election bid after dropping his own campaign for president as an independent, has been criticized for his history of promoting false or misleading claims about vaccines. "When you jump on the bandwagon with the most divisive president ever, it makes sense that you're going to be made to look terrible," Pratt said. "So I don't know what to believe. It's not like I sit with Bobby and go, 'So hey, let's talk about this.' We're just playing cards or playing Mafia or having fun or having dinner. I'm not going to pick his brain to find out exactly which of those things are true. I just kind of assume that none of them are, and for the most part, I wish him well." Pratt argued that even critics of the Trump administration should be able to root for its success in some instances. "I'd hate to be so mired in hatred for the president that any success from his administration is something I'd have an allergic reaction to," he said. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. declares 'loyalty' to Trump, rules out a 2028 presidential bid The "Terminal List" actor did not endorse a candidate in the 2024 presidential election, even as several of his Marvel costars rallied around former Vice President Kamala Harris. In an essay for his mother-in-law Maria Shriver's Sunday Paper before the election, Pratt wrote that he was "trying to make sense of the election through the eyes of Americans on both sides." "I've been thinking a lot about where we'll be as a nation on November 6th, how we can attempt to move forward after so much division, and how some of the lessons that sports teach us may be just what all of us need as we chart a course forward," he wrote. Pratt went on to add that after the election, Americans should exercise their "civic duty" to "accept the results and focus instead on showing up for each other." Contributing: Hannah Hudnall and Erin Jensen, USA TODAY

Europeans demand a ceasefire before Trump summits with Putin and Zelensky
Europeans demand a ceasefire before Trump summits with Putin and Zelensky

Los Angeles Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Europeans demand a ceasefire before Trump summits with Putin and Zelensky

Russia must agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine before negotiations can advance toward a formal peace agreement, top European leaders told Donald Trump at the White House on Monday, urging the U.S. president to 'put pressure on Russia' in his push to end the war. The meeting had an historic flair with six European heads of government, the NATO secretary general, and the president of the European Commission all converging on Washington for discussions with the president — a flurry of diplomatic activity after Trump's summit last week with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska sparked widespread fears over the fate of U.S. support for security on the continent. Trump first met with Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelensky, in the Oval Office, striking an affable tone following their last, disastrous meeting in the room back in February. This time, Trump emphasized his 'love' for the Ukrainian people and his commitment to provide security guarantees for Kyiv in an ultimate peace settlement with Russia. Zelensky offered only praise and gratitude to Trump, telling reporters that they had their 'best' meeting yet. But an expanded meeting with Zelensky and the chancellor of Germany, the presidents of France and Finland, the prime ministers of the United Kingdom and Italy, and the heads of NATO and the European Commission hinted at a more challenging road ahead for the burgeoning peace effort. 'The next steps ahead are the more complicated ones now,' said German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said. 'The path is open — you opened it. but now the way is open for complicated negotiations, and to be honest, we would all like to see a ceasefire, at the latest, from the next meeting on.' 'I can't imagine the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire,' Merz added. 'So let's work on that. And let's put pressure on Russia.' Emmanuel Macron, the French president, sat sternly throughout the start of the meeting before echoing Merz's call. 'Your idea to ask for a truce, a ceasefire, or at least to stop the killings,' Macron said, 'is a necessity, and we all support this idea.' Trump had been in agreement with his European counterparts on the necessity of a ceasefire for months. Zelensky first agreed to one in March. But Putin has refused, pressing Russian advantages on the battlefield, and in Anchorage on Friday convinced Trump to drop his calls for an immediate halt to the fighting. 'All of us would obviously prefer an immediate ceasefire while we work on a lasting peace. Maybe something like that could happen — as of this moment, it's not happening,' Trump said at the meeting. 'But President Zelensky and President Putin can talk a little bit more about that.' 'I don't know that it's necessary,' Trump added. 'You can do it through the war. But I like the ceasefire from another standpoint — you immediately stop the killing.' The European leaders all emphasized to Trump that they share his desire for peace. But the president of the commission, Ursula Van der Leyen, called for a 'just' peace, and Zelensky would not engage publicly with reporters on Putin's central demand: a surrender of vast swaths of Ukrainian territory to Russian control. Putin first invaded Ukraine in 2014, occupying the Crimean peninsula in a stealth operation and funding an attack on the eastern Donbas region using proxy forces. But he launched a full-scale invasion of the entire country in 2022, leading to the bloodiest conflict in Europe since World War Two. In a hot mic moment, before press were ushered out of the expanded meeting with European leaders, Trump told Macron that he believes the Russian president and former KGB officer would agree to a peace deal because of their personal relationship. He 'wants to make a deal for me,' he said, 'as crazy as it sounds.' European leaders said that detailed U.S. security guarantees — for Ukraine specifically, and more broadly for Europe — were at the top of the agenda for Monday's meetings, including the prospect of U.S. troops on the ground in Ukraine to enforce any future peace settlement. Asked whether U.S. forces would be involved, Trump did not rule it out, stating, 'we'll be talking about that.' 'When it comes to security, there's going to be a lot of help,' he said in the Oval Office. 'It's going to be good. They are first line of defense, because they're there — they are Europe. But we're going to help them out, also. We'll be involved.' Van der Leyen, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer praised the Trump administration for discussing what it called 'Article 5-like' security guarantees for Ukraine, referencing a provision of the NATO charter that states that an attack on one member is an attack on all. But the provision also provides countries in the NATO alliance with broad discretion whether to participate in a military response to an attack on a fellow member. Starmer and Macron have expressed a willingness for months to send British and French troops to Ukraine. But the Russian Foreign Ministry said on Monday that Moscow would oppose the deployment of NATO troops to the country as 'provocative' and 'reckless,' creating a potential rift in the negotiations. Despite the gulf between Europe and Russia, Trump expressed hope throughout the day that he could schedule a trilateral meeting amongst himself, Putin and Zelensky, possibly within a matter of days. He planned on calling Putin shortly after European leaders left the White House, he told reporters. Trump's team floated inviting Zelensky to attend the negotiations in Alaska last Friday, and Zelensky has said he is willing to participate in a trilateral meeting. He repeated his interest to Trump on Monday and asked him to attend. But Moscow has yet to commit to a trilateral summit. Ahead of Friday's meeting, Russian officials said that conditions weren't right for a direct talks between Putin and the Ukrainian president. The Russian leader has repeatedly questioned Zelensky's legitimacy, and has tried to assassinate him on numerous occasions. In the Oval Office, a Fox News reporter asked Zelensky if he was 'prepared to keep sending Ukrainian troops to their deaths,' or whether he would 'agree to redraw the maps' instead. The Ukrainian president demurred. 'We live under each day attacks,' Zelensky responded. 'We need to stop this war, to stop Russia. And we need the support — American and European partners.' Trump and his team largely adopted Putin's position on Friday that Russia should be able to keep the Ukrainian territory it has occupied by force — and possibly even more of the Donbas region of Donetsk that remains in Ukrainian control — in exchange for an end to the fighting. But European officials were silent on the idea on Monday. The Ukrainian Constitution prohibits the concession of territory without the support of a public referendum, and polls indicate that three out of four Ukrainians oppose giving up land in an attempt to end the war. Steve Witkoff, the president's envoy for special missions, said Sunday that Putin agreed to pass legislation through the Kremlin that would guarantee an end to wars of conquest in Ukraine, or elsewhere in Europe. But Russia has made similar commitments before. In 1994, the United States and Britain signed on to a agreement in Budapest with Ukraine and Russia that ostensibly guaranteed security for Kyiv and vowed to honor Ukraine's territorial integrity. In exchange, Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons.

Hot mic catches Trump's ‘crazy' whisper to French prez Macron before multilateral meeting
Hot mic catches Trump's ‘crazy' whisper to French prez Macron before multilateral meeting

New York Post

time15 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Hot mic catches Trump's ‘crazy' whisper to French prez Macron before multilateral meeting

A hot mic caught President Trump whispering something he called 'crazy' as he, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and seven European heads of state spoke to the press before their closed-door meeting at the White House to talk about ending Russia's war in Ukraine. 'I think he [Russian President Vladimir Putin] wants to make a deal,' Trump whispered to French President Emmanuel Macron in the East Room. President Trump speaking to French President Emmanuel Macron in the East Room of the White House on Aug. 18, 2025. AP Photo/Alex Brandon Advertisement 'I think he wants to make a deal for me, you understand that? As crazy as it sounds.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store