Expedia cites lower demand for U.S. travel for weaker-than-expected revenue
By DEE-ANN DURBIN
Expedia Group said Friday that reduced travel demand in the United States led to its weaker-than-expected revenue in the first quarter.
Expedia, which owns the lodging reservation platforms Hotels.com and VRBO as well as an eponymous online travel agency, was the latest American company to report slowing business with both international visitors and domestic travelers.
Airbnb and Hilton noted the same trends last week in their quarterly earnings reports. Most major U.S. airlines pulled their full-year financial guidance in April and said they planned to reduce scheduled flights, citing an ebb in economy passengers booking leisure trips.
The U.S. Travel Association has said that economic uncertainty and anxiety over President Donald Trump's tariffs may explain the pullback. In April, Americans' confidence in the economy slumped for a fifth straight month to the lowest level since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Abroad, anger about the tariffs as well as concern about tourist detentions at the U.S. border have made citizens of some other countries less interested in traveling to the U.S., tourism industry experts say.
The U.S. government said last month that 7.1 million visitors entered the U.S. from overseas this year as of the end of March, 3.3% fewer than during the first three months of 2024.
The numbers did not include land crossings from Mexico or travel from Canada, where citizens have expressed indignation over Trump's remarks about making their country the 51st state. Both U.S. and Canadian government data have shown steep declines in border crossings from Canada.
Expedia Chief Financial Officer Scott Schenkel said the net value of the travel technology company's bookings into the U.S. fell 7% in the January-March period, but bookings to the U.S. from Canada were down nearly 30%.
In a conference call with investors Friday, Expedia CEO Ariane Gorin said U.S. demand was even softer in April than March.
'We're still continuing to see pressure on travel into the U.S., but we've also seen some rebalancing,' Gorin said. 'Europeans are traveling less to the U.S., but more to Latin America.'
Seattle-based Expedia said its revenue rose 3% to $2.99 billion for the quarter. That was lower than the $3 billion Wall Street was expecting, according to analysts polled by FactSet.
Expedia shares were down than 7% in mid-day trading Friday.
Airbnb said last week that foreign travel to the U.S. makes up only 2% to 3% of its business. But within that category, it's seeing declining interest in the U.S. as a destination.
'I think Canada is the most obvious example, where we see Canadians are traveling at a much lower rate to the U.S. but they're traveling more domestically, they are traveling to Mexico, they are going to Brazil, they're going to France, they're going to Japan,' Airbnb Chief Financial Officer Ellie Mertz said in a conference call with investors.
Meanwhile, Hilton lowered its full-year forecast for revenue per available room, a key industry metric. The company said in late April that it now expects growth of 0% to 2% for the year, down from 2% to 3%.
Hilton President and CEO Christopher Nassetta told stock analysts the company saw international travel to its U.S. hotels fall throughout the first quarter, particularly from Canada and Mexico.
But Nassetta said he remained optimistic for the second half of this year.
'My own belief is you will see some of — if not a lot of — that uncertainty wane over the next couple of quarters, and that will allow the underlying strength of the economy to shine through again,' he said.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
26 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Tariffs May Remain in Effect While Appeals Proceed, US Appeals Court Rules
Reuters file photo U.S. President Donald Trump holds a chart next to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick as Trump delivers remarks on tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2025. June 10 (Reuters) – A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower-court decision blocking them on grounds that he had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his 'Liberation Day' tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the duties to remain in place while the appeals play out. The Federal Circuit said the litigation raised issues of 'exceptional importance' warranting the court to take the rare step of having the 11-member court hear the appeal, rather than have it go before a three-judge panel first. It scheduled arguments for July 31. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature, have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as duties on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address 'unusual and extraordinary' threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The May 28 ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties, and the other by 12 U.S. states led by Oregon. Jeffrey Schwab, an attorney for the small businesses that sued, said Tuesday's federal appeals court decision was disappointing, but it did not mean that the Trump administration would win in the end. 'It's important to note that every court to rule on the merits so far has found these tariffs unlawful, and we have faith that this court will likewise see what is plain as day: that IEEPA does not allow the president to impose whatever tax he wants whenever he wants,' Schwab said Tuesday. The White House and state of Oregon did not immediately respond to requests for comment after normal business hours on Tuesday. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed.
Yomiuri Shimbun
26 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Japan's Nikkei Stock Average Climbs for Fourth Day on US-China Trade Framework; Hino Plunges
Yomiuri Shimbun file photo The Tokyo Stock Exchange TOKYO, June 11 (Reuters) – Japan's Nikkei share gauge climbed for a fourth straight session on Wednesday after U.S. and Chinese officials agreed on a framework to put their trade truce back on track and remove China's curbs on rare earths, supporting demand for risk assets. Chip-sector heavyweights Sumco 3436.T and Tokyo Electron 8035.T surged 7% and 3.6%, respectively. Mazda Motor 7261.T climbed 1.2% as the yen weakened, boosting export shares. The Nikkei 225 Index .N225 climbed 0.5% as of the midday break, set for its longest winning streak in about a month. So far, it is down 4.2% for the year. The broader Topix gauge .TOPX was flat. U.S. President Donald Trump's on-again, off-again tariff spats have largely been factored into global equity prices, but Japanese stocks have yet to recover to highs seen around the beginning of the year, said Tatsunori Kawai, chief strategist at Mitsubishi UFJ eSmart Securities. After meetings by the Bank of Japan and the Federal Reserve next week, summer salary bonuses and company dividends in Japan may be factors to push domestic shares higher. 'With those funds in the pipeline, I think the inflow of money into the market will continue,' Kawai said. 'After we get through next week, I think it's basically easier to go higher and catch up with U.S. equities.' Sumco was the biggest gainer on the Nikkei, followed by Isetan Mitsukoshi 3099.T gaining 6.2%. The biggest loser was Hino Motors 7205.T down 17%, after the truckmaker and unit of Toyota Motor 7203.T said it would issue new shares as part of a merger agreement with Mitsubishi Fuso.
Yomiuri Shimbun
40 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Bessent Emerges as Possible Contender to Succeed Fed's Powell
(Bloomberg) – A growing chorus of advisers inside and outside the Trump administration are pushing another name to serve as the next chair of the Federal Reserve: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. President Donald Trump said Friday he would name a successor 'very soon' to replace Jerome Powell, whose term as Fed chair ends in May 2026. The small list of candidates under consideration has included Kevin Warsh, a former Fed official whom Trump interviewed for the Treasury secretary role in November, according to people familiar with the matter. But Bessent – who is leading Trump's effort to kickstart the US economy with sweeping changes to trade, taxes and regulation – is also now one of the contenders for the job, said the people, who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. Formal interviews for the position have not begun, two of the people said. 'I have the best job in Washington,' Bessent said in response to a request for comment. 'The president will decide who's best for the economy and the American people.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. As Treasury chief, Bessent would traditionally play a key role in the search and interview process for the next Fed chair. It's unclear if he would recuse himself as Trump begins to make his decision. 'Given the amount of trust and confidence that the global financial community has in Scott Bessent, he's an obvious candidate,' said Tim Adams, president and CEO of the Institute of International Finance. 'He's a dark horse candidate,' Adams said, adding that Warsh – who served as a governor on the Fed board from 2006 to 2011 – would also be a good choice. Asked specifically about Warsh on Friday, Trump said: 'He's very highly thought of.' Bessent has been at the forefront of negotiations on a US-China trade deal, arguably the most important of the pacts the president is seeking to forge as part of his effort to reshape the global trade landscape. 'Scott Bessent proved he could implement President Trump's agenda during an incredibly turbulent first six months,' said Steve Bannon, former chief White House strategist and outside adviser to the president. 'He's not just the star of the cabinet, but a safe pair of hands for global capital markets.' The president, who first nominated Powell to the job in 2017, has regularly complained that the Fed chief has been too reluctant to cut borrowing costs. Trump pushed Powell to lower interest rates in a White House meeting last month. Powell and Fed officials have held interest rates steady in 2025, arguing a patient approach to policy is appropriate amid economic uncertainty caused by Trump's expanded and evolving use of tariffs. Fed policymakers have said they expect the announced tariffs to weigh on economic growth and boost inflation. Whoever the Senate confirms for the post will have to prove to the world that the Fed's independence from political meddling remains intact. Trump has said many times that Powell is making a mistake by not lowering rates, and has previously said that he should have a say on rate decisions, raising questions over whether markets would see the next pick as beholden to him. Bessent or Warsh 'would be given the benefit of the doubt from the financial community' that they would preserve the independence of the Fed's rate-setting authority, IIF's Adams said. Economist and Trump ally Arthur Laffer said Bessent 'is wonderful, but he already has a job. And his specialty is not monetary policy.' 'As I told the president, I think Kevin Warsh is just perfect for the job,' he said. Other candidates whose names have previously been floated for Fed chair include Kevin Hassett, the White House's National Economic Council director, Christopher Waller, a Fed governor, and former World Bank President David Malpass.
