2025 Top 25 Real Estate Law Firms in Los Angeles County
In the wake of these devastating tragedies, real estate practice groups have advised on issues such as land use, zoning, building codes, environmental laws and building approval process with governmental agencies.
When people are ready to move forward with rebuilding, real estate attorneys advise on construction agreements, architects' agreements, mortgage financing and transactions.
Many firms offered pro bono support to victims of the wildfires, have raised funds to contribute for wildfire relief efforts and have supported the process of navigating FEMA and other agencies that provide benefits to fire victims.
In addition to fires, there are significant state laws that impact commercial real estate development. Enacted in 2025, AB 98 addresses large warehouse construction and mandates truck routing plans for these facilities.
Overall, the 25 largest real estate law firms in Los Angeles County reported 518 attorneys for the specialty in local offices, which included 286 partners.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
5 days ago
- The Hill
Trump tariffs India over Russian oil
Energy & Environment The Big Story Trump raises India tariff to 50 percent over Russian oil President Trump on Wednesday announced he would increase tariffs on India by 25 percent over its purchases of Russian oil, bringing the total tariffs he has imposed on New Delhi to 50 percent. Trump signed an executive order making the tariff increase official, though it does not go into effect for another three weeks. The 25 percent increase is on top of a 25 percent 'reciprocal' tariff Trump announced on India last week, which is set to take effect Thursday. Trump earlier this week threatened to increase tariffs on India over its purchase of Russian oil, arguing it was fueling Moscow's war efforts in Ukraine. But the president had not specified how high a tariff he would impose. 'They're buying Russian oil, they're fueling the war machine. And if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be happy,' Trump said of India during a Tuesday interview with CNBC. India on Monday pushed back on Trump's threat of heightened tariffs, asserting that its purchases of Russian oil was a 'necessity' to keep costs stable. Welcome to The Hill's Energy & Environment newsletter, I'm Rachel Frazin — keeping you up to speed on the policies impacting everything from oil and gas to new supply chains. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect the energy and environment sectors now and in the future: DHS transfers FEMA staff to ICE amid hurricane season The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is temporarily transferring personnel from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) just ahead of the peak of hurricane season as it seeks to speed hiring for immigration officers. Full Story Weather Service expected to expand hiring efforts amid vacancies The National Weather Service (NWS) is expected to expand its hiring efforts after facing both vacancies and public scrutiny as a result of Trump administration staffing cuts. Full Story Trump reverses Biden approval of Idaho wind project The Trump administration will reverse a Biden-era approval of a major wind energy project — marking the latest in a string of anti-renewable moves by the Trump administration. Full Story What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets touching on energy issues, the environment and other topics: Australia's Great Barrier Reef suffers record coral decline following mass bleaching (Reuters) Breaking down Chicago's 'worst in the world' air quality (Axios) What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: FBI ask throws curveball in Texas redistricting fight Morning Report is The Hill's a.m. newsletter. Click here to sign up to get it in your inbox. Read more Former Georgia lieutenant governor joins Democratic Party Former Georgia Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan has joined the Democratic Party after falling out with the GOP, saying the switch has been coming for a while. Read more
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump Issues Wild Threat to States That Boycott Israel
The Trump administration will no longer distribute disaster relief funds to states—unless their cities pledge not to boycott Israeli companies. The revision targets the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, which aims to curb Israel's violence in Gaza by peeling financial support away from the nation and its businesses. Trump's condition will affect $1.9 billion that is supposed to be distributed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and that would apply to grants for search-and-rescue equipment, emergency manager salaries, backup power systems, and other emergency-related equipment, according to nearly a dozen grant notices reviewed by Reuters. More than a quarter of the funds—approximately $553.5 million—are earmarked for terrorism prevention in high-risk areas such as New York, which stands to receive the largest chunk at $92.2 million. In order to access the funds, states or cities must certify that they would not avoid or end 'commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies,' the grant notices state. But the FEMA notice is just the latest in a long line of warnings from the Trump administration regarding its alliance with Israel and its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The Department of Homeland Security announced in April that boycotting Israel was forbidden for any state or city intending to receive federal funding, and the White House has rescinded billions of dollars from universities around the country for failing to meet Trump's metric of support for America's genocidal Middle Eastern ally. Specifically targeting New York is another way to challenge New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's chances of running the country's most populous city. Mamdani's support for the divestment movement has fueled the ire of the president, who has issued several sharp threats to Mamdani since the 33-year-old Democratic Socialist swept the primary. Those include telling the Queens lawmaker that he 'better behave' or face 'big problems.' Trump has also baselessly accused Mamdani of being an illegal immigrant.
Newsweek
5 days ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Suffers Legal Loss Over Billions of FEMA Funds
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A federal judge has temporarily halted the Trump administration's plan to reallocate more than $4 billion in federal disaster preparedness funds, marking a legal victory for 20 states that challenged the move. U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns of Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction Tuesday, August 5, preventing the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) from diverting money allocated to its Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program. The program funds projects designed to strengthen infrastructure against natural disasters. Why It Matters The ruling temporarily safeguards $4 billion in FEMA funds that support 2,000+ projects nationwide. BRIC is central to helping states and cities prepare for floods, wildfires, hurricanes, and other disasters that are becoming more frequent and severe. The program finances major infrastructure improvements—such as coastal flood defenses, stormwater and levee upgrades, sewage protection systems, and critical drainage projects. Local officials warn that without these funds, communities—particularly those in flood-prone or economically vulnerable regions—face delays or cancellations of safety projects leaving those areas facing greater risks and higher future recovery costs. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) building is seen on May 15, 2025 in Washington, D.C. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) building is seen on May 15, 2025 in Washington, To Know What is the BRIC program? The BRIC program has been a cornerstone of America's strategy to build long-term resilience. From flood barriers to sewage overhaul and levee upgrades, BRIC has funded essential improvements that save lives, reduce recovery costs, and strengthen community preparedness. Examples of BRIC-funded mitigation projects include: Bridgeport, Connecticut : $42 million coastal flood defense system with walls and elevated streets; funding cuts risk years of safety planning. : $42 million coastal flood defense system with walls and elevated streets; funding cuts risk years of safety planning. Austin, Texas : ~$50 million stormwater and levee upgrades near key energy and wastewater facilities; grant cancellation jeopardizes regional flood protection. : ~$50 million stormwater and levee upgrades near key energy and wastewater facilities; grant cancellation jeopardizes regional flood protection. Detroit, Michigan : Sewage system improvements shielding 600+ homes in vulnerable Jefferson Chalmers neighborhood; halted BRIC support threatens ongoing flood mitigation. : Sewage system improvements shielding 600+ homes in vulnerable Jefferson Chalmers neighborhood; halted BRIC support threatens ongoing flood mitigation. Mount Pleasant, North Carolina : $4 million stormwater management project for flood-prone areas paused after funding freeze. : $4 million stormwater management project for flood-prone areas paused after funding freeze. Nationwide Projects: Typical BRIC rounds fund 53 projects (~$796 million total) for disaster resilience across multiple states, including CA, NY, WA, and NC. FEMA stated in a June 2018 fact sheet that: "Natural hazard mitigation saves $6 on average for every $1 spent on federal mitigation grants." making these funds essential to public safety and long-term resilience. States Challenge FEMA Decision The lawsuit was brought in July 2025, by 20 Democratic-led states, including Washington, Massachusetts, California, and New York, as well as Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro in his official capacity. The plaintiffs argue that FEMA acted unlawfully when it announced it was ending BRIC and redirecting more than $4 billion in unspent funds to other federal accounts without congressional approval. With projects in jeopardy following termination of the BRIC program, local leaders and state attorneys general have emphasized the real-world consequences facing flood-prone and climate-vulnerable areas. Judge's Reasoning In his order, U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns of Massachusetts found that FEMA had taken, "affirmative steps" to implement the program's termination, including canceling funding opportunities and notifying states that unobligated funds would no longer be available. The judge noted that FEMA's monthly report to Congress in June showed a $4.07 billion reduction in BRIC funds, labeled a "reversal" of prior set-asides. The court concluded that this presented an imminent threat of harm to states that rely on BRIC funding for mitigation projects, such as stormwater management and the relocation of buildings in flood-prone areas. "The funds, if spent on other purposes, will be lost forever," Stearns wrote, adding that there is "an inherent public interest in ensuring that the government follows the law." FEMA's Position According to reporting by Reduceflooding, citing an April 4, 2025, press release—which has since been removed from FEMA's website—the BRIC program was described as, "yet another example of a wasteful and ineffective FEMA program." It accused the program of being, "more concerned with political agendas than helping Americans affected by natural disasters." However, David Richardson, FEMA's acting administrator, stated in the court filing that the BRIC program had not officially ended and that no grants had been canceled as of July. But Judge Stearns found these assurances inconsistent with FEMA's actions, concluding that the program's termination appeared to be a preordained outcome. According to the states' lawsuit, more than 2,000 approved resilience projects could be jeopardized if BRIC funding were diverted. These include initiatives like California's $21 million flood prevention project in Sacramento and New York City's $50 million project to address rising sea levels and extreme heat. Broader Context The Trump administration has sought to reallocate funds across several federal agencies, including FEMA. While it has recently downplayed earlier statements about eliminating FEMA entirely, officials have described efforts to reform and streamline the agency. What People Are Saying David Richardson, FEMA's acting administrator, stated: "The BRIC program provides technical and financial assistance to States and local governments for cost-effective pre-disaster hazard mitigation measures that reduce injuries, loss of life, and damage and destruction of property," adding that: "The Secretary of Homeland Security [Kristi Noem] has not made a final decision to end the BRIC program," and "no grants have yet been canceled." U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns of Massachusetts wrote in his 15-page ruling, August 5: "The BRIC program is designed to protect against natural disasters and save lives. The potential hardship to the government, in contrast, is minimal." He emphasized that " … the order maintains the status quo while the court considers the merits of the lawsuit." California Attorney General, Rob Bonta, one of the lead plaintiffs, said in a statement, July 16: "The president keeps breaking the law, and we keep holding him accountable in court. Shuttering this program would do nothing to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse or improve government efficiency. This is a program with bipartisan support that is focused on protecting lives and livelihoods from flooding, wildfires, earthquakes, and other natural disasters." What Happens Next With this ruling, the BRIC program—created in 2019 to support infrastructure resilience projects nationwide—remains funded while legal proceedings continue. Judge Stearns' order does not immediately release funds to states but prevents FEMA from spending them on other programs, while leaving open the possibility for FEMA to request emergency access to the funds if a major disaster occurs during the injunction period. The order is intended to preserve the contested funds until the court issues a final decision on whether the administration had the legal authority to dismantle BRIC.
