TN Attorney General sues Dept. of Education for discrimination
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti joined 'Students for fair admission' to file an anti discrimination lawsuit against the US Department of Education.
The lawsuit claims the Hispanic Serving Institution program, or HSI program, is discriminatory and unconstitutional.According to the lawsuit, the reason the program discriminates is because it only provides federal funding to needy students who go to colleges and universities that already have a student body that is comprised of 25% or more of Hispanic students.
AG Skrmetti cited the University of Memphis as an example, which is ineligible for the grant even though enrollment is 61% minorities.
'A federal grant system that openly discriminates against students based on ethnicity isn't just wrong and un-American—it's unconstitutional,' said Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti. 'In SFFA v. Harvard, the Supreme Court ruled that racially discriminatory admissions standards violate the law, and the HSI program's discriminatory grant standards are just as illegal. Treating people differently because of their skin color and ancestry drags our country backwards. The HSI program perversely deprives even needy Hispanic students of the benefits of this funding if they attend institutions that don't meet the government's arbitrary quota.'
AG Skrmetti
The lawsuit is seeking to end the HSI program's 'nonsensical, divisive, and discriminatory requirement and declare the limitation on access unconstitutional.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Bring Kilmar home': Protesters gathered outside Nashville federal court for Kilmar Abrego Garcia
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — Tensions ran high outside a Nashville federal courthouse as dozens of protesters rallied to support Kilmar Abrego Garcia. While the hearing was taking place inside, protesters gathered outside the Fred D. Thompson Federal Building and Courthouse — holding signs, chanting and delivering emotional speeches to the crowd. They demanded three things: due process for Abrego Garcia, for the abolition of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and an end to what they called the weaponization of the U.S. Government. Wife of Kilmar Abrego Garcia spoke before hearing 'The way this whole thing has been handled has been illegal and racist,' Rebecca Bornac, a resident in Nashville, said. 'I wanted Kilmar to know we support him, and we support his right to a fair trial.' Abrego Garcia was deported to an El Salvador prison in March. He's been accused of conspiring to bring undocumented immigrants to the U.S. from 2016 to 2025. 'As a citizen of the United States, I am deeply sorry and ashamed for the treatment that my country has visited upon Mr. Abrego Garcia, which violates our core principles as a people and his rights on U.S. soil,' Ian Montgomery, Organizer with United Volunteers and Organizers for Tennessee expressed. Speeches continued for almost three hours, and some participants went into the courtroom to listen in to the arraignment firsthand. 'He was in an orange jumpsuit, and everything was peaceful and fine,' Margaret Pitts, a resident in Nashville, explained. 'To be a part of it and witness it felt really important.' Kilmar Abrego Garcia pleads not guilty in Nashville courtroom on federal charges The participants told News 2 that they would never stop fighting for Abrego's freedom. 'We are people, Nashvillians, Tennesseans, standing up for what is right, standing up for our constitution for our neighbors and due process,' a protester expressed. The protest wrapped up around 11:30 a.m. due to inclement weather, but event organizers told News 2 they will be back out again on Saturday for 'No Kings' at Bicentennial Capital Mall State Park. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tennessee Republican pushes roadway blockade protest bill ahead of ‘No King' demonstrations
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — 'No King' protests are set to take place across the country, but in Tennessee, Republican lawmakers have tightened the reins, and they're asking demonstrators to obey the laws. The Republican supermajority has passed multiple measures related to protests, they say, to protect the public. 'I wouldn't classify it as trying to prevent protests and demonstrations,' Rep. Jody Barrett (R-Dickson) said. 'I would classify it as a public safety measure to try to prevent innocent bystanders from being caught up and put in danger as a result of these demonstrations.' 'This is not a monarchy': Nashville protest targets Trump, military parade For the last couple of years, Rep. Barrett has sponsored a bill to make intentionally blocking a roadway, bridge, highway, or other passageway a felony in Tennessee. However, his bill, which has a $241,000 fiscal impact according to the proposal's fiscal note, has yet to be included in the state's budget. 'What we're seeing and have seen over the last several years is this trend of intentionally blocking highways and roads and bridges and things and having sit ins on passages ways to put regular, ordinary citizens, who are just trying to get back and forth to work, or go to the airport, or deliver their load on time, or worse, get to the hospital, getting caught up in these demonstrations that are organized,' Rep. Barrett said. Intentionally blocking a passageway remains a misdemeanor in Tennessee, but people who are harmed, hurt, or otherwise negatively impacted as a result can sue the individuals responsible under a law, also sponsored by Barrett, that went into effect last year. 'If you're unable to get to the hospital and you have damages as a result of that, or you have contractual damages because you can't get your load to the delivery point on time, that bill, this new law would give you the right to sue those people that caused that, who intentionally blocked your access and your use of the passageways in this state,' Barrett said. Democrats called the measure 'harmful' and 'anti-democratic,' but Barrett argues that intentionally blocking the public from getting to their destination has a much greater negative impact. 'When you get these mass protests going and things get out of hand, innocent people get put in danger and they get hurt,' Rep. Barrett said. 'Not only do we have property damage, but we have physical injuries as a result of it, and we need to stop that and make sure that's not the case in Tennessee.' Barrett told News 2 he hopes his bill to make intentionally blocking a roadway a felony is included in next year's budget. ⏩ This year, Gov. Bill Lee signed the 'Protecting Everyone Against Crime and Extremism,' or 'PEACE Act,' into law, which criminalizes giving a fake identity to police, intentionally coming within 25 feet of an officer after being asked to back up, and hanging a banner or flyer on a bridge or overpass, among other provisions. The measure will go into effect July 1. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Padilla backlash could backfire on Democrats, some in party worry
Democratic Party officials have been united in their public and vigorous support of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) after he was forcibly removed and handcuffed at a news conference for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Thursday. Since then, Democrat after Democrat has offered their backing to Padilla, calling the incident a grave miscarriage of justice and signaling an effort to take on President Trump and his administration. But behind the scenes, a number of Democrats worry the incident won't play well for the party in the long run, especially since the chatter appeared to fall along party lines in the aftermath of Padilla's removal. In interviews Friday, these Democrats didn't want to speak on the record given that officials in their party are publicly unanimous in backing Padilla. But these sources say they fear the Padilla incident could have negative ramifications as the party tries to find its way back from their devastating loss in November. 'Here's the thing: Did it change anyone's minds or did it just rev up the base?' said one Democratic strategist worried the incident could backfire on their party. 'This is what we don't understand. We think these moments will cause outrage, but they miss the point. It's not swaying anyone. It just makes us look petty.' Some Democrats said the moment was political theater that would just become another thing for red and blue America to disagree over. 'I'm not sure it stands out, especially as more Democrats begin to take a stand,' a second party strategist said. 'Let's put it this way, it's a zero-sum game.' The mild-mannered Padilla remained the talk of political circles Friday, even as news about the incident disappeared from cable television airwaves amid Israel's strikes on Iran and Tehran's counterattacks. Even with that conflict crowding the Padilla controversy out of the spotlight, Democrats were seeking to turn the moment into a talking point against President Trump — and a fundraising opportunity to boot. Padilla himself was fundraising off the incident and doing interviews. 'If that's what they do to a United States senator with a question, imagine what they do to farm workers, day laborers, cooks, and the other nonviolent immigrants they are targeting in California and across the country,' a fundraising note from Padilla said. In his own fundraising appeal, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) called Padilla 'one of the most decent people.' And the Democratic National Committee said the incident 'isn't normal and are steps toward authoritarianism,' a sentiment other Democrats echoed in statements. Some Democrats said their party should go even further. Democratic strategist Christy Setzer said she hoped Padilla and Democrats could 'successfully leverage this moment … but I'm skeptical.' 'Trump's thugs chose Padilla to rough up for a reason: to show they'll physically take on anyone who dares to question them, including and especially a Hispanic man with power,' Setzer said. 'The response from congressional Democrats should be absolutely apoplectic 'They should shut down the Senate. Even the meekest response — calling for DHS to fire the men who handcuffed Padilla — would be welcome,' Setzer added. The incident surrounding Padilla comes at a time when Democrats are anxious to stand up to Trump and the GOP. While there was some thought early in the Trump administration to try to work alongside Republicans, some Democrats have concluded that it's the wrong approach. Instead, they're leaning into a fighting stance against the president. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) dared Trump to arrest him, after the two men got into a back-and-forth over the immigration raids in Los Angeles and the protests and at times violent disorder that followed. 'Just get it over with,' Newsom said. 'Arrest me.' Earlier this year, Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) took a tough stance while participating in a 25-hour filibuster on the floor of the upper chamber. And in April, Sen. Chris Van Holden (D-Md.) traveled to El Salvador to meet with Kilmar Abrego Garcia, one of his constituents who was deported to a prison in that country. Democrats said they expected the tougher stance to continue in the months ahead. 'Democrats are at a moment where the base needs to see them show their willingness to fight,' said Democratic strategist Joel Payne, who predicted that more Democrats would follow Padilla and Newsom in standing up to Trump. 'We need to demonstrate to our voters that we're not just going to talk the tack but we're going to walk the walk.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
