logo
G7 needs to raise pressure on Russia for ceasefire, says EC chief Leyen

G7 needs to raise pressure on Russia for ceasefire, says EC chief Leyen

More pressure must be exerted on Russia to secure a ceasefire in Ukraine, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Sunday, and urged the G7 nations to ramp up sanctions to achieve that goal.
Leaders of the world's largest industrial nations are meeting in Canada's Rockies with European countries seeking to keep the war in Ukraine firmly on the mind of US President Donald Trump despite fighting breaking out between Israel and Iran in the Middle East.
With diplomacy at a standstill, the European Union is set to adopt a new sanctions package on Russia, but have so far failed to convince Trump - who has been reluctant to weigh on Russian President Vladimir Putin - to impose new US sanctions. Trump has said he did not want the sanctions to interfere with getting a ceasefire.
"Last week, we put forward a proposal for an 18 sanctions package. I will invite all G7 partners to join us in this endeavour."
Global attention has turned to the Middle East, where strikes by Israel on Iran have raised the risks of an escalation into a broader regional conflict. The subsequent oil price spike has added to concerns over the global economy.
Von der Leyen said that in talks with Trump on Saturday the two had agreed that like-minded countries should safeguard market stability, notably in the energy markets.
"We will also stay very vigilant (on) what the implications for the international energy markets are concerned," she said.
Regarding trade negotiations with the Trump administration, she said she preferred a negotiated solution ahead of a July 9 deadline, but that the bloc was preparing contingencies in the event no agreement was reached.
Von der Leyen also spoke to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu earlier on Sunday.
"Iran is the principal source of regional instability, and we've always been very clear, Iran can never have a nuclear weapon," she said.
"The recent events have underlined the increasing interlinks between the conflicts in Europe on one hand and the Middle East on the other hand. The same type of Iranian designed and made drones and ballistic missiles are indiscriminately hitting cities in Ukraine and in Israel."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Operation Rising Lion: How Israel's proactive approach should shape Bharat's strategic thinking
Operation Rising Lion: How Israel's proactive approach should shape Bharat's strategic thinking

First Post

time30 minutes ago

  • First Post

Operation Rising Lion: How Israel's proactive approach should shape Bharat's strategic thinking

Israel's Operation Rising Lion has been an audacious gambit that has so far been successful for the Netanyahu government. More than 20 Iranian military commanders, including Army chief Mohammed Bagheri, have been killed, and several key military assets and nuclear sites destroyed, in the biggest direct conflict between the two nations that started with Tel Aviv's military operation on Friday. Nine scientists working on Iran's nuclear programme too have reportedly been killed. Iran's air defence systems, military airbases and parts of their key nuclear sites were decimated by Israel's military exercise. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It is still too early to predict the contour of the conflict, but at this point of time it is apparent that Israel has gained a definite advantage over its arch-rival with its timely and precise targeting. What gives Tel Aviv an edge is its undiminished sense of shatrubodh, which, when mixed with its never-give-up attitude and incessant, long-term planning, helps Israel achieve results, historic and unprecedented. Israel's success mantra is simple: Prepare for war in the time of peace. Use that 'free time' to your advantage. In recent memory, the only time Israel goofed up—and goofed up badly—was on October 7, 2023, when more than 1,000 Hamas terrorists stormed into southern Israel and went on a killing spree, murdering 1,200 men, women and children and abducting another 250 people. This aberration apart, this tiny nation of less than one crore people has had splendid successes. In the past year and a half, after the October 7 fiasco, it has emasculated Hamas after flattening Gaza and decapitated the Hezbollah leadership with a never-seen-before usage of civilian technology for military purposes. Coming back to Operation Rising Lion, it has its genesis in Mossad pulling off 'one of the most spectacular exploits in the entire history of espionage on the eve of January 31, 2018', as authors Yonah Jeremy Bob and Ilan Evyatar write in their 2024 book Target Tehran. 'After months of meticulous planning, endless hours of sophisticated electronic surveillance, and the risky infiltration of Israeli agents into Iran, the Mossad team broke into the secret warehouse where Iran's nuclear archive, containing the full record of its efforts to become a nuclear weapons power, was kept,' write the authors. Very little is known in the public about Mossad's 2018 operation, but Target Tehran explains how meticulously planned this exercise was. The Israeli team had 'exactly six and a half hours to find the vast amount of material they needed, load it onto trucks, and make their escape, or they would be discovered, and the mission, with all its months of meticulous planning—data analysis, risky intelligence gathering by agents infiltrated into Iran, and more—would come to naught, and two dozen lives could be lost to the tender mercies of Iranian justice'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The 2018 operation was a grand success. The revelations of the archive's contents proved that Iran had been lying for years about its nuclear programme, hiding its true military nature by claiming it was only for civilian use. This gave Donald Trump, who was then the US President, an excuse to withdraw the US from the Iran nuclear deal signed with much fanfare in 2015. Israel was well aware that these measures could only delay the nuclear inevitable. The next step would be to give a physical body blow to the project, but in between came the Biden administration. Tel Aviv used this time to strengthen itself, and when Trump 2.0 was inaugurated, the Israeli leadership knew its time had come. Israel is bound by what's famously called the Samson Option, a term named after the Biblical figure who killed himself and thousands of Israel's enemies by bringing down the pillars of the Gazan temple where he was held captive. Given the fact that Israel lacks significant landmass, it has made nuclear weapons the centrepiece of its strategic deterrence, thus conveying to its adversaries in no uncertain terms that it would be willing to cross the nuclear threshold in the event of an existential threat. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A geographically bigger country like Bharat may think it's not bound by the Samson Option, but given the revolutionary changes taking place in arms and armament, and of course, modern warfare, the difference seems to be mitigating between a big and a small nation. Bharat needs to realise that the era belongs to those who pursue a proactive rather than a reactive policy. Of course, the action has to be a well-calibrated, responsible one, but in today's era, to wait for the act to take place can be too devastating to recover. This should be the next evolutionary stage of Bharat's military tactics. You don't wait. You pre-empt. You ensure that the enemy is neutralised well before it is ready with its first move. Today, Bharat has every reason to rejoice the stupendous success of Operation Sindoor, but, taking a cue from the dear friend Israel, Bharat should start preparing for the worst. The enemy is now well aware of the giant leap taken by Bharat on the military front and is preparing itself accordingly. This is the time for the preparation of Operation Sindoor 2.0. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As for Israel's Operation Rising Lion, Bharat should give silent support. Though there will be many bleeding-heart commentators in the subcontinent who would bemoan the attack on Iran, the fact of the matter is that the decline of the current Iranian dispensation will weaken the Islamist axis that invariably targets Bharat and its geostrategic interests. There is no denying that Bharat has maintained good relations with Iran, but it has been tactical in nature. Israel, on the other hand, is an all-weather friend. A weakened Tehran is also bad news for Islamabad. Pakistan becomes much less important, geostrategically, for the US. The idea that Pakistan has ever been a reliable supporter of the US is a perception Americans have created to deceive themselves; in reality, Pakistan has harmed US interests far more than it has forwarded them. If Operation Rising Lion is effective in considerably weakening the current Iranian dispensation, if not managing the regime change, Pakistan would believe that it is now next in the line of the Israeli fire. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD One hopes the leadership of Bharat takes adequate lessons from Operation Rising Lion. The country needs to change. It has to change from being a reactive to an assertive power, but without compromising its ethical, moral compass. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

When Israel And India Nearly Bombed Pakistan's Kahuta Nuclear Site, But Indira Gandhi Backed Out
When Israel And India Nearly Bombed Pakistan's Kahuta Nuclear Site, But Indira Gandhi Backed Out

News18

time35 minutes ago

  • News18

When Israel And India Nearly Bombed Pakistan's Kahuta Nuclear Site, But Indira Gandhi Backed Out

Last Updated: According to a TOI report, Israel had drawn up a dramatic blueprint in the early 1980s to replicate its infamous 1981 airstrike on Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor The ongoing war between Israel and Iran, marked by missile exchanges and intensifying hostilities, has revived memories of a covert operation that was once poised to redraw the nuclear map of South Asia. In the shadow of Tel Aviv's current offensive against Iran's nuclear assets, a nearly executed strike plan from the 1980s has returned to global discourse, a joint Israeli-Indian mission to destroy Pakistan's burgeoning nuclear program. According to a detailed report published by The Times of India, Israel had drawn up a dramatic blueprint in the early 1980s to replicate its infamous 1981 airstrike on Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor, targeting Pakistan's highly guarded Kahuta facility. The plan was more audacious than its predecessor, involving Israeli F-15 and F-16 fighter jets taking off from airbases at Jamnagar and Udhampur, supported by India's own Jaguar aircraft. The central fear driving Israel's proposal was the possibility of Pakistan passing nuclear know-how to hostile nations. Then-Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin even expressed alarm to his British counterpart, Margaret Thatcher, over growing ties between Islamabad and Tripoli. There was deep anxiety in Tel Aviv that Pakistani scientists could transfer atomic secrets to Libya, a regime then seen as a nuclear wild card. India's then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi initially greenlit the operation, giving the impression of a rare military and strategic alignment between India and Israel. But the plan was eventually abandoned, just weeks later. The domestic situation in India was spiraling as Bhindranwale's separatist movement was gaining ground in Punjab, unrest was spreading in Jammu and Kashmir, and India's standoff with Pakistan over the Siachen Glacier was heating up. Moreover, the geopolitical risks were deemed too great. US intelligence reportedly caught wind of the plan and subtly passed warnings to Pakistan, which promptly threatened retaliatory airstrikes using its newly acquired American F-16s. The US, then deeply enmeshed in backing Pakistan's efforts in Afghanistan against Soviet forces, was unlikely to support any action that destabilised Islamabad. Indira Gandhi, wary of triggering a full-blown war in the subcontinent, backed off. After her assassination in 1984, the plan was buried for good. Rajiv Gandhi, who succeeded her as Prime Minister, formally shelved the operation. By then, Pakistan's nuclear program had made significant advances, and the window for pre-emption had closed. In a twist of diplomatic restraint, both countries took a historic step in 1988. India and Pakistan signed an agreement pledging not to attack each other's nuclear facilities. Since then, the two rivals have exchanged lists of their nuclear installations every January 1 as part of a confidence-building measure that still holds, even amid border skirmishes and political tensions. First Published: June 16, 2025, 17:06 IST

Tehran fires 100 missiles at Tel Aviv; nuclear tensions rise
Tehran fires 100 missiles at Tel Aviv; nuclear tensions rise

Time of India

time35 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Tehran fires 100 missiles at Tel Aviv; nuclear tensions rise

Iranian missiles struck Israel's Tel Aviv and the port city of Haifa before dawn on Monday, killing at least eight people and destroying homes, prompting Israel's defence minister to warn that Tehran residents would "pay the price and soon". Iran said its parliament was preparing a bill to leave the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), adding that Tehran remains opposed to developing weapons of mass destruction. Passing the bill could take several weeks. Israel is presumed to have a sizable nuclear arsenal but neither confirms nor denies it. It is the only Middle East state that has not signed the NPT. Israel's military, which has gutted Iran's nuclear and military leadership with airstrikes, said on Monday it had killed four senior intelligence officials, including the head of the Revolutionary Guards' intelligence unit. Show more Show less

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store