logo
Zara shopper says store employee barged into fitting room and shoved his hand down his pants: lawsuit

Zara shopper says store employee barged into fitting room and shoved his hand down his pants: lawsuit

Independent26-05-2025

A New York City man trying on clothes at Zara was stunned to find a store clerk watching him disrobe in the fitting room, after which the employee repeatedly grabbed at the shopper's private parts 'all under the false pretense of assisting with garment fit,' according to an eye-popping lawsuit obtained by The Independent.
In what the suit describes as an 'act of forcible compulsion,' the retail worker – who is not named as a defendant in the case – allegedly barged in on the shopper, 'pushed his hand inside [the man's] underwear, and seized, held, and pulled [his] genitals.'
It says the 'appalling and invasive assault was committed with complete disregard for [the shopper's] autonomy and was captured on video,' providing 'irrefutable evidence of [the employee's] brazen and predatory conduct.'
The alleged incident took place at one of the fast-fashion chain's Midtown Manhattan locations, according to accuser 'John Doe,' who brought the suit anonymously. A few months later, the same employee was accused of similar behavior towards another customer, but was let off with a mere verbal warning, the lawsuit maintains.
Doe's attorney, Thomas Andrykovitz, told The Independent that the situation represents 'an appalling violation of customer safety and trust.'
'Our client was sexually assaulted by a Zara employee inside a fitting room, which is an area that should offer privacy, not peril,' Andrykovitz said. 'No customer should have to fear being preyed upon while shopping for clothes. We filed this case to hold Zara accountable and to help ensure no other customer is victimized or put at risk in one of its stores.'
A Zara spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment on Monday, a U.S. holiday.
Zara, a massively popular apparel and home decor retailer owned by Inditex, a Spanish conglomerate, operates more than 2,200 stores worldwide, 99 of them in the United States. In March, as Inditex reported slowing growth during the first part of 2025, it also announced Zara had posted 2024 sales of more than $30 billion, a 6.6 percent increase year-over-year, making it the top performer in its parent company's portfolio of brands.
On January 18, 2024, Doe was shopping for shorts and shirts at a Zara store on Fifth Avenue and 42 Street, and selected several items to try on, according to his complaint. Doe brought them up to a fitting room on the second floor, where the employee in question was working by himself, the complaint says.
'Rather than instructing [Doe] to use any available changing stall, as is standard practice in most retail clothing stores, [the Zara employee] insisted that [Doe] use a specific changing stall,' the complaint states. 'This deviation from common procedure was unusual and suspicious, particularly given that other stalls were unoccupied and accessible at the time.'
Nevertheless, Doe did as he was told and began to undress 'in the privacy of the closed changing stall,' the complaint continues. However, while Doe was taking off his clothes, the store employee 'repeatedly and abruptly pulled back the curtain without permission, brazenly staring at [Doe] during various stages of undress,' the complaint alleges.
It says the Zara employee 'attempted to mask this gross invasion of privacy by pretending to inquire about the fit of the garments [Doe] had selected – as if such a question could possibly justify his unwelcome and outrageous intrusions into a space specifically designed for personal privacy.'
Each time the employee opened the curtain, Doe would immediately close it again 'in an effort to reestablish his privacy,' according to the complaint. But, it contends, the employee kept coming back for more, each time 'with increasing boldness.'
Soon, the employee physically entered the fitting room and 'plac[ed] his bare hands on [Doe's] body, all under the false pretense of assisting with garment fit,' the complaint states, calling his behavior 'a flagrant violation of [Doe's] bodily autonomy and the sanctity of the private space Zara purported to provide for its customers.'
Doe 'expressly resisted' the alleged advances by the Zara employee, and demanded he stop touching him, again shutting the curtain to try and 'reclaim his privacy,' the complaint alleges. Regardless, it says, the employee ignored Doe's 'clear and repeated objections, [and] continued to return to the private changing stall.'
Then, in what the complaint calls a 'shocking escalation,' it says the Zara employee 'inserted his fingers into the waistband of [Doe's] pants and underwear, snaking his hand toward [Doe's] penis.'
In a state of shock, Doe took out his phone and began recording what was happening, '[i]n a desperate attempt to protect himself and document the ongoing sexual abuse,' according to the complaint. Yet, at this point, the employee – 'motivated solely by his own sexual gratification' – shoved his hand down Doe's underpants and gripped his genitalia, the complaint says.
Doe became 'overwhelmed with disbelief as the assault unfolded,' and could barely comprehend what was happening, the complaint asserts.
'Fearing for his safety and unable to rely on Zara's safeguards,' the complaint says Doe 'remained in the stall until he could safely escape the fitting room – still reeling from the shock of the forced sexual contact and the betrayal of trust by a store employee in a space meant to offer privacy and protection.'
The 'grotesque act' constituted 'a profound violation' of Doe's personal dignity, according to the complaint.
Five months later, another Zara customer reported that Doe's alleged attacker had also opened the curtain to their fitting room without permission, the complaint states.
But, the complaint alleges, Zara responded 'with nothing more than a verbal warning, failing to take meaningful corrective action or protect future customers from further harm.'
Zara fitting rooms have been at the center of controversy before. Earlier this year, an Irish woman sued and won some $20,000 after a security guard at a Zara store in Dublin pulled back the curtain to her changing room and peeked in while the shopper was 'half-dressed.'
In 2022, Zara apologized to a trans woman in the Philippines after a store employee allegedly refused to allow her into the women's dressing room.
And in early 2020, a brawl between a customer and a Zara employee over the number of items allowed into a fitting room at one time landed both of them, as well as a 61-year-old bystander who tried to intervene, in the hospital.
Doe's complaint says Zara should have been aware of the store employee's "dangerous propensities," but failed to take "adequate precautions" to prevent his alleged misconduct. It further calls Zara out for allowing its fitting rooms to be "exploited by sexual predators as a hunting ground."
Doe, who claims to have suffered severe emotional trauma, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress, accuses Zara of negligence, assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent hiring, and violations of the New York City Human Rights Law.
He is seeking compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorneys' fees and court costs, to be determined by a jury.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Madison Square Garden, ex-Knicks star fight over lawyer fees
Madison Square Garden, ex-Knicks star fight over lawyer fees

Reuters

time24 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Madison Square Garden, ex-Knicks star fight over lawyer fees

June 5 (Reuters) - (Billable Hours is Reuters' weekly report on lawyers and money. Please send tips or suggestions to opens new tab) Lawyers for one-time New York Knicks All-Star Charles Oakley and Madison Square Garden are squaring off over attorney fees, as the stadium fights to finally escape an eight-year-old lawsuit over the former NBA player's televised removal from a February 2017 Knicks game. Oakley's case against the Manhattan stadium and its chief executive James Dolan, who also owns the Knicks, has twice been dismissed by a federal judge, only to be revived each time by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. MSG on Friday asked U.S. Circuit Judge Richard Sullivan, who is overseeing the case in the lower court, to reject Oakley's lawsuit, opens new tab for good, arguing that the evidence shows that he refused to leave the stadium when asked and assaulted security guards. They separately asked the judge to sanction Oakley, opens new tab and his lawyers at Wigdor LLP and Petrillo, Klein & Boxer for pushing what they called a "false narrative" about Oakley's ejection. Wigdor partner Valdi Licul, in a letter to Sullivan, opens new tab filed Wednesday, said Oakley would be filing his own sanctions motion against MSG, arguing that the stadium's sanctions bid is unreasonable and was improperly filed. MSG is represented by New York first deputy mayor Randy Mastro and lawyers at Mastro's former law firm King & Spalding. They did not respond to requests for comment. A spokesperson for Mayor Eric Adams, who appointed Mastro in March, said the city had determined there was no conflict of interest for Mastro to continue his "limited representation" of MSG. Mastro is working on the case "in his personal capacity, on his own time, without compensation, and without city resources," the spokesperson said. The amount of sanctions the arena's lawyers are seeking could be significant — MSG wants Wigdor to reimburse it for the money it paid Mastro and its high-powered lawyers going as far back as the beginning of the case. If Sullivan won't go that far, MSG has asked him to at least award fees since July 2021, when Douglas Wigdor, one of Oakley's lawyers, personally oversaw revisions to the former NBA player's autobiography that MSG alleges were intended to bolster his lawsuit. MSG claimed that Oakley's initial drafts undermined his claims that he was not given a reasonable opportunity to leave the stadium before he was ejected, and that he admitted to slipping and falling on his own and not being pushed by MSG security guards. Licul pushed back in Wednesday's court filing, arguing that MSG was engaged in "self-serving editorialization." He also said MSG and its lawyers should be sanctioned for making allegedly false assertions that Dolan was not involved in Oakley's removal from the stadium that night. Oakley is a 19-year NBA veteran and fan favorite who was a Knicks power forward from 1988 to 1998. He initially brought a bevy of claims against MSG and Dolan. He sued for defamation over several statements, including when the Knicks tweeted that his behavior was "highly inappropriate and completely abusive" and expressed hope he "gets some help soon," which Oakley said insinuated substance abuse. In his latest amended complaint, opens new tab from April 2024, the former NBA player is alleging claims of assault and battery against MSG and its related entities. --Alphabet's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Google has hired U.S. Supreme Court veteran Donald Verrilli Jr of Munger Tolles to lead the company's high-stakes appeal in the D.C. Circuit challenging a ruling that said the company was illegally monopolizing the web search market. Verrilli separately is battling the Trump administration in a spate of cases. He is lead counsel for law firm Susman Godfrey in its lawsuit against a Trump executive order targeting the firm. A court filing in March in a U.S. bankruptcy case involving a Munger client showed Verrilli has billed at $2,270 an hour. Verrilli did not immediately respond to a request for comment about his new work for Google, which has denied any wrongdoing. --Google has agreed to pay $80 million in legal fees, opens new tab to plaintiffs' lawyers at Scott+Scott for their work on a shareholder lawsuit and settlement with the tech giant. In the accord, Google will dedicate $500 million over ten years to make a series of corporate reforms, resolving a lawsuit that accused the company's board of allowing anticompetitive conduct in search, advertising and apps. The settlement requires court approval. Google and its board denied any wrongdoing. --Some health insurer class members in a multibillion-dollar federal healthcare judgment will get a little more money in the coming weeks, thanks to a federal judge's ruling on an interest payment. Judge Kathryn Davis of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims on Tuesday directed law firm Quinn Emanuel, opens new tab to send a roughly $10 million check to the claims administrator in the case. Davis' ruling was tied to her decision in October to slash Quinn's legal fee in the case from $185 million to $92 million. Class members who questioned the original fee and Quinn then fought over which interest rate should apply to extra money that the lower fee award yielded to the judgment fund. The challengers had asked for a higher interest rate than what Davis applied in her ruling this week. Quinn Emanuel and a lawyer for the objectors did not immediately respond to requests for comment. --A U.S. judge in Maryland on Thursday awarded, opens new tab law firms Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll and Handley Farah & Anderson more than $132 million in fees for their work on settlements totaling nearly $400 million with major poultry producers. The defendants were accused of conspiring to suppress their workers' wages, in violation of antitrust law. The settling companies have denied any wrongdoing. Read more: Wegovy maker Novo faces fee demand after losing copycat drug lawsuit US agencies face fees over faulty cases, Ford seeks $300 million from lemon law lawyers Settlements mount against law firm caught up in bankruptcy judge's secret romance

Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyer accuses witness of lying about balcony attack
Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyer accuses witness of lying about balcony attack

Reuters

time25 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyer accuses witness of lying about balcony attack

NEW YORK, June 5 (Reuters) - A lawyer for Sean "Diddy" Combs accused a witness at his sex trafficking trial on Thursday of falsely testifying that the hip-hop mogul held her over the balcony of a Los Angeles apartment, and suggested Combs was on the East Coast at the time of the alleged attack. Bryana Bongolan, a friend of Combs' former girlfriend Casandra Ventura, opens new tab, testified on Wednesday that Combs in September 2016 held her over the rail of the balcony at Ventura's apartment and then threw her onto the balcony's furniture, causing her bruises. Prosecutors say the incident was among several violent acts that Combs, 55, took against Ventura and people close to her during the decade he was coercing Ventura to take part in drug-fueled sexual performances with male sex workers known as "Freak Offs." Combs has to five counts including racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. He could face life in prison if convicted on all counts. Bongolan had not stated the exact date of the alleged balcony attack during her testimony on Wednesday. Jurors on Wednesday saw a picture Bongolan took of a bruise on her leg taken on September 26, 2016. A civil lawsuit Bongolan filed against Combs last year said the incident took place "on or about September 26, 2016." On Thursday, Combs' lawyer Nicole Westmoreland asked Bongolan if she was aware that Combs performed at a concert in New Jersey on September 25, 2016 and attended an event in New York with Ventura the following day. Westmoreland also showed jurors a document from the Trump International hotel in New York indicating that someone named "Frank Black" stayed there from September 24, 2016 through September 29, 2016. Previous witnesses at the trial have testified that Combs, like other celebrities, frequently used aliases when staying at hotels. "You came in here and you lied to the ladies and gentlemen of this jury, didn't you?" Westmoreland asked. "I can't agree with you," Bongolan replied. Under further questioning from prosecutor Madison Smyser, Bongolan said she did not know the exact date of the incident because it happened "a while ago," but said she had no doubt it took place. "I will never forget him holding me on that balcony," Bongolan said.

Newspaper's 'disgraceful' puff piece on Boulder attack suspect's daughter faces avalanche of criticism
Newspaper's 'disgraceful' puff piece on Boulder attack suspect's daughter faces avalanche of criticism

Daily Mail​

time26 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Newspaper's 'disgraceful' puff piece on Boulder attack suspect's daughter faces avalanche of criticism

USAToday was forced to heavily edit a story on the daughter of the Colorado terror suspect after thousands hammered the newspaper's glowing puff piece for excluding horrific details of the attack. The article, originally published Tuesday, did not specifically state that 45-year-old Egyptian national Mohamed Soliman allegedly threw Molotov cocktails at a group of pro-Israel demonstrators. The revised version added this detail to the body of the story and to the headline, with an editor's note saying the story had been updated to provide 'context and detail'. However, the main thrust of the piece was that Mohamed's 18-year-old daughter, Habiba Soliman, had dreams to attend medical school in the United States. 'Before the attack, Habiba Soliman had written about her hope of accomplishing great things,' the article says in both versions, adding that her 'favorite activity' was volunteering at a local hospital. The article further portrayed the despicable crime allegedly committed by her father as an unfortunate disruption to Habiba's aspirations to become a physician now that the entire family is set to be deported. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced on Tuesday that Mohamed's wife and five kids were in ICE custody and that federal investigators would determine 'to what extent his family knew about this heinous attack.' Hours later, the White House said the family 'could be deported by tonight.' The headline used to promote the USAToday article on X glossed over the brutal specifics of the attack, which left an 88-year-old Holocaust survivor with severe burns. 'Boulder suspect's daughter dreamed of studying medicine. Now she faces deportation,' the headline read in the post, which is still up on the social media site. This was also the headline used in the original version of the article, which USAToday said has been updated to include: 'Then, her father firebombed Jewish marchers in Boulder'. But before the update could be made, social media users had plenty of time to share their outrage at a major American newspaper showing what appeared to be sympathy for a suspected terrorist's daughter over the innocent victims of her father's alleged cruelty. Many were also frustrated that USAToday seemed to be sympathizing with Mohamed's family now that they face deportation, despite all of them being in the country illegally. 'I don't care what she dreamed of,' one X user commented underneath USAToday's post. 'If she's here illegally, AMERICANS dreamed that she gets deported.' 'Interesting editorial decision to allocate more words to the family of the terrorist than to the families of the victims,' another replied. Christina Hoff Sommers, an author and a well-known critic of modern feminism, said she was 'awaiting stories about how families of the burn victims are faring.' And Anna Kelly, the Deputy White House Press Secretary, simply commented, 'Are you so for real?' The opening four paragraphs of the revised article (pictured) added more context about the attack, not all of which were present in the original This excerpt of the revised piece adds this context about the motive behind the crime. None of this was broached in the original The main differences between the original and updated article from USAToday come in the very beginning. The original headline, which made no mention of the pro-Israel protestors who were attacked, was updated to the following: 'Habiba Soliman wanted to be a doctor. Then, her father firebombed Jewish marchers in Boulder.' The opening of the original and updated version also read differently, with the latter taking the whole second and third paragraphs to better explain the gruesome attack. 'Then her father, Mohamed Soliman, drove from Colorado Springs to Boulder on June 1, picked up 87-octane gas and flowers and made firebombs that he threw at a group of Jewish marchers on Pearl Street, investigators said,' read the second paragraph of the updated article. None of this context, at least in the specificity used above, was present in the original piece. The original piece also failed to mention the motive behind the attack, which took place at an outdoor mall where about 30 people were marching to raise awareness of the Israeli hostages still being held by Hamas. Mohamed, the suspect, allegedly branded this crowd a 'Zionist group' and said he wanted 'to kill all Zionist people,' according to investigators on the scene. After searching his car, police also found a red gas container, rags and documents with the words 'Israel,' 'Palestine,' and 'USAID' on them, according to an FBI affidavit. The original piece in USAToday did not mention any of this, even though all these details had already been widely publicized in the media. The revised piece added much of this context in the 12th paragraph, while also mentioning his alleged statement about wanting to stop Jews from taking over Palestine. Still, the revised piece largely retained the same angle, mostly focusing on Habiba Soliman's struggles when she moved to the US from Kuwait as a young teenager. The piece talks about how she joined a private charter school in Colorado Springs as a sophomore, detailing her difficulties learning English and making friends. It's meant to be a tragic tale, since Habiba won a college scholarship, became fluent in English and was on her way to medical school before her father messed it all up by getting them all deported. approached the USAToday newsroom for comment on the controversy. Mohamed has been charged with 16 counts of attempted first-degree murder, eight of which are 'with intent and deliberation,' the other eight of which are 'with extreme indifference.' Mohamed, who is being held on a $10 million bond, also faces federal hate crime charges. His first scheduled court appearance in Denver's federal court is on Friday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store