logo
New cholesterol drug lowers LDL when statins aren't enough, study finds

New cholesterol drug lowers LDL when statins aren't enough, study finds

Yahoo07-05-2025

A new medication that combines an already approved drug with a new unapproved one has been shown to cut the level of LDL, or 'bad' cholesterol, when statins aren't helping enough.
In the Phase 3 trial, Cleveland Clinic researchers found that the combination of the new drug, obicetrapib, with an established medication, ezetimibe, reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 48.6% after about three months' use — producing more effective results than either drug alone. Ezetimibe is a cholesterol-lowering drug that is often prescribed with statins to reduce LDL even more.
The research was presented Wednesday during a late-breaking science session at the annual meeting of the European Atherosclerosis Society in Glasgow, Scotland, and simultaneously published in The Lancet.
In the multicenter clinical trial, the lead researcher, Dr. Ashish Sarraju, a preventive cardiologist at the Cleveland Clinic, and his colleagues enrolled 407 patients with a median age of 68 with LDL cholesterol levels greater than 70 mg/dL even though they had taken medication to lower it.
The participants were randomly assigned to four groups: a group for a pill that combined obicetrapib with ezetimibe, a group for each of the drugs separately and a placebo group. All participants continued on the medications they were taking before they started the trial, along with the medications being studied.
The reason: Some people have to take a number of prescriptions to get LDL down to desired levels.
'We need to give patients and their doctors all the options we can to try to get LDL under control if they are at risk for, or already have, cardiovascular disease,' Sarraju said. 'In higher-risk patients, you want to get LDL down as quickly as possible and keep it there as long as possible.'
High-risk patients either had had strokes or heart attacks or were likely to in the future.
For that reason, the researchers enrolled patients in the trial who, despite already being on statins or even high-intensity statins, still had LDL levels that were too high.
The hope is that lowering LDL levels will reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events such as strokes and heart attacks. According to the American Heart Association, the optimal total cholesterol level for an adult is about 150 mg/dL, with LDL levels at or below 100 mg/dL ('dL' is short for 'deciliter,' or a tenth of a liter). For high-risk patients, Sarraju recommends an LDL no higher than 70 mg/dL.
The trial was funded by the maker of obcetrapib, Netherlands-based NewAmsterdam Pharma. It expects to have conversations with the Food and Drug Administration about approval for the new combo drug 'over the course of the year,' a spokesperson said.
A multitude of modifiable factors can result in high LDL, such as a diet high in saturated fats, processed foods and fried foods; being overweight; smoking; and older age.
Dr. Robert Rosenson, director of lipids and metabolism for the Mount Sinai Health System in New York City, said other drugs in the same class have failed to reduce heart attacks or stroke, 'but I am cautiously hopeful.'
The drugmaker is currently running an additional trial to determine if the combo drug not only lowers cholesterol but also protects against adverse heart events.
While lifestyle changes can help bring down LDL, levels remain stubbornly high for some people. Only 20% of patients at high risk of heart disease are able to manage their LDL, said Dr. Corey Bradley, a cardiologist at the Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Heart disease is the leading cause of death for adults in the United States.
'High LDL is one of the leading risk factors for heart disease, and we have such a poor handle on controlling that risk,' Bradley said. 'Many people have such a high LDL they will require multiple agents to control it.'
'I am very excited about drugs like obicetrapib,' she said.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Night owls tend to have more health risks than early birds—including cognitive decline, new study finds
Night owls tend to have more health risks than early birds—including cognitive decline, new study finds

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Night owls tend to have more health risks than early birds—including cognitive decline, new study finds

Night owls—people whose natural body clock, or chronotype, skews to late sleep and wake times—are already forced to wake up too early for office jobs and to deal with derision from early birds. And now comes a new affront: research concluding that they appear to decline faster, cognitively, than morning people. To look into this, dementia researcher Ana Wenzler at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands analyzed sleep-based questionnaires through a large national study, BIRD-NL Project. She was able to determine people's chronotypes and found that 52% were morning people, 44% intermediate, and only about 5% night owls—different from the general global population breakdown, where typically 30% are night owls, 40% early birds, and the rest in between. Next, Wenzler looked at the results of a cognitive function test over a 10-year period to see how the scores differed at the end of the decade. Her conclusion was that evening people saw faster cognitive decline. But every night owl may not have the same risk. 'We found that 25% of the effect was due to lower sleep quality and smoking,' Wenzler tells Fortune. 'So, having a healthy lifestyle could lower the negative effect of having a late chronotype a bit.' She says that, for this study, she only looked into the executive function of the brain, so more research is needed into how chronotype affects memory, language, and other cognitive aspects. But the increased risk here, interestingly, was found mostly in highly educated people. 'That probably has to do with their sleep rhythm,' Wenzler said in a news release. 'They are often people who have to go back to work early in the morning and are therefore more likely to sleep too short, giving their brains too little rest.' This tracks with a previous body of research showing that night owls, compared with early risers, face various health risks—a 30% higher risk of diabetes, nearly double the odds of depression and other psychological disorders, increased heart disease risk, and a 10% higher all-cause mortality risk. 'All of this evidence, to me at least, impresses the fact that when we do not sleep in harmony with our chronotype, the ensuing sleep disruption that unfolds has consequences,' Matt Walker, a professor of neuroscience and psychology at the University of California, Berkeley, and founder and director of the Center for Human Sleep Science, previously told Fortune. He added, 'There is vast variability in chronotype, and it's important to sleep in harmony with yours.' (You can determine it with this free calculator.) But if work and other factors won't allow you to stay up till 2 a.m. and sleep in until 10 a.m., could you push yourself to become an early bird? 'Some studies showed that intensive intervention could help change your chronotype… but only by a few hours,' Wenzler says. 'But forcing yourself to get up early every day while you are an extreme evening person will not make you a morning person. In these cases, it might be best to adapt your life, as much as possible, to your chronotype.' Walker also noted that only slight shifts are really possible, and that the ongoing, disciplined interventions that are required to truly change chronotypes are 'just not tenable,' he said. 'Let night owls sleep as they were biologically designed. At least, that's how I feel on the basis of the science and medicine of the data.' So, is the cognitive health of night owls just simply doomed? 'If these individuals are doomed is hard to say, as we only had a follow-up of 10 years,' says Wenzler, explaining that the true long-term effects—particularly whether or not night owls are more likely to develop dementia—need further investigation. 'Faster cognitive decline in middle age does not necessarily mean a higher risk of dementia,' she said in the news release. 'With our research, we hope to find out more about this. This will ultimately help us to be able to give people informed advice on how to try to prevent dementia.' More on cognitive health: 5 ways to reduce your dementia risk as study estimates U.S. cases could double by 2060 A study on the Mediterranean diet offers the strongest proof yet that it's associated with healthy brain aging It's not just forgetfulness: 8 early warning signs of dementia This story was originally featured on

AstraZeneca announces results from MATTERHORN Phase III trial of IMFINZI
AstraZeneca announces results from MATTERHORN Phase III trial of IMFINZI

Business Insider

time6 hours ago

  • Business Insider

AstraZeneca announces results from MATTERHORN Phase III trial of IMFINZI

Positive results from the MATTERHORN Phase III trial showed perioperative treatment with AstraZeneca's (AZN) IMFINZI in combination with standard-of-care FLOT chemotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in the primary endpoint of event-free survival, EFS, versus chemotherapy alone. Patients were treated with neoadjuvant IMFINZI in combination with chemotherapy before surgery, followed by adjuvant IMFINZI in combination with chemotherapy, then IMFINZI monotherapy. The trial evaluated this regimen versus perioperative chemotherapy alone for patients with resectable, early-stage and locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction, GEJ, cancers. In a planned interim analysis, patients treated with the IMFINZI-based perioperative regimen showed a 29% reduction in the risk of disease progression, recurrence or death versus chemotherapy alone. Estimated median EFS was not yet reached for the IMFINZI arm versus 32.8 months for the comparator arm. For the secondary endpoint of overall survival, a strong trend was observed in favor of the IMFINZI-based perioperative regimen. The trial will continue to follow OS, which will be formally assessed at the final analysis. Confident Investing Starts Here:

Guardant Health presented results of largest study on ctDNA in colon cancer
Guardant Health presented results of largest study on ctDNA in colon cancer

Business Insider

time6 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Guardant Health presented results of largest study on ctDNA in colon cancer

Guardant Health (GH) presented results of the largest study to date evaluating circulating tumor DNA, ctDNA, in colon cancer prior to chemotherapy, demonstrating the ability of the Guardant Reveal test to stratify the risk of disease recurrence and overall survival, and thus inform treatment decisions after surgery. Data from the phase III trial of FOLFOX-based adjuvant chemotherapy involving over 2,000 patients with stage III colon cancer with median follow-up of 6.1 years were presented at the 2025 American Society for Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting. Results demonstrated that circulating tumor DNA detected in the bloodstream after cancer surgery and prior to the start of adjuvant therapy, using the Guardant Reveal test, is a strong predictor of the risk of disease recurrence and poorer survival, and suggest the potential for ctDNA testing to improve decision-making at a critical time point for post-operative chemotherapy. Specifically: Among patients with post-surgical ctDNA detected, 62.6% had the cancer return within 3 years, despite having had adjuvant chemotherapy, while only 15.4% of patients with undetectable ctDNA recurred in the same period. The level of ctDNA, or tumor fraction, showed promise in identifying individuals who are less likely to clear residual disease with adjuvant treatment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store