G7 agrees to exempt US multinationals from global minimum tax
OTTAWA: The Group of Seven nations said Saturday they have agreed to exempt US multinational companies from a global minimum tax imposed by other countries -- a win for President Donald Trump's government, which pushed hard for the compromise.
The deal will see US companies benefit from a "side-by-side" solution under which they will only be taxed at home, on both domestic and foreign profits, the G7 said in a statement released by Canada, which holds the group's rotating presidency.
The agreement was reached in part due to "recently proposed changes to the US international tax system" included in Trump's signature domestic policy bill, which is still being debated in Congress, the statement said.
The side-by-side system could "provide greater stability and certainty in the international tax system moving forward," it added.
Nearly 140 countries struck a deal in 2021 to tax multinational companies, an agreement negotiated under the auspices of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
That agreement, deeply criticised by Trump, includes two "pillars," the second of which sets a minimum global tax rate of 15 per cent.
The OECD must ultimately decide to exempt the US companies from that tax -- or not.
The G7 said it looked forward to "expeditiously reaching a solution that is acceptable and implementable to all."
On Thursday, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had signaled that a "joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests" was in the works.
He also asked US lawmakers to "to remove the Section 899 protective measure from consideration in the One, Big, Beautiful Bill" -- Trump's policy mega-bill.
Section 899 has been dubbed a "revenge tax," allowing the government to impose levies on firms with foreign owners and on investors from countries deemed to impose unfair taxes on US businesses.
The clause sparked concern that it would inhibit foreign companies from investing in the United States. - AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
43 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
US Senate approves Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill'
MOSCOW: The US Senate has approved President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" by a majority vote, reported Sputnik/RIA Novosti citing a NBC News report. The lower house of the US Congress in May passed a bill promoted by Trump that cuts federal spending but simultaneously provides significant tax breaks. As a result, according to the Congressional Budget Office, both the budget deficit and the national debt will grow. It is noted that 51 people voted for the bill, 49 voted against it. The day before, US billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk criticised the latest version of the bill on cutting government spending, saying that the document could destroy millions of jobs in the United States.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
US Senate opens debate on Trump's controversial spending bill
WASHINGTON: US senators on Saturday began debating Donald Trump's "big beautiful" spending bill, a hugely divisive proposal that would deliver key parts of the US president's domestic agenda while making massive cuts to social welfare programs. Trump is hoping to seal his legacy with the "One Big Beautiful Bill," which would extend his expiring first-term tax cuts at a cost of US$4.5 trillion and beef up border security. But Republicans eyeing 2026 midterm congressional elections are divided over the package, which would strip health care from millions of the poorest Americans and add more than US$3 trillion to the country's debt. The Senate formally opened debate on the bill late Saturday, after Republican holdouts delayed what should have been a procedural vote – drawing Trump's ire on social media. Senators narrowly passed the motion to begin debate, 51-49, hours after the vote was first called, with Vice President JD Vance joining negotiations with holdouts from his own party. Ultimately, two Republican senators joined 47 Democrats in voting "nay" on opening debate. Trump has pushed his party to get the bill passed and on his desk for him to sign into law by July 4, the United States' independence day. Democrats are bitterly opposed to the legislation and Trump's agenda, and have vowed to hold up the debate. They began by insisting that the entirety of the bill be read aloud to the chamber before the debate commences. The bill is roughly 1,000 pages long and will take an estimated 15 hours to read. "Republicans won't tell America what's in the bill," said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer. "So Democrats are forcing it to be read start to finish on the floor. We will be here all night if that's what it takes to read it." If passed in the Senate, the bill would go back to the House for approval, where Republicans can only afford to lose a handful of votes – and are facing stiff opposition from within their own ranks. Republicans are scrambling to offset the US$4.5 trillion cost of Trump's tax relief, with many of the proposed cuts to come from decimating funding for Medicaid, the health insurance program for low-income Americans. Republicans are split on the Medicaid cuts, which will threaten scores of rural hospitals and lead to an estimated 8.6 million Americans being deprived of health care. The spending plan would also roll back many of the tax incentives for renewable energy that were put in place under Trump's predecessor Joe Biden. On Saturday, key Trump ally Elon Musk – with whom the president had a public falling out this month over his criticism of the bill – called the current proposal "utterly insane and destructive." "It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future," said Musk, who is the world's richest person, and owns electric vehicle company Tesla and space flight firm SpaceX, among others. Independent analysis also shows that the bill would pave the way for a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest 10 per cent of Americans to the richest. The bill is unpopular across multiple demographic, age and income groups, according to extensive recent polling. Although the House has already passed its own version, both chambers have to agree on the same text before it can be signed into law.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
US factory struggles with Trump steel tariffs impact
BELCAMP: The sweltering summer heat at Independent Can's Maryland factory contrasts sharply with the snowman-decorated metal containers taking shape on the production line. But the real tension stems from President Donald Trump's steep steel tariffs, now doubled to 50%, which CEO Rick Huether says are wreaking havoc on his business. Huether, 73, who began working at his family's company at age 14, is determined to keep the nearly century-old firm afloat. However, Trump's tariffs on imported steel and aluminum have complicated operations, forcing Huether to consider price hikes of over 20%. 'We're living in chaos right now,' Huether told AFP. The factory, which employs nearly 400 workers across four sites, relies heavily on imported tinplate—a steel variant coated with tin to prevent rust. Yet, US production meets only 25% of the demand, leaving manufacturers like Independent Can dependent on foreign suppliers. While Huether supports strengthening US manufacturing, he criticizes Trump's unpredictable tariff policies. 'Those all require us to buy in the neighborhood of 70 percent of our steel outside of the United States,' he said. The tariffs have already led to a 20-25% drop in orders as customers brace for economic uncertainty. The company's Iowa plant shut down last year partly due to earlier tariff hikes. Now, with costs soaring, Huether fears history may repeat itself. Some buyers are shifting to American-made products, but Huether remains skeptical. 'During the pandemic, we took everybody in... our business went up 50 percent,' he said. Yet, post-pandemic, clients returned to cheaper Chinese alternatives. Huether insists on long-term contracts to mitigate risks. 'We need to have a two-year contract,' he said. Despite the challenges, he remains hopeful. 'I think that our business will survive,' he added, though navigating the next six months remains uncertain.
