logo
AP journalists testify over White House revoking access

AP journalists testify over White House revoking access

Yahoo27-03-2025
A pair of top journalists for The Associated Press covering the White House testified on Thursday to the damage caused to the outlet by President Trump's decision to revoke its access to key West Wing spaces over the organization's refusal to use 'Gulf of America' in its widely used stylebook.
AP chief White House correspondent Zeke Miller and Evan Vucci, the AP's top photographer in Washington, D.C., described what they called 'diminished' and delayed reporting because of the administration's banning them from being part of the small group of journalists who document the president each day, otherwise known as the press pool.
The pair took the stand during a court hearing over whether to restore the wire service's access to the pool, which is allowed in certain areas of the White House with limited space such as the Oval Office and their access to traveling with the president on Air Force One.
AP has a long tradition of having a reporter and photographer in the press pool each and every day both at the White House and when the president is traveling.
'AP's barred time and again because of our journalism,' Miller said in open court Thursday.
The AP sued three top White House officials last month over the ban after its reporters were barred from the Oval Office and Air Force One because the outlet refused to change its stylebook guidelines to use 'Gulf of America' after Trump renamed the Gulf of Mexico.
News organizations across the industry use the AP Stylebook for spelling, grammar and guidelines on how to refer to certain people and places in aim of making such references widely understood both in the U.S. and worldwide.
The AP and press freedom groups have argued the Trump administration is, in effect, trying to suppress coverage it does not view as favorable enough and send a chilling effect through the mainstream media.
Miller testified that on Feb. 11, he was summoned to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt's office, where she informed him she was 'just the messenger' but the president was not pleased with AP's decision not to conform to the new reference of Gulf of America.
Trump had decided to bar the AP from entering the Oval Office until it changed its policy, Leavitt told Miller.
AP's access was further limited from there.
After she told Miller of Trump's decision, Leavitt announced the White House would take control of the press pool, a job usually handled by the White House Correspondents' Association. She said the White House would decide which outlets would be allowed in the pool. So far, the White House has maintained the same rotation of news outlets that the correspondents' association had but added two more spots — one for television and another for new media, which are typically filled with right-leaning news organizations.
Though the administration has argued in court filings that AP remains eligible to be part of the press pool, it has yet to be selected to serve in the press pool since the White House took control of the body.
Both AP journalists testified their reporting lacks the completeness it did when they were granted full access.
Vucci recalled his physical presence traveling with former President George W. Bush as being key to his status as the only journalist to photograph the Iraqi journalist who threw a shoe at Bush.
'We don't know what we're not going to see,' Miller said.
Lawyers for the AP noted that Vucci captured an 'iconic piece of history' last summer — the widely seen image of Trump pumping his fist after an assassination attempt in Butler, Pa., which they noted Trump used as the cover of his own book 'Save America.'
But since AP's access was revoked, Vucci said he's gone from 'being in every single event to not being able to do anything.' He called the AP's photojournalism the 'gold standard' and warned that Trump's ban on the wire service has drastically altered its ability to gather a historical record.
Vucci pointed to an Oval Office meeting between Trump, Vice President Vance and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky last month, which went off the rails and drove headlines for days.
No American AP photojournalists were allowed in the meeting, though a Ukrainian videographer who freelances for the AP joined with that country's envoy.
'When we get our butt kicked, you know immediately — and that happened this day,' he said, citing long delays in receiving images from poolers in the room instead of the AP photographers themselves, which also impacts competition.
On cross-examination, Justice Department lawyer Brian Hudak pointed to White House events where foreign AP photojournalists or photographers with licensing agreements were allowed to attend. AP's journalists and lawyers, however, noted that print journalists were not allowed to attend all the events and pushed back against the government's contention that they were allowed at all tarmac events, when the president's plane took off or landed.
'As far as journalism goes, it's 360,' Vucci said. 'You've got to be there.'
Miller also described an apparent chilling effect on other journalists who cover the White House, describing a 'softening of tone and tenor' in questioning the president and other officials.
Aside from AP, however, the same contingent of reporters at national independent news outlets continue to populate the White House briefing room during Leavitt's briefing and ask the president questions during remarks he gives from the Oval Office and Roosevelt Room, though both tend to give deference now to publications seen as more friendly.
Charles Tobin, a lawyer for the AP, argued that the wire service's reporters would not say that the president's 'bullying' had chilled them because of their commitment to independent journalism. But he urged the judge to consider that the First Amendment protects journalists who both stand by their convictions or 'succumb.'
The AP is meanwhile waging a pressure campaign against the White House outside the courtroom.
In an editorial published this week in The Wall Street Journal, AP Executive Editor Julie Pace said the wire service 'pursued every possible avenue to resolve the issue before taking legal action.'
'If we don't step up to defend Americans' right to speak freely, who will?' she asked. 'Today the U.S. government wants to control the AP's speech. Tomorrow it could be someone else's.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pete Buttigieg Has A Name For What Trump Does When He's Desperate, And It's Spot On
Pete Buttigieg Has A Name For What Trump Does When He's Desperate, And It's Spot On

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pete Buttigieg Has A Name For What Trump Does When He's Desperate, And It's Spot On

Donald Trump's efforts to shift the nation's conversations away from files concerning the crimes of convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein don't seem to be working. Instead, Trump's base has begun turning on him over his administration's flip-flopping about whether an Epstein "client list" does or does not exist... Related: And they're burning their hats to be heard. Twitter: @krassenstein Amid the backlash, Trump used this time to bolster the unsupported claims of National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard, who says she has evidence of an 'Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert Trump's 2016 Victory and Presidency.' (The Obama administration has denied this, and former CIA director John Brennan told NBC News, 'There is no factual basis for the allegations that Tulsi Gabbard is making.") But, of course, that didn't stop Trump from sharing a fake, AI-generated video of Obama being arrested on his Truth Social account. Related: Well, when asked about the chaos during his appearance on The Breakfast Club, former secretary of transportation Pete Buttigieg called Trump's actions exactly as he saw them. "So, Trump says, 'We're going to release the files, we're going to release the files, we're going to release the files.' And then he says, 'We're not going to release the files,'" Buttigieg told hosts. Related: "And people are mad, including MAGA, saying, 'Wait a minute, you said you were going to release this information and you're not.'" "And what does he do?" Buttigieg posed. "He's like, 'Uh, we're going to arrest Obama.'" As hosts laugh, Buttigieg concludes, "That has nothing to do with anything," before adding a term for Trump's behavior anytime he's cornered, "It's the distraction machine." Related: Viewers appear to resonate with the interview as a whole, which you can watch in full here. What are your thoughts on his take? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Poll: Americans think Paramount is canceling 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' because of politics — and they don't approve
Poll: Americans think Paramount is canceling 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' because of politics — and they don't approve

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Poll: Americans think Paramount is canceling 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' because of politics — and they don't approve

More favor (46%) than oppose (31%) "late-night talk show hosts getting involved in politics by speaking out on political issues." More Americans disapprove (40%) than approve (33%) of Paramount's controversial decision earlier this month to cancel CBS's long-running late-night program with host Stephen Colbert, according to a new Yahoo/YouGov poll. And while CBS has claimed the decision was 'purely … financial' — adding that it was 'not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount' — more Americans believe that politics rather than money was the real reason behind it. The survey of 1,729 U.S. adults was conducted in the immediate aftermath of Paramount's Late Show announcement, from July 24 to July 28 — a period that coincided with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finally agreeing to sign off on the company's proposed $8 billion mega-merger with the Hollywood studio Skydance. Colbert is a sharp critic of President Trump, and skeptics have accused Paramount of canceling the Late Show not because late-night talk shows are losing money but because the company wanted to appease the Trump administration and get its Skydance deal over the line. Last October, Trump sued Paramount for the way CBS's 60 Minutes program edited an interview with his Democratic rival, Kamala Harris — and earlier this month, Paramount decided to settle with Trump and pay $16 million to his future presidential library, even though several legal experts said the case was frivolous. Colbert — who is scheduled to keep hosting the Late Show until it goes dark next May — mocked the settlement on-air, calling it a 'big fat bribe.' 'As someone who has always been a proud employee of this network, I'm offended, and I don't know if anything will ever repair my trust in this company,' Colbert told his audience. 'But just taking a stab at it, I'd say $16 million would help.' The new Yahoo/YouGov poll shows that more Americans agree with Colbert's theory of why his show was canceled than agree with other, more 'purely financial' explanations. When asked why CBS and Paramount are canceling the Late Show — and instructed to select all the reasons that apply — the share who select 'Paramount is trying to curry favor with the Trump administration' (37%) and 'Stephen Colbert is too critical of Donald Trump' (36%) is greater than the share who select 'the Late Show is losing money (32%), 'the Late Show is losing viewers' (30%) and 'the late-night format is losing relevance' (26%). Partisan preferences are clearly playing a role in the reaction to the Late Show's demise. Far more Americans think Colbert is liberal (53%) than think he's moderate (10%) or conservative (3%), and Democrats (72%) are six times more likely to disapprove of the decision than Republicans (12%). Still, there is no consensus that Colbert has gone overboard politically. In fact, more Americans (35%) say he is "about right" politically than say he's "too political" (28%). And more also favor (46%) than oppose (31%) "late-night talk show hosts getting involved in politics by speaking out on political issues." That might help explain why a majority of Americans still say they watch Colbert's content — either 'always' (5%), 'occasionally' (21%) or when they 'see clips online' (27%). The rest (47%) say they never watch Colbert. Finally, when Americans are asked to select up to three of their favorite late-night talk show hosts, Colbert (25%) ties Jimmy Fallon (25%) for first place, with Jimmy Kimmel (22%), Jon Stewart (19%), John Oliver (11%) Seth Meyers (7%), Bill Maher (7%), Andy Cohen (3%) and Taylor Tomlinson (2%) trailing behind them. __________________ The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,729 U.S. adults interviewed online from July 24 to 28, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.1%. Solve the daily Crossword

Marjorie Taylor Greene Is Now The First GOP Member Of Congress To Call The Crisis In Gaza A "Genocide"
Marjorie Taylor Greene Is Now The First GOP Member Of Congress To Call The Crisis In Gaza A "Genocide"

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Marjorie Taylor Greene Is Now The First GOP Member Of Congress To Call The Crisis In Gaza A "Genocide"

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) became the first congressional Republican to label the worsening humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip a 'genocide' on Monday, after President Donald Trump acknowledged that Palestinians are starving. Greene's comment came within a larger criticism of a colleague, Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.), who spoke approvingly of the deteriorating situation in Gaza. Related: 'Release the hostages. Until then, starve away,' Fine wrote on social media last week, adding that he considers the increasing evidence of widespread famine in the region to be 'a lie.' Even Trump was moved to say there is 'real starvation' occurring in Gaza as a result of Israel's nearly two-year war in retaliation for the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on civilians that was instigated by fighters from the Palestinian militant group Hamas, who took hostages back to Gaza. 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct 7th in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' Greene wrote on X, formerly Twitter. Related: 'But a Jewish U.S. Representative calling for the continued starvation of innocent people and children is disgraceful,' she said. 'His awful statement will actually cause more antisemitism.' Greene has also fueled antisemitic tropes in the past, most notably in a now-deleted 2018 Facebook post that suggested a link between the wealthy Jewish Rothschild family and wildfires in California — prompting ridicule for what her critics called her 'Jewish space lasers' theory. Her choice of words, however, makes her unique among congressional Republicans. Trump said during his visit to Scotland on Monday that he had been disturbed by images and reporting he had seen on television of the worsening situation in Gaza. Related: Israel, which controls entry to Gaza and patrols its coastline, has for months been blocking aid from reaching over 2 million Palestinians there. Photos of exhausted, skeletal children have begun to surface on front pages around the world. One child reportedly weighed less upon her death than when she was born. 'You can't fake that,' Trump said of the images. Related: Like Fine, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has flat-out denied that Palestinian civilians are starving to death. Israel has for months claimed that Hamas, which controls Gaza, is misusing shipments of food and supplies, although the New York Times reported over the weekend that Israeli officials know there is no evidence to support that assertion. Asked Monday if he agreed with Netanyahu, Trump responded, 'I don't know.' 'I mean, based on television, I would say not particularly,' he went on. 'Because those children look very hungry.'This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store