Trump mocked his clothes last time — now Zelensky's bringing a suit to the Oval office
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
When Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky steps into the Oval Office on Monday for a high-stakes meeting with US president Donald Trump, he'll be wearing something more formal, as per a report.Volodymyr Zelensky opts for a more formal lookMonths after the Ukrainian president's last visit to the White House which ended into a shouting match, where he was seen in his customary military-style attire, Zelensky is opting for what aides are calling a 'suit-style' jacket this time, as per the Independent report.Zelensky is expected to wear the same black jacket that he wore to a June NATO summit in the Netherlands, which insiders have described as being 'suit-style' but not a full suit, as reported by the Independent. However, he still won't wear a tie, but in Washington, even a half-step toward business attire is being closely watched, especially by Trump's team, according to the report.The June NATO summit was the first time Zelensky was seen wearing a business-style jacket since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in Ukraine in 2022, and the fashion choice reportedly impressed Trump, as per the Independent report.Zelensky's last US visit ended in shouting and wardrobe criticismEarlier this year, Trump had welcomed Zelensky into the West Wing and had mocked about about his customary military-style attire, when the US president jokingly told the press, 'he's all dressed up today,' as quoted in the report.However, when Zelensky last visited the White, it was reportedly vice president JD Vance who was more annoyed than Trump by the Ukrainian leader's understated fashion choices, especially because he was without a tie, as reported by the Indepdent.Trump aides still skepticalOne Trump advisor said that 'it would be a good sign for peace' if Zelensky dressed up on Monday, but highlighted that, 'We don't expect him to do it,' as quoted by the Independent.Another insider said that, 'It would be great if he wore a tie, but we don't expect him to,' as quoted in the report.Donald Trump pushes for peace dealThis time, Zelensky will also be joined by neighboring European leaders in a show of unity in a meeting which is set to be held Monday at 3 p.m. EST, and comes after Trump met with Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, as per the report.Trump is now urging Zelensky to sign a peace deal without Crimea and NATO membership instead of an immediate ceasefire, as he is backing Moscow's position, according to the Independent report.The US president wrote on Truth Social, "President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight," adding, "No getting back Obama given Crimea... and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!" as quoted in the report.FAQsWhy is Zelensky's jacket making headlines?Because it's a rare shift from his usual military-style attire and after Trump mocked him last time, it's being seen as a diplomatic gesture.How did Trump react to Zelensky's military clothes in the past?He joked about them, saying, 'he's all dressed up today,' during a previous press appearance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump vows executive order to ban mail-in ballots, voting machines before 2026
US President Donald Trump pledged on Monday to issue an executive order to end the use of mail-in ballots and voting machines ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, a move likely to disproportionately favour his Republican elections are administered at the state level, however, and it is unclear if the president has the constitutional power to enact the measure. Legal challenges by some states are Democratic voters traditionally more likely to use mail-in ballots than Republicans, Trump's pledge is his latest effort to reshape the midterm election battlefield to his party's advantage. He has also urged Republicans in states including Texas and Indiana to redraw congressional districts to increase the likelihood of a Republican candidate being elected. The November 3, 2026, elections will be the first nationwide referendum on Trump's domestic and foreign policies since he returned to power in January. Democrats will be seeking to break Republicans' grip on both the House of Representatives and the Senate to block Trump's domestic agenda."I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we're at it, Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES," Trump wrote in a social media at the White House, Trump said his Republican Party must get behind the new effort if they want to retain power, and noted the executive order was in the process of being who has promoted the false narrative that he, not Democrat Joe Biden, won the 2020 election, has long cast doubt on the security of mail-in ballots, although evidence of voter fraud is vanishingly has for years also called for the end of electronic voting machines, pushing instead for the use of paper ballots and hand-counts, a process that election officials say is time-consuming, costly and far less accurate than machine counting."Remember, the States are merely an 'agent' for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes. They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them," Trump wrote in his social media legal experts said states were responsible for administering federal elections under the US Constitution and that only Congress can regulate how they do so."The President has no power constitutionally to dictate to states the manner in which they conduct national elections," said New York University Law School professor Richard Pildes, who specializes in legal issues related to BALLOTSadvertisementTrump's comments follow his meeting with his Russian counterpart on Friday, after which Trump said Vladimir Putin agreed with him on ending mail-in Republican-led states such as Florida have embraced mail-in voting as a safe, convenient way to expand voter participation. Trump himself voted by mail in some previous elections and urged his supporters to do so for the 2024 presidential ballots hit record highs in the US in 2020 as states expanded options for voters amid the COVID-19 pandemic, but the numbers dropped in 2024, according to the US Election Assistance than two-thirds of voters in the 2024 general election cast their ballots in person, while about three in 10 ballots were cast through the mail, according to the US state has some form of absentee or mail-in ballot option, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.- EndsTune InMust Watch
NDTV
17 minutes ago
- NDTV
Zelensky Says "Best" Conversation Yet With Trump At White House
Washington: Ukrainian President Volodmyr Zelensky on Monday gave an upbeat asessment of talks with US counterpart Donald Trump and said they discussed security guarantees. "We had a very good conversation with President Trump, and it really was the best one -- or, sorry, maybe the best one will be in the future," Zelensky said at an expanded meeting with European leaders.
Hindustan Times
32 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Five dangerous fault lines divide Trump and Zelensky
On August 18th Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine's president, will enter the White House to meet Donald Trump and discuss ending the war in Ukraine . For Mr Zelensky it is a perilous moment. Since Mr Trump met Vladimir Putin , Russia's president, in Alaska on August 15th, the American president has put intense pressure on Mr Zelensky, stating that he could 'end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to'. The leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Finland and the European Union fear the White House will sell out Ukraine and Europe, and are rushing to Washington to support Mr Zelensky. 'Never had so many European leaders at one time,' wrote Mr Trump. 'My great honour to host them!' What are the contours of the negotiations? In the past 48 hours there has been a swirl of speculation and public comments by Team Trump. It is hard to know what the president is thinking. But five critical issues for any peace deal are likely to be discussed: sequencing, territory, security guarantees, sanctions and recognition. In each case, America will struggle to bridge the demands of Mr Putin with those of Ukraine and Europe. Map Start with sequencing, where Mr Trump has already all but folded to Mr Putin, dropping his demand that Russia should agree to a ceasefire ahead of formal peace talks. The Kremlin is keen to negotiate while the fighting still rages. On Sunday Mr Zelensky insisted that Ukraine would not begin talks with Russia 'under the pressure of weapons'. But that position—already undercut by Mr Trump's cosy bilateral meeting with Mr Putin—can probably not withstand for long American pressure to force Ukraine to the table. If the discussion moves straight to 'final' peace talks, the second issue is terrain, or what Steve Witkoff, Mr Trump's envoy, calls 'land swaps'. Russia controls all of Crimea, which it seized and annexed in 2014. Mr Trump says that the peninsula will remain in Russian hands. But Russia also claims and has formally annexed four provinces in southern and eastern Ukraine which its troops do not entirely control (see map). One proposal, which Mr Witkoff hinted at on Sunday, is reportedly for Ukraine to cede Donetsk and Luhansk entirely to Russia, including the areas that it does not presently control—and which British defence intelligence suggests could require four-plus years and more than 1.9m casualties to take on present trends. In exchange Russia would freeze the front lines in Kherson and Zaporizhia. It would also withdraw from the pockets of territory that it controls in Sumy and Kharkhiv, two northern provinces. Much of this would be anathema to Ukraine. 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier,' Mr Zelensky has said. The terrain in question in Donetsk and to an extent in Luhansk, is especially important because it is heavily fortified by Ukraine's army. Without it Ukraine would find it harder to defend the rest of the country against future Russian attacks. How to make any agreement on borders binding leads to the third issue: security guarantees. America has suggested that Ukraine's membership of NATO (an aspiration the alliance promised in 2008 to fulfil and which is enshrined in the country's constitution) is off the table. Forswearing NATO membership for Ukraine has long been a key Russian demand. Yet on Sunday Mr Witkoff claimed that America could offer some kind of guarantee, modelled on NATO's Article 5, a mutual-defence clause. Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, put more emphasis on guarantees from Europe. 'It would be a very big move by the President if he were to offer a US commitment to a security guarantee. That will be his decision to make.' But the detail matters: in earlier talks, in 2022, Russia appeared to agree to international guarantees, but demanded a clause that would have given it a veto on any assistance to Ukraine. Closely related to that is the question of boots on the ground. Britain has said it could send troops to Ukraine as part of a peacekeeping force. But whether a European-only force is really credible is open to question. Very few troops have been promised for such a force, despite months of discussion. If America does not take part in a credible security guarantee European countries will push hard to at least secure promises about the supply of weapons from America. Mr Putin may try to push for limits on the flow of arms to Ukraine from the West. A priority for Russia is sanctions relief, the fourth issue. Mr Trump has used both threats of more financial warfare and the promise of future business deals as negotiating tools. On the one hand, he has threatened big importers of Russian oil, such as India, with swingeing tariffs. On the other, he and his team have dangled energy co-operation in the Arctic and other business partnerships. Russia's economy, which has weathered the impact of harsh Western sanctions since 2022, is beginning to feel the strain. Officials, who warn of a recession later this year, badly want the restrictions lifted. Here, Europe has some leverage. America would struggle to ease the economic strain on Russia without the full co-operation of Europe, which has a critical role in global banking, insurance, energy and shipping markets. Furthermore roughly two-thirds of the Russian central bank's foreign reserves that the West froze in 2022— thought to be worth more than $300bn—are are held in Brussels. Europe may be reluctant to release them if Mr Trump's deal weakens Ukraine. The final critical issue is recognition of any deal. Ukraine's constitution would require any 'land swap' to be put to a referendum, in which voters would almost certainly reject it. European leaders would be reluctant to endorse any deal that permanently recognises borders that have been altered by force. Whether America would do so for the sake of a peace deal is unclear. It is possible that America could recognise Russia's claim to Crimea, but not to other areas. Another fudge is for Europe to recognise the ceasefire line as a de-facto border without renouncing its view that Ukraine's pre-invasion border is the legitimate one. Mr Trump's meeting with Mr Zelensky and Ukraine's European allies will be a high-wire act of diplomacy. The brief, separate statements that Mr Trump and Mr Putin gave on August 15th, without taking questions from journalists, suggest that their plans are fragile. Mr Trump says he wants to bring the war to an end. For Ukraine and Europe the fear is that Mr Trump tries to force them to accept bad terms on the five key issues, and then threatens to abandon or punish Ukraine and Europe if they refuse. If this is how the talks turn out, Mr Putin will be the clear winner.
