
Angus Robertson makes freedom of speech pledge at Festival
Read more:
Mr Robertson was speaking less than a fortnight after First Minister John Swinney opened Edinburgh's summer festivals season with a speech that pledged that he would 'always protect freedom of speech in our country.'
The Edinburgh International Book Festival, the National Library of Scotland and Fringe venue Summerhall, which are all government-funded, have all become embroiled in free speech rows.
Scottish culture secretary Angus Robertson has spoken out in the wake of a number of freedom of speech controversies. (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire)
Politicians and writers have raised concerns over 'censorship' and behind-the-scenes lobbying by activists to try to cancel events and influence programming decisions.
Mr Robertson insisted the government had no involvement in programming decisions made by arts organisations and the importance of 'arms-length' decision-making on funding for arts and culture.
The National Library of Scotland has been accused of censorship. (Image: Gordon Terris/ The Herald)
However the culture secretary said that did that 'diminish' the importance of freedom of expression.
Edinburgh's summer festivals season has played out against a background of freedom of speech and cancel culture controversies.
Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes was interviewed by The Herald's political editor Andrew Learmonth at Summerhall. (Image: Gordon Terris) The book festival has been accused of avoiding 'difficult' topics, and excluding certain books and writers, including gender critical authors, from its line-up.
The National Library has been accused of 'cowardice' after it emerged it had removed a best-selling gender critical book from a special exhibition to mark its centenary after some of its staff raised complaints that it promote 'hate speech.'
The Edinburgh International Book Festival has been accused of deliberately excluding gender critical authors from its line-up.
Although the exhibition features books selected by well-known authors Damian Barr, Alan Cumming, Gemma Cairney, Sir Ian Rankin and Val McDermid, the National Library decided to withdraw The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht, after it was initially selected based on public nominations. It features essays by women including Harry Potter creator JK Rowling, MP Joanna Cherry, MSP Ash Regan and former prison governor.
Summerhall, which was threatened with closure over an HMRC investigation last year, has come under fire after it issued an apology to artists and performers for hosting an event with Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes, which it described as an "oversight."
Management had been urged to pull the plug on her appearance, which was part of a series of Fringe events organised by The Herald. Summerhall said it would be 'developing robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies' as a result of Ms Forbes appearance.
In response to reports of Summerhall's apology, Ms Forbes, who has responsibility for the funding of Edinburgh's festivals, said she fervently believed in freedom of speech, adding: 'Any effort to 'cancel' people, especially politicians, undermines democracy.'
Mr Robertson was speaking after an event to celebrate the Made in Scotland showcase at the Fringe.
Four shows have secured a shared of £540,000 in government funding, while Summerhall secured more than £600,000 in funding for the next years in January.
He told The Herald: 'As Scotland's culture secretary I am a strong supporter of the freedom of speech and of expression at our festivals and as part of our cultural life in general.
'There is a distance between government and our cultural organisations, which is important, but does not diminish our strong support for the broadest cultural offerings.
'There a number of issues of public concern and public debate.
'For as long as I can remember, there have been tensions between the right to freedom of speech and developments or views that some people find unpopular or unjustifiable.
'That tension will always exist. It's something that the organizers of festivals or cultural events are presented with at all times. It will not be easy all of the time to please everybody.
'But I think keeping an eye on the principle of freedom of expression and the expression of different views is an established and important part of our national life.
'For very good reasons, funding to our major cultural and festival events takes place at arm's length.
'That, though, does not diminish the important position of the Scottish Government, including myself and the First Minister, to support the right of freedom of expression and freedom of speech.
'I want to make sure that our arts festivals and our arts organisations are properly supported and properly funded, as they are being now, with the biggest increase in spending for culture since the beginning of devolution.
'And I am keen to make sure that we have an understanding about freedom of expression and the ability of people to express views that may be popular or less popular as part of our cultural life, and people can choose if they want to go and hear those or not.'
A spokesperson for the Scottish Government said: "While ministers have no role in booking or curation decisions taken by individual venues or institutions, the Scottish Government supports individuals' rights to freedom of expression and we are clear that there is no place for any form of discrimination in Scotland.'
The Herald has teamed up with EdFest.com to make the purchase of tickets for the Edinburgh Festival Fringe so much easier.
To buy tickets please click here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
18 minutes ago
- The National
Nicola Sturgeon says monarchy 'should end soon' at book launch
The former first minister was interviewed by ex-BBC Newsnight presenter Kirsty Wark in a packed out McEwan Hall as part of the Edinburgh International Book Festival. As part of the conversation, Sturgeon reflected on her encounters with Queen Elizabeth, a woman she said she had had "huge admiration" for. But she went on to say King Charles and other members of the royal family so not have the same "mystique" as the Queen did, and so people are coming to realise the "absurdities" of the monarchy. Asked about when the monarchy should end, Sturgeon said: "I think it should end probably quite soon." READ MORE: National Library of Scotland debunks claim it 'banned' gender-critical book After a round of applause, she went on: "I think we will look back, and I don't know if this will be in 10 years or 100 years, and history will look back on the death of Queen Elizabeth as probably the beginning of the end of the monarchy because there was such a mystique around her and, with the greatest of respect to the King and the other members of the royal family, I just don't think they have that to the same extent and I think without that, what we focus more on and what we will focus more on are the absurdities of the monarchy." Sturgeon has been under the spotlight this whole week following the release of Frankly, which officially came out on Thursday but has been available in bookshops since Monday. The relationship between Sturgeon and her predecessor Alex Salmond dominated the interview, with Wark asking early on in the chat whether Sturgeon felt Salmond had ever been guilty of "coercive control". Wark claimed there had "almost been a thread of coercive control" from Salmond running through the book which she asked Sturgeon about. The former first minister replied: "I wouldn't describe it as that. "He was an incredibly strong and charismatic individual and for much of my life he was a force for good. He encouraged me to reach beyond what I would have considered my abilities to be, he pushed me on. I once said ages ago he believed in me before I believed in myself and all of that is true. I try to be true to that in the book and not to rewrite history." She went on to describe how Salmond's approval and disapproval of her impacted her greatly, something she came to realise through getting counselling. She said: "What I do think is that I realised a couple of times, even after I was first minister, that his approval mattered to me and his disapproval knocked by confidence and I think latterly, he probably played on that a little bit, but that was something I realised was there through my psychologist." Sturgeon was also heavily quizzed about her leadership around gender reform. Earlier this week Sturgeon said she should have paused gender reform legislation that was going through the Scottish Parliament towards the end of her tenure. READ MORE: SNP demand UK Government act amid Israeli E1 plan in West Bank The Gender Recognition Reform Bill would have allowed transgender people to self-identify and simplified the requirements to acquire a gender recognition certificate (GRC), before it was blocked by Westminster from becoming law. She said during the interview that one of the reasons she may not have paused was to not "give in" to transphobic people. "When it became so toxic, maybe I should have taken a step back and paused to see if we could find a less divisive way through it. Would that have worked? I don't know. "But I guess what stopped me, and I'm not saying this was the right decision, but if I look back on what stopped me at the time [...], every time I say this I get howls of derision even though I caveat it in the way I'm about to caveat it, but I don't think everyone who disagrees with me on this issue is transphobic. But this whole issue has been hijacked and weaponised by people who are transphobic. "I think I perhaps worried that to pause at the time would have been to give in to that."


The Herald Scotland
34 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Sturgeon: I did not appreciate factors behind attainment gap
She said that when she promised to eradicate the gap between the educational performance of pupils from rich and poor areas, she 'probably [did not] appreciate' the full extent of the factors that influence it. In a speech in 2015, Ms Sturgeon said: 'My aim, to put it bluntly, is to close the attainment gap completely. "It will not be done overnight, I accept that. But it must be done. "After all, its existence is more than just an economic and social challenge for us all. It is a moral challenge. Indeed, I would argue that it goes to the very heart of who we are and how we see ourselves as a nation.' READ MORE Sandie Peggie: NHS Fife admits breaking law over trans doctor's use of changing room GERS: Can the SNP still afford the social contract? National Library accused of 'cowardice' over exclusion of gender-critical book In their 2016 manifesto, the SNP said 'closing the gap in attainment between young people from our most and least deprived communities will be the defining mission of the SNP in the next parliament.' Ms Sturgeon then said her government would push to substantially reduce the attainment gap by 2026, writing in that year's Programme for Government document that elimination of the gap was 'a yardstick by which the people of Scotland can measure our success'. However, exams results last week revealed that despite some progress, the rate of the attainment gap remains substantial. The National 5 rate dropped from 17.2% to 16.6% while Higher saw a small dip from 17.2% to 17.1% and Advanced Higher from 15.5% to 12.8%. The gap in the number of pupils achieving an A also reduced slightly at all levels, but remained substantially higher than the A-C rate. In National 5, the rate fell from 27.6% to 27.5%, 22.1% to 22% in Higher and 18.7% to 18.3% in Advanced Higher. Asked about the failure to eliminate the gap during the book festival event, Ms Sturgeon said: 'This is possibly one of my biggest regrets. At the time, I made the promise of probably not appreciating as much as I quickly came to do the factors that would influence that. 'And that was not just about issues around the curriculum in schools, but what is the driving cause of the poverty related attainment gap in our schools? It's poverty, it's the conditions children grow up in, outside school." "So some of the things that I am proudest of are the Scottish Child Payment, the doubling or early years education, the baby box. "These are things that are lifting children out of poverty, and I believe in time will make a difference to the Scottish Government." Ms Sturgeon added: 'I think Scottish education is good. I don't believe it is in the terrible state that many say. I believe we saw in the exams results last week that the attainment gap is starting to close. 'I'm not really sitting here saying I don't regret that it didn't go further.' She added: 'On this particular issue, and again, I'm being frank about it, it was probably a lack of appreciation of what you had." Ms Sturgeon said initiatives and putting money into education was not enough. "All of that is right, but unless you're changing the conditions kids are growing up in, then you're not going to have the impact. And that's what I learned along the way."


Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Nicola Sturgeon claims baby box will help reduce child poverty attainment gap 'in time'
The former first minister pledged in 2015 "to close the attainment gap completely" but latest exam results show it remains at 17 per cent. Nicola Sturgeon has claimed the introduction of the baby box in Scotland will help reduce the poverty-related attainment gap. The former first minister today admitted it was her "biggest regrets" that secondary school pupils from the poorest backgrounds continue to perform more poorly in exams than those from the richest. Sturgeon used a keynote speech in 2015 to promise her government would "close the attainment gap completely" over the next decade - a policy ministers formally adopted a year later when John Swinney was serving as education secretary. But exam results published this month show the SNP Government is now on course to miss that key target next year, after it became a policy commitment signed off in 2016. Higher and National 5 results out show the richest 20 per cent of pupils continue to significantly outperform the 20 per cent of kids from the most disadvantaged backgrounds. Sturgeon was pressed on the issue when appearing at the Edinburgh International Book Festival today to promote her new memoir, Frankly. Asked by host Kirsty Wark why the attainment gap was still there, Sturgeon said: "This is possibly one of my biggest regrets, and it comes from not delivering it, but also the time I made the promise. I was probably not appreciating, as I quickly came to do, the factors that would influence that. "That was not just about issues around the curriculum in schools, but what is the driving cause of the poverty related attainment gap? It's poverty, it's the conditions children grow up in outside of school. "Some of the things that I am proudest of, are the Scottish Child Payment, the doubling of early years education, the baby box - these are things that are lifting children out of poverty and I believe, in time, will make a difference to the attainment gap." In the 2016 Programme for Government, Sturgeon claimed her government would push to substantially reduce the attainment gap by 2026, saying it was "a yardstick by which the people of Scotland can measure our success". The latest figures show some progress on the previous year in terms of overall attainment and a slight narrowing of the attainment gap. But by most measures the attainment gap is largely unchanged compared to pre-pandemic levels, and the attainment gap in the Higher pass rate has widened since 2019. Speaking at the book festival event today, Sturgeon added: "I think Scottish education is good, I don't believe it's in the terrible state that many say. The attainment gap is starting to close. "I won't sitting here and say, I don't regret it didn't go further. You'll have to judge me when you read the book, but I won't shy away things that went wrong, I try to explain what wrong, why did I get that wrong. "On this particular issue, unless you change the conditions kids are growing up in, you're not going to have the impact - and that's what I learned along the way."