UN's Albanese hails 30-nation meeting aimed at ending Israeli occupation of Palestine
Francesca Albanese will say the two-day gathering in Bogotá, Colombia, starting on Tuesday and including China, Spain and Qatar, comes at 'an existential hour' for Israel and the Palestinian people.
The aim of the conference is to set out steps the participating countries can take to implement a UN general assembly motion mandating member states to take measures in support of Israel ending its unlawful occupation of Palestine.
The motion set a deadline of September 2025 to implement a July 2024 international court of justice advisory opinion that Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories was unlawful.
The ICJ said in its advisory opinion that 'Israel's security concerns do not override the principle of the prohibition of the acquisition of territory by force' and called on it to end its occupation 'as rapidly as possible'. It said UN member states had an obligation 'not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by Israel's illegal presence in the occupied Palestinian territory'.
The UK has yet to say what steps if any it is required to take in response to the ICJ opinion.
The Colombian president and conference host, Gustavo Petro, says the meeting will show that the world is finally moving from condemnation of Israel's military action to collective action to bring it to a halt.
The aim is to agree a detailed plan of political, economic and legal actions, but there are range of views over how far states can go politically or legally to isolate Israel, a country that feels secure so long as it maintains US support.
The Hague Group was initially brought together by South Africa and Colombia, but since then support has grown and it now includes Algeria, Brazil, Spain, Indonesia and Qatar.
Albanese, the UN special rapporteur for the occupied Palestinian territories, is determined to show that the US state department sanctions will not cow her.
'For too long, international law has been treated as optional – applied selectively to those perceived as weak, ignored by those acting as the powerful. This double standard has eroded the very foundations of the legal order. That era must end,' she will say in Bogotá.
'The world will remember what we, states and individuals, did in this moment – whether we recoiled in fear or rose in defence of human dignity. Here in Bogotá, a growing number of states have the opportunity to break the silence and revert to a path of legality by finally saying: enough. Enough impunity. Enough empty rhetoric. Enough exceptionalism. Enough complicity. The time has come to act in pursuit of justice and peace – grounded in rights and freedoms for all, and not mere privileges for some, at the expense of the annihilation of others.'
Albanese will say that the UN charter and universal human rights instruments must remain everyone's compass. 'I trust that more states will align their policies with these fundamental principles as we move forward in this existential hour – for both the Palestinian and the Israeli people, and the integrity of the international legal order itself,' she will say.
The sanctions on Albanese were imposed by the US state department for what it called her 'shameful promotion' of action by the international criminal court against the US and Israel.
Albanese will directly address the sanctions in Bogotá. 'These attacks shall not be seen as against me personally. They are a warning to everyone who dares defend international justice and freedom. But we cannot afford to be silenced – and I know I am not alone,' she will say. 'This is not about me or any other single individuals but about justice for the Palestinian people at the most critical juncture in their history.'
In an article for the Guardian published last week, Petro framed the stakes of the conference. 'We can either stand firm in defence of the legal principles that seek to prevent war and conflict, or watch helplessly as the international system collapses under the weight of unchecked power politics,' he wrote.
A Hague Group conference in January attended by only nine nations committed to implementing the provisional measures of the international court of justice, issued on 26 January, 28 March and 24 May 2024.
In practice this meant measures such arms embargos against Israel by preventing the docking of vessels at any port, if applicable, within their territorial jurisdiction.
Varsha Gandikota-Nellutla, the executive secretary of the Hague Group, said: 'We meet in Bogotá with a twin imperative: to end Israel's impunity and sever the cords of complicity. The international court of justice has already made its rulings, deeming Israel's continued presence in the Palestinian territories as unlawful. There is no absence of legal clarity.
'States will now deliberate how to enforce their obligations – from ceasing arms exports and preventing harbour for vessels carrying military equipment to ensuring justice for all victims.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
US and Israel ditch ceasefire talks as Trump envoy points finger at Hamas
The US is withdrawing its negotiating team from Gaza ceasefire talks in Qatar after Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, pointed the finger at Hamas for a 'lack of desire to reach a ceasefire'. 'While the mediators have made a great effort, Hamas does not appear to be coordinated or acting in good faith,' Witkoff said on Thursday. 'We will now consider alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people of Gaza.' The announcement suggested a setback for diplomatic efforts to end the relentless siege, destruction and ruin of Gaza that has devastated the territory for more than 21 months. Israel also recalled its negotiating team following Hamas's response, in effect suspending weeks of Qatar-mediated talks that had shown only limited progress. It's also unclear what 'alternative options' are under consideration. According to a Haaretz report, Israeli sources described the teams' recall as a coordinated move designed to pressure Hamas. Hamas said it was surprised by Witkoff's remarks, adding that the group's position had been welcomed by mediators and had opened the door to reaching a comprehensive agreement. 'The movement affirms its keenness to continue negotiations and engage in them in a manner that helps overcome obstacles and leads to a permanent ceasefire agreement,' Hamas added in a statement early on Friday. The announcement comes as Gaza endures cataclysmic humanitarian conditions. Israeli forces have killed more than 1,000 desperate and hungry people in Gaza in recent weeks trying to fetch food according to the UN, with at least 85 Palestinians killed on Sunday alone. The World Health Organization on Wednesday described the situation as 'man-made mass starvation' caused by restrictions on aid deliveries. Witkoff added that it was 'a shame that Hamas has acted in this selfish way' while insisting the US remains 'resolute' in ending the bombardment of Gaza, though American officials have consistently attributed negotiation failures to the Palestinian side. The proposed deal under discussion would have established a 60-day ceasefire during which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and the remains of 18 others in staged phases. In exchange, Israel would free Palestinian prisoners, increase aid deliveries to Gaza, and both sides would enter negotiations for a permanent truce. The talks had been bogged down over where Israeli troops would redeploy after any ceasefire – specifically whether Israel would maintain control of the Netzarim and Philadelphi corridors – a sticking point that is proving insurmountable thus far. Israel also refuses to end the war until Hamas surrenders power and disarms, though Hamas has indicated a willingness to discuss stepping down from power under certain conditions. The Haaretz report suggested that other sticking points include the areas from which Israel would withdraw during a pause in fighting, and the identities of the prisoners who would be released. Thursday's development comes in contrast with recent signs from the Trump administration, which had been optimistic about securing a breakthrough and had campaigned on ending foreign wars. A temporary ceasefire deal was last reached between Israel and Hamas in January, but collapsed after Israel launched surprise airstrikes in March that killed more than 400 people.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘We were heard': the Pacific students who took their climate fight to the ICJ
'I'm so nervous about today … it's going to be OK. Let's pray.' Those were the quiet but powerful words of Cynthia Houniuhi on Wednesday morning, just before the international court of justice (ICJ) handed down its historic advisory opinion on climate change at the Peace palace in The Hague. In the packed courtroom, thousands of kilometres from home, tension hung in the air. For Houniuhi – one of the original 27 Pacific law students who sparked the global legal campaign that led to the ruling – the moment was overwhelming. As the judges began to speak, she became teary. Years of hard work and late nights had come down to this. 'I was literally hanging on to each and every word the judge was saying. I was anticipating, waiting for the things I hoped to hear. The more I listened, the more emotional I became,' Houniuhi said. 'When the judges stated that states' obligations are not limited to the Paris agreement or the climate regime but also extend to environmental law, human rights law and international customary law, I cried right there in the courtroom.' The ICJ's advisory opinion for the first time gives the Pacific and all vulnerable communities a legal mechanism to hold states accountable and to demand the climate action long overdue. In the landmark opinion published on Wednesday, the court said countries must prevent harm to the climate system and that failing to do so could result in their having to pay compensation and make other forms of restitution. It says states are liable for all kinds of activities that harm the climate, but it takes explicit aim at fossil fuels. For a young Pacific woman at the forefront of this global fight, this win wasn't just political, it was personal. And it was history. 'We were there. And we were heard,' she said. The group of students all hailed from Pacific island countries that are among the most vulnerable in the world to the climate crisis. They came up with the idea of changing international law by getting the world's highest court to issue an advisory opinion on the climate crisis. The campaign was led by the nation of Vanuatu, a Pacific state of about 300,000 people that sits at the forefront of the climate crisis and has been ranked by the United Nations as the country most prone to natural disasters. Sitting beside Houniuhi was Vishal Prasad, executive director of the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change (PISFCC), quietly taking it all in. 'I'm still trying to process everything,' Vishal said on Thursday. 'Cynthia was beside me, and our Pacific team was there. Line by line, paragraph by paragraph, I was amazed. From the obligations of states under the Paris agreement to the recognition of human rights and the right to a clean, healthy environment – and then to hear the court speak so strongly on fossil fuels – it was incredible.' The Ni-Vanuatu anthropologist and minister for climate change, Ralph Regenvanu, remembered when those same students first approached him for support in 2019. 'Back then I never imagined it would grow this big. It felt like a wild dream – this idea that we could go to the ICJ. But we thought, 'Why not?' There was youthful ambition and energy, and surprisingly – with support from across the world – we got here. Especially thanks to the international youth climate justice movement.' But it wasn't easy. Over the years, the movement faced resistance from major emitting countries. The Pacific had to go back, gather more evidence, more testimonies – and keep pushing, despite the odds. Siosiua Veikune, a youth climate advocate from Tonga and PISFCC member, said the group's cautious optimism about the case gave way to overwhelming gratefulness when the ruling was handed down. 'At first, we were skeptical. History has shown that courts sometimes speak to some issues but leave others out. But this ruling … it was bold. It was clear.' 'As a young Tongan, I hope we've helped set a healthy legal standard – a blueprint that can be replicated globally. This duty of care … it goes beyond legal obligations. It speaks to who we are in the Pacific.' The opinion didn't just recognise states' climate responsibilities – it tied them directly to human rights and the lives of frontline communities. Many in the Pacific and those who have been following the advisory opinion, including those who contributed to oral submissions, cheered with joy when the advisory opinion came down. Rufino Varea, director of the Pacific Islands Climate Network, said the court had handed Pacific people 'legal backbone for climate justice'. 'No more excuses. Those who fuel this crisis must stop the harm and help repair it,' he said. 'The law now reflects the justice our communities have always demanded – and we will use this opinion everywhere we fight for our people.' Pacific feminist climate activist Tamani Rarama said the ruling offered new tools in the fight for accountability. 'Now we have clarified, more nuanced international legal advice – a pathway for justice, redress and repatriation for the loss and damage our frontline communities have endured for years.' From scientific submissions provided by the Pacific Community to testimonies gathered by PISFCC in the Witness Stand for Climate Justice, every part of the case was anchored in the experiences of Pacific people. Dr Coral Pasisi, the Pacific Community's director of climate change, reflected on what the ruling means to her personally. 'My children told me before I left: there better be a decent outcome. Especially my 10-year-old son, who said, 'Mum, you've been doing this for 13 years, and the adults still aren't listening. Maybe you need to bring the kids to the table.' 'What this advisory opinion does is bring that next generation into the heart of climate discourse. It's a recognition of intergenerational responsibility. And we cannot have that conversation without bringing our children into it in a meaningful way.' As the Pacific celebrate, PISFCC and Pacific leaders are already discussing how to use the ruling in upcoming negotiations – especially in the lead-up to Cop30 in Brazil and working out what it means to the Pacific. For Houniuhi and the students who began it all, the work is far from over. 'This is a victory forged by Pacific youth but owned by all,' she said. 'We pushed the world's highest court to listen – and it did. Now we move from legal words to living change. Young people will make sure this ruling cannot be shelved or spun.' As for how she'll celebrate, she plans to wait until she gets home. 'It still feels surreal. Some of the people I want to celebrate with are back home. So, for now, I'm holding back the celebration – just feeling deeply grateful.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Thailand-Cambodia border dispute: 100,000 Thai civilians evacuated amid clashes
Thailand evacuated more than 100,000 people along the Cambodian border, it said on Friday, as the two countries fight their bloodiest military clashes in over a decade. The interior ministry said 100,672 people from four border provinces had been moved to shelters, while the health ministry announced the death toll had risen to 14. Thailand scrambled an F-16 fighter jet to bomb targets in Cambodia on Thursday after artillery volleys from both sides killed at least 11 civilians. Both blamed each other for starting a morning clash at a disputed area of the border, which quickly escalated from small arms fire to heavy shelling in at least six locations 209km (130 miles) apart along a frontier where sovereignty has been disputed for more than a century. The worst fighting between the countries in 13 years came after Thailand on Wednesday recalled its ambassador to Phnom Penh and expelled Cambodia's envoy in response to a second Thai soldier losing a limb to a landmine that Bangkok alleged had been laid recently by rival troops, an accusation Cambodia called baseless. Thailand said there were 14 fatalities, including an eight-year-old boy. Authorities said 31 people were hurt on Thursday. 'We condemn this – using heavy weapons without a clear target, outside of conflict zones … the use of force and did not adhere to international law,' Thailand's acting prime minister, Phumtham Wechayachai, told reporters. 'We remain committed to peaceful means and there should be discussions, but what happened was a provocation and we had to defend ourselves.' Thailand's health minister, Somsak Thepsuthin, said a hospital was hit by shelling in Surin province, an attack he said should be considered 'a war crime'. Cambodian government, defence and foreign ministry officials gave no indication of fatalities sustained or any estimate of the number of people evacuated. The UN security council was due to meet on Friday over the conflict. The US, a longtime treaty ally of Thailand, called for an immediate end to hostilities. 'We are … gravely concerned by the escalating violence along the Thailand-Cambodia border and deeply saddened by reports of harm to civilians,' the state department's deputy spokesperson, Tommy Pigott, told a regular news briefing. 'The United States urges an immediate cessation of hostilities, protection of civilians and a peaceful resolution of the conflict.' Britain's foreign ministry on Thursday advised against all but essential travel to parts of Cambodia and Thailand. With Agence France-Presse and Reuters
