Fired D.E.I. Administrator Sues the University of Michigan
Rachel Dawson, the former director of the university's office of academic multicultural initiatives, denied in her lawsuit that she had made antisemitic remarks last year.
Two Jewish professors from other universities had accused Ms. Dawson of saying in a private conversation that the university was 'controlled by wealthy Jews,' that Jewish students were not in need of her office's diversity services because they are 'wealthy and privileged' and that 'Jewish people have no genetic DNA that would connect them to the land of Israel,' according to documents that were part of a complaint from the Anti-Defamation League of Michigan.
In her lawsuit, filed on Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Ms. Dawson painted a starkly different version of events. And she said that there was racial bias in what she called the unusual process that the public university used to investigate the complaint and in its decision to side with her accusers.
'Historically, Black women have been subjected to stereotypes that portray them as confrontational or untrustworthy,' Ms. Dawson wrote during a disciplinary review, according to her lawsuit.
A lawyer for Ms. Dawson, Amanda M. Ghannam, said she would file another lawsuit in state court, which will claim that the university violated Ms. Dawson's free speech and due process rights. Under Michigan law, those claims against a state institution cannot be brought in federal court, Ms. Ghannam said.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. commerce secretary dismisses question that free trade with Canada is dead
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is dismissing the question of whether U.S. free trade with Canada is dead, calling the notion "silly" and saying a substantial amount of Canadian goods enter the U.S. tariff-free under the current North American free trade deal. "We have a plan called [the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement], virtually 75 per cent of all goods coming from Mexico and Canada are already coming tariff-free," Lutnick said in an interview on Face the Nation that aired Sunday morning on CBS. But in the same breath, Lutnick suggested tariffs on Canada are here to stay, for now. "The president understands that we need to open the markets. Canada is not open to us. They need to open their market. Unless they're willing to open their market, they're going to pay a tariff," he added. The commerce secretary's comments come days after Prime Minister Mark Carney told reporters in French there's "not a lot of evidence right now" that the U.S. is willing to cut a deal with Canada without some tariffs included. WATCH | Carney says 'not a lot of evidence' for tariff-free deal: But the prime minister also said on Tuesday that Canada has "almost free trade" with the U.S. — a reference to tariff exemptions granted to Canadian goods that are compliant with USMCA, known as the Agreement (CUSMA) among Canadians. According to an RBC report released last month, approximately 79 per cent of U.S. imports from Canada were "explicitly duty free" in January 2025. That figure rose to approximately 89 per cent in April. "Why should we have our country be wide open while theirs is closed? This is an 80-year wrong that President Trump is trying to fix, and our businesses are going to really, really enjoy it," Lutnick told host Margaret Brennan. CUSMA negotiations looming Lutnick also told Brennan that Trump "is absolutely going to renegotiate [CUSMA], but that's a year from today." "It makes perfect sense for the president to renegotiate it. He wants to protect American jobs. He doesn't want cars built in Canada or Mexico when they could be built in Michigan or Ohio. It's just better for American workers," he added. CUSMA is not officially up for renegotiation until 2026, but some Canadian business leaders and others have called on the federal government to kick-start talks for the sake of economic stability. There are also lingering questions over whether negotiations will yield another trilateral trade pact. Last November, Ontario Premier Doug Ford pitched ditching Mexico and signing a bilateral deal with the United States — a move Alberta Premier Danielle Smith agreed was worth exploring. That suggestion sent a chill through Canada-Mexico relations, but Carney and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum appear to be closing the gap. The two leaders met with each other in June during the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alta., and "looked forward to meeting again in Mexico in the coming months," according to a news release published on the prime minister's website. Canada-U.S. trade talks continue Carney and his negotiating team continue to work toward a deal with Trump in hopes of avoiding the U.S. president's latest threat — a 35 per cent tariff on all Canadian goods. The U.S. president made the threat in a letter he posted on social media that was addressed to the prime minister. He said the tariffs would come into effect on Aug. 1 and that the United States would increase levies if Canada retaliates. Lutnick said the White House will cut better deals with large countries that open their economies "to ranchers, fishermen, farmers and businesses," but if they keep tariff barriers in place then "it seems fair" to impose levies. WATCH | Trump threatens 35 per cent tariffs on Canadian goods: In his letter, Trump cited fentanyl "pouring" into the U.S. from Canada as the reason for his latest tariff threat, even though data continues to show minimal amounts of the drug are crossing the Canada-U.S. border compared to the U.S.-Mexico border. Trump also took a shot at Canada's supply management system, a long-standing irritant that he claims leads to Canada imposing tariffs as high as 400 per cent on American dairy products. High Canadian tariffs only apply if the agreed tariff-rate quotas on U.S. dairy imports under USMCA are reached or exceeded. The U.S.-based International Dairy Association says the Americans have never gotten close to exceeding quotas, but also claims it's because of "protectionist measures" from Canada that limit exports. The Liberal government has maintained it will not dismantle supply management.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Online misogyny seeping into classrooms in 'frightening' ways, teachers and experts say
"Shut up and make me a sandwich." "I don't have to listen to you, go get the man in charge." Those are some of the comments one Halifax teacher says she has heard from some of her male students in recent years. Christine Emberley said the comments range from sarcastic sniping about a woman's place in society to "grotesquely sexual" remarks. Sometimes, the students refuse to make eye contact, listen or acknowledge her. "It's frightening," she said. Emberley has been teaching for nearly two decades and says the sexist and offensive remarks started cropping up only in the last few years. She teaches drama in classrooms across all grade levels and said these attitudes are more common among boys in junior high and high school. She is not the only one noticing this rhetoric in the classroom. Luc Cousineau is a researcher at Dalhousie University and director of the Canadian Institute for Far-Right Studies. In a recent study, he analyzed what teachers said about their experiences on Reddit, a social media platform that hosts discussion boards for various communities, by filtering the teachers' discussion board for posts that mention Andrew Tate. Tate has millions of followers on social media, with a message of unapologetic misogyny that has drawn boys and young men to the luxurious lifestyle he projects. The 38-year-old influencer is also facing 10 charges in Britain related to three women that include rape, actual bodily harm, human trafficking and controlling prostitution for gain. A major component of Tate's rhetoric is the belief that women are subordinate to men. According to the latest data from Statistics Canada, just over 75 per cent of teachers are female in Canada. Cousineau said his research, published in the peer-reviewed journal Gender and Education, showed misogynistic comments from students are disrupting learning environments, as teachers deal with sexist and degrading comments, defiance and male-supremacist sentiments. "Teachers expressed that this content and these things that students were saying in class were making them feel unsafe," he said. Cousineau said boys are exposed to misogynistic influences, even if they don't want to be, because they're suggested by social media algorithms. He said not all content from the influencers focuses on misogyny. They also post about bodybuilding, politics or feeling misunderstood. "If young people are engaging with the messaging that doesn't feel contentious, then they're going to get that other [misogynistic] content as well." Lance McCready is an associate professor at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. He said the issue of so-called "manosphere" influencers comes up in classrooms of soon-to-be-teachers. "It's definitely on a lot of people's minds," he told CBC News. He said young men and boys are looking for representation and relatable role models; they want to feel like their voice is heard. He said there needs to be more positive representations of masculinity for boys early in childhood. "We have to start having these conversations and discussing it in our curriculum, in our family," said McCready. "I would like to see more men willing to have these conversations." Responding to misogyny from students When a student makes a misogynistic comment, Emberley said she responds by saying it's inappropriate and talks to the student. "The way that we need to deal with it, from my perspective, is curiosity and empathy," she said. "Shame is just going to make somebody double down on that belief. "They need guidance. They need someone who's offering an attractive or a palatable alternative to what they're consuming online." Depending on the severity of the comment, the consequences can escalate, Emberley said. In her experience, some students adjust their behaviour after an intervention while others don't. "When you have a kid who's really into that messaging, are they even going to listen?" Emberley said it's a minority of boys who hold these anti-women opinions, but other boys rarely speak out against their peers. "Not everybody is comfortable doing that, so sometimes it ends up feeling like the majority." Emberley said she's heard from female students about their peers' behaviour. "There's a lot of helplessness that they're feeling and a lot of disgust." Emberley said teachers and parents should talk to boys about what they're seeing online, but the issue requires a larger solution. She said creating a framework to guide teachers' responses to misogyny would help, but the process is falling behind the growth of the problem. Curriculum updates around gender-based violence are ongoing for Nova Scotia schools following recommendations in the Mass Casualty Report in response to the province's 2020 mass shooting. More changes to the curriculum are expected to be implemented in the fall. Cousineau said social conditions, media and tech infrastructure make it easy for boys to latch onto these ideas. He said solutions will require more research. "We're talking about a global phenomenon here," he said. "If we are going to only have country-by-country or province-by-province actions, then we're fighting a battle on a different playing field." Cornelia Schneider, an associate professor at the Mount Saint Vincent University department of education, specializes in inclusive practices in education. She said this behaviour is likely amplified by the success of political movements, like MAGA. "These voices, that might always have existed but were more underground, now have a legitimate outlet and are allowed and applauded." She said responses to the influence of social media can only be so effective because of how rapid its presence has grown. She said we're only learning about the effects of social media "in real time." "[It's] this tool that we're developing and using at the same time." MORE TOP STORIES
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NFLPA's J.C. Tretter resigns after backlash against candidacy to replace Lloyd Howell, uses 'Game of Thrones' character to defend himself
J.C. Tretter was the other name scrutinized in the backlash that led to NFLPA executive director Lloyd Howell resigning. He's headed out too now. The former Cleveland Browns center, who was working as the union's chief strategy officer after two terms as president during his playing days, told CBS Sports on Sunday he is taking himself out of the running for the interim executive director position and resigning from the union, citing the impact on his family. He did so after it was reported he was in a two-man race for interim executive director alongside NFLPA chief player officer Don Davis. From CBS Sports: "I'm not resigning because what I've been accused of is true. ... I'm not resigning in disgrace. I'm resigning because this has gone too far for me and my family, and I've sucked it up for six weeks. And I felt like I've been kind of left in the wind taking shots for the best of the organization," he said. "… I got to the point this morning where I woke up and I realized, like, I am going to keep dying on this f***ing sword forever of, I'll never, ever be able to do what's best for me. And I will always pick what's best for the organization. And in the end, what's the organization done for me? Like, nothing. Tretter played a central role in Howell's hire, which has been increasingly questioned after it was reported the players might not have known about a sexual discrimination lawsuit against him at his previous employer and that he had a massive conflict of interest as a Carlyle Group consultant. It was also revealed last week that a grievance successfully brought by the NFL against Tretter was covered up. The news that Tretter might have replaced Howell when the vote went to the players was met with disbelief and criticism from some former players, many of whom worked in NFLPA leadership or as player representatives. A text message was also reportedly being distributed among players railing against him as "the common denominator in all these scandals." Promoting Tretter to executive director would have represented an endorsement of the NFLPA's leadership in recent years, and it has become very clear that would be a hard sell. The NFLPA has had a very bad month The controversy began last month when Pablo Torre and Mike Florio reported the NFL and NFLPA buried a ruling on a collusion grievance that saw an arbitrator conclude that the league encouraged its teams to reduce guaranteed money in 2022 after Deshaun Watson's unprecedented, fully guaranteed contract. The NFL actually won the grievance because the arbitrator, Christopher Droney, concluded he could not establish a "clear preponderance" that NFL teams acted on that advice, but he still left a damning sentence on page 55 of a 61-page document: 'There is little question that the NFL Management Council, with the blessing of the Commissioner, encouraged the 32 NFL Clubs to reduce guarantees in veterans' contracts at the March 2022 annual owners' meeting.' The NFL's reason for hiding that conclusion is obvious. It validates many critics' portrayals of a league willing to color outside the lines to suppress player compensation in any way it can get away with. What was less clear was why the NFLPA agreed with the NFL that the public, and more notably the players, didn't need to see that a neutral observer concluded its main adversary was acting in such a way. Questions abounded for Howell and the rest of the union's leadership, and it got worse as the weeks went on. After Howell resigned Thursday, it was reported Friday he had been discovered to have expensed more than $3,000 at strip clubs. The NFLPA has never been anywhere close to the most prestigious or effective player union in sports, but the latest developments were beyond the pale enough for many that Tretter couldn't escape the backlash either. J.C. Tretter compares himself to a 'Game of Thrones' character while defending decisions In a lengthy interview with CBS, Tretter defended himself on many of the above contentions, most notably the notion that he pushed Howell into the executive director role from the shadows. Howell was one of two finalists, alongside former SAG-AFTRA director David White. Tretter said that while Howell performed better in interviews, the NFLPA executive committee voted 10-1 in favor of White over Howell, with Tretter among the 10. However, the committee did not share its preference with the board of 32 player representatives, who voted for Howell. Tretter said he expects there will be changes to the approval process in the next go-around. From CBS Sports: "We did hundreds of hours of work, and we did multiple rounds of interviews. We had people flying into D.C. regularly to meet candidates in person. I don't think it's feasible to do that for everybody," he explained. "… The executive committee is in the day-to-day of it. The board has the approval rights. "It's a fair question. I think that's something that the board and the [executive committee] and the players need to wrestle with as they launch the next search is like, 'How is it set up?' I'm not saying we did everything right. I think we made decisions based off what we had done historically and wanted to do something different and thought what we were doing was the best option. We've learned more since then. There are probably going to be changes. There should be changes. They should do something that they feel confident in and they should learn from every experience they have." Tretter also said he regretted the quote about injuries and running backs that led to the covered-up NFL grievance, calling it a "dumb tongue-in-cheek remark" and denied having any access to the collusion grievance Howell agreed with the NFL to keep secret. Overall, Tretter had a comparison for his role in all this — Tyrion Lannister. Let's hear him out: Tretter has been thinking about one specific scene from "Game of Thrones" over the last few weeks. Tyrion Lannister is on trial for killing his nephew, King Joffrey, and though he didn't commit the murder, he says that he wished he had. "I wish I was the monster you think I am," Lannister says at his trial. "I felt a lot of that over the last six weeks," Tretter said Sunday. "I'm being accused of being this all-controlling, all-powerful person, and I'm not. And I f***ing wish I was because I don't think we'd be in the same place we are now if I was.
