logo
Emmett Till national monument at risk of removal from Trump's anti-DEI initiatives

Emmett Till national monument at risk of removal from Trump's anti-DEI initiatives

Yahoo5 hours ago

Tallahatchie County, Mississippi — There are 138 National Monuments across the U.S., but for the first time in nearly 100 years, they're eligible to be sold for parts.
This Juneteenth, some of the protected lands in jeopardy commemorate important moments in American civil rights history, including some newer monuments like the Emmett Till and Mamie Till-Mobley National Monument.
"We are seeing this effort to erase and reverse history and historic preservation," said historian Alan Spears, senior director of cultural resources and government affairs for the National Parks Conservation Association. "This is turning quickly into a dream deferred."
Spears advocated for years, alongside several community members, to get federal protections for the areas in Mississippi and Chicago that tell the story of Emmett Till — a 14-year-old Chicago boy who was kidnapped in the middle of the night and brutally lynched in 1955 after reportedly whistling at a White woman while visiting family in Mississippi.
"His badly decomposed body was taken from the water, and officials in this area wanted to have him buried immediately to sort of get rid of the evidence," Spears explained. "His mother insisted that he'd be sent back to Chicago, where they had an open casket funeral. And images of Till's badly decomposed body in that open casket really sparked the modern civil rights movement."
Protections to preserve this history finally came in 2023, when a monument consisting of two sites in Mississippi and one in Illinois, was designated by former President Joe Biden.
One site is located at Graball Landing along the Tallahatchie River near Glendora, Mississippi, where Till's body was found. The second is at the Tallahatchie County Courthouse in Sumner, Mississippi, where his confessed killers were found not guilty by an all-White jury. The third is located at Chicago's Roberts Temple Church of God in Christ, where Till's funeral was held.
Spears says he and his colleagues have been working to expand the monument, not remove or shrink it.
"Let's make sure it doesn't happen to anybody else's son ever again," Spears said.
But just as the stroke of a president's pen preserved these areas, it could now take them away.
A legal opinion released by the Justice Department earlier this month gives presidents the ability to revoke or shrink certain national monuments for the first time since the 1930s. The opinion comes as part of a movement against diversity, equity and inclusion, with some land reportedly under consideration to be used for mineral extractions.
It's not just national monuments that are at risk. Under newly proposed budget cuts for the National Park Service of nearly $1 billion, Spears says more than 300 park sites would be forced to shut down. Those budget cuts could also potentially see the closure of the Emmett Till and Mamie Till-Mobley National Monument, according to Spears and former National Park Service Director Chuck Sams.
"It's like amputating an arm for a hangnail. It's a complete overreaction," Spears says.
Sams says the agency has lost 13% of its staff already since he left his post earlier this year.
Sams was involved in the designation of five different National Monuments signed by Biden, including the Till monument. He says if the monument were to close, it would be "very sad and egregious."
"People don't like to look at their past when it shows a negative light of who we are, and I can understand that nobody likes to look at their own personal past that may have a negative light, but we also know that in order to learn from our own history, we also have to learn from our past mistakes,' Sams told CBS News. "And we, as Americans, have never been actually scared to do so, and I don't think we should be now. We look at our past, and we know that from our past mistakes that we have become stronger."
Currently, the Chuckwalla National Monument and Sáttítla Highlands National Monument — both located in California — are under consideration for revocation or being sold for parts.
The Baaj Nwaavjo I'tāh Kukveni–Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument is also under consideration reportedly due to its uranium supply.
Judy Cummings is touring America's national monuments this summer with her daughter and granddaughter.
They drove from Wisconsin to see the Emmett Till and Mamie Till-Mobley National Monument sites in North Mississippi.
Asked about the potential for sites like this to close, Cummings said, "it makes me want to weep and it makes me furious at the same time."
When asked about the potential removal of national monuments, White House spokesperson Anne Kelly told CBS News in a statement, "Under President Trump's leadership, Secretary Burgum is keeping our parks ready for peak season, ensuring they are in pristine condition for visitors, and restoring truth and sanity to depictions of American history in line with the President's Executive Order. The President is simultaneously following through on his promise to 'Drill, Baby, Drill' and restore American energy dominance."
And in a separate statement provided to to CBS News, the Department of Interior said: "Under President Trump's leadership, we're advancing strategic reforms to maximize resources and improve park operations. These efforts will make our parks more efficient, better maintained, and more enjoyable for the American people, while keeping conservation efforts strong and effective. By modernizing how we manage assets and facilities, we're ensuring our parks can serve future generations even better."
"You can't just do away with more than two-thirds of the National Park System because it makes sense from a government efficiency standpoint," Spears said. "That's not what we want."
According to a recent study, about half of the current National Parks first began as National Monuments, including the iconic Grand Canyon.
According to Spears, every $1 invested in a National Park site returns about $15 to the communities that it is located in.
"That's an enormous, enormous return on investment," Spears said.
It is also an investment in the visitors too.
"I don't really have words," said Nicole Cummings, Judy's daughter. "I just kind of get goosebumps and it's just really powerful."
SpaceX Starship upper stage blows up
Hurricane Erick approaches Mexico with destructive winds, major storm surge
Biden to speak at Juneteenth event in Texas

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wendy Williams had 'no idea' about her 'money-grubber' ex-husband's lawsuit
Wendy Williams had 'no idea' about her 'money-grubber' ex-husband's lawsuit

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Wendy Williams had 'no idea' about her 'money-grubber' ex-husband's lawsuit

Wendy Williams had "no idea" her "money-grubber" ex-husband Kevin Hunter was planning to file a $250 million lawsuit over her guardianship. Hunter - who was married to the presenter from 1999 until 2020 - filed a lawsuit on Tuesday (17.06.25) demanding a jury trial and naming 48 defendants who he claims have violated Wendy's constitutional rights by facilitating a guardianship order which came into force in 2022 - but Wendy has insisted she's not involved with the legal challenge. She told "[I had] no idea [he was filing the suit]. Nor do I want him to be a part of my life like that, no. Because I'm divorced forever ... "He's a money-grubber; he's always been that way. It's good to know that he's doing such evil things - again .. He won't win." Amongst those named in the legal papers are Wendy's legal guardian Sabrina Morrissey, the judge presiding over her guardianship Lisa Sokoloff, Wells Fargo, her assisted living facility and several lawyers. The complaint states: "Guardianship is a civil death. In New York, more than 28,000 adults, which includes (Williams), are being abused, neglected, and defrauded under the care of court-appointed guardians." The Wendy Williams Show host was placed under a legal guardianship in 2022 before it was revealed the following year that she had been diagnosed with aphasia and frontotemporal dementia. LaShawn Thomas, the attorney who filed the lawsuit, acknowledged that Wendy is "not legally aware of all the evidence that supports our claims that she should not be forced to suffer from this guardianship". The statement to People read: "I plan on laying out sufficient evidence to support our claims and ensure that her rights are vindicated and she is made whole financially." Hunter's lawsuit is not looking for an end to the former broadcaster's guardianship but his requests include a "new impartial guardian", the unsealing of her case's files, her release from "involuntary confinement", a full forensic accounting and $250 million in relief for financial loss, repetitional damage, emotional distress, legal costs and the deprivation of Wendy's liberty. Kevin has been named as a co-plaintiff in the case and wants to be appointed as Williams' "next friend" - a party who can legally act "on behalf of an individual unable to assert their own rights and when no guardian is acting in their best interests".

Trump to Decide on Iran Strike Within Two Weeks
Trump to Decide on Iran Strike Within Two Weeks

Bloomberg

time41 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump to Decide on Iran Strike Within Two Weeks

00:00 Let me just ask you about the latest, which is that President Trump seems to be opening a window, a door to the diplomatic channels, and says that he has not made a final decision on whether to get involved in this war militarily, essentially buying about two weeks of time before we know exactly what the U.S. are going to do. Yes, I think you're exactly right. I don't think his initial instinct or his basic instinct is to go to war. In fact, he returned to power on the promise of withdrawing the United States or ending endless wars, needless wars, as he would see them. So I think his first choice, his first preference would be for a diplomatic deal, of course, his terms for a diplomatic deal so far and not terms the Iranians have accepted. And perhaps he sees the coming two weeks with sustained Israeli military pressure as the time in which Iran will do a review and perhaps decide to climb down from its refusal to give up its uranium enrichment. That really is at the heart of this diplomatic dispute. Now, it's also worth remembering the phrasing within two weeks actually gives a very hazy timeline. Essentially, he can make a decision a minute from now. He can make a decision two weeks from now. And if it's two weeks from now, that takes us up against the July 4th holiday, Independence Day in the United States, perhaps a time when he would want to hold up a successful U.S. military offensive, military intervention in Iran as part of his administration's success. So it's very hard to know if there's also a tactical haze, a sense that he might be wanting to, again, lower the guard of the Iranians for an eventual U.S. intervention militarily if that happens.

'No One Has Ever!': Jimmy Kimmel Trolls Trump By Exposing His 'Ultimate' Move
'No One Has Ever!': Jimmy Kimmel Trolls Trump By Exposing His 'Ultimate' Move

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

'No One Has Ever!': Jimmy Kimmel Trolls Trump By Exposing His 'Ultimate' Move

Jimmy Kimmel said President Donald Trump has a go-to move when it comes to big decisions: stall for time. The president went to it again this week while trying to decide on military intervention in Iran. 'Trump gave Iran what he called the 'ultimate ultimatum,' which is kind of like the 'final finale,' but scarier,' Kimmel said. 'He really enjoys making threats, and he loves attaching them to timelines.' Trump said he'd make a decision on Iran within two weeks. 'It's always two weeks,' Kimmel pointed out. 'For a guy whose catchphrase was 'You're fired,' no one has ever given more two weeks' notice than Donald J. Trump.' Kimmel rolled a minute-long supercut video of Trump promising various things within two weeks, ending with a vow to sign a new health care plan into law ― also in two weeks. 'That was July 19, 2020,' Kimmel noted. 'We're still waiting for him to sign that health care plan, and on almost all of the other stuff, too.' See more in his Thursday night monologue:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store