Fact Check: No evidence Musk invested $5M to build affordable housing for low-income families
Claim:
Tech billionaire Elon Musk invested $5 million to build affordable housing for low-income families.
Rating:
In late March 2025, a rumor spread online that Elon Musk, the tech billionaire and adviser to U.S. President Donald Trump, had invested $5 million to build affordable housing for low-income families.
The story circulated weeks after The Associated Press reported that Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative had halted a $1 billion affordable housing program as part of cuts and freezes at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
One example of the claim, a March 27 Facebook post (archived), had around 37,000 reactions and 11,200 comments, many of which suggested the commenters believed the story was true. The text of that post read:
Elon Musk Spends $5 Million to Build Housing for Low-Income Families, Creating Sustainable Communities
Elon Musk has invested $5 million to build affordable housing for low-income families, aiming to provide safe and sustainable living conditions. The funds will support the construction of new homes in underserved areas, ensuring that families have access to affordable housing options. Musk's contribution reflects his commitment to addressing housing inequality and creating lasting impact in communities in need.
(Facebook page Daily News Feed)
Additional instances of the rumor appeared in other (archived) popular Facebook posts (archived) that, in the bodies of the posts or in comments, contained links to different websites hosting an article that claimed to share additional details about Musk's alleged investment.
Snopes readers searched our site and wrote in looking for information about the claim.
In short, there was no demonstrable evidence that Musk had invested $5 million to build affordable housing for low-income families. As a result, we've rated this claim false.
First, although the article some posts linked to claimed that Musk had "recently announced a $5 million investment to build affordable housing for low-income families," a Google search for the terms "Elon Musk," "$5 million," "low income" and "housing" found no coverage of such an announcement — which would have made headlines if it were true — in legitimate news outlets. Musk's official X account also showed no evidence that he had invested in low-income housing.
Furthermore, the article about the investment, which appeared on content-farm websites with generic names, was likely the product of artificial intelligence (AI) software. The AI text detectors GPTZero and ZeroGPT both found with high confidence that the text of the article was AI-generated.
The article included an image of Musk and a house with text reading, "$10,000 HOUSE." That image was the thumbnail of a YouTube video about Musk that misleadingly spliced together real footage of tiny houses from the modular home company Boxabl.
Musk has said that he owns a $50,000 version of the company's Casita house — which at the time of this writing cost between $60,000 and $70,000 according to the company's website — and that he uses it to host visitors. It was not immediately clear how much, if anything, Musk has invested in the company, although Boxabl has touted Musk's ownership of one of its products on its website and in multiple Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
Regardless of Musk's level of involvement in the company, there was no evidence Boxabl had built homes specifically for low-income families. Instead, as Business Insider reported in 2023, the company's highest-profile projects have been a Department of Defense contract to build Casitas at the Guantánamo Bay detention center and a deal to construct worker housing at an Arizona copper mine.
The claim about Musk investing in housing for low-income families was one of several positive — but fictional and seemingly AI-generated — stories about the billionaire that we investigated in early 2025, including a rumor that he paid the medical bills of a 7-year-old with a rare neurological disorder and also arranged for an experimental device produced by his company Neuralink to be implanted in the child's brain.
"Affordable Housing Threatened as Trump Halts $1 Billion Slated for Extending Life of Aging Buildings." AP News, 12 Mar. 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-doge-affordable-housing-preservation-crisis-de27d7846271779157550fcec0a78ea6.
Wazer, Caroline. "Don't Fall for This Story about Musk Paying Medical Bills, Arranging Neuralink Brain Implant for Sick Girl." Snopes, 26 Mar. 2025, https://www.snopes.com//fact-check/girl-musk-medical-bills/.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
24 minutes ago
- Politico
Musk and Trump's Social-Media Fight Reveals How Power Works Today
The fact that Elon Musk kicked off this week's emo bloodbath with the words 'I'm sorry, but' has got to be the realest-housewives part of it. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk posted to X on Tuesday. Bless his heart — he sounded really contrite. Then he consulted a 'Downton Abbey' phrasebook and found 'disgusting abomination' to poshly trash Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill.' He kept huffing his own X fumes through Wednesday until, on Thursday at 2:30 p.m., Trump all-capped him on Truth Social: 'CRAZY!' Off to the races. Everyone has their favorite part of Thursday's cage match. I was instantly startled by the non-pettiness: Musk gunning for Trump's impeachment, Trump gunning for Musk's financial ruin. All amid a cacophonous peanut gallery that included Ye, MAGA billionaire Bill Ackman and Musk ex Ashley St. Clair. But the Trump-Musk feud is not just a clash of two madmen; it is a clash between the two fiercest social-media influencers of all time. Trump and Musk are human memes, forged on Twitter and its spinoffs, X and Truth Social. Their rise, their public personas, their marriage of convenience and their falling out took place in short-form posts and the freestyle cultivation of likes and engagement. Their feud is in many ways a story of our times: It reveals how online power struggles work now — with rivals leveraging online fanbases, battling for authority across platforms and aiming for the ultimate flex: starving the opponent of any attention at all. Long before most, both Trump and Musk understood that traditional PR handlers would sterilize their personas, blunt the trolling potential of their best material and interfere with their relationships with fans. Trump built his political identity on Twitter, beating his chest and savaging his foes with a rawness that used to make his every utterance on Twitter unmissable. Musk built his celebrity through it, too, with runic tweets, like 'laws are on one side, poets on the other.' In late 2021, he was so proud of his philosopher-king status that he considered going pro: 'thinking of quitting my jobs & becoming an influencer full-time wdyt,' he tweeted, to 371,000 likes. The Musk-Trump bond, but also the tension in it, has also been defined by these platforms. It heated up in the fall of 2022, when Trump was in exile from Twitter and out of the White House. Metabolizing pandemic redpills, Musk was still half-heartedly striking a neoliberal pose, only recently having supported Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Joe Biden in 2020. But he was also slagging Twitter for having banished groypers, conspiracy-mongers and especially Trump, its star, for insurrectioning. That's when Musk bought Twitter for $44 billion. He claims now he knew he was vastly overpaying — and in February he said X is worth 'like, eight cents' — but the expense was for a noble cause: to restore freedom of speech and welcome @realDonaldTrump back to the green pastures of his social-media homeland. In November of that year, Musk polled X, and a slight majority said Trump should be reinstated. 'The people have spoken,' Musk posted. 'Vox Populi, Vox Dei.' The voice of people is the voice of God. Right. But then, if we're just talking about the course of human events, something extremely cruel happened, a monumental act of Trumpian ingratitude. After his account was reinstated, Trump didn't come back. For nine long months, @realDonaldTrump met Musk's devastatingly expensive largesse with stony silence. Trump, of course, had built his own dopey Twitter dupe, Truth Social, and he probably liked no longer being someone else's tenant, vulnerable to eviction. He also probably liked looking down at the world's richest man from his own social-media castle. When asked when he'd go home to Musk-owned, Trump-friendly Twitter, Trump said, coldly, 'I don't see any reason for it.' Trump was betting that he had made Twitter powerful, not the other way around. If Musk had hoped to spend his days evading the fun police with Trump on Twitter, he might have been hurt that Trump didn't even bother to visit Musk's platform, which he renamed X in July 2023, until he had a mugshot to post in August of that year, after his indictment for a scheme to overturn election results in Georgia. The next summer, on July 13, 2024, Musk endorsed Trump, and soon started whooping and jumping and dancing like 2005 Tom Cruise. He tilted hard right for his hero, and he mostly did it on X, amplifying Dark MAGA posts, from Covid denial to QAnon praise. Tesla's stock tanked. Musk muted his environmentalist leanings. He lost his close friends, including Sam Harris and Philip Low. A month after the endorsement, Trump graced X with his presence with a campaign video. It was only the second time he'd posted to X since Musk rolled out the red carpet for him. In the last months of his campaign, while Musk's money and adulation surged his way, Trump finally managed to show Musk the occasional courtesy of using the platform Musk had bought, furnished and upholstered in part for him. Flash forward to last week. On Monday, June 2, three days before the Trump-Musk affair came utterly undone, @realDonaldTrump posted to X for what looks like the last time: a manly boast video about his steel tariffs. It was scored with what sounded like pounding Christian rock. These tariffs, which Trump increased to fully 50 percent last week, will raise the cost of imported car components, including at Tesla, and further imperil Musk's fortune. For Trump to crow about this insult to Tesla in Musk's own house when they were still acting like pals and Musk was mostly keeping mum about the 'big beautiful bill' (which if it passes will also injure Tesla) — this seems like the unkindest cut of the whole match made in hell. The end of last week's social-media spat reveals that the heavyweight champ of social-media influence is still Trump. At the news that Musk's net worth fell by $34 billion during the spat, while Tesla's market value sank by $153 billion, Musk waved a white flag. He deleted or retracted his incendiary X posts — the innuendo about Trump and the Epstein files and the threat to decommission a spacecraft. Trump, for his part, took back nothing. He now says he rejects a make-up call. He's selling the pretty red Tesla Musk presented to him. And most importantly, he's back to ghosting X. No posts there since Monday. By Friday he was on Truth Social praising Commerce Secretary Scott Bessent, one of Musk's most aggressive rivals for Trump's favor and the one whose April shouting match with Musk came to blows, according to Steve Bannon. On Sunday, Musk gave perhaps the clearest sign that he is tapping out: He screenshotted a Truth Social post by Trump in which the president called Gavin Newsom 'Governor Gavin Newscum' — and posted it admiringly to X. No commentary, no irony, no comeback. Just a tribute. In the posting wars, this is what bending the knee looks like: one man obsequiously signal-boosting the other, on the platform he couldn't lure him back to.
Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
What's Happening With Dogecoin?
CANADA - 2025/02/23: In this photo illustration, the Dogecoin logo is seen displayed on a smartphone ... More screen. (Photo Illustration by Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) Dogecoin (DOGE) has recently experienced a significant price decline, plummeting over 50% from its January 2025 highs of $0.40 to current levels around $0.18. This sharp downturn underscores the inherent volatility of the cryptocurrency market and highlights Dogecoin's particular susceptibility to external, often non-fundamental, influences. Separately, see – What's Better – Circle Stock or Bitcoin? And, if you are looking for upside with less volatility than individual stocks or cryptocurrencies, the Trefis High Quality portfolio offers an alternative, having outperformed the S&P 500 and delivering returns that exceed 91% since its launch. Dogecoin's price movements are largely driven by a unique interplay of factors that distinguish it from many other cryptocurrencies. Historically, prominent figures, most notably Elon Musk, have exerted immense influence over Dogecoin's price. His tweets and public statements have frequently triggered substantial price surges, establishing a direct correlation between his pronouncements and market performance. This phenomenon extends to other celebrities and viral social media moments, demonstrating the power of community-driven hype in the Dogecoin ecosystem. Also, Dogecoin's low individual unit price and its origin as a "meme coin" have made it attractive to a broad base of casual investors and first-time cryptocurrency buyers. While this accessibility contributes to its widespread popularity, it also creates a potentially unstable investor base, as these investors may be more prone to speculative trading and less concerned with underlying technological advancements or long-term utility. Like all cryptocurrencies, Dogecoin is subject to the broader trends and sentiment of the crypto market. Bearish market conditions or significant downturns in major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum can exert downward pressure on Dogecoin's price. But the current market tells a different story: Bitcoin is nearing its lifetime highs, whereas Dogecoin is nowhere close to its. A recent and significant development introducing substantial risk to Dogecoin's near-term prospects is the political fallout between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Musk's public criticism of Trump's fiscal policies has led to escalating tensions, with Trump reportedly threatening retaliation against Musk-affiliated companies. This political conflict is particularly concerning for Dogecoin due to Musk's established role as its primary celebrity endorser. His departure from Trump's advisory circle and the potential for policy repercussions against his business interests could significantly diminish his willingness or ability to publicly promote Dogecoin. The reliance on a single, influential individual for jumps in price creates a vulnerability, and any perceived withdrawal of that support can lead to a loss of investor confidence and further price depreciation. Dogecoin is currently trading around $0.18, reflecting a significant 50% decline from its January highs. This decline can be attributed to a combination of broader cryptocurrency market pressures and the specific, intensified risk stemming from its dependence on celebrity endorsement, particularly the unfolding Musk-Trump political conflict. The political rift represents a significant headwind that could further suppress Dogecoin's price performance and limit its recovery potential in the near future. Cryptos at large, including Dogecoin, remain a risky asset. As a long-term investment option, you can explore the Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, which is rooted in quality that seeks reliability, predictability, and compounding growth. With a collection of 30 stocks, it has a track record of comfortably outperforming the S&P 500 over the last four-year period. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.
Forbes
28 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why It Will Take Strong Character To Address The Alarming U.S. Deficit
The public and bitter split between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk has once again spotlighted a glaring deficit in the personalities of both leaders. Although the breach erupted after Musk criticized Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' a tax and spending plan projected to result in an additional budgetary shortfall of $2.4 trillion over the next decade, that is not the deficit I'm referring to here. The void that has further polarized our country is a lack of character and values at the highest levels of government. Aside from the clear lack of decorum, the Trump-Musk feud has turned into an outrageous display of insults and retaliation. As the former chair and CEO of Baxter International, I can say that if such a level of public acrimony had happened in the corporate world, it would have raised serious governance concerns that would need to be addressed. Without values and a strong moral character, leadership is weakened. That's why in today's polarized environment, values-based leadership is not only relevant, it should also be a yardstick against which we evaluate leaders in business and government. As my good friend and former chair and CEO of Medtronic, Inc., Art Collins, wrote in an insightful LinkedIn post: 'While past performance should always be examined, I firmly believe that an individual's character is a crucial attribute to be considered when selecting and appraising a leader.' After reading his post, I asked Art to engage in a discussion on values, character, and leadership. Here are some highlights from our conversation. As the Trump-Musk breakup fills the news headlines and late-night television monologues, we cannot let ourselves be distracted by political theater playing out in Washington. This is a matter of character, not only among our leaders, but for our country and how we are perceived around the world.
