Marc Lamont Hill Breaks Silence on Viral Video of Him Getting Pepper Sprayed During a Talk
In 2024, scholar, author and activist Marc Lamont Hill was the victim of a terrifying attack during a speaking engagement that left him and those who witnessed it in complete shock. Hill, who has not previously spoken about the event, just gave us more details about the incident and the woman who instigated it.
On the June 12 episode of 'The Joe Budden Podcast,' Hill explained that an alleged stalker attacked him with pepper spray at a Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day event in his native Philadelphia, which took place across the street from his bookstore, Uncle Bobbie's Coffee & Books. The woman — who apparently believed Hill was part of a government plot against her — approached the stage where he was sitting and pepper-sprayed him.
Hill shot behind the stage curtains until security could restrain the woman.
'She had written a letter to me, saying that she was trying to talk to me about how the CIA and Joe Biden were trying to frame her for murder,' Hill explained.
A video of the incident has recently resurfaced on social media.
Although the incident was extremely serious, host Joe Budden still managed to find a way to make a joke. When teased by Budden that the alleged stalker might have been upset about a romance gone wrong, Hill quickly denied having any ties with his alleged attacker.
'Not only did I not hit, I never met her before. It was clear she was a crazy person, right?' he asked.
In case you were wondering, Hill, who has been outspoken about finding alternatives to calling the police, told Budden that he understood the woman was mentally ill and never planned to get law enforcement involved.
'You can hear me on the tape say, 'Do not call the police,'' he said. 'I walk it like I talk it. She was mentally ill. She had been stalking me for a couple of weeks, and I didn't know … I never met her before.'
Hill shared more about how he's engaged with the woman's family since the incident on social media.
'I have worked with her family and community members to enable a restorative process. Through the process, I have learned that she did indeed suffer significant childhood abuse, as well as serious mental health challenges that continue to this day. Instead of criminal prosecution, I have done my best to make sure that she receives social and mental health support to help her heal as best as possible,' he wrote in part in a June 12 post on X.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Tom's Guide
6 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
One of the year's best spy thriller movies is finally streaming — and it's perfect for ‘Jason Bourne' fans
I feel like 2025 has been a pretty great year for spy movies. We got the seriously excellent 'Black Bag' in March, and the popcorn thrills of 'Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning' are still delighting audiences in the theatre. But good things often come in threes, and this is no exception. 'The Amateur,' a gripping little action-thriller which arrived in cinemas back in April, perhaps didn't get the love it deserves. The critical reception was mixed, but I'm here to argue its merits now that it's finally arrived on premium video-on-demand via platforms including Apple and Amazon. Starring 'Mr. Robot' lead and Oscar-winner Rami Malek, it's an engaging spy flick very much in the mold of the 'Jason Bourne' franchise. However, don't worry: It's a cut above Bourne's most recent secret agent efforts. Plus, it includes one of my favourite action scenes of the year — though sadly, it was completely spoiled in the various trailers, so preview watcher beware! If you're looking to inject a dose of excitement into your weekend or just want to absorb yourself in a thrilling revenge mission, look to 'The Amateur." Based on the Robert Littell novel of the same name, which was previously adapted into a Canadian movie in 1981, 'The Amateur' opens as many action-thrillers do with CIA decoder Charlie Heller (Rami Malek) living a seemingly perfect life with his wife, Sarah (Rachel Brosnahan). When Sarah travels to London, she is murdered in a terrorist attack. Using his own computer wizardry, Charlie identifies those responsible, but is rebuffed by his superiors, and stunned when they refuse to take immediate action. Blackmailing his bosses, he demands to be given expert training at a military base and given a license to hunt down the four assailants himself. New to the spy game, Charlie finds himself in way over his head as he travels across the globe to find the men who killed his wife. But while he's no sharpshooter, his knack for outsmarting his enemies soon becomes his greatest weapon on his revenge mission. Conceptually, 'The Amateur' isn't breaking new ground. Anybody who has seen 2017's 'American Assassin' might get a sense of deja vu about the whole 'man trains as a spy to get revenge for the murder of his girlfriend' narrative, and that's just one example of the trope. It's been used in the genre for decades. But it's a rich well for storytelling that spy media returns to so often for a reason. It's effortlessly compelling. It's very easy to immediately get onboard with Charlie's mission and want to see those responsible for the attack brought to justice. Or at least, what Charlie perceives to be rightful justice. Some critics were scornful of the movie's cold tone, but I found it fitting for both Charlie's detached headspace in the wake of his wife's death and the morally grey world in which he operates. Even his mentor figure, Henderson (Laurence Fishburne), is far from a wisecracking sidekick. It's not a movie full of levity, and it doesn't have to be either. It's very focused, much like Charlie. While the portion that sees Charlie trained up to be at least vaguely competent in the field does drag a little, once he flies off to Paris to begin his quest, the pacing quickens, and it doesn't let up from there. I said there was no levity, but there is an almost comedic element to his first attempted hit as he bumbles his way through his first stab at things. As the movie progresses, Charlie becomes more and more skilled in the role, and by the time he confronts one of his wife's killers at a rooftop pool in Madrid, he's ruthless. It's this scene, which sees him execute a well-staged plan that marks the movie's high point, and it's a shame its culmination is so thoroughly spoiled in the trailer. The focus on brains instead of brawn is probably my favorite aspect of 'The Amateur.' Charlie quickly realizes he can't outmuscle his enemies, or outgun them, but he can outmanoeuvre them. This leads to several thrilling sequences when you think Charlie has been backed into a corner, only for him to reveal he was pulling the puppet strings all along. While the overarching international conspiracy plot does require viewers to suspend their disbelief quite often, the gritty and grounded tone reminds me of the 'Jason Bourne' franchise more than the slightly cheesy suave spy escapade you might find in the 'James Bond' movies. As somebody who's always preferred the former (yes, even as a Brit), that's a win in my books. 'The Amateur' was no flop with critics, but it wasn't a darling either. It currently holds a 61% score on Rotten Tomatoes, enough for a fresh rating, but only just. The site's 'Critics Consensus' reads, 'Rami Malek is a compellingly unconventional action hero in the otherwise formulaic The Amateur, which dispenses justice with solid execution but a curious lack of emotional stakes. However, chalk this one up as another case where viewers were impressed than the critics. 'The Amateur' holds an 88% score on the RT Popcornmeter. Some of the user's recent reviews describe it as 'perfect,' 'thrilling' and 'entertaining'. I certainly wouldn't go as far as to label it flawless, but I certainly agree with the latter two statements. If you enjoy a good spy movie or just can't get enough of action-thrillers (which seem to be all the rage in the streaming world these days), consider giving 'The Amateur' a watch. With a strong leading performance from Malek and some highly suspenseful scenes, it's pretty darn gripping. Not totally sold on "The Amateur"? Here's a roundup of all the top new movies arriving on streaming this week, which offers plenty of extra choices with flicks to suit every mood and taste in cinema.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kate Beckinsale says 'Canary Black' producers made her perform 'dangerous' action stunts
Kate Beckinsale is suing the producers of her 2024 film "Canary Black," claiming she was exposed to "unsafe" working conditions and forced to perform stunts resulting in "debilitating" injuries. In a lawsuit first filed anonymously in December, amended May 21 and obtained by USA TODAY June 12, Beckinsale alleged that the "extremely challenging and physically demanding" action role, in which she plays a former CIA agent, caused "significant trauma to her left knee." Media site Puck was first to report the lawsuit. Beckinsale is suing producer John Zois, Anton Entertainment Media Services and Canary Black LTD for negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress and battery. Beckinsale, 51, is requesting a jury trial, as well as economic, non-economic and punitive damages. USA TODAY has reached out to Beckinsale and Zois' reps for comment. Kate Beckinsale details assault on set at 18, more abuse after Blake Lively complaint Beckinsale, who filmed the movie from late 2022 to early 2023, said despite prior agreements and the actress and her team raising the alarm on what they call "unsafe" conditions – including 15-hour shooting days, surprise stunts and lack of adequate equipment and medical personnel on set – the production "recklessly and intentionally" forged ahead, according to the lawsuit. Before filming began in Croatia in September 2022, Beckinsale and the movie's producers had agreed to have physical health resources – including gym equipment, a physical trainer or a qualified massage therapist – but none were provided, the lawsuit stated. She was also contracted to be on set for no more than 12 hours, which filming routinely pushed past. She said the producers would often deviate from the filming schedule and inform her of stunts "spur of the moment," therefore "recklessly increasing the risk of injury." And she recalled being told on the same day that scenes previously set to be filmed via green screen were suddenly "practical." At one point, Beckinsale's stuntwoman broke an ankle after a "dangerous" scene. As a replacement, the producers provided an "unqualified" stunt performer who was "simply the girlfriend of the stunt coordinator." According to Beckinsale, Zois at another point told her "that the production company had failed" to do "any significant training period" for things like harness work. In November 2022, Beckinsale and her team brought concerns to Zois, per the filing, which he purportedly acknowledged. "I don't know what else to say other than you're right," he said, according to the suit. And "bottom line, we need to shorten these days…The days are too packed for the pace we are moving and it's CLEARLY not sustainable." However, conditions did not change, the lawsuit states. And in a December 2022 incident, Beckinsale was directed to perform a "dangerous" stunt with a male actor that involved throwing and slamming her into a wall, per the filing. The actor was fully padded, while Beckinsale only received mini pads, providing no protection. Despite her complaints, many takes were shot, resulting in her suffering a complex meniscus tear in her left knee, the suit said. The lawsuit stated that Beckinsale was immediately pressured to return to finish the film, with the actress asserting her return was contingent upon her doctor approving the shot list and the team sticking to strict physical limitations. Despite the medical orders, when the actress returned in February 2023, the film's producers failed to adhere to orders, continuing to inform her of unsafe action shots last minute, which caused further injury. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Kate Beckinsale lawsuit: 'Canary Black' stunts were 'unsafe'
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
How Israel Executed Its Surprise Assault on Iran
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. To pull off the most ambitious and sophisticated attack in the long history of antagonism between the Middle East's preeminent powers, covert Israeli agents set up a drone base deep inside Iranian territory. They recruited disaffected Iranians to aid their cause. They smuggled weapons systems across enemy lines. These are among the espionage tactics that allowed Israel to conduct its surprise attack on Iran last night, simultaneously eroding Tehran's defenses and limiting its capacity to retaliate as Israeli forces picked off senior commanders and struck sensitive nuclear sites. The operation, termed 'Rising Lion,' signals a new phase in Israel's efforts to transform extensive intelligence gathering into decisive military campaigns intended to outmaneuver its enemies throughout the Middle East. In recent years, Israel has used intelligence to assassinate top Iranian military officers and nuclear scientists, as well as the leaders of Iran-backed militias. Israel has also targeted sensitive locations within Iran for air strikes. The attacks begun this week, however, were more audacious both in the scope of the targeting and in the clear aim of arresting Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Among the sites struck was the Natanz Nuclear Facility, where Iran has generated most of its nuclear fuel. Fordow, a facility buried under a mountain, presents a more difficult target. A former U.S. intelligence official with expertise in the Middle East told us that Israel may need U.S. bunker-buster weapons to do more lasting damage to additional Iranian facilities. That makes Washington's potential support for what is expected to be a drawn-out campaign all the more important. Israeli and other Western officials said the campaign was in its initial stages, and Tehran has vowed a vigorous response, which began after sunset today when it fired dozens of missiles toward Israel—including some that made it through the Iron Dome defensive shield. But current and former U.S. and Israeli officials and analysts told us that the blow already dealt to Iran in the early hours of the attack makes manifest Israel's advantages. [Read: The war Israel was ready to fight] Iran's 'Axis of Resistance'—a network of militias expected to join in any war with Israel—is flat on its back, degraded by a series of U.S.-enabled Israeli offensives over the past year and a half. Israel weakened Iran's air-defense systems and missile-production facilities in a pair of strikes conducted last April and October, while also revealing the limits of Iran's offensive capabilities by fending off drones and missiles in a coordinated effort with Western partners. As a former CIA station chief in Israel told us, the Mossad has 'a good network inside Iran, and they have the support of the U.S.' Iran, meanwhile, has shown that it possesses neither strategic foresight nor the technical ability to fend off Israeli operations, the former station chief said, pointing to the 2020 assassinations of Qasem Soleimani, Iran's senior security and intelligence commander, and Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, the country's top nuclear scientist. 'To add to it,' the former senior intelligence officer said, 'Iran has few friends, so it's hard for them to get supplies in.' Iran also has enemies within: A former Israeli intelligence official told The Atlantic that Iranians opposed to the regime make for a ready recruiting pool, and indicated that Iranians working for Israel were involved in efforts to build a drone base inside the country. Israel's operation drew on years of intelligence gathering against senior Iranian commanders and scientists and relied on extensive cooperation between the Mossad and the Israeli military. It showed not just technical prowess, homing in on key targets, but also creativity in executing covert action that has been a hallmark of Israel's multipronged campaign against its enemies in the region. The Mossad released video today of Israeli operatives deploying precision strikes on air-defense systems from inside Iran. Security officials briefed Israeli media on other aspects of the secretive operation, including the use of vehicles to smuggle weapons systems into the country. In a statement late yesterday, in the early hours of the strikes, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the United States was not involved in the attack. But a former Israeli security official told us that there is 'no doubt' that Israel had U.S. backing for its actions, even if Donald Trump and his advisers had worked to avert a strike. The former official said that the apparent inability of the Iranians to mount a vigorous self-defense makes clear that there is 'less Iranian capacity than they wanted us all to believe.' Still, the former official said, Tehran will retaliate and 'can do much damage over time.' The central questions now are what role Trump intends to play, how severely Iran's nuclear program is stalled, and whether negotiations can be resumed. 'The Israelis are very tactically successful,' Ray Takeyh, a senior fellow for Middle East studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, told us. 'But they often confuse short-term success with long-term gain.' [Read: What Trump knew about the attack against Iran] A primary reason the Israelis were determined to act now, Takeyh said, is that they knew they had a limited window for success and needed to strike when Iran had reduced retaliatory capacity through its proxies—among them Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Hamas has been seriously diminished by nearly two years of fighting triggered by its October 7, 2023, assault on Israel. And Hezbollah has been depleted by a long-running conflict with Israel, whose intelligence services succeeded in penetrating the group so extensively that they were able to remotely detonate the militia's pagers and walkie-talkies last year, killing or maiming scores of fighters. Proxies still in a position to respond militarily, analysts told us, include the Houthis in Yemen and Shiite militias in Iraq. The Houthis are perhaps the strongest component of the Iranian-backed axis. The Islamist faction active in northwestern Yemen has continued launching drones and missiles at Israel even as Washington secured a cease-fire agreement with the group, whose attacks on ships in the Red Sea had snarled international trade. U.S. officials told us that Israel feared Iran's rapid efforts to improve its retaliatory capacities, which added to their feeling that they had a limited window to act. But the inclination for a military solution also reflects a long-held impulse of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Before his second inauguration, in 2009, Netanyahu told Jeffrey Goldberg, now The Atlantic's editor in chief, that he would have to act if then–President Barack Obama failed to stop Iran's nuclear program. Obama reached a deal with Iran over Netanyahu's objections in 2015—a deal that Trump tore up three years later. In the midst of Trump's attempts to secure a new agreement, Netanyahu has taken his long-promised action. 'Since the dawn of the nuclear age, we have not had a fanatic regime that might put its zealotry above its self-interest,' Netanyahu said in 2009. 'People say that they'll behave like any other nuclear power. Can you take the risk?' Article originally published at The Atlantic