
Lymphoma and CAR T–Related Renal Injury: Assessing the Risks
In the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, baseline kidney function did not appear to be associated with an increased risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI) from the treatment. However, other key factors, including low albumin, showed a link.
'Our study is the largest to date examining renal toxicity in CD19 CAR T–treated lymphoma patients,' senior author Roni Shouval, MD, PhD, director of the Precision Cellular Therapy Laboratory at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center, New York City, said in an interview.
While the findings show no link between baseline kidney function and the development of AKI, ultimately, 'hypoalbuminemia may be a better flag for AKI risk and a prompt for closer monitoring or proactive interventions such as fluid management and nephrotoxin avoidance,' Shouval said.
The study was published in March in Haematologica .
CAR T-cell therapy is known to provide durable disease remission in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including in the disease subsets of large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
While the common treatment-related toxicities of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurologic syndrome (ICANS) are well documented, less has been reported regarding AKI treatment–related effects and outcomes.
The US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) AKI Reports
To investigate, Shouval, first author Alexander P. Boardman, MD, also of MSK, and colleagues first screened data from the FAERS database, identifying 5912 patients who had adverse events related to CD19 CAR T-cell therapy reported between January 2017 and September 2022.
The patients had a median age of 62 years, and the most common CAR T-cell therapies utilized were axi-cel (n = 3526 patients), followed by tisa-cel (n = 1780), liso-cel (n = 178), and brexu-cel (n = 428).
The main indications for CAR T-cell treatment were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (88%) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (11%).
Overall, 211 (3.6%) patients developed AKI that was determined to have a primary etiology of CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, with no significant differences based on age, sex, event year, type of CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, or indication.
Of note, AKI was more common among patients treated with CD19 CAR T-cell therapy than among all other patients with cancer in the FAERS database (age- and sex-adjusted reporting odds ratio [ROR], 1.72).
AKI developed at a median of 2.5 days post-infusion, and patients with AKI were more likely to have had concurrent CRS than those with other CAR T-cell reports not involving AKI (64% vs 50%; P < .001).
The rates of life-threatening illness (22.75% vs 8.00%) and mortality (49% vs 23%; P < .001 for all) were higher among patients with AKI than among those with other CD19 CAR T-cell reports not involving AKI.
'In the FAERS dataset, we observed a disproportionately high reporting of AKI among CAR T recipients compared to other oncology patients, reinforcing that renal toxicity is a consistent safety signal on a population level,' Shouval said.
A Closer Look
In a subsequent single-center analysis, the authors identified 399 patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with CD19 CAR T-cell therapy at MSK Cancer Center between April 2016 and December 2023.
Of the patients, 84% had LBCL, 11% had MCL, and 5% had non-LBCL.
Their median age was 66 years, and the most common treatments included were axi-cel (46%), tisa-cel (20%), liso-cel (29%), and brexu-cel (5%).
Of note, patients' pre-lymphodepletion estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was not associated with overall or progression-free survival, CRS grade ≥ 2, ICANS grade ≥ 2, or neutropenia.
'Thus, baseline renal function was not significantly associated with efficacy or toxicity endpoints,' the authors reported.
AKI, Kidney Outcomes
From the time of CAR T-cell infusion to day 100, AKI of any grade was reported among 39 (10%) of the MSK patients, with only a small percentage (5%) having grade ≥ 2 AKI.
The majority of AKI cases (71.8%) were attributed to prerenal factors; 14 cases occurred concurrently with CRS.
For survival outcomes, those developing AKI within 100 days of treatment had significantly lower progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.63; P < .001) and overall survival (HR, 3.36; P < .001) than those without AKI.
And among those with AKI grade ≥ 2, progression-free survival was significantly lower (HR, 3.14; P < .001), as was overall survival (HR, 4.18; P < .001).
Low Albumin, Inflammatory Markers Linked to Increased AKI Risk
Notably, after a multivariate adjustment, serum albumin level prior to lymphodepletion was a significant risk factor for AKI (HR, 0.15; P < .001).
In addition, higher levels of inflammatory markers, specifically serum interleukin 6 (HR, 1.74; P = .008) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (HR, 2.23; P < .001), on day 0, just prior to CAR T-cell infusion, were significantly associated with the risk for AKI
'Intriguingly, we are the first to determine that hypoalbuminemia is strongly associated with risk of AKI after CAR T-cell therapy,' the authors reported. 'Hypoalbuminemia emerged as an even more robust independent predictor of AKI than baseline eGFR,' Shouval added.
'In clinical terms, we believe hypoalbuminemia is surrogate for frailty and possibly systemic inflammation,' he said. 'Therefore, patients with low albumin should be recognized as high risk for renal complications.'
'Overall, we find that most AKI events after CAR T-cell infusion are of grade 1 and that most patients recover from these events within 3 months,' the authors wrote.
However, in looking at the eGFR and AKI outcomes together, Shouval concluded that 'these data position AKI as both a clinically meaningful and prognostically significant complication, deserving greater attention in the CAR T risk-benefit assessment.'
Findings Point to a 'Cytokine-Driven Phenomenon'
Commenting on the research, Michael D. Jain, MD, PhD, medical director of the Immune and Cellular Therapy Program at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, noted that the findings underscore that CAR T-cell therapy 'is really a cytokine-driven phenomenon rather than related to comorbidities that cause baseline chronic kidney disease [CKD].'
He added that low albumin, often a marker of inflammation/cytokines, 'might contribute to AKI because it affects intravascular volume and thus blood flow to the kidney.'
Jain agreed that the risk for AKI and other complications from CAR T is 'related more to tumor burden and inflammation than to baseline renal dysfunction.'
'In our center, we have protocols to give CAR T cells to patients who are on dialysis and believe we can safely deliver their therapy,' he noted.
A Word of Caution Re CKD
In a smaller study of 155 patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory LBCL, a history of CKD was, contrarily, found to indeed be associated with AKI on a multivariate analysis (RR, 2.7; P = .04).
However, while in Shouval's study, most patients who had low eGFR (< 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) received either liso-cel or tisa-cel, in this study, the majority of patients received axi-cel.
Based on that, 'I would offer caution [using CAR T-cell therapy] in those with CKD, especially in those receiving axi-cel,' senior author Narendranath Epperla, MD, of the James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, said in an interview.
He added, however, that Shouval's research importantly 'highlights a clinically relevant yet understudied complication of CAR-T that would aid clinicians in decision-making and counseling peri-CAR T.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Better High-Yield Dividend Stock: Altria or British American Tobacco?
Altria and British American Tobacco have nearly identical dividend yields, growth, and valuations today. Smoke-free nicotine is the industry's future. This is where differences begin to show. It's too soon to panic, but one company is currently in a much better spot for the long term. 10 stocks we like better than British American Tobacco › Sin stocks, such as tobacco companies, aren't for everyone, but they make excellent dividend stocks due to their entrenched and resilient business models and huge profit margins, which allow them to send most of their profits to shareholders. Altria Group (NYSE: MO) and British American Tobacco (NYSE: BTI) are industry leaders with many similarities, including outsized dividends that yield around 7% at their current share prices. But which company would be a better fit in your portfolio? The tobacco industry is evolving, and one company is adapting better. Here is what you need to know. Altria and British American Tobacco sell many of the leading brands of cigarettes and other tobacco products. Altria operates primarily in the U.S., where it sells Marlboro cigarettes. British American Tobacco sells globally, where it competes mainly with Philip Morris International in non-U.S. markets. Investors looking at the financials will quickly notice that these two stocks are strikingly similar. Altria and British American Tobacco have nearly identical dividend yields, anticipated long-term earnings growth, and trade at almost the same valuation. Essentially, both companies are slow-growing, high-yield dividend stocks. You can also count on both companies to continue paying and raising their dividends. Both companies generate enough free cash flow to cover their dividends, and they have multibillion-dollar stakes in other companies that they can liquidate to raise cash. Altria owns a stake in Anheuser-Busch InBev, worth approximately $11 billion at the company's current price. British American Tobacco owns a roughly 25% stake in ITC Limited, an Indian conglomerate worth approximately $16 billion today. Despite the slow demise of traditional cigarettes, tobacco companies have become excellent financial survivalists. Modern society is aware of the health dangers of smoking, which is why cigarette use has been in decline for years. Tobacco companies know this and have spent the past decade rushing to develop and launch smokeless nicotine products that aren't healthy by any means but don't produce the harmful smoke cigarettes do. The big three product categories are electronic cigarettes/vapes, oral nicotine pouches, and heat-not-burn tobacco devices. The tobacco industry is becoming the nicotine industry, and market share is up for grabs as consumers transition from cigarettes to smokeless products. Both companies, directly or through joint ventures, have established offerings in all three smokeless categories. British American Tobacco has thrived with its electronic vape brand, Vuse, with an estimated 40% market share in its core markets. Sales of new product categories represented 13.2% of total revenue in 2024. Altria is much further behind. In 2018, the company invested $12.8 billion in a fast-growing electronic vape company, but the investment was a disaster that set the company back. Altria has worked on alternative plans since then, but sales of new product categories totaled just $300 million in 2024, only 1.2% of total revenue. While both companies should continue to squeeze value out of their cigarette businesses, Altria's long-term growth is currently on shakier ground. Philip Morris International is rolling out its leading heat-not-burn brand, IQOS, in the United States. IQOS offers a similar experience to cigarettes and has successfully converted smokers in other countries. If IQOS thrives and Marlboro's cigarette declines accelerate, it could further pressure Altria. Meanwhile, the U.S. government has begun cracking down on illegal vape products that have flooded the market. It's a win for Altria and British American Tobacco, but the latter should benefit more since Vuse already enjoys a whopping 50% share of the U.S. vaping market. Altria doesn't seem poised to enjoy the same market leadership with these next-generation nicotine products that it has for generations with Marlboro cigarettes. Unless that changes, Altria's business may grow weaker over time as cigarette volumes erode. Change is happening slowly, so Altria can still be an excellent short-term dividend stock. However, British American Tobacco is the superior high-yield stock to buy and hold. Before you buy stock in British American Tobacco, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and British American Tobacco wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,761!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $826,263!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 978% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 170% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025 Justin Pope has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends British American Tobacco P.l.c. and Philip Morris International and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $40 calls on British American Tobacco and short January 2026 $40 puts on British American Tobacco. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better High-Yield Dividend Stock: Altria or British American Tobacco? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Better High-Yield Dividend Stock: Altria or British American Tobacco?
Altria and British American Tobacco have nearly identical dividend yields, growth, and valuations today. Smoke-free nicotine is the industry's future. This is where differences begin to show. It's too soon to panic, but one company is currently in a much better spot for the long term. 10 stocks we like better than British American Tobacco › Sin stocks, such as tobacco companies, aren't for everyone, but they make excellent dividend stocks due to their entrenched and resilient business models and huge profit margins, which allow them to send most of their profits to shareholders. Altria Group (NYSE: MO) and British American Tobacco (NYSE: BTI) are industry leaders with many similarities, including outsized dividends that yield around 7% at their current share prices. But which company would be a better fit in your portfolio? The tobacco industry is evolving, and one company is adapting better. Here is what you need to know. Altria and British American Tobacco sell many of the leading brands of cigarettes and other tobacco products. Altria operates primarily in the U.S., where it sells Marlboro cigarettes. British American Tobacco sells globally, where it competes mainly with Philip Morris International in non-U.S. markets. Investors looking at the financials will quickly notice that these two stocks are strikingly similar. Altria and British American Tobacco have nearly identical dividend yields, anticipated long-term earnings growth, and trade at almost the same valuation. Essentially, both companies are slow-growing, high-yield dividend stocks. You can also count on both companies to continue paying and raising their dividends. Both companies generate enough free cash flow to cover their dividends, and they have multibillion-dollar stakes in other companies that they can liquidate to raise cash. Altria owns a stake in Anheuser-Busch InBev, worth approximately $11 billion at the company's current price. British American Tobacco owns a roughly 25% stake in ITC Limited, an Indian conglomerate worth approximately $16 billion today. Despite the slow demise of traditional cigarettes, tobacco companies have become excellent financial survivalists. Modern society is aware of the health dangers of smoking, which is why cigarette use has been in decline for years. Tobacco companies know this and have spent the past decade rushing to develop and launch smokeless nicotine products that aren't healthy by any means but don't produce the harmful smoke cigarettes do. The big three product categories are electronic cigarettes/vapes, oral nicotine pouches, and heat-not-burn tobacco devices. The tobacco industry is becoming the nicotine industry, and market share is up for grabs as consumers transition from cigarettes to smokeless products. Both companies, directly or through joint ventures, have established offerings in all three smokeless categories. British American Tobacco has thrived with its electronic vape brand, Vuse, with an estimated 40% market share in its core markets. Sales of new product categories represented 13.2% of total revenue in 2024. Altria is much further behind. In 2018, the company invested $12.8 billion in a fast-growing electronic vape company, but the investment was a disaster that set the company back. Altria has worked on alternative plans since then, but sales of new product categories totaled just $300 million in 2024, only 1.2% of total revenue. While both companies should continue to squeeze value out of their cigarette businesses, Altria's long-term growth is currently on shakier ground. Philip Morris International is rolling out its leading heat-not-burn brand, IQOS, in the United States. IQOS offers a similar experience to cigarettes and has successfully converted smokers in other countries. If IQOS thrives and Marlboro's cigarette declines accelerate, it could further pressure Altria. Meanwhile, the U.S. government has begun cracking down on illegal vape products that have flooded the market. It's a win for Altria and British American Tobacco, but the latter should benefit more since Vuse already enjoys a whopping 50% share of the U.S. vaping market. Altria doesn't seem poised to enjoy the same market leadership with these next-generation nicotine products that it has for generations with Marlboro cigarettes. Unless that changes, Altria's business may grow weaker over time as cigarette volumes erode. Change is happening slowly, so Altria can still be an excellent short-term dividend stock. However, British American Tobacco is the superior high-yield stock to buy and hold. Before you buy stock in British American Tobacco, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and British American Tobacco wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,761!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $826,263!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 978% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 170% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025 Justin Pope has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends British American Tobacco P.l.c. and Philip Morris International and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $40 calls on British American Tobacco and short January 2026 $40 puts on British American Tobacco. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better High-Yield Dividend Stock: Altria or British American Tobacco? was originally published by The Motley Fool


Business Wire
8 hours ago
- Business Wire
Iksuda Therapeutics announces first patient successfully dosed in phase 1 trial evaluating IKS03 in advanced B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas
NEWCASTLE, England--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Iksuda Therapeutics (Iksuda), the developer of class-leading antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) with clinically validated tumour-selective payload release formats, today announces the completion of dosing of its first patient with IKS03, a CD19-directed ADC, in a phase 1, first-in-human, clinical trial in patients with advanced B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This first-in-human study ( will evaluate the safety, tolerability, preliminary antineoplastic activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of increasing dose levels of IKS03, and determine the recommended dose for dose-expansion. Efficacy will be further evaluated in disease-specific expansion cohorts. The study is currently enrolling patients across clinical sites in Italy, Spain, Australia, United States and Canada. Dr Dave Simpson, Chief Executive Officer, Iksuda Therapeutics, said: 'With the first patient successfully completing the safety evaluation period with IKS03, Iksuda demonstrates its continued commitment to drive its differentiated ADCs through clinical proof of concept, further solidifying our position as a clinical-stage ADC-focused company. Although there have been advances in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in recent years, there remains a significant unmet patient need, and we hope that IKS03 will be able to build on the potential benefit-risk profile suggested by the data generated in preclinical studies.' About IKS03 IKS03 is a best-in-class CD19-targeting ADC delivering a tumour-activated prodrug pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) which was licensed from LigaChem Biosciences (formerly LegoChem Biosciences) ( Preclinical testing demonstrates best-in-class efficacy (vs in-clinic and marketed CD19-targeted therapies) in in vivo xenograft models and significantly raised maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in non-human primate disease models, demonstrating its potential to be the leading anti-CD19 therapy in B-cell cancers. About Iksuda Therapeutics: Iksuda Therapeutics is a clinical stage, UK-based biotechnology company focussed on the development of class leading antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting difficult-to-treat haematological and solid tumours. Iksuda's pipeline of ADCs is centred on a portfolio of prodrug DNA and protein alkylating payloads in combination with stable conjugation chemistries including its proprietary PermaLink ® platform. The Company's design concepts for ADCs are now clinically validated to significantly improve the therapeutic index of this important modality and improve the outcomes for patients living with cancer.