Ramaphosa reaffirms South Africa's stance on Israel and US relations
Image: GCIS
President Cyril Ramaphosa said South Africa has not received any formal request from the US to reconsider the genocide case against Israel in the International Criminal Court.
'South Africa remains steadfast in its call for an immediate ceasefire, access to humanitarian assistance, an end to the ongoing occupation and the collective punishment of Palestinians,' Ramaphosa said.
He was responding to EFF leader Julius Malema, who also asked whether he had received any formal communication from US President Donald Trump indicating that he was now persuaded that there was no white genocide taking place in South Africa.
Ramaphosa said the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) communicated with the US Embassy through diplomatic channels following the announcement of Executive Order by Trump in February 2025, which accorded refugee status to white Afrikaner South Africans.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
He also said the department had pointed out that the determination of refugee status required a factual assessment, considering the prevailing circumstances and giving due regard to both subjective and objective factors.
'The department asserted that allegations of discrimination are unfounded and that sufficient structures and systems exist within South Africa to address any concerns that any group may have. Even if there are allegations of discrimination, these do not meet the threshold of persecution required under domestic and international refugee law.'
Ramaphosa told EFF MP Nqobile Mhlongo that the official working visit to the United States on May 21, 2025, was aimed at enhancing bilateral relations and promoting South Africa's economic and diplomatic goals.
'The expenses for the visit, which covered travel, accommodation, and logistical support for the government members of the delegation, were borne by the respective government departments. The State did not cover the costs of the other members of the delegation,' he said.
He also said Trump and he agreed on the number and composition of the delegation, which included government officials, business and labour leaders, and key stakeholders essential for achieving the visit's objectives.
Ramaphosa said the meeting with Trump did not address the discontinuation of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programmes or reparations for descendants of enslaved people.
'The primary objective of the engagement was to reset the bilateral relationship between South Africa and the United States of America,' he said when responding to EFF MP Thapelo Mogale.
Meanwhile, International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola has revealed that the Presidential Envoy to the US, Mcebisi Jonas, has yet to travel to the United States of America to undertake his duties there.
'The special envoy is yet to travel to the US on official business,' Lamola said.
He was responding to DA MP Emma Powell, who asked for a complete list of all travel to the US undertaken by Jonas, including meeting schedules, costs of travel, and travel dates.
Lamalo stated that the sensitive and confidential work of Special Envoys is never publicised.
In April, Ramaphosa appointed Jonas with the responsibility to advance South Africa's diplomatic, trade, and bilateral priorities.
This was after South African ambassador to the US Ebrahim Rasool was expelled by the US.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
20 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Ramaphosa responds to Zuma's letter of demands
The president would not meet Zuma's demands. President Cyril Ramaphosa has, through his legal representative, reportedly responded to former president Jacob Zuma's letter of demands sent to the president this week. In the letter, Zuma, through his legal representative, KMNS Attorneys, said he had acted in his capacity as a 'concerned citizen, voter, taxpayer and former president.' He sought answers from the resident on the processes followed when he placed Police minister Senzo Mchunu on leave of absence and appointed Wits law professor Firoz Cachalia as acting minister. 'When exactly (date and time) was your decision to appoint Professor Cachalia as Acting Minister of Police taken, communicated to him and communicated to the public?' 'What exactly is a 'Minister Designate', from a constitutional point of view? Immediately after the swearing-in ceremony (i.e. from around 9:30am on 1 August 2025), what was the exact correct description of Professor Cachalia? Was he a minister, acting minister or minister designate?' ALSO READ: Zuma demands Ramaphosa resign by Friday, or else… Another demand was for Ramaphosa to step down from the Presidency by Friday, 10am, or face legal action. The letter followed Zuma and the MK party's Constitutional Court loss regarding the same matter. The court said the two parties' application does not engage the court's jurisdiction and consequently, refused them direct access in their matter. Ramaphosa responds In a letter shared by broadcaster Newzroom Afrika on Friday, Ramaphosa responded, saying while some of the answers to their questions were already in the public domain, others needed Zuma to follow proper procedure for asking questions to the president. 'To the extent that your client seeks information that is not already available to him, he will be aware, as the leader of the Umkhonto weSizwe Party, of the procedure under Chapter 10 of the National Assembly Rules to address a request for oral or written questions to the president,' reads the letter. ALSO READ: MK party and Zuma suffer blow as ConCourt rules in Ramaphosa's favour [VIDEO] 'That is the appropriate manner for a political party, and its leader, to address questions to the president. When the president receives questions through those proper procedures, he deals with them in accordance with the requirements of the Rules.' Where he could have answered, he implied it would be a futile exercise as Zuma 'has already concluded that his conduct was unlawful.' The president would not meet Zuma's demands, it continued. 'Furthermore, the president shall not comply with the demands in paragraph five of your letter. He stands by the reasons for his decisions as recorded in his answering affidavit in the proceedings before the Constitutional Court. The decisions were lawful, rational and consistent with the president's constitutional duties.' If Zuma and the MK party do approach the courts over the president's decisions, their application will be opposed, reads the letter. Zuma is expected to hold a media briefing on Friday afternoon, 'on the outcomes of the latest meeting of the national officials and will share the [MK] party's latest developments.' READ NEXT: Zuma and MK party case should've started in High Court, ConCourt hears [VIDEOS]
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Has South Africa achieved gender equality or is it a long way off?
On August 9 South Africa marks Women's Day, a public holiday rooted in one of the most iconic moments in the country's history: the 1956 march of more than 20,000 women to the Union Buildings in Pretoria, protesting against apartheid pass laws. These fearless women stood together and made it clear: ' Wathint' abafazi, wathint' imbokodo [if you strike a woman, you strike a rock]. ' Since then, Women's Day has become more than a commemoration. It's a day to reflect on how far South African women have come and how far we still have to go. Nearly 70 years later, women continue to fight for equality, safety and recognition, but for many South Africans the meaning of Women's Day has shifted. We would like to know what you think.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
US Message Is Step Out Of Line Or Pay The Price
U.S. President Donald Trump (R) greets visiting South African President Cyril Ramaphosa (C) at the White House in Washington, D.C., the United States, on May 21, 2025. U.S. President Donald Trump confronted visiting South African President Cyril Ramaphosa on Wednesday with conspiracy theories on "white genocide" in South Africa, which Ramaphosa firmly denied. Image: Xinhua South African exports to the United States have been slapped with a 30% tariff. A blow, yes, but not a surprise. These tariffs don't exist in a vacuum. They are the latest move in a pattern of increasing diplomatic pressure from the United States, and they arrive on the back of months of thinly veiled threats to review South Africa's eligibility under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). The politicisation of AGOA and the new tariffs, raises serious questions about the conditionality of so-called development partnerships and global trade. Is economic cooperation only valid when African states remain silent and compliant on global political issues? Government estimates more than 100,000 jobs could be lost across key sectors like agriculture, textiles and autos, at a time when unemployment is already hovering above 32%. Entire communities stand to lose income, security and dignity, but what's equally staggering is how little South Africa actually exports to the U.S. We make up just 0.25% of all U.S. imports, less than a rounding error in Washington's trade book. Our exports don't compete with American industries, they complement them. Our fruit, for instance, is counter-seasonal, plugging supply gaps in the U.S. market rather than replacing local produce. In fact, our trade supports U.S. industry. So what, exactly, is being punished? The answer, of course, has little to do with economics and everything to do with power. This is not about trade. It's about sending a message. And that message has been loud, blunt, and unmistakable – step out of line, and pay the price. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ From Rhetoric to Retaliation The U.S. administration's growing discomfort with South Africa's independent foreign policy, especially its stance on global conflicts and growing ties with BRICS partners—has clearly influenced this economic escalation. Washington's displeasure has shifted from diplomatic rhetoric to economic punishment. Threatening to revoke AGOA benefits, in tandem with the new tariffs, sends a powerful signal that dissent from Global South nations will be met with financial consequences. To compound the blow, Danish shipping giant Maersk has announced it will halt direct cargo shipments between South Africa and the U.S., effective October 1. While the company has cited global operational restructuring as the reason, the timing could not be more telling. The withdrawal forces South African exporters to reroute goods via European ports, increasing costs, delays, and administrative burdens. It effectively builds yet another barrier between South African goods and the U.S. market, making AGOA benefits, should they even survive this political fallout—more expensive and harder to access. Breaking the Myth of 'Rules-Based' Trade What we are witnessing is not mere coincidence. The tariff imposition, AGOA expiring next month, and Maersk's rerouting form a cumulative pattern of economic pressure. It is no longer just about trade; it's about submission. The U.S. is signalling that if South Africa won't play the geopolitical game by Washington's rules, then its economy will be made to suffer. This is a dangerous precedent, not just for South Africa, but for all emerging economies that dare to exercise political independence. When trade becomes a tool of coercion rather than cooperation, the very premise of multilateralism begins to collapse. For those of us watching the steady unraveling of what was once called the rules-based international order, this feels like the logical next step in a long, cynical game. Perhaps, it's the nudge we've needed to finally stop begging for a seat at someone else's table and start building our own. It's no coincidence that these tariffs come in the same year South Africa took Israel to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for genocide, criticised MAGA politics, and continued to deepen ties within BRICS. What we are witnessing is the punishment of a middle power that dared to act like it had agency. The U.S. doesn't like being questioned, least of all by African democracies who refuse to toe the line. So when Pretoria tried to stave off the tariffs by offering to import U.S. gas, buy American crops, and invest in U.S.-linked recycling infrastructure, Washington wasn't interested. Retaliation was the point. Choosing Ourselves in a Multipolar World The irony though is that by turning up the pressure, the U.S. may have inadvertently done us a favour. For too long, South Africa and many in the Global South, have built trade strategies on the assumption that Western markets are stable, rational, and rules-based. That if we behaved, played nice, opened our markets, and said the right things in multilateral meetings, we'd be rewarded with access. That myth is now shattered, and it should be, because access isn't guaranteed. Rules are arbitrary, and partnership, at least under Trump's doctrine, is contingent on silence and compliance. So where do we go from here? President Ramaphosa's promise to support exporters and expand trade ties with Africa, Asia and the Middle East is more than damage control, it's a signal of something bigger. A chance to rebuild South Africa's trade identity on our own terms, not as a junior partner to the West, but as a central node in an emerging multipolar economy. We're not starting from scratch. BRICS, once dismissed as a diplomatic photo-op, is fast becoming a platform for alternative cooperation. At last year's summit in Kazan, countries like India, Brazil and South Africa called not just for new development banks and infrastructure funds, but for serious structural alternatives to a dollar-dominated world. At the same time, the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) holds the promise of turning our fragmented markets into a $3.4 trillion single economy. Asian demand for African raw materials, manufacturing capacity, and fintech innovation is accelerating. The pieces of a new trade reality are already on the table. The challenge? Putting them together. Yes, it will be hard, but it will be ours. Let's not romanticise this shift. South–South trade is still fraught. Logistics are weak, infrastructure is uneven, and trust among governments is not always consistent. We face years of hard work, standardising policies, improving ports, digitising customs, and building the kind of supply chains that aren't just extractive, but transformative. If there's one thing this moment has made clear, it's that dependence is a liability, and the only true resilience lies in integration, production, and self-determination. I often think about how the Global South is described. Lacking capital. Lacking infrastructure. Lacking voice. But what if we stopped focusing on what we lack and started recognising what we are? A collection of nations with the resources, labour, culture, and leverage to rewire the global economy. A bloc that doesn't just have raw materials, but the power to set new rules, if we work together to do so. This isn't just about the U.S. punishing South Africa. It's about us realising that we no longer need to wait for validation from somewhere else. What Trump may not realise is that in trying to isolate us, he may have finally given us permission to choose ourselves. And I'm hoping this time, we will. By Chloe Maluleke Associate at The BRICS+ Consulting Group Russian & Middle Eastern Specialist * MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE ** Follow @brics_daily on X/Twitter & @brics_daily on Instagram for daily BRICS+ updates
