Tasman Debates Fairness Of Dog And Waste Fees
Dog fees in Tasman are going up after almost two thirds of submitters opposed the increases, and ratepayers will pick up the bill for other people's waste disposal.
Those are just two of many changes to the district council's fees and charges for next financial year, most of which are increasing by 10%.
But on Tuesday, the Tasman District Council grappled with the principles of fairness when trying to determine how dog and waste disposal fees were split.
Elected members confirmed that its annual dog registration fees would jump by $25, bringing urban dogs up to $90 and rural dogs to $70 – increases of 38 and 56% respectively.
A new working dog fee of $50 will also be introduced.
The council went ahead with the hikes despite 39 of 64 submitters on the entire suite of fee changes specifically opposing the increases.
Increasing the fee would ensure that the cost of delivering dog services – including enforcement, responding to complaints, managing public safety, operating the animal shelter, rehoming dogs, and educating the public – met the council's budget.
The closed dog services account has previously run at a deficit, which then impacts either council debt or rates.
Increasing the dog fees would also ensure the council continues its current approach that dog owners pay 95% of the costs of local dog services, in keeping with user pays principles.
But the scale of the increases concerned some elected members.
Mayor Tim King's proposal to stage the increase over two years lapsed due to a lack of support, as did councillor Glen Daikee's suggestion that SuperGold cardholders get reduced fees for urban dogs.
'Targeted relief for these residents would be worth it. 60% of people on a Super card over 65 are living on a fixed income essentially, and they don't have the ability to absorb these things as easily as others,' Daikee said.
His proposal would have had to be processed as a rebate, which would come with additional administrative costs.
However, members were interested in transitioning to a different dog fee framework in the future with 'much higher' base fees, but with rebates offered for responsible dog owners.
'At the moment there really isn't a significant incentive or disincentive between a good dog owner and a bad dog owner,' King said.
Resource recovery centres across the district are also receiving less waste, which might be an otherwise positive result for the council if it didn't complicate budget-setting.
Waste volumes have fallen by 28%, or 7500 tonnes, across Tasman over the last two years, with the Richmond centre bearing the brunt of the drop at 6000 tonnes.
The fall is attributed to a combination of a slower economy, waste minimisation initiatives, diversion to York Valley Landfill in Nelson, and increased illegal dumping.
Similar to dogs, the council has been seeking to recover most of its waste processing costs through those who use the service and drop off waste.
But many of the costs of running the resource recovery centres are static and don't decrease as the amount of waste decreases, meaning that dumping costs need to go up as waste shrinks.
The council's initial proposal was to increase the weight-based charge for mixed refuse by 28%, from $360.60 to $425.50 per tonne, to ensure that resource recovery was fully funded.
However, feedback from industry has indicated that jumps of that scale would increase the amount of waste being sent straight to the York Valley Landfill, reducing the council's revenue.
Elected members agreed to increase the rate by a smaller 15%, to about $414.70 per tonne, to try and reduce the amount of waste diversion.
That choice still leaves a deficit for next financial year and will mean another 0.215% added onto rates – already proposed to go up 8.8% – to cover the shortfall.
Council staff suggested a lesser increase might reduce illegal dumping, thus providing a community-wide benefit, but some councillors were wary of using rates to subsidise waste disposal.
'It's completely inconsistent with people taking personal responsibility … it sends all the wrong messages,' said Christeen Mackenzie.
The waste disposal charges will be reviewed in November 2025.
The new fees will be implemented on 1 July.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Budget rates relief ‘necessary'
Oamaru. PHOTO: PETER MCINTOSH Rates relief for potentially hundreds of Waitaki senior citizens through Budget 2025, is "timely and necessary", Age Concern Otago says. The Budget last week announced a rise in the income abatement threshold for SuperGold Cardholders and their households to be eligible for the maximum rebate from $31,510 to $45,000, about the same rate as a couple receiving superannuation. "In the Waitaki District alone, over 5700 people receive NZ Super, many of whom will benefit directly from this support," Age Concern Otago chief executive Mike Williams said. "While we don't have exact figures on how many will qualify, we do know that around 40% of New Zealanders aged 65 and over have virtually no other income beyond NZ Super. With nearly a quarter of Waitaki's population aged 65 or older, and rates set to rise by an average of around 10% across the district, this support is both timely and necessary." The maximum rebate for the scheme will also increase from $790 to $805, while those SuperGold cardholders with income higher than $45,000 will be eligible for a smaller rebate. Ratepayers can apply for the new maximum rebate under the new abatement thresholds after July 1. Application forms will be available from councils and will also be able to be downloaded from the New Zealand Government website ( and then submitted to local councils. Waitaki district mayor Gary Kircher is positive in his support for the move. "It's a tough budget for many, though I see some benefits in the budget for our community," he told the Oamaru Mail. "It is good to see that more of our Super Gold Card holders will be eligible for rates relief, as the government recognises the pressures on local government and their ratepayers. "This is welcome news for many of our Waitaki ratepayers, especially those on fixed incomes who own their own homes." Any over-65s with questions about eligibility can contact Waitaki District Council on 03 433 0300 or by contacting service@ Mr Kircher said there were other good news items in the Budget. "An increase of $2.7b for roads schools and hospitals will help, though at least some of those increases had already been announced. "From a council perspective, it will be extremely helpful if the government increases the ability of NZTA to match more of our funding to help councils make progress on the overall underinvestment in roading. "There will be general benefits for our community with the sensible changes to prescriptions, and improvements to our after-hours healthcare, along with an extra $1b for new health infrastructure. "However, the zero increase to many budgets and the decrease in others will be difficult for most government agencies. "I doubt that it has been an easy task for the government, and there is some good logic behind a number of changes. "Unfortunately, many people are doing it bloody hard right now and there will some who are going to be slightly better off, but not all of those most affected." Waitaki MP Miles Anderson said the district would also benefit from Budget 2025's new Investment Boost initiative, which would provide "a major new tax incentive to encourage businesses to invest, grow the economy, and lift wages". "This is great news for farms and businesses in the Waitaki and the initiative is already seeing a strong positive response from the sector. "With our region's strong rural and supporting industries we need businesses to invest in productive assets — like machinery, tools, equipment, vehicles and technology. Investment drives productivity improvements, makes firms more competitive and supports employers to improve workers' wages. "Investment Boost allows a business to immediately deduct 20% of the cost of a new asset, on top of depreciation, meaning a much lower tax bill in the year of purchase." That meant better cashflows, which in turn, makes potential investments "stack up financially", he said. On top of a $164m investment in rural health, including expanded and improved after-hours health services in Oamaru, the Budget also strengthened education provision with $1.5billion to improve student achievement, including $646m of initiatives to ensure earlier identification of, and better help for, children with additional physical, learning and behavioural needs, he said. Another $700m would deliver new schools and classrooms. "We are making smart improvements in education that will make a real difference for young people here," Mr Anderson said.
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
Tasman Debates Fairness Of Dog And Waste Fees
Dog fees in Tasman are going up after almost two thirds of submitters opposed the increases, and ratepayers will pick up the bill for other people's waste disposal. Those are just two of many changes to the district council's fees and charges for next financial year, most of which are increasing by 10%. But on Tuesday, the Tasman District Council grappled with the principles of fairness when trying to determine how dog and waste disposal fees were split. Elected members confirmed that its annual dog registration fees would jump by $25, bringing urban dogs up to $90 and rural dogs to $70 – increases of 38 and 56% respectively. A new working dog fee of $50 will also be introduced. The council went ahead with the hikes despite 39 of 64 submitters on the entire suite of fee changes specifically opposing the increases. Increasing the fee would ensure that the cost of delivering dog services – including enforcement, responding to complaints, managing public safety, operating the animal shelter, rehoming dogs, and educating the public – met the council's budget. The closed dog services account has previously run at a deficit, which then impacts either council debt or rates. Increasing the dog fees would also ensure the council continues its current approach that dog owners pay 95% of the costs of local dog services, in keeping with user pays principles. But the scale of the increases concerned some elected members. Mayor Tim King's proposal to stage the increase over two years lapsed due to a lack of support, as did councillor Glen Daikee's suggestion that SuperGold cardholders get reduced fees for urban dogs. 'Targeted relief for these residents would be worth it. 60% of people on a Super card over 65 are living on a fixed income essentially, and they don't have the ability to absorb these things as easily as others,' Daikee said. His proposal would have had to be processed as a rebate, which would come with additional administrative costs. However, members were interested in transitioning to a different dog fee framework in the future with 'much higher' base fees, but with rebates offered for responsible dog owners. 'At the moment there really isn't a significant incentive or disincentive between a good dog owner and a bad dog owner,' King said. Resource recovery centres across the district are also receiving less waste, which might be an otherwise positive result for the council if it didn't complicate budget-setting. Waste volumes have fallen by 28%, or 7500 tonnes, across Tasman over the last two years, with the Richmond centre bearing the brunt of the drop at 6000 tonnes. The fall is attributed to a combination of a slower economy, waste minimisation initiatives, diversion to York Valley Landfill in Nelson, and increased illegal dumping. Similar to dogs, the council has been seeking to recover most of its waste processing costs through those who use the service and drop off waste. But many of the costs of running the resource recovery centres are static and don't decrease as the amount of waste decreases, meaning that dumping costs need to go up as waste shrinks. The council's initial proposal was to increase the weight-based charge for mixed refuse by 28%, from $360.60 to $425.50 per tonne, to ensure that resource recovery was fully funded. However, feedback from industry has indicated that jumps of that scale would increase the amount of waste being sent straight to the York Valley Landfill, reducing the council's revenue. Elected members agreed to increase the rate by a smaller 15%, to about $414.70 per tonne, to try and reduce the amount of waste diversion. That choice still leaves a deficit for next financial year and will mean another 0.215% added onto rates – already proposed to go up 8.8% – to cover the shortfall. Council staff suggested a lesser increase might reduce illegal dumping, thus providing a community-wide benefit, but some councillors were wary of using rates to subsidise waste disposal. 'It's completely inconsistent with people taking personal responsibility … it sends all the wrong messages,' said Christeen Mackenzie. The waste disposal charges will be reviewed in November 2025. The new fees will be implemented on 1 July.
Scoop
24-05-2025
- Scoop
Budget 2025: What Will KiwiSaver Changes Mean For Your Balance?
Article – RNZ Retirement Commissioner Jane Wrightson said low-income earners, Mori, women and self-employed people will be hit hardest by the changes. , Money Correspondent An increase in default KiwiSaver contribution rates announced in Thursday's Budget could leave KiwiSaver members more than $100,000 better off at retirement – but there is a warning that not everyone will benefit. As part of the Budget, a number of changes were announced to KiwiSaver. The government will halve the member tax credit available to people who contribute at least $1042 in a year to $260.72. When the scheme was first launched, the government provided a matching $1042. The cut is expected to save the government $400 million a year. Employer and government contributions will be made available to 16- and 17-year-olds. Previously, they had only applied to those aged 18 to 65. The default contribution rate for both employees and employers will increase in two stages to 4 percent from 1 April, 2028. Employees can opt to stay on the lower 3 percent rate, matched by their employer, but that will reset to the new default rate after 12 months. Impact of higher contributions KiwiSaver managers estimated that the increase to a default contribution rate of 4 percent, plus 4 percent for an employer, would make a material difference to KiwiSaver members' final outcomes. Murray Harris, head of KiwiSaver at Milford, calculated that someone who was 35, earning the average wage with a KiwiSaver balance of $25,000 in a balanced fund, could have an extra $56,000 (inflation adjusted) at 65. That would give them $50 a week more to spend, he said. At Sharesies, general manager of funds Matt Macpherson said without adjusting for inflation, the increase for a 30-year-old currently earning $75,000 a year with $30,000 saved in a growth fund would be $175,000 at 65. Harris said the increase would help to close the gap between what it cost to live in retirement and what NZ Super would provide. But he said it would have been good to see contributions extended to people over 65, as well as teenagers. Some KiwiSaver providers said the increase was not likely to be enough. Kōura founder Rupert Carlyon said 4 percent plus 4 percent was better than 3 percent plus 3 percent. 'But it's well short of six plus six, which would have brought us in line with Australia, and it's nowhere near the 15 percent OECD average pension contribution. We have a long way to go, but it's better than nowhere.' Dean Anderson, founder of Kernel Wealth, said the government should have followed Australia's lead and set a path detailing how contributions would increase over time. 'I don't know why we couldn't have gone further, with a long-term plan.' Carlyon said he was worried by stats showing that half of employers used a 'total remuneration' approach to KiwiSaver. This means that rather than providing a contribution on top of a person's salary, they are offered a total salary amount and the employee decides whether to contribute to KiwiSaver from that total. Carlyon said he was worried this would become more common as a way for employers to avoid the additional contribution. 'This is probably net positive for balances over time, but not for everyone – only a select group of people who have employers who do the right thing.' Reduction in member tax credit Macpherson said the impact of the smaller tax credit could compound out to $21,000 less for the 30-year-old earning $75,000 that he used as an example for the higher contribution calculation. He said some people were being left behind, 'in particular self-employed'. He said he saw many self-employed people contributing to Sharesies' scheme at the level to get the member tax credit – they would now have their returns reduced. Retirement Commissioner Jane Wrightson said low-income earners, Māori, women and self-employed people would be hit hardest by the reduction. 'It's a shame there are so few government incentives for a scheme that underpins private saving for retirement. I would at least have liked to see some of the savings from reducing government contributions be applied to serving those groups where we see the widest retirement savings gaps.' But other providers said the impact of the credit was not material for most KiwiSaver members. Anyone who was earning at least $50,000 a year and contributing 3 percent would have received the full payment. 'As much as I hate to see tweaking to KiwiSaver and removing incentives erodes confidence, when you're looking to find balance in the economy and make a saving, on a cost benefit basis, it's probably okay.'
