Peace momentum: on the White House meetings and the Ukraine war
The message from Europe is clear: irrespective of Washington's position, Europe is firmly committed to Ukraine's security. But European leaders also recognise that they lack the capability to continue to back Ukraine in a war it is not winning should the U.S. cut off its weapons supplies to Kyiv. So, the challenge before the French and British leaders was to persuade Mr. Trump — he has already ruled out NATO membership for Ukraine — to offer some form of American support for security guarantees to Ukraine as part of a final settlement. Europe has already begun planning to send a 'reassurance force' to Ukraine. Mr. Trump's comments signalling support for the idea of security guarantee were a small but significant breakthrough. He said Europe would be 'the first line of defence' but did not rule out American involvement, adding that Mr. Putin would accept western security guarantees for Ukraine. The next big question is on where to draw the ceasefire line. Mr. Putin wants all of Donbas and is willing to freeze the frontline in the south. Mr. Zelenskyy and his European partners have so far ruled out any territorial concessions for peace, but all sides are ready to continue the talks. Mr. Zelenskyy should adopt a pragmatic approach, weighing Ukraine's future security against its present battlefield vulnerabilities. Mr. Putin should realise that this may be his best opportunity to end the war that he launched in February 2022. Mr. Trump and the European leaders must now work towards a compromise formula that addresses Ukraine's future security needs and Russia's past grievances. The current momentum for peace should not be squandered.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Israel's military offensive in Gaza could lead to disaster, permanent war, says French President Emmanuel Macron
French President Emmanuel Macron has warned that the military offensive in Gaza for which Israel has been preparing for weeks could lead to disaster for both set of people. In a post on X, the French President said he spoke with Jordan's King Abdullah II and Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi about the developments in Gaza. According to Macron, the three leaders agreed that the military offensive risks plunging the entire region into a cycle of permanent war. 'The military offensive in Gaza that Israel is preparing can only lead to disaster for both peoples and risks plunging the entire region into a cycle of permanent war,' Macron stated. The three leaders acknowledged that only a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, the release of all hostages, large-scale delivery of humanitarian assistance, the disarmament of Hamas, and the strengthening of the Palestinian Authority can bring an end to the conflict. To achieve this, Macron said France, together with Egypt, Jordan, and other regional partners, will have to deploy an international stabilisation mission for Gaza and work towards a political solution that fulfills the aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians. He also reiterated France's commitment to co-chairing a conference along with Saudi Arabia in New York in September on the two-state solution. 'This is the only credible way forward—for the families of the hostages, for Israelis, and for Palestinians alike. No to war. Yes to peace and security for all,' he said. I have just spoken with His Majesty King Abdullah II of Jordan and with President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt. We share the same conviction: The military offensive in Gaza that Israel is preparing can only lead to disaster for both peoples and risks plunging the entire region… — Emmanuel Macron (@EmmanuelMacron) August 20, 2025 In July, France and Saudi Arabia had agreed to revive the push for a two-state solution at a UN conference in New York in September. Macron also announced that he would formally recognise the State of Palestine in September. The announcement, however, did not go down well in Israel, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a letter written earlier this week, accused Macron of fuelling anti-semitism. 'Your call for a Palestinian state pours fuel on this anti-semitic fire. It is not diplomacy, it is appeasement. It rewards Hamas terror, hardens Hamas's refusal to free the hostages, emboldens those who menace French Jews and encourages the Jew-hatred now stalking your streets,' Netanyahu wrote in a strongly worded letter. Responding to Netanyahu's letter, Macron's office, in a statement on Tuesday, said the accusations were 'erroneous, abject, and will not go unanswered'. 'Violence against the Jewish community is unacceptable,' the statement added.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump thinks owning piece of Intel would be good deal for US: Here's what to know
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads President Donald Trump wants the US government to own a piece of Intel , less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping the goal is realised, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more US companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10 per cent stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the US government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogramme the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15 per cent commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the US , which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the US will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the US in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an "amazing story."The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the US government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly USD 19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last rare, it's not unprecedented for the US government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favour with the president to increase their orders for the company's was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives programme - money that Lutnick derided as a "giveaway" that would better serve US taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. "We think America should get the benefit of the bargain," Lutnick told CNBC. "It's obvious that it's the right move to make."
The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
In Moscow, Jaishankar raises challenge posed by tariff to India-Russia trade, calls for early conclusion of India-Eurasian Economic Union FTA
In the backdrop of U.S. President Donald Trump's imposition of penalty tariff on India, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) in Moscow raised the challenge posed by 'tariff and non-tariff trade barriers' before Russia-India trade and called for 'early conclusion' of a Free Trade Agreement among India and the countries of the Eurasian region. Mr. Jaishankar made the remarks during the 26th Session of the India-Russia Inter-Government Commission for Trade, Economic, Scientific, Technological and Cultural Cooperation (IRIGC-TEC) where the Russian side was being led by First Deputy Prime Minister of Russia Denis Manturov. Delivering his opening remarks Mr. Jaishankar said, 'tariff and non-tariff trade barriers, removing bottlenecks in logistics, promoting connectivity through the International North-South Transport Corridor, the Northern Sea Route and the Chennai-Vladivostok Corridor, effecting payment mechanisms smoothly' are the main issues before the IRIGC-TEC. He further said that Wednesday's meeting in Moscow also finalized the terms of reference of the India-Eurasian Economic Union Free Trade Agreement of which Russia has been a leading proponent as it aims at removing obstacles for overland trade among Russia, China, India and the Central Asian countries. '..we are all acutely aware that we are meeting in the backdrop of a complex geopolitical situation. Our leaders remain closely and regularly engaged,' said Mr Jaishankar indirectly referring to the trade-related anxieties in India-U.S. relation. He also raised the issue of trade imbalance in India-Russia trade that has expanded in the past few years as India's trade with Russia grew from $13 billion in 2021 to $68 billion in 2024-'25. India-Russia trade has risen sharply after Russia was hit with Western sanctions following the crisis in Ukraine. Bulk of this trade is in hydrocarbon that Russia supplies to India. As a result the earlier trade imbalance of $ 6.6 billion has risen to $58.9 billion. 'So, we need to address that urgently,' said Mr Jaishankar in his remarks.
