Trump administration unveils stricter subsidy rules for wind and solar projects
Under the new rules, utility-scale projects will be required to show substantial and continuous physical work to be eligible for the 30% tax credits, but they will still have four years to claim them.
For the last decade, project developers had also been able to "safe harbor" projects for four years by incurring 5% of total costs before a credit expired or stepped down to a lesser value.
According to an agency document, "substantial" work does not include permitting, design or holding components in inventory.
A solar industry trade group said the rules would harm businesses and undermine lawmakers' intentions with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
"This is yet another act of energy subtraction from the Trump administration that will further delay the buildout of affordable, reliable power," Solar Energy Industries Association CEO Abigail Ross Hopper said in a statement. "American families and businesses will pay more for electricity as a result of this action, and China will continue to outpace us in the race for electricity to power AI."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Woke Star Wars icon debated moving out of USA after Trump win
Star Wars icon Mark Hamill has revealed that he once considered leaving the United States following the election of former President Donald Trump. The 73-year-old actor, best known for playing Luke Skywalker, told The Times that he briefly weighed a move overseas, narrowing his options to two English-speaking European countries: England or Ireland. He even left the final decision up to his wife, Marilou York. 'She's very clever,' Hamill said. 'She didn't respond right away but a week later she said, 'I'm surprised you would allow him to force you out of your own country.' That son of a b*tch, I thought. I'm not leaving.' Hamill credits York with changing his perspective and ultimately keeping him in the U.S. Despite his frustrations with the political climate, the Life of Chuck star says he remains optimistic. 'I still believe there are more honest, decent people than there are the MAGA crowd,' Hamill explained. 'If I didn't, I'd move back to England.' The BAFTA winner remains as outspoken about politics, but has abandoned Facebook and Twitter for the social media platform BlueSky. 'The bullying, the incompetence, the people in place,' he said. 'The only way I can deal with it without going crazy and wanting to open my veins in a warm tub is to look at it like a thick, sprawling political novel, The Book of Boba Fett actor explained. 'It's entertaining in a way because this could actually be the end. Our status in the world has been crippled and that will reverberate for decades. Making Canada a 51st state? Do you know how offensive that is? And then taking over Greenland and renaming the Gulf of Mexico. The distractions are hilarious.' Hamill is not the the only celebrity to consider relocating to another country in the wake of the 2024 election. Angelina Jolie, 50, is reportedly looking to make the move, according to Page Six. The outlet claimed she was prepping the six bedroom/10 bathroom estate once owned by famed director Cecil B. DeMille for sale. The Oscar winner told British Vogue in 2021 she choose the sprawling two acre property for her and her kids because 'I wanted it to be close to their dad, who is only five minutes away,' referring to her ex-husband Brad Pitt. 'She didn't respond right away but a week later she said, 'I'm surprised you would allow him to force you out of your own country.'' he said of the conversation with wife Marilou York. 'That son of a b*tch, I thought. I'm not leaving'; Pictured in Los Angeles in November 2024 A source told People the Maria star plans to relocate as soon as her youngest children, twins Knox and Vivienne, turn 18 in July 2026. 'She's eyeing several locations abroad. She'll be very happy when she's able to leave Los Angeles,' they contended. Rosie O'Donnell, 63, has moved to Ireland with her youngest child who is non-binary and has autism. 'It was something I needed to do for myself and for my child, and for my own sanity,' she told People. Ellen DeGeneres, 67, and her wife Portia de Rossi, 52, have moved to England permanently. The couple are concerned about efforts to reverse the rights of same-sex couples to marry. 'Portia and I are already looking into it, and if they do that, we're going to get married here,' according to the BBC. CNN has reported a record number of Americans have applied for British citizenship in the first quarter of 2025. However who want to leave have found it's not feasible due to work and financial constraints.
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Zelensky returns to Washington, this time with Europe at his side
It has to be a tribute to Volodymyr Zelensky 's resilience, as well as an acknowledgement of Donald Trump 's still-pivotal role as the would-be peacemaker, that he is prepared to risk another encounter at the White House. That meeting, six months ago, has gone down in the annals as one of the most disgraceful episodes in modern-day diplomacy, with a national leader humiliated in front of the cameras in a grilling that the US president said afterwards would make good television. Lessons have clearly been drawn from that dire encounter, not just by President Zelensky himself, and maybe President Trump, who mended fences at an informal tete-a-tete at the Vatican, but also by the Ukrainian's many European supporters. Joining Mr Zelensky in Washington will be the heads of the EU and Nato, and a clutch of European leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer. That all these highly placed individuals are prepared to meet, as they did in various configurations on Sunday, and travel at such short notice to Washington at the height of Europe's holiday season, shows how high the stakes are, as seen not just by Ukraine, but by Europe. And they are certainly a great deal higher than they were in February, given both the situation on the battlefield and what would appear to be the new level of understanding between Mr Trump and Russia's president, Vladimir Putin, following their summit in Alaska. Whatever format is applied to the meeting, or surely meetings, in Washington, there are lessons that it must be hoped Mr Zelensky has taken to heart, should he find himself again one-to-one with Trump in the Oval Office. They include using a translator – whether or not he thinks he needs one – and ignoring media questions before any talks have taken place. What he chooses to wear, on the other hand, should be for him to decide, not for the White House to dictate. In the end, though, the presence of so many high-level Europeans may be the best guarantee that Mr Zelensky is not treated as a lone leader of a peripheral state who can easily be imposed upon. And there are already intimations of a little more transatlantic flexibility on two key points. After Alaska, Mr Trump appeared to follow Putin's script for an actual end to the war, rather than an immediate ceasefire. The Europeans now appear to have followed, with the ceasefire demand now replaced by the longer-term, if more complex, aim of ending the war. It would also appear that security guarantees – a consistent requirement of Ukraine and slightly less consistent on the part of the Europeans – may be back on the agenda, although vague as to what form they might take and whether the US would underwrite them. With Nato membership for Ukraine one of Russia's reddest of red lines, this could help square that circle. The choreography in Washington alone will itself challenge complaints that the US and Russia were intent on cobbling together an agreement over the heads of Ukraine and Europe. This does not mean that the visitors should not be wary that Washington may listen and not hear. The Europeans must do their utmost not to make cracks show, and stick to what appears to be their simple and limited script. In particular, that means Ukraine's full participation in any peace process. There must also be no dilution of their stance on what the Trump White House is calling 'land swaps' and might more accurately be called territorial concessions. The European position appears to be that no borders may be changed by force, although the last word must rest with Ukraine, which is quite right. Mr Zelensky has at times hinted at a readiness at least to broach such a possibility, while at others – including at Sunday's joint press conference with Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels – insisting that sacrificing land would be out of the question as it would contravene Ukraine's constitution. In the end, though, the benefits for Ukraine of ending the war may have to be set against any territorial losses. Domestically, this will be one of Mr Zelensky's toughest calls. Internationally, there are diplomatic formulas that can cope with continuing territorial ambiguities. The emotive issue of Ukraine's abducted children must also be factored into any discussions. If it is true that the US first lady, Melania Trump, has taken up their cause, then their return may not be as remote a prospect as once seemed. Above all, the principle of 'nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine' is not just a slogan; it is an entirely practical requirement. There can be no peace that does not reflect the assent of Ukraine, as it will simply not endure. The torrent of recent developments has opened the question of whether, for all Moscow 's official intransigence, there is enough now in play, as between the US, Russia and Ukraine, for some modest progress towards peace. A very cautious 'Yes' may be the best answer that can be hoped for out of Washington on Monday.
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan says Donald Trump is ‘not a force for good'
London Mayor Sadiq Khan has expressed a willingness to meet Donald Trump, even as he warned that the US President could be "inadvertently radicalising people" and is "not a force for good". The Labour politician dismissed the US President's recent jibes, made during a visit to Scotland, where Trump labelled him "a nasty person" who has "done a terrible job". Sir Sadiq stated such remarks were "water off a duck's back". However, speaking at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, he admitted that the exchanges sometimes made him feel like he was "nine years old again" and "in the school playground". But Sir Sadiq, speaking at the Political Party show with comedian Matt Forde, hit back at the US President, saying: 'Somebody who has views like he does about black people, about women, about gays, about Muslims, about Mexicans, thinks I'm nasty. 'Really. He is the leader of the free world, arguably the most powerful man in the world, and really.' He spoke out as he said that records showed since the middle of January this year – when Mr Trump began his second term in the White House – and July 'there have never been more Americans applying to British citizenship and living in London'. The Mayor said: 'So I think Americans have got good taste by and large.' He added that he hoped the President would come to London during his state visit to the UK next month, with Sir Sadiq stressing the 'diversity' of the capital was a 'strength, not a weakness'. Speaking about this diversity, he insisted: 'I think it makes us stronger not weaker, richer not poorer. 'And when President Trump says some of the things he does, it brings from the periphery to the mainstream, views that are potentially dangerous. 'He inadvertently – I'm not going to suggest he does it deliberately – he inadvertently could be radicalising people with views that could lead to them doing things that are dangerous.' He spoke out about fears that minorities 'could be treated less favourably because of the views of the President of the USA' as he accused Mr Trump of 'using London and our diversity as a political football, as a proxy for a culture war'. The London Mayor continued: 'On a personal level, it is water off a duck's back, but we can't run away from the fact that there are some really serious challenges we face as a western society and President Trump, in my view, I speak generally, isn't a force for good.' However he insisted that he would be 'more than happy to meet President Trump' saying he would seek to show him that it is 'possible to be proud to be a westerner and a proud to be Muslim, that it is possible to be British, and proud to be British, and be of Pakistani origin and be a law abiding citizen and we aren't three headed monsters'. The Labour politician said: 'I suspect President Trump may have formed a view of Muslims because of the actions of a small minority of really bad people who are terrorists and use Islam in a perverted way. 'What I would want President Trump to know is that is a very small fraction of Muslims across the globe. 'So if there was an opportunity to meet President Trump, I would be more than happy to do so.'
