
Poilievre happy to keep old beater running, even if it's stuck in reverse
The federal Conservatives want to kill Ottawa's electric vehicle mandate.
That's their solution to the many challenges Canada faces in transitioning to a low-emissions transportation sector.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has made no secret of his disdain for the policy, which requires that all new light-duty vehicles sold in Canada by 2035 be either fully electric or plug-in hybrid. A phase-in period is scheduled to begin next year.
ADRIAN WYLD / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES
It's Poilievre's latest wedge issue — one he hopes will be as successful politically as the 'axe the tax' campaign he waged against the Liberal government's consumer carbon tax (which Prime Minister Mark Carney scrapped earlier this year).
Granted, there are legitimate concerns with Ottawa's EV target, especially in a country with long winters, sprawling geography and a patchwork of inadequate charging infrastructure. But cancelling the mandate outright would be reckless, given what's at stake with climate change.
Canada has already been experiencing the costly effects of global warming — out-of-control wildfires that are devastating communities coast-to-coast, extreme heat and more intense storms.
Transportation is the second-largest source of greenhouse-gas emissions in Canada, accounting for almost a quarter of the total. About half of those emissions came from cars and light passenger trucks in 2023.
If we're serious about curbing those emissions, we can't simply throw up our hands and stick with the status quo.
Expecting Canadians to embrace electric vehicles, including hybrid plug-ins, en masse without ensuring affordability, reliable performance in cold weather and easy access to charging stations is putting the cart before the horse.
That doesn't mean the Liberal plan is flawless. Far from it. Ottawa has set an ambitious deadline but hasn't fully equipped Canadians to meet it. Expecting Canadians to embrace electric vehicles, including hybrid plug-ins, en masse without ensuring affordability, reliable performance in cold weather and easy access to charging stations is putting the cart before the horse.
For most Canadians, the biggest barrier to buying an EV today is price. While costs have come down in recent years, electric vehicles remain considerably more expensive than their gas-powered counterparts.
Ottawa had an EV rebate program, but the program ran out of money. There's talk of bringing in a new one.
The second challenge is performance in Canada's climate. Anyone who has driven or tested an EV in -30°C knows battery range drops significantly in the cold, sometimes by as much as 30 to 40 per cent. That's not a minor inconvenience for Canadians who live in rural or northern regions, where driving distances are longer and charging stations are few and far between.
People need to know that their vehicle will get them from A to B reliably, even in the dead of winter. Manufacturers are making progress, but cold-weather performance is still a major hurdle that has to be overcome before Canadians can have full confidence in electric vehicles.
MIKAELA MACKENZIE / FREE PRESS FILES
That leads directly to the third problem: infrastructure. Canada's charging network is woefully inadequate. According to Natural Resources Canada, there are just under 30,000 public charging ports nationwide. That might sound like a lot, but the federal government estimates that Canada would need well over 600,000 charging ports by 2040 to meet the new mandate.
It's not enough to have a token charging station in a small town off the highway. Drivers need the same kind of convenience they have today with gas stations — knowing they can charge quickly and get back on the road without planning their trip around charging stops.
Ottawa has committed to funding more charging stations, but the pace of expansion is nowhere near what's required to meet the 2035 mandate.
None of these shortcomings should surprise anyone. Transforming an entire transportation sector in a country as large and diverse as Canada is not a simple task.
What's disappointing is the lack of urgency in addressing them. Rather than tackling these challenges head-on — through stronger subsidies, cold-weather technology incentives and aggressive investment in charging infrastructure — the Liberals have spent more time trumpeting the target itself. Targets don't reduce emissions. Real action does.
This is where the Conservatives could play a constructive role. But instead, they've chosen the easy political path of tearing down the mandate altogether. That might be an effective vote-getter in some quarters, but it's dangerously short-sighted. It does nothing to address the broader climate crisis.
We can debate the feasibility of a 2035 deadline and the phase-in period leading up to it. Maybe it needs to be pushed back to 2040 to give technology and infrastructure time to catch up.
But eliminating the policy altogether would leave Canada further behind in a global transition that is already well underway.
The climate crisis doesn't care about political lines or partisan preferences. It's already costing Canadians billions in disaster recovery and insurance payouts.
The climate crisis doesn't care about political lines or partisan preferences. It's already costing Canadians billions in disaster recovery and insurance payouts, not to mention lives lost and communities destroyed.
Canadians deserve a serious conversation about how to make this mandate workable, not a political stunt that promises a return to business as usual. That means acknowledging the obstacles and crafting solutions that ordinary people can afford and trust.
Bring back meaningful subsidies. Accelerate investment in infrastructure. Incentivize research and development into cold-weather battery performance. And if the 2035 timeline proves unrealistic, adjust it.
What Canada can't afford to do is simply give up.
tom.brodbeck@freepress.mb.ca
Tom BrodbeckColumnist
Tom Brodbeck is a columnist with the Free Press and has over 30 years experience in print media. He joined the Free Press in 2019. Born and raised in Montreal, Tom graduated from the University of Manitoba in 1993 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics and commerce. Read more about Tom.
Tom provides commentary and analysis on political and related issues at the municipal, provincial and federal level. His columns are built on research and coverage of local events. The Free Press's editing team reviews Tom's columns before they are posted online or published in print – part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Are gas vehicles really being banned in Canada? Let's fact check that
Is Prime Minister Mark Carney really planning to ban gas vehicles? It's something Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has said numerous times, most recently while visiting a farm near Saskatoon. Now that he's officially heading back to Ottawa after winning an Alberta byelection Monday, we decided to take a closer look at the country's zero-emission vehicle targets, and what he's said about them.

Cision Canada
2 hours ago
- Cision Canada
CIRO to Hold a Disciplinary Hearing for Abid Hossain Français
TORONTO, le 19 août 2025 /CNW/ - An initial appearance has been scheduled under the Investment Dealer and Partially Consolidated Rules before a hearing panel of the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) to set a date for a disciplinary hearing in the matter of Abid Hossain. The initial appearance is open to the public unless the hearing panel orders otherwise. The date for the disciplinary hearing will be made available at Initial Appearance Date: August 28, 2025 at 10:00 am (Eastern Time) Location: Toronto, Ontario (via videoconference) Members of the public, who would like to obtain further particulars, should fill out this form. The hearing concerns allegations that Abid Hossain misappropriated, misapplied, or failed to account for the proceeds of redemptions of client investments that he processed, and failed to cooperate with an investigation by CIRO Staff into his conduct. The Notice of Hearing and Statement of Allegations, which set out the allegations, are available at: The alleged violations occurred while Abid Hossain was a Dealing Representative with TD Investment Services in the Toronto, Ontario area. Abid Hossain is not currently registered with a CIRO-regulated firm in any capacity. * * * The Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) is the national self-regulatory organization that oversees all investment dealers, mutual fund dealers and trading activity on Canada's debt and equity marketplaces. CIRO is committed to the protection of investors, providing efficient and consistent regulation, and building Canadians' trust in financial regulation and the people managing their investments. For more information, visit All information about disciplinary proceedings relating to current and former member firms and individual registrants under the Investment Dealer and Partially Consolidated Rules (for investment dealers), the Mutual Fund Dealer Rules (for mutual fund dealers) and the Universal Market Integrity Rules (UMIR) is available on CIRO's website. Background information regarding the qualifications and disciplinary history, if any, of advisors currently employed by CIRO-regulated investment firms is available free of charge through the AdvisorReport service. Information on how to make dealer, advisor or marketplace-related complaints is available by calling 1-877-442-4322. CIRO investigates possible misconduct by its member firms and individual registrants. It can bring disciplinary proceedings which may result in sanctions including fines, suspensions, permanent bars, expulsion from membership, or termination of rights and privileges for individuals and firms. All other Inquiries: Complaints & Inquiries Secure form Toll-free (Canada/US) 1-877-442-4322 Hearing Notice Number: 25-0236 SOURCE Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO)

Edmonton Journal
2 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Deachman: Will Alberta MP Pierre Poilievre show more contempt for Ottawa's public servants?
Article content One thing is for sure: with Pierre Poilievre officially back in the political ring, things in Ottawa aren't likely to be boring. Article content But which Poilievre will we see? Article content Article content On the one hand, it's possible that, after experiencing his first electoral defeat in April following seven consecutive victories, we might see a more introspective politician and man — one who doesn't take anything, and least of all voters from across the spectrum, for granted. Article content Article content Then again, it's also feasible that the newest Alberta MP, who blamed public service unions for his loss in Carleton four months ago — and who is no longer directly beholden to those same Ottawa voters — may start showing even more contempt for public servants and others he deems to have suckled for too long at the teat of Liberal/Eastern largesse. Article content Article content It's been 16 weeks since Carleton voters sent their longtime MP and wannabe PM packing. On Monday, the people of Alberta's Battle River-Crowfoot riding — or slightly more than 40,000 of them at least — sent him back to Ottawa to represent them. Article content Those who have wearied of Poilievre's endless 'Canada is broken' refrain and populist rhetoric might find some small shards of solace in the numbers: Poilievre did, after all, receive 13,000 fewer votes than Tory Damien Kurek got when he won the seat in April. And nearly 15,000 fewer Battle River-Crowfoot electors even bothered to show up this time, lowering turnout from 76 per cent in April to about 59 per cent (in comparison, almost 82 per cent of Carletonites cast ballots in April). Article content Article content But let's not kid ourselves. These are the straws clutched at by bitter losers. Poilievre's victory on Monday was a landslide. Sure, it was a safe seat, but in claiming just over 80 per cent of the votes cast, he barely even creased his parachute. And he did so —technically, anyway — on a write-in ballot, with Elections Canada refusing to cut down the forests necessary to print ballots with 214 candidates' names on them. Article content Article content Still, though, and with apologies to Michael Corleone, it kind of feels as though just when we thought he was out, they threw him back in. Article content But such is politics, and I have my fingers crossed that maybe a second Poilievre makeover will take. The last one, in 2023, saw PP jettison his wardrobe, optometrist and hair stylist to present a warmer, more relaxed persona. It was enough to (likely) defeat an extremely unpopular Justin Trudeau. But it didn't prevent Poilievre from alienating many voters with his endless yammering about the Liberals' 'lost decade' and blaming Trudeau 2.0, and later Carney, for pretty much any perceived shortcoming in the country. Trump's implacability? A global increase in food prices?



