
Osprey came back from the brink once. Now chicks are dying in nests, and some blame overfishing
'The birds never laid here this year,' said Watts, near the mouth of Virginia's Chesapeake Bay. 'And that's a pattern we've been seeing these last couple of years.'
Watts has a more intimate relationship with ospreys than most people have with a bird — he has climbed to their nests to free them from plastic bags, fed them by hand and monitored their eggs with telescopic mirrors.
The fish-eating raptor known for gymnastic dives and whistle-like chirps is an American conservation success story. After pesticides and other hazards nearly eliminated the species from much of the country, the hawk-like bird rebounded after the banning of DDT in 1972 and now numbers in the thousands in the U.S.
But Watts has documented an alarming trend. The birds, which breed in many parts of the U.S., are failing to successfully fledge enough chicks around their key population center of the Chesapeake Bay. The longtime biologist blames the decline of menhaden, a small schooling fish critical to the osprey diet. Without menhaden to eat, chicks are starving and dying in nests, Watts said.
Watts's claim has put him and environmental groups at odds with the fishing industry, trade unions and sometimes government regulators. Menhaden is valuable for fish oil, fish meal and agricultural food as well as bait.
U.S. fishermen have caught at least 1.1 billion pounds of menhaden every year since 1951. Members of the industry tout its sustainability and said the decline in osprey may have nothing to do with fishing.
But without help, the osprey population could tumble to levels not seen since the dark days of DDT, said Watts, director of the Center for Conservation Biology at The College of William & Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia.
'The osprey are yelling pretty loudly that, hey, there's not enough menhaden for us to reproduce successfully,' Watts said. 'And we should be listening to them to be more informed fully on the fisheries side, and we should take precaution on the fisheries management side. But that hasn't won the day at this point.'
Watts, who has studied osprey on the Chesapeake for decades, has backed his claims of population decline by publishing studies in scientific journals. He said it boils down to a simple statistic — to maintain population, osprey pairs need to average 1.15 chicks per year.
Osprey were reproducing at that level in the 1980s, but today in some areas around the main stem of the Chesapeake, it's less than half of that, Watts said. In particularly distressed areas, they aren't even reproducing at one-tenth that level, he said. And the decline in available menhaden matches the areas of nesting failure, Watts said.
Also called pogies or bunkers, the oily menhaden are especially important for young birds because they are more nutritious than other fish in the sea. Osprey 'reproductive performance is inextricably linked to the availability and abundance' of menhaden, Watts wrote in a 2023 study published in Frontiers in Marine Science.
Conservationists have been concerned for years, saying too many menhaden have been removed to maintain their crucial role in the ocean food chain. Historian H. Bruce Franklin went so far as to title his 2007 book on menhaden 'The Most Important Fish In The Sea.'
Menhaden help sustain one of the world's largest fisheries, worth more than $200 million at the docks in 2023. Used as bait, the fish are critical for valuable commercial targets such as Maine lobster. They're also beloved by sportfishermen.
The modern industry is dominated by Omega Protein, a Reedville, Virginia, company that is a subsidiary of Canadian aquaculture giant Cooke. The company pushed back at the idea that fishing is the cause of osprey decline, although it did acknowledge that fewer menhaden are showing up in some parts of the bay.
Federal data show osprey breeding is in decline in many parts of the country, including where menhaden is not harvested at all, said Ben Landry, an Omega spokesperson. Climate change, pollution and development could be playing a role, said Landry and others with the company.
Blaming fishing 'just reeks of environmental special interest groups having an influence over the process,' Landry said.
The menhaden fishery is managed by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, an interstate body that crafts rules and sets fishing quotas. Prompted by questions about ospreys, it created a work group to address precautionary management of the species in the Chesapeake Bay.
In April, this group proposed several potential management approaches, including seasonal closures, restrictions on quotas or days at sea, and limitations on kinds of fishing gear. The process of creating new rules could begin this summer, said James Boyle, fishery management plan coordinator with the commission.
The osprey population has indeed shown declines in some areas since 2012, but it's important to remember the bird's population is much larger than it was before DDT was banned, Boyle said.
'There are big increases in osprey population since the DDT era,' Boyle said, citing federal data showing a six-fold increase in osprey populations along the Atlantic Coast since the 1960s.
To a number of environmental groups, any decline is too much. This irritates some labor leaders who worry about losing more jobs as the fishing industry declines.
Kenny Pinkard, retired vice president of UFCW Local 400's executive board and a longtime Virginia fishermen, said he feels the industry is being scapegoated.
'There are some people who just don't want to see us in business at all,' he said.
But Chris Moore, Virginia executive director for Chesapeake Bay Foundation, said the country risks losing an iconic bird if no action is taken. He said Watts's studies show that the osprey will fail without access to menhaden.
'Osprey have been a success story,' Moore said. 'We're in a situation where they're not replacing their numbers. We'll actually be in a situation where we're in a steep decline.'
Whittle reported from Portland, Maine.
___ This story was supported by funding from the Walton Family Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
US-born Indians embracing Indian roots more strongly: Carnegie report
Indian Americans born in the US are displaying a marked increase in cultural and identity-based affinity with their Indian heritage, with 86% taking pride in calling themselves "Indian-American", according to a new report by the Carnegie Endowment for International is a significant increase from the 2020 report, when 70% of US-born Indian American respondents said that being Indian was "very" or "somewhat" important to them. At the same time, the percentage of those who considered their Indian identity unimportant was halved – from 30% to just 15%, according to the report, based on an Indian-American Attitude Survey (IASS), conducted between September and October last year, challenges the long-held assumption that successive generations of immigrant communities tend to gradually shed their ancestral identities in favour of Americanisation. Its findings are based on a national-level online survey of 1,206 Indian American residents in the United States, the report US-BORN INDIAN AMERICANS NOW IDENTIFY AS ASIAN INDIANThe report also observed a change in how individuals self-identify. There was a decline in those using the label "Indian American" and a rise in the number identifying as "Asian Indian".Similarly, compared to four years ago, a greater share of US-born individuals with Indian descent reported feeling equally Indian and American (as opposed to more American than Indian), the report findings come amid the fact that Indian Americans are the second-largest immigrant group in the US and increasingly visible in politics, academia, and approximately 5.2 million individuals of Indian descent calling the US their home, Indian Americans comprise around 21% of the Asian population in the US, according to an analysis of US Census Bureau data and the American Community Survey by the Pew Research are the largest Asian population in the US, with around a population of 5.5 rise of the Indian community in the US has been driven by sustained migration and population growth over the past 20 AMERICANS STAY CONNECTED TO ROOTS THROUGH FOOD, MOVIESThe survey also asked whether respondents had watched Indian movies/television in the past month; had participated in or enjoyed Indian dance, music, or art in the past six months; or had eaten Indian food in the past in ten Indian Americans (81%) reported eating Indian food in the past month – the most common of the three activities. A total of 65% had watched Indian television or movies in the past month, while 38% engaged with Indian dance, music, or art in some form or fashion in the past six 7% of respondents reported engaging in none of these cultural practices, according to the survey also found that 55% of respondents reported communicating with friends and family in India at least once per month.- EndsMust Watch


Time of India
14 hours ago
- Time of India
Viral ‘Clean Statue of Liberty' movement gains momentum amid severe floods in New York and New Jersey
As New York and New Jersey rise from severe flash floods that filled highways and neighborhoods this week, a new wave of activism has swept social media : the 'Clean Statue of Liberty' movement. Sparked by images of the iconic monument's weathered and yellowing exterior, thousands of Americans are calling for a comprehensive cleaning and restoration of Lady Liberty ahead of the nation's 250th Independence Day celebrations next year. The movement, whose origins remain unclear, exploded online Monday as dramatic floodwaters swept through the region. Influencers and everyday citizens alike began sharing before-and-after images of the statue, highlighting the gradual discoloration of its copper patina. 'There is a movement to clean the Statue of Liberty next year for America's 250th anniversary,' one user posted on X (formerly Twitter), echoing the sentiment of many demanding action from city and federal officials. Advocates are not just asking for a cosmetic touch-up. Many are urging authorities to address graffiti, restore the statue's original luster, and upgrade Liberty Island's infrastructure to withstand increasingly frequent climate-driven storms. A petition, which began circulating in 2022, has gained renewed traction. It reads, in part: by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Sua loja virtual pode ser o sucesso que você sempre sonhou: saiba como começar agora. Tray Saiba Mais Undo 'The Statue of Liberty is a monumental piece of American history, symbolizing our heritage and human rights as citizens of this great nation. We must restore this piece of art to its former and original, respective glory, as a sign of hope, peace, and pursuit of happiness during these dark times'. The last major restoration of the Statue of Liberty occurred in the mid-1980s, when the monument underwent a massive overhaul in preparation for its centennial. That project included extensive cleaning of both the interior and exterior copper, repairs to the iron framework, and the replacement of the original torch. Since then, only routine maintenance has been performed, leaving many to argue that the statue is overdue for another significant restoration—especially as climate change brings harsher weather to the region. Live Events


Time of India
18 hours ago
- Time of India
What are JASSM missiles and why the US keeps using them in modern conflicts
If you've been following news about U.S. airstrikes lately, you've probably heard a lot about something called the JASSM missile . It sounds technical, but at its core, it's simply a highly advanced cruise missile — and one the U.S. military trusts for some of its most sensitive missions. JASSM stands for Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile . The name says a lot. These missiles are designed to hit targets from far away, keeping American pilots out of danger zones. They're stealthy, precise, and hard for enemy defenses to detect. In simple terms, they allow the U.S. to strike deep inside enemy territory without putting boots on the ground or risking aircraft flying directly over hostile areas. These aren't new weapons. The U.S. military has been using versions of the JASSM for over two decades, steadily updating them as technology evolves. Today's latest versions can travel more than 500 miles , skimming low under radar and delivering pinpoint strikes against heavily defended targets like bunkers, radar stations, and key infrastructure. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Bank-Repossessed Cars in the Philippines at Bargain Prices! SUV Deals | Search Ads Search Now Undo Why are they so common in headlines now? Because modern conflicts increasingly require this kind of precision strike — hitting hard, hitting fast, and doing it from a safe distance. Whether it's a retaliatory strike in the Middle East or a show of strength in Eastern Europe, the JASSM is often the weapon of choice because it minimizes risk while maximizing impact. At a time when military planners are trying to avoid drawn-out conflicts and protect their forces, missiles like the JASSM fit perfectly into today's strategies. They're a reminder that wars are no longer fought just with troops on the ground, but with technology designed to reach enemies long before soldiers ever do.